The Most Unconstitutional Administration

[PoliticalChic]

1. How many lies and fabrications did one have to swallow to vote for him in '08? Beyond the missing vetting that candidates of other parties have to contend with, the 'media' ignored all sorts of red flags, such as Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers, and Reverend Wright....or, at least, smoothed the bumps in that road.


But to suggest a love of America and the Constitution....with this sort of pretense: "Sen. Obama, who has taught courses in constitutional law at the University of Chicago, has regularly referred to himself as "a constitutional law professor," most famously at a March 30, 2007, fundraiser when hesaid, "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution."




Hillary Clinton’s earlier campaign picked up on this charge. In a March 27 conference call with reporters, Clinton spokesman Phil Singer claimed:
"Singer (March 27):Sen. Obama has often referred to himself as “a constitutional law professor” out on the campaign trail. He never held any such title. And I think anyone, if you ask anyone in academia the distinction between a professor who has tenure and an instructor that does not, you’ll find that there is … you’ll get quite an emotional response."
Obama a Constitutional Law Professor?



Wow! Has that come back to bit all of us!



2. "One of Barack Obama’s chief accomplishments has been to return the Constitution to a central place in our public discourse. Unfortunately, the president fomented this upswing in civic interest not by talking up the constitutional aspects of his policy agenda, but by blatantly violating the strictures of our founding document.

3. ...he’s been most frustrated with the separation of powers, which doesn’t allow him to “fundamentally transform” the country without congressional acquiescence.

But that hasn’t stopped him.... the Administration launched a “We Can’t Wait” initiative, ...explaining that “when Congress won’t act, this president will.” And earlier this year, President Obama said in announcing his new economic plans that “I will not allow gridlock, or inaction, or willful indifference to get in our way.”

4. ....hereby present President Obama’s top 10 constitutional violations....

1. Delay of Obamacare’s out-of-pocket caps.The Labor Department announced in February that it was delaying for a year the part of the healthcare law that limits how much people have to spend on their own insurance. .... changing the law requires actual legislation.

2. Delay of Obamacare’s employer mandate.The administration announced via blogpost on the eve of the July 4 holiday that it was delaying the requirement that employers of at least 50 people provide complying insurance or pay a fine. This time it did cite statutory authority, but the cited provisions allow the delay of certain reporting requirements, not of the mandate itself."
President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013

 

[NYcarbineer]

1. How many lies and fabrications did one have to swallow to vote for him in '08? Beyond the missing vetting that candidates of other parties have to contend with, the 'media' ignored all sorts of red flags, such as Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers, and Reverend Wright....or, at least, smoothed the bumps in that road.


But to suggest a love of America and the Constitution....with this sort of pretense: "Sen. Obama, who has taught courses in constitutional law at the University of Chicago, has regularly referred to himself as "a constitutional law professor," most famously at a March 30, 2007, fundraiser when hesaid, "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution."




Hillary Clinton’s earlier campaign picked up on this charge. In a March 27 conference call with reporters, Clinton spokesman Phil Singer claimed:
"Singer (March 27):Sen. Obama has often referred to himself as “a constitutional law professor” out on the campaign trail. He never held any such title. And I think anyone, if you ask anyone in academia the distinction between a professor who has tenure and an instructor that does not, you’ll find that there is … you’ll get quite an emotional response."
Obama a Constitutional Law Professor?



Wow! Has that come back to bit all of us!



2. "One of Barack Obama’s chief accomplishments has been to return the Constitution to a central place in our public discourse. Unfortunately, the president fomented this upswing in civic interest not by talking up the constitutional aspects of his policy agenda, but by blatantly violating the strictures of our founding document.

3. ...he’s been most frustrated with the separation of powers, which doesn’t allow him to “fundamentally transform” the country without congressional acquiescence.

But that hasn’t stopped him.... the Administration launched a “We Can’t Wait” initiative, ...explaining that “when Congress won’t act, this president will.” And earlier this year, President Obama said in announcing his new economic plans that “I will not allow gridlock, or inaction, or willful indifference to get in our way.”

4. ....hereby present President Obama’s top 10 constitutional violations....

1. Delay of Obamacare’s out-of-pocket caps.The Labor Department announced in February that it was delaying for a year the part of the healthcare law that limits how much people have to spend on their own insurance. .... changing the law requires actual legislation.

2. Delay of Obamacare’s employer mandate.The administration announced via blogpost on the eve of the July 4 holiday that it was delaying the requirement that employers of at least 50 people provide complying insurance or pay a fine. This time it did cite statutory authority, but the cited provisions allow the delay of certain reporting requirements, not of the mandate itself."
President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments. Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively.


Seriously...

The author of this thread is arguing that it is unconstitutional to make a losing argument in front of the Supreme Court.

 

[Jantje_Smit]

Wow! Has that come back to bit all of us!

Indeed

 

[Mad Scientist]

"But, but, but..... Bush!"

Lol at the Commie Libtards.

 

[NYcarbineer]

1. How many lies and fabrications did one have to swallow to vote for him in '08? Beyond the missing vetting that candidates of other parties have to contend with, the 'media' ignored all sorts of red flags, such as Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers, and Reverend Wright....or, at least, smoothed the bumps in that road.

The media ignored the Reverend Wright?

OMG, where were you in 2008?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Seriously...

The author of this thread is arguing that it is unconstitutional to make a losing argument in front of the Supreme Court.

It seems her argumetns get crazier every day.

She's well into 'liberal plant' territory. She's working for us.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. How many lies and fabrications did one have to swallow to vote for him in '08? Beyond the missing vetting that candidates of other parties have to contend with, the 'media' ignored all sorts of red flags, such as Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers, and Reverend Wright....or, at least, smoothed the bumps in that road.


But to suggest a love of America and the Constitution....with this sort of pretense: "Sen. Obama, who has taught courses in constitutional law at the University of Chicago, has regularly referred to himself as "a constitutional law professor," most famously at a March 30, 2007, fundraiser when hesaid, "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution."




Hillary Clinton’s earlier campaign picked up on this charge. In a March 27 conference call with reporters, Clinton spokesman Phil Singer claimed:
"Singer (March 27):Sen. Obama has often referred to himself as “a constitutional law professor” out on the campaign trail. He never held any such title. And I think anyone, if you ask anyone in academia the distinction between a professor who has tenure and an instructor that does not, you’ll find that there is … you’ll get quite an emotional response."
Obama a Constitutional Law Professor?



Wow! Has that come back to bit all of us!



2. "One of Barack Obama’s chief accomplishments has been to return the Constitution to a central place in our public discourse. Unfortunately, the president fomented this upswing in civic interest not by talking up the constitutional aspects of his policy agenda, but by blatantly violating the strictures of our founding document.

3. ...he’s been most frustrated with the separation of powers, which doesn’t allow him to “fundamentally transform” the country without congressional acquiescence.

But that hasn’t stopped him.... the Administration launched a “We Can’t Wait” initiative, ...explaining that “when Congress won’t act, this president will.” And earlier this year, President Obama said in announcing his new economic plans that “I will not allow gridlock, or inaction, or willful indifference to get in our way.”

4. ....hereby present President Obama’s top 10 constitutional violations....

1. Delay of Obamacare’s out-of-pocket caps.The Labor Department announced in February that it was delaying for a year the part of the healthcare law that limits how much people have to spend on their own insurance. .... changing the law requires actual legislation.

2. Delay of Obamacare’s employer mandate.The administration announced via blogpost on the eve of the July 4 holiday that it was delaying the requirement that employers of at least 50 people provide complying insurance or pay a fine. This time it did cite statutory authority, but the cited provisions allow the delay of certain reporting requirements, not of the mandate itself."
President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments. Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively.


Seriously...

The author of this thread is arguing that it is unconstitutional to make a losing argument in front of the Supreme Court.

You don't actually believe that the Supreme Court serves the purpose for which it was created...do you?

Wow! Has that come back to bit all of us!

Indeed

Do I have to teach you everything??????

Reality is defined by actions, not by words......mark that down.


Obama's is the most unconstitutional of administrations.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Seriously...

The author of this thread is arguing that it is unconstitutional to make a losing argument in front of the Supreme Court.

It seems her argumetns get crazier every day.

If "crazy" is the defining characteristic, you've certainly come to the right place.

 

[NYcarbineer]

1. How many lies and fabrications did one have to swallow to vote for him in '08? Beyond the missing vetting that candidates of other parties have to contend with, the 'media' ignored all sorts of red flags, such as Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers, and Reverend Wright....or, at least, smoothed the bumps in that road.


But to suggest a love of America and the Constitution....with this sort of pretense: "Sen. Obama, who has taught courses in constitutional law at the University of Chicago, has regularly referred to himself as "a constitutional law professor," most famously at a March 30, 2007, fundraiser when hesaid, "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution."




Hillary Clinton’s earlier campaign picked up on this charge. In a March 27 conference call with reporters, Clinton spokesman Phil Singer claimed:
"Singer (March 27):Sen. Obama has often referred to himself as “a constitutional law professor” out on the campaign trail. He never held any such title. And I think anyone, if you ask anyone in academia the distinction between a professor who has tenure and an instructor that does not, you’ll find that there is … you’ll get quite an emotional response."
Obama a Constitutional Law Professor?



Wow! Has that come back to bit all of us!



2. "One of Barack Obama’s chief accomplishments has been to return the Constitution to a central place in our public discourse. Unfortunately, the president fomented this upswing in civic interest not by talking up the constitutional aspects of his policy agenda, but by blatantly violating the strictures of our founding document.

3. ...he’s been most frustrated with the separation of powers, which doesn’t allow him to “fundamentally transform” the country without congressional acquiescence.

But that hasn’t stopped him.... the Administration launched a “We Can’t Wait” initiative, ...explaining that “when Congress won’t act, this president will.” And earlier this year, President Obama said in announcing his new economic plans that “I will not allow gridlock, or inaction, or willful indifference to get in our way.”

4. ....hereby present President Obama’s top 10 constitutional violations....

1. Delay of Obamacare’s out-of-pocket caps.The Labor Department announced in February that it was delaying for a year the part of the healthcare law that limits how much people have to spend on their own insurance. .... changing the law requires actual legislation.

2. Delay of Obamacare’s employer mandate.The administration announced via blogpost on the eve of the July 4 holiday that it was delaying the requirement that employers of at least 50 people provide complying insurance or pay a fine. This time it did cite statutory authority, but the cited provisions allow the delay of certain reporting requirements, not of the mandate itself."
President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments. Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively.


Seriously...

The author of this thread is arguing that it is unconstitutional to make a losing argument in front of the Supreme Court.

You don't actually believe that the Supreme Court serves the purpose for which it was created...do you?
.

You believe that arguments before the Supreme Court can be unconstitutional.

Explain that in your own words.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. How many lies and fabrications did one have to swallow to vote for him in '08? Beyond the missing vetting that candidates of other parties have to contend with, the 'media' ignored all sorts of red flags, such as Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers, and Reverend Wright....or, at least, smoothed the bumps in that road.


But to suggest a love of America and the Constitution....with this sort of pretense: "Sen. Obama, who has taught courses in constitutional law at the University of Chicago, has regularly referred to himself as "a constitutional law professor," most famously at a March 30, 2007, fundraiser when hesaid, "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution."




Hillary Clinton’s earlier campaign picked up on this charge. In a March 27 conference call with reporters, Clinton spokesman Phil Singer claimed:
"Singer (March 27):Sen. Obama has often referred to himself as “a constitutional law professor” out on the campaign trail. He never held any such title. And I think anyone, if you ask anyone in academia the distinction between a professor who has tenure and an instructor that does not, you’ll find that there is … you’ll get quite an emotional response."
Obama a Constitutional Law Professor?



Wow! Has that come back to bit all of us!



2. "One of Barack Obama’s chief accomplishments has been to return the Constitution to a central place in our public discourse. Unfortunately, the president fomented this upswing in civic interest not by talking up the constitutional aspects of his policy agenda, but by blatantly violating the strictures of our founding document.

3. ...he’s been most frustrated with the separation of powers, which doesn’t allow him to “fundamentally transform” the country without congressional acquiescence.

But that hasn’t stopped him.... the Administration launched a “We Can’t Wait” initiative, ...explaining that “when Congress won’t act, this president will.” And earlier this year, President Obama said in announcing his new economic plans that “I will not allow gridlock, or inaction, or willful indifference to get in our way.”

4. ....hereby present President Obama’s top 10 constitutional violations....

1. Delay of Obamacare’s out-of-pocket caps.The Labor Department announced in February that it was delaying for a year the part of the healthcare law that limits how much people have to spend on their own insurance. .... changing the law requires actual legislation.

2. Delay of Obamacare’s employer mandate.The administration announced via blogpost on the eve of the July 4 holiday that it was delaying the requirement that employers of at least 50 people provide complying insurance or pay a fine. This time it did cite statutory authority, but the cited provisions allow the delay of certain reporting requirements, not of the mandate itself."
President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments. Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively.


Seriously...

The author of this thread is arguing that it is unconstitutional to make a losing argument in front of the Supreme Court.

You don't actually believe that the Supreme Court serves the purpose for which it was created...do you?
.

You believe that arguments before the Supreme Court can be unconstitutional.

Explain that in your own words.

1. How many lies and fabrications did one have to swallow to vote for him in '08? Beyond the missing vetting that candidates of other parties have to contend with, the 'media' ignored all sorts of red flags, such as Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers, and Reverend Wright....or, at least, smoothed the bumps in that road.


But to suggest a love of America and the Constitution....with this sort of pretense: "Sen. Obama, who has taught courses in constitutional law at the University of Chicago, has regularly referred to himself as "a constitutional law professor," most famously at a March 30, 2007, fundraiser when hesaid, "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution."




Hillary Clinton’s earlier campaign picked up on this charge. In a March 27 conference call with reporters, Clinton spokesman Phil Singer claimed:
"Singer (March 27):Sen. Obama has often referred to himself as “a constitutional law professor” out on the campaign trail. He never held any such title. And I think anyone, if you ask anyone in academia the distinction between a professor who has tenure and an instructor that does not, you’ll find that there is … you’ll get quite an emotional response."
Obama a Constitutional Law Professor?



Wow! Has that come back to bit all of us!



2. "One of Barack Obama’s chief accomplishments has been to return the Constitution to a central place in our public discourse. Unfortunately, the president fomented this upswing in civic interest not by talking up the constitutional aspects of his policy agenda, but by blatantly violating the strictures of our founding document.

3. ...he’s been most frustrated with the separation of powers, which doesn’t allow him to “fundamentally transform” the country without congressional acquiescence.

But that hasn’t stopped him.... the Administration launched a “We Can’t Wait” initiative, ...explaining that “when Congress won’t act, this president will.” And earlier this year, President Obama said in announcing his new economic plans that “I will not allow gridlock, or inaction, or willful indifference to get in our way.”

4. ....hereby present President Obama’s top 10 constitutional violations....

1. Delay of Obamacare’s out-of-pocket caps.The Labor Department announced in February that it was delaying for a year the part of the healthcare law that limits how much people have to spend on their own insurance. .... changing the law requires actual legislation.

2. Delay of Obamacare’s employer mandate.The administration announced via blogpost on the eve of the July 4 holiday that it was delaying the requirement that employers of at least 50 people provide complying insurance or pay a fine. This time it did cite statutory authority, but the cited provisions allow the delay of certain reporting requirements, not of the mandate itself."
President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments. Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively.


Seriously...

The author of this thread is arguing that it is unconstitutional to make a losing argument in front of the Supreme Court.

You don't actually believe that the Supreme Court serves the purpose for which it was created...do you?
.

You believe that arguments before the Supreme Court can be unconstitutional.

Explain that in your own words.

Are you pretending that you can tell me what I believe?

Really?

That would be like a mushroom 'telling' the gardener how to tend the nursery.

 

[PoliticalChic]

. ....hereby present President Obama’s top 10 constitutional violations....


"3. Delay of Obamacare’s insurance requirements.The famous pledge that “if you like your plan, you can keep it” backfired when insurance companies started cancelling millions of plans that didn’t comply with Obamacare’s requirements.

... Obama called a press conference last month to proclaim that people could continue buying non-complying plans in 2014—despite Obamacare’s explicit language to the contrary. He then refused to consider a House-passed bill that would’ve made this action legal.



4. Exemption of Congress from Obamacare.A little-known part of Obamacare requires Congressmen and their staff to get insurance through the new healthcare exchanges, rather than a taxpayer-funded program. In the quiet of August, President Obama directed the Office of Personnel Management to interpret the law to maintain the generous congressional benefits."
President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013


Obama's: the most unconstitutional presidency.

 

[NYcarbineer]

1. How many lies and fabrications did one have to swallow to vote for him in '08? Beyond the missing vetting that candidates of other parties have to contend with, the 'media' ignored all sorts of red flags, such as Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers, and Reverend Wright....or, at least, smoothed the bumps in that road.


But to suggest a love of America and the Constitution....with this sort of pretense: "Sen. Obama, who has taught courses in constitutional law at the University of Chicago, has regularly referred to himself as "a constitutional law professor," most famously at a March 30, 2007, fundraiser when hesaid, "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution."




Hillary Clinton’s earlier campaign picked up on this charge. In a March 27 conference call with reporters, Clinton spokesman Phil Singer claimed:
"Singer (March 27):Sen. Obama has often referred to himself as “a constitutional law professor” out on the campaign trail. He never held any such title. And I think anyone, if you ask anyone in academia the distinction between a professor who has tenure and an instructor that does not, you’ll find that there is … you’ll get quite an emotional response."
Obama a Constitutional Law Professor?



Wow! Has that come back to bit all of us!



2. "One of Barack Obama’s chief accomplishments has been to return the Constitution to a central place in our public discourse. Unfortunately, the president fomented this upswing in civic interest not by talking up the constitutional aspects of his policy agenda, but by blatantly violating the strictures of our founding document.

3. ...he’s been most frustrated with the separation of powers, which doesn’t allow him to “fundamentally transform” the country without congressional acquiescence.

But that hasn’t stopped him.... the Administration launched a “We Can’t Wait” initiative, ...explaining that “when Congress won’t act, this president will.” And earlier this year, President Obama said in announcing his new economic plans that “I will not allow gridlock, or inaction, or willful indifference to get in our way.”

4. ....hereby present President Obama’s top 10 constitutional violations....

1. Delay of Obamacare’s out-of-pocket caps.The Labor Department announced in February that it was delaying for a year the part of the healthcare law that limits how much people have to spend on their own insurance. .... changing the law requires actual legislation.

2. Delay of Obamacare’s employer mandate.The administration announced via blogpost on the eve of the July 4 holiday that it was delaying the requirement that employers of at least 50 people provide complying insurance or pay a fine. This time it did cite statutory authority, but the cited provisions allow the delay of certain reporting requirements, not of the mandate itself."
President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments. Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively.


Seriously...

The author of this thread is arguing that it is unconstitutional to make a losing argument in front of the Supreme Court.

You don't actually believe that the Supreme Court serves the purpose for which it was created...do you?
.

You believe that arguments before the Supreme Court can be unconstitutional.

Explain that in your own words.

1. How many lies and fabrications did one have to swallow to vote for him in '08? Beyond the missing vetting that candidates of other parties have to contend with, the 'media' ignored all sorts of red flags, such as Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers, and Reverend Wright....or, at least, smoothed the bumps in that road.


But to suggest a love of America and the Constitution....with this sort of pretense: "Sen. Obama, who has taught courses in constitutional law at the University of Chicago, has regularly referred to himself as "a constitutional law professor," most famously at a March 30, 2007, fundraiser when hesaid, "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution."




