The making of nazi race law

Ringo

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2021
Messages
19,674
Reaction score
8,340
Points
473
Location
Over there
A book about the influence of american racism on german nazism:

Whitman, James Q. "Hitler's American model: The United States and the making of Nazi race law". Princeton University Press, 2017.
PDF (20 Mb):
EPUB (3.8 Mb):

Book review:
Professor Whitman demonstrates how American race law provided inspiration for the infamous Nuremberg Laws (NĂĽrnberger Gesetze).
 
A book about the influence of american racism on german nazism:

Whitman, James Q. "Hitler's American model: The United States and the making of Nazi race law". Princeton University Press, 2017.
PDF (20 Mb):
EPUB (3.8 Mb):

Book review:
Professor Whitman demonstrates how American race law provided inspiration for the infamous Nuremberg Laws (NĂĽrnberger Gesetze).

Germany had a long history of laws restricting and outright banning Jews from multiple locations. They didn't need to look to the US for any inspiration.

Of course back before 1870 there wasn't a Germany, there were dozens of various States, some large, some small, all under the supposed rule of the "Holy Roman Empire"
 
The United States Constitution vs. a dictatorship with no constitution headed by a maniac? What could go wrong?
 
The United States Constitution vs. a dictatorship with no constitution headed by a maniac? What could go wrong?

Jim Crow laws and segregation are examples of people ignoring what the Constitution says and replacing it with what they want it to say.

Plessey's "logic" came from the same "logic" that gave us Roe and Chevron.
 
The United States Constitution vs. a dictatorship with no constitution headed by a maniac? What could go wrong?
The Weirmar Republic had a constitution, and Adolf was initially placed in power the way any republican leader ascends to the top spot.

If you don't know that, or understand how that happened, you can't understand why the DNC and its supporters are hyperventilating now.

Semi-Presidentialism in the Weimar Republic​

Semi-Presidentialism in the Weimar Republic

A Failed Attempt at Democracy
Chapter

Abstract

"The Weimar Republic is an important case for the study of semipresidentialism for two reasons: Weimar was one of the first semi-presidential countries, and it was an attempt at democracy that failed. In this chapter, I define Weimar’s semi-presidentialism as a “vertical dual executive system,” meaning that the president and/or the premier could be the real political leader at the same time. The designers of the constitution intended the president to play a moderating role during normal times and to serve as a political leader in reserve in the event of an emergency. However, because of the fragmented party system, parliament remained powerless. The actual operation of the state transgressed the essence of the constitution after 1930 and finally caused the breakdown of Weimar’s democracy."
 
Jim Crow laws and segregation are examples of people ignoring what the Constitution says and replacing it with what they want it to say.

Plessey's "logic" came from the same "logic" that gave us Roe and Chevron.
Somebody forgot the 14th amendment which negates Jim Crow etc. But nobody seemed to care so we get stuck with a bunch history that should not have happened the way it did.,
 
Germany had a long history of laws restricting and outright banning Jews from multiple locations. They didn't need to look to the US for any inspiration.

As does Russia. The very term "Pogrom" is a Russian word, that came into common usage after centuries of attacks by Russians on the Jewish minorities there.

And of course the NSDAP itself openly stated multiple times that the NSDAP itself credited none other than Margaret Sanger with the inspiration for most of their eugenics and racial policies.
 
Germany had a long history of laws restricting and outright banning Jews from multiple locations. They didn't need to look to the US for any inspiration.

🇷🇺 Muscovites taught Hitler how to exterminate all Jews​

 
As does Russia. The very term "Pogrom" is a Russian word, that came into common usage after centuries of attacks by Russians on the Jewish minorities there.
I have seen a VERY long list of cases when mass violence and expulsion of jews took place in various cities of civilized Europe. Even entire countries, such as England and Spain, completely expelled jews from their countries, and did so repeatedly. But turopean anti-russian propaganda knows only the word “pogrom.”

Until the end of the 18th century, there were few jews in Russia, so there was no question of any mass "pogroms". Jews appeared in large numbers in the Russian Empire in the second half of the 18th century, after the partitions of Poland. A “Pale of Settlement” was established by law for jews, according to which they were not allowed to settle on lands east of it. But while in Europe hostility towards jews turned into racial hatred, in Russia the difference remained religious, meaning that if a jew converted to christianity, he could live anywhere in the empire.

