Vegasgiants
Silver Member
- Apr 16, 2022
- 2,469
- 462
- 98
- Banned
- #5,221
Oh look a moron opinionRussia should have declared war sooner so Japan would have surrendered sooner.![]()
HAHAHAHAHA
You dont even know why they specifically chose that date. Lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh look a moron opinionRussia should have declared war sooner so Japan would have surrendered sooner.![]()
Your ego needs for you to say that but your ego knows you arguing Japan surrendered because of Russia says otherwise.And then I own you!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHA
Dont cryYour ego needs for you to say that but your ego knows you arguing Japan surrendered because of Russia says otherwise.
The moron opinion is believing Japan surrendered because of Russia.Oh look a moron opinion
HAHAHAHAHA
You dont even know why they specifically chose that date. Lol
I'm not the one who argued Japan surrendered because of Russia. That's you.Dont cry
Japanese Navy Admiral: The US has destroyed our navy.Now you bore me
That is incorrect. The atomic bombs were dropped on vital military targets.Wrong. Dirty Harry won the war, then he massacred thousands of defenseless women and children of a defeated nation.
So you agree that Japan would have put up a bloody resistance to our invasion if the war had progressed to the point where we invaded??You don’t think Americans would fight until the last man, if we were invaded. Think. Please think.
No he didn't. Before August 10, 1945, Japan was refusing to surrender.McArthur knew they wished to surrender.
I've never heard MacArthur say that Japan wanted to surrender before August 10, 1945.Are you too calling him a liar?
There were no such efforts to surrender until after both atomic bombs had already been dropped.Oh brother. Are you capable of thinking? Do you know how surrendering works. Both antagonists must agree. Jesus
The Japanese people fighting knew nothing of their government’s efforts to surrender. They were merely trying to protect their country, just as Americans would.
You have made three major errors here.Since both Stalin’s Stooge and Dirty Harry stupidly demanded unconditional surrender, the Japanese assumed the US would hang the emperor. All they asked of Dirty Harry is leave the emperor alone. He didn’t agree with those terms until AFTER he incinerated all those defenseless women and children at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Links to progressives spewing lies about America are not generally regarded as credible evidence.I’m guessing you’ve got dementia because several posters including me, have posted links for you to read. You can read, right?
That is doubly wrong.No. All they asked for was no harm to the emperor, by July 1945.
Even more errors here.Dirty Harry said fuck you, then he nuked thousands of defenseless women and children and then he said okay.
Yes. Mr. Truman did the right thing.What a guy.
That is incorrect. The US government does not go on genocidal rampages.Our government does that too. Do you think it’s okay for your children and grandchildren to be massacred because our government murders?
Wartime strikes against vital military targets are not murder.Mass murder defenseless innocent women and children to save lives. Not logical.
You've done no such thing. There is no such documented evidence. The events in question never happened.I’ve told the grunt many times over the years of documented evidence of Japan‘s efforts to surrender long before Dirty Harry committed his terrible crime.
Links to progressives spewing lies about America are not generally regarded as credible evidence.I given you many links. It’s not my fault you can’t read.
We could afford to wait three daysThat is incorrect. The atomic bombs were dropped on vital military targets.
And it was Japan's choice to wait until August 10 before offering to surrender. If Japan was a defeated nation, then they should have surrendered earlier.
So you agree that Japan would have put up a bloody resistance to our invasion if the war had progressed to the point where we invaded??
No he didn't. Before August 10, 1945, Japan was refusing to surrender.
I've never heard MacArthur say that Japan wanted to surrender before August 10.
I suspect that MacArthur never said that, and people are lying about what MacArthur said.
There were no such efforts to surrender until after both atomic bombs had already been dropped.
You have made three major errors here.
First, Japan didn't even ask for those terms until after Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Second, we never agreed to Japan's request even after they asked for it.
Third, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were vital military targets.
Links to progressives spewing lies about America because they hate freedom are not generally regarded as credible evidence.
That is doubly wrong.
First, what Japan asked was that Hirohito retain unlimited dictatorial power as Japan's living deity.
Second, Japan did not ask this until after both atomic bombs had already been dropped.
Even more errors here.
The atomic bombs had already been dropped when Japan made their request.
The atomic bombs were dropped on vital military targets.
Mr. Truman never said OK to Japan's request. Our reply was that Hirohito would be subordinate to MacArthur.
Yes. Mr. Truman did the right thing.
That is incorrect. The US government does not go on genocidal rampages.
Wartime strikes against vital military targets are not murder.
For an example of mass murder look to the peacetime attack against Pearl Harbor.
You've done no such thing. There is no such documented evidence. The events in question never happened.
Links to progressives spewing lies about America because they hate freedom are not generally regarded as credible evidence.
Fake news. No such proof has ever been offered. No such proof exists. No such thing ever happened.Then you're ignoring the vast amount of proof provided that there were Japanese overtures to surrender long before Okinawa; overtures that were willfully ignored by roosevelt.
Fake news. Filled with untrue claims.![]()
Hiroshima: Military Voices of Dissent | Origins
Almost six decades after the fact, the 1945 unleashing of an atomic bomb on Hiroshima continues to be the subject of impassioned debate. Every year the bombing anniversary â which falls on August 6 â occasions heated exchanges between those who question the atomic bombing and those who...origins.osu.edu
Fake news. Never happened.