Hillary Clinton’s earlier campaign picked up on this charge. In a March 27 conference call with reporters, Clinton spokesman Phil Singer claimed:
"Singer (March 27):Sen. Obama has often referred to himself as “a constitutional law professor” out on the campaign trail. He never held any such title. And I think anyone, if you ask anyone in academia the distinction between a professor who has tenure and an instructor that does not, you’ll find that there is … you’ll get quite an emotional response."
Obama a Constitutional Law Professor?



Wow! Has that come back to bit all of us!



2. "One of Barack Obama’s chief accomplishments has been to return the Constitution to a central place in our public discourse. Unfortunately, the president fomented this upswing in civic interest not by talking up the constitutional aspects of his policy agenda, but by blatantly violating the strictures of our founding document.

3. ...he’s been most frustrated with the separation of powers, which doesn’t allow him to “fundamentally transform” the country without congressional acquiescence.

But that hasn’t stopped him.... the Administration launched a “We Can’t Wait” initiative, ...explaining that “when Congress won’t act, this president will.” And earlier this year, President Obama said in announcing his new economic plans that “I will not allow gridlock, or inaction, or willful indifference to get in our way.”

4. ....hereby present President Obama’s top 10 constitutional violations....

1. Delay of Obamacare’s out-of-pocket caps.The Labor Department announced in February that it was delaying for a year the part of the healthcare law that limits how much people have to spend on their own insurance. .... changing the law requires actual legislation.

2. Delay of Obamacare’s employer mandate.The administration announced via blogpost on the eve of the July 4 holiday that it was delaying the requirement that employers of at least 50 people provide complying insurance or pay a fine. This time it did cite statutory authority, but the cited provisions allow the delay of certain reporting requirements, not of the mandate itself."
President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments. Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively.


Seriously...

The author of this thread is arguing that it is unconstitutional to make a losing argument in front of the Supreme Court.

You don't actually believe that the Supreme Court serves the purpose for which it was created...do you?
.

You believe that arguments before the Supreme Court can be unconstitutional.

Explain that in your own words.

Are you pretending that you can tell me what I believe?

Really?

That would be like a mushroom 'telling' the gardener how to tend the nursery.

You posted it. Are you now prepared to argue against what you posted?

You posted the article entitled
President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013

Number 7:

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments. Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively."

Now tell us what makes a Supreme Court argument an unconstitutional act?

 

[NYcarbineer]

. ....hereby present President Obama’s top 10 constitutional violations....


"3. Delay of Obamacare’s insurance requirements.The famous pledge that “if you like your plan, you can keep it” backfired when insurance companies started cancelling millions of plans that didn’t comply with Obamacare’s requirements.

... Obama called a press conference last month to proclaim that people could continue buying non-complying plans in 2014—despite Obamacare’s explicit language to the contrary. He then refused to consider a House-passed bill that would’ve made this action legal.



4. Exemption of Congress from Obamacare.A little-known part of Obamacare requires Congressmen and their staff to get insurance through the new healthcare exchanges, rather than a taxpayer-funded program. In the quiet of August, President Obama directed the Office of Personnel Management to interpret the law to maintain the generous congressional benefits."
President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013


Obama's: the most unconstitutional presidency.

Which of the 10 were actually ruled unconstitutional?

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. How many lies and fabrications did one have to swallow to vote for him in '08? Beyond the missing vetting that candidates of other parties have to contend with, the 'media' ignored all sorts of red flags, such as Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers, and Reverend Wright....or, at least, smoothed the bumps in that road.


But to suggest a love of America and the Constitution....with this sort of pretense: "Sen. Obama, who has taught courses in constitutional law at the University of Chicago, has regularly referred to himself as "a constitutional law professor," most famously at a March 30, 2007, fundraiser when hesaid, "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution."




Hillary Clinton’s earlier campaign picked up on this charge. In a March 27 conference call with reporters, Clinton spokesman Phil Singer claimed:
"Singer (March 27):Sen. Obama has often referred to himself as “a constitutional law professor” out on the campaign trail. He never held any such title. And I think anyone, if you ask anyone in academia the distinction between a professor who has tenure and an instructor that does not, you’ll find that there is … you’ll get quite an emotional response."
Obama a Constitutional Law Professor?



Wow! Has that come back to bit all of us!