With the victory of soviet power, all restrictions on the rights of any nationality were legislatively abolished, unlike in Europe and even the United States, where anti-semitism remained at the legislative level and reached the point of state genocide, as in Hitler's Europe.
 
I have seen a VERY long list of cases when mass violence and expulsion of jews took place in various cities of civilized Europe. Even entire countries, such as England and Spain, completely expelled jews from their countries, and did so repeatedly. But turopean anti-russian propaganda knows only the word “pogrom.”

Ands what I see repeatedly with you is that you will take something and beat others over the head with it. But the moment the mirror is pointed in your direction, suddenly that no longer matters because any similar claims against Mother Russia are all lies.

You do make some interesting statements on occasion. But you are also simply a mirror image of Snitwin in that you absolutely deny that the side that you are in love in has ever done anything wrong.

Which is why I laugh at both of you equally.

With the victory of soviet power, all restrictions on the rights of any nationality were legislatively abolished

Sure, you only did that by outright prohibiting any expression of "nationalities". Like prohibiting any instructions in Hebrew. Or exiling the Jews that were in Soviet occupied Poland at the start of WWII to Siberia.

You see, a lot of us are more than aware of the "Refuseniks", and the decades of antisemitism by the Soviet Union against the Jews in an attempt to erase their religious and culture identity.



Funny you are comparing "expulsions", when the Soviet Union was a giant prison nation that refused to allow people to leave. And then talk about "rights of nationality", when the very basis of the national belief was in absolutely eliminating any "National Identity" other than that of being a Soviet.

In addition to being Atheistic, so also trying to eliminate any traces of any religion.

As my ancestors were often quoted in old movies, you "speak with forked tongue". Which completely destroys any claims you tried to make.
 
Last edited:
Jim Crow laws and segregation are examples of people ignoring what the Constitution says and replacing it with what they want it to say.

Plessey's "logic" came from the same "logic" that gave us Roe and Chevron.
The media seems to be the problem when it sanctions violations of the Constitution for political reasons. FDR's notorious EO9066 and Biden/Fauci's Covid edicts are a good example. It's not hard for the media to convince Americans that Constitutional violations are O.K. and for their own benefit.
 
Or exiling the Jews that were in Soviet occupied Poland at the start of WWII to Siberia.
Bloody hell... Even saving jews from nazi occupation and inevitable death is portrayed as a “crime” committed by communists...
Is there any lie in the world that will cause even a spark of doubt in the minds of those frozen by years of russophobia?
Probably not, otherwise there would be no reports of ukrainian children being kidnapped from the war zone by russian barbarians... The population continues to eat the shit of propaganda and still consider themselves to be intelligent and enlightened with regard to the subject..
 
Bloody hell... Even saving jews from nazi occupation and inevitable death is portrayed as a “crime” committed by communists

The Soviets did not "save" them. They invaded and occupied Eastern Poland at the same time the Germans invaded Western Poland. Then packed up all the Jews and sent them to freaking Siberia.

And yes, invading another nation and packing off ethnic minorities and forcing them to relocate is indeed a crime.

I present to you Geneva Convention Article 49.

Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country, occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive.

And Russia has made no attempt to hide it is doing that now in Ukraine.
 
The Soviets did not "save" them. They invaded and occupied Eastern Poland at the same time the Germans invaded Western Poland. Then packed up all the Jews and sent them to freaking Siberia.
And you are not an idiot after that? Jast go away.
 
And you are not an idiot after that? Jast go away.

As I have often said, you and Snitwin are just mirror images of each other.

Don't like me correcting your lies, then stop posting them.

Russia has outright admitted it is relocation people from occupied Ukraine. In clear violation of the Geneva Convention.
 
15th post
Ands what I see repeatedly with you is that you will take something and beat others over the head with it. But the moment the mirror is pointed in your direction, suddenly that no longer matters because any similar claims against Mother Russia are all lies.

You do make some interesting statements on occasion. But you are also simply a mirror image of Snitwin in that you absolutely deny that the side that you are in love in has ever done anything wrong.

Which is why I laugh at both of you equally.



Sure, you only did that by outright prohibiting any expression of "nationalities". Like prohibiting any instructions in Hebrew. Or exiling the Jews that were in Soviet occupied Poland at the start of WWII to Siberia.

You see, a lot of us are more than aware of the "Refuseniks", and the decades of antisemitism by the Soviet Union against the Jews in an attempt to erase their religious and culture identity.



Funny you are comparing "expