The New York Times, gnashing its teeth into powder, ran a reaction story headlined, “Trump Administration Emphasizes Religion in Official Christmas Me

excalibur

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
28,372
Reaction score
57,349
Points
2,290
Now, the NY Times has been quite far to the eft for decades, but they have reached new lows.

After all, it is called Christmas, as in Christ.


Well, Christmas is a religious holiday, so that’s not news, but whatever. For instance:

https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2589469a-8ced-4293-be18-a0c00a55d5b0_1359x997.png






This tweet from the official Homeland Security account is a perfect example, and it probably infuriated progressives who work at the Times. Click the link —you’ll love it— it included a wonderfully sentimental and nostalgic video packed with terrific callbacks to the 70s, 80s, and 90s— and more importantly, it began with the title: “Remember the Miracle of Christ’s Birth.”

That was only the topmost gift in a Santa’s sack of official Christmas commentary. War Secretary Pete Hegseth tweeted, “Merry Christmas to all. Today we celebrate the birth of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.” NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya quoted John Chapter 1: “The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.” Assistant US Attorney (and covid superlawyer) Harmeet Dhillon —who isn’t even a Christian— tweeted, “Wishing Christians nationwide a wonderful day filled with joy and peace, celebrating the birth of Jesus!” Secretary Rubio said, “The joyous message of Christmas is the hope of Eternal Life through Christ.”

HUD Secretary Scott Turner even used his official X account to read the birth narrative from Luke Chapter 2:


CLIP: Secretary Turner reads the Bible on social media, singeing the Times reporters like vampires splashed with holy water (2:10).



It was all just too much for the Times.

“Government officials have traditionally steered clear of such overtly religious language,” the Times noted sourly, “as the Constitution bans an official state religion.” What the Times meant is that government officials have “traditionally” been too chicken to mention the real source of the Christmas celebration, out of fear that the New York Times would round up a bunch of mealy-mouthed malcontents and platform them as “critics.”

Behold, not only is courage back, but humor as well. When the Times dinged the White House yesterday, asking it to respond to “critics” of all the religious messaging, here was the hilarious response:

https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fa785429e-4b03-4a5d-a9fa-f42e6dfb9ff4_1360x171.png



The Times printed that, unironically.



 
Last edited:
Never mind that pesky Constitution!
 
Now, the NY Times has been quite far to the eft for decades, but they have reached new lows.

After all, it is called Christmas, as in Christ.


Well, Christmas is a religious holiday, so that’s not news, but whatever. For instance:
https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2589469a-8ced-4293-be18-a0c00a55d5b0_1359x997.png

This tweet from the official Homeland Security account is a perfect example, and it probably infuriated progressives who work at the Times. Click the link —you’ll love it— it included a wonderfully sentimental and nostalgic video packed with terrific callbacks to the 70s, 80s, and 90s— and more importantly, it began with the title: “Remember the Miracle of Christ’s Birth.”
That was only the topmost gift in a Santa’s sack of official Christmas commentary. War Secretary Pete Hegseth tweeted, “Merry Christmas to all. Today we celebrate the birth of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.” NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya quoted John Chapter 1: “The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.” Assistant US Attorney (and covid superlawyer) Harmeet Dhillon —who isn’t even a Christian— tweeted, “Wishing Christians nationwide a wonderful day filled with joy and peace, celebrating the birth of Jesus!” Secretary Rubio said, “The joyous message of Christmas is the hope of Eternal Life through Christ.”
HUD Secretary Scott Turner even used his official X account to read the birth narrative from Luke Chapter 2:
CLIP: Secretary Turner reads the Bible on social media, singeing the Times reporters like vampires splashed with holy water (2:10).

It was all just too much for the Times.
“Government officials have traditionally steered clear of such overtly religious language,” the Times noted sourly, “as the Constitution bans an official state religion.” What the Times meant is that government officials have “traditionally” been too chicken to mention the real source of the Christmas celebration, out of fear that the New York Times would round up a bunch of mealy-mouthed malcontents and platform them as “critics.”
Behold, not only is courage back, but humor as well. When the Times dinged the White House yesterday, asking it to respond to “critics” of all the religious messaging, here was the hilarious response:
https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fa785429e-4b03-4a5d-a9fa-f42e6dfb9ff4_1360x171.png
The Times printed that, unironically.



They may not be comfortable in their Atheism
 
Government officials have traditionally steered clear of such overtly religious language, as the Constitution prohibits the establishment of an official state religion.

What part of that do you morons find hard to understand?
 
Government officials have traditionally steered clear of such overtly religious language, as the Constitution prohibits the establishment of an official state religion.

What part of that do you morons find hard to understand?
It's not the purview of the government to establish that Christianity is a religion in the first place. No law means no law.

This means the government can do all the Christian shit it wants.
 
Government officials have traditionally steered clear of such overtly religious language, as the Constitution prohibits the establishment of an official state religion.

What part of that do you morons find hard to understand?
Um, yea, so, the United States has no state religion.

Well, Christmas is a federal holiday. So, what do you suppose "religion" means?

Think real hard.
 
Never mind that pesky Constitution!
Which in no way, form or fashion prohibits the recognition of and enjoyment of Christmas as either a secular or religious holiday. In fact it is very specific that Christmas can be enjoyed as either by everybody who choose to do so.
 
Um, yea, so, the United States has no state religion.

Well, Christmas is a federal holiday. So, what do you suppose "religion" means?

Think real hard.
No but evangelicals have had that as a goal for decades.
 
They don't call it the

Jew York Times for nothin.

Ochs-Sulzberger family controlled paper (70% stock holding)
Editor in Chief-Joseph Kahn.
 
15th post
Government officials have traditionally steered clear of such overtly religious language, as the Constitution prohibits the establishment of an official state religion.

What part of that do you morons find hard to understand?
Explain to me how in the **** putting out a Christmas message, is "the establishment of an official state religion"? Moron indeed....
 
Back
Top Bottom