Seymour Flops
Diamond Member
So could the kids that edge out Asian kids with extra points for not being Asian. Or do they deduct points from Asians?Or they can go to a state university, get the same degree that they would get from Harvard. It wouldn't be as prestigious, mind you. Still more than adequate to get you a job, though.
Either way, absent Affirmative Action with student loans and lowered admission standards, anyone can go to a state college and get the same degree they would get from Harvard and get a job to start making the payments until another Dem makes the American taxpayers foot that bill for them.
Yeah, politics sucks. We could go on all day. But first tell me how eliminating Asians from Harvard changes that.Um, yeah, you do? Then why do you keep electing THESE people?
View attachment 719758
Were these really the most competent and able people you could find? I mean, they are probably the whitest people you could find.
Fair point, but the solution is eliminate non-merit based consideration from admission, not to pile more on. Particularly state-funded colleges should be merit-based only. With "not being Asian" not counting as "merit."On a more serious note, if college admission was determined purely by test scores and grades, you MIGHT have an argument.
But a lot of those slots are legacies (your parents graduated from that school, so they let you in), athletics, the children of donors, etc. In fact, at Harvard, 43% of students are ADLC admissions, and they tend to be overwhelmingly white. Compared to only 16% who are minority affirmative action admissions.
![]()
A new statistic reveals the startling privilege of white kids admitted to Harvard
Ivy League admissions are far from a meritocracy.qz.com
Give points for being poor or first generation college and I'm fine with that.
More Blacks than Asians get football scholarships, should that playing field be leveled also?
When transwomen become the majorty of a big sports school's womens athletics, should there be affirmative action for cis women?