2. "One of Barack Obama’s chief accomplishments has been to return the Constitution to a central place in our public discourse. Unfortunately, the president fomented this upswing in civic interest not by talking up the constitutional aspects of his policy agenda, but by blatantly violating the strictures of our founding document.

3. ...he’s been most frustrated with the separation of powers, which doesn’t allow him to “fundamentally transform” the country without congressional acquiescence.

But that hasn’t stopped him.... the Administration launched a “We Can’t Wait” initiative, ...explaining that “when Congress won’t act, this president will.” And earlier this year, President Obama said in announcing his new economic plans that “I will not allow gridlock, or inaction, or willful indifference to get in our way.”

4. ....hereby present President Obama’s top 10 constitutional violations....

1. Delay of Obamacare’s out-of-pocket caps.The Labor Department announced in February that it was delaying for a year the part of the healthcare law that limits how much people have to spend on their own insurance. .... changing the law requires actual legislation.

2. Delay of Obamacare’s employer mandate.The administration announced via blogpost on the eve of the July 4 holiday that it was delaying the requirement that employers of at least 50 people provide complying insurance or pay a fine. This time it did cite statutory authority, but the cited provisions allow the delay of certain reporting requirements, not of the mandate itself."
President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments. Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively.


Seriously...

The author of this thread is arguing that it is unconstitutional to make a losing argument in front of the Supreme Court.

You don't actually believe that the Supreme Court serves the purpose for which it was created...do you?
.

You believe that arguments before the Supreme Court can be unconstitutional.

Explain that in your own words.

1. How many lies and fabrications did one have to swallow to vote for him in '08? Beyond the missing vetting that candidates of other parties have to contend with, the 'media' ignored all sorts of red flags, such as Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers, and Reverend Wright....or, at least, smoothed the bumps in that road.


But to suggest a love of America and the Constitution....with this sort of pretense: "Sen. Obama, who has taught courses in constitutional law at the University of Chicago, has regularly referred to himself as "a constitutional law professor," most famously at a March 30, 2007, fundraiser when hesaid, "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution."




Hillary Clinton’s earlier campaign picked up on this charge. In a March 27 conference call with reporters, Clinton spokesman Phil Singer claimed:
"Singer (March 27):Sen. Obama has often referred to himself as “a constitutional law professor” out on the campaign trail. He never held any such title. And I think anyone, if you ask anyone in academia the distinction between a professor who has tenure and an instructor that does not, you’ll find that there is … you’ll get quite an emotional response."
Obama a Constitutional Law Professor?



Wow! Has that come back to bit all of us!



2. "One of Barack Obama’s chief accomplishments has been to return the Constitution to a central place in our public discourse. Unfortunately, the president fomented this upswing in civic interest not by talking up the constitutional aspects of his policy agenda, but by blatantly violating the strictures of our founding document.

3. ...he’s been most frustrated with the separation of powers, which doesn’t allow him to “fundamentally transform” the country without congressional acquiescence.

But that hasn’t stopped him.... the Administration launched a “We Can’t Wait” initiative, ...explaining that “when Congress won’t act, this president will.” And earlier this year, President Obama said in announcing his new economic plans that “I will not allow gridlock, or inaction, or willful indifference to get in our way.”

4. ....hereby present President Obama’s top 10 constitutional violations....

1. Delay of Obamacare’s out-of-pocket caps.The Labor Department announced in February that it was delaying for a year the part of the healthcare law that limits how much people have to spend on their own insurance. .... changing the law requires actual legislation.

2. Delay of Obamacare’s employer mandate.The administration announced via blogpost on the eve of the July 4 holiday that it was delaying the requirement that employers of at least 50 people provide complying insurance or pay a fine. This time it did cite statutory authority, but the cited provisions allow the delay of certain reporting requirements, not of the mandate itself."
President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments. Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively.


Seriously...

The author of this thread is arguing that it is unconstitutional to make a losing argument in front of the Supreme Court.

You don't actually believe that the Supreme Court serves the purpose for which it was created...do you?
.

You believe that arguments before the Supreme Court can be unconstitutional.