I would hope not, since what we really did was bomb vital military targets with the goal of making Japan surrender (which they were refusing to do at the time).Can you find one quote from one political or military leader of that time indicating that we incinerated hundreds of thousands of civilians as an act of revenge?
Because Japan was refusing to surrender.Why?No
But the bombs had to fall
That's why the atomic bombs were dropped on vital military targets.Deliberately targeting and incinerating hundreds of thousands of civilians is not what America is about.
Fake news. Never happened.Want to try and focus on the discussion, champ? The bloodthirsty fdr had the opportunity to pursue peace via the surrender of Japan before Okinawa ever happened.
The article lies.Do you have Biden Syndrome, old man? Read the article.
Fake news. Never happened.There is even a list of terms offered - a list identical to the terms we eventually accepted after lackey truman carried out the ghoul fdr's last wishes from hell.
^^^![]()
Hiroshima: Military Voices of Dissent | Origins
Almost six decades after the fact, the 1945 unleashing of an atomic bomb on Hiroshima continues to be the subject of impassioned debate. Every year the bombing anniversary â which falls on August 6 â occasions heated exchanges between those who question the atomic bombing and those who...origins.osu.edu
Except, Japan was not defenseless, and was refusing to surrender.Yeah sort of very similar to ruthlessly bombing a defenseless nation seeking surrender.
No. He is entirely correct.Obviously all wrong.1. They were not "defenseless", they attacked us.
2. They were not "seeking surrender", they were "seeking peace on their own terms".
3. Sure, imperial powers are all the same (it is the simple result of evolution) , but we are best of the best.
His corrects statements indicate otherwise.You know nothing.
Why should he do that? It is important to set the record straight when progressives lie about America.Stop posting.
The attack on Pearl Harbor came in peacetime. That was the only mass murder here.In your delusional world, the response to an attack on a military base is mass murdering thousands of defenseless women and children.
I thought Americans were better than this.
That's because the US government doesn't actually commit said heinous acts.It’s funny how Americans are so judgmental of other nations, but are completely unaware of the many heinous acts committed by their government. WTF!
^^^Bullcrap. It is an ethnic slur. It was understood to be an ethnic slur in the 1940s, and it is understood to be an ethnic slur today. Undertaking the grueling task of typing 5 more letters will probably not give you a stroke.
At least have the sack to be honest about what you're doing. This playing coy nonsense is weak.
Fake news. Filled with untrue claims.![]()
Hiroshima: Military Voices of Dissent | Origins
Almost six decades after the fact, the 1945 unleashing of an atomic bomb on Hiroshima continues to be the subject of impassioned debate. Every year the bombing anniversary â which falls on August 6 â occasions heated exchanges between those who question the atomic bombing and those who...origins.osu.edu
If Japan had kept refusing to surrender, we were going to invade. We were not going to sit around for years waiting for them to hypothetically surrender from starvation.When it comes to 'what-ifing', the fundamental one is what if planners finally realized that there was no necessity of invading Japan, which was by then nothing but a besieged bastion with no means of supporting itself at any level.
The Imperial Army in Manchuria? Just send over a few thousand T54s and M 48s and run over it.
Nothing like hundreds of thousands had to die unless the Japanese chose it. Then it would all have been up to them. The Emperor would probably have died along with maybe millions of civilians and military, if only from starvation. That, at least, would have put the onus for the deaths of so many on the Japanese themselves, and would have absolved the U.S. of accusations of excessive use of power and racism. It would also have cleared the way for an egalitarian democracy, as in 1776.
Fake news I dont careFake news. No such proof has ever been offered. No such proof exists. No such thing ever happened.
Fake news. Filled with untrue claims.
Fake news. Never happened.
I would hope not, since what we really did was bomb vital military targets with the goal of making Japan surrender (which they were refusing to do at the time).
Because Japan was refusing to surrender.
That's why the atomic bombs were dropped on vital military targets.
Fake news. Never happened.
Japan refused to surrender until August 10, 1945.
The article lies.
Fake news. Never happened.
That is freaking hilarious. LOLIf Japan had kept refusing to surrender, we were going to invade. We were not going to sit around for years waiting for them to hypothetically surrender from starvation.
So if that is your "what if", what would have happened is we would have gone ahead with the invasion anyway.
If you mean "what if they were going to surrender immediately after the Soviets declared war and we knew it", if that was true then maybe we would have avoided dropping the atomic bombs on Japan.
Then, when the Cuban Missile Crisis came around without the example of Hiroshima to restrain the US and USSR from nuclear war, the human race would have been wiped out (or at least set back to a stone age level of existence).
So it's a good thing that we nuked Hiroshima when we did.
I can tell you for a fact they were planning to invade Japan as my dad was a BAR man in Germany and got called back early with all the BAR men to prepare for the invasion.If Japan had kept refusing to surrender, we were going to invade.
Yet they did. Hours after the russian invasionI can tell you for a fact they were planning to invade Japan as my dad was a BAR man in Germany and got called back early with all the BAR men to prepare for the invasion.
They weren't fucking around. The Japanese had given them no indication that they intended to surrender. In fact, they had given them every indication that they did not intend to surrender.
Japanese Navy Admiral: The US has destroyed our navy.Yet they did. Hours after the russian invasion