Explain that in your own words.

Are you pretending that you can tell me what I believe?

Really?

That would be like a mushroom 'telling' the gardener how to tend the nursery.

You posted it. Are you now prepared to argue against what you posted?

You posted the article entitled
President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013

Number 7:

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments. Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively."

Now tell us what makes a Supreme Court argument an unconstitutional act?

So, my little mushroom, you were lying when you said "You believe that arguments before the Supreme Court can be unconstitutional."


So THAT'S why you're known as the NYLiar!

 

[NYcarbineer]

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments. Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively.


Seriously...

The author of this thread is arguing that it is unconstitutional to make a losing argument in front of the Supreme Court.

You don't actually believe that the Supreme Court serves the purpose for which it was created...do you?
.

You believe that arguments before the Supreme Court can be unconstitutional.

Explain that in your own words.

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments. Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively.


Seriously...

The author of this thread is arguing that it is unconstitutional to make a losing argument in front of the Supreme Court.

You don't actually believe that the Supreme Court serves the purpose for which it was created...do you?
.

You believe that arguments before the Supreme Court can be unconstitutional.

Explain that in your own words.

Are you pretending that you can tell me what I believe?

Really?

That would be like a mushroom 'telling' the gardener how to tend the nursery.

You posted it. Are you now prepared to argue against what you posted?

You posted the article entitled
President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013

Number 7:

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments. Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively."

Now tell us what makes a Supreme Court argument an unconstitutional act?

So, my little mushroom, you were lying when you said "You believe that arguments before the Supreme Court can be unconstitutional."


So THAT'S why you're known as the NYLiar!

No. You posted the article as YOUR argument.

If you wish to admit you erred in using those 10 points for your argument, then by all means do so.

But until you do, they are YOUR argument, which makes point number 7 YOUR RIDICULOUS ARGUMENT.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Seriously...

The author of this thread is arguing that it is unconstitutional to make a losing argument in front of the Supreme Court.

It seems her argumetns get crazier every day.

If "crazy" is the defining characteristic, you've certainly come to the right place.

You really should get someone to reread your posts for you before you push that button.

She's incapable of making her own arguments, which repeatedly gets her into trouble when she doesn't bother to read the arguments of the people she's enlisting as her mouthpieces.

 

[BULLDOG]

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments. Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively.


Seriously...

The author of this thread is arguing that it is unconstitutional to make a losing argument in front of the Supreme Court.

You don't actually believe that the Supreme Court serves the purpose for which it was created...do you?
.

You believe that arguments before the Supreme Court can be unconstitutional.

Explain that in your own words.

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments. Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively.


Seriously...

The author of this thread is arguing that it is unconstitutional to make a losing argument in front of the Supreme Court.

You don't actually believe that the Supreme Court serves the purpose for which it was created...do you?
.

You believe that arguments before the Supreme Court can be unconstitutional.

Explain that in your own words.

Are you pretending that you can tell me what I believe?

Really?

That would be like a mushroom 'telling' the gardener how to tend the nursery.

You posted it. Are you now prepared to argue against what you posted?

You posted the article entitled
President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013

Number 7:

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments. Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively."

Now tell us what makes a Supreme Court argument an unconstitutional act?

So, my little mushroom, you were lying when you said "You believe that arguments before the Supreme Court can be unconstitutional."


So THAT'S why you're known as the NYLiar!

Oh honey, you're confused. An argument can be found to be unconstitutional, but the act of arguing it is not. Think of it in terms of your fat doctor. When you ask him if it's all right for you to eat that stick of fried butter, he will probably tell you no, but there is nothing wrong with you asking. Get it now?

 

[JakeStarkey]

PC is now saying her arguments are others, then attacks them. #19 above.

She reminds me of gipper, who claims the far right does not exist. I have asked him to show how he does not exist.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Does anyone agree with her goofy claim that the media ignored Reverend Wright?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Does anyone agree with her goofy claim that the media ignored Reverend Wright?

The media left, center, and right all reported BIG TIME on Rev. Wright. Anyone saying otherwise is simply goofy or malignantly motivated or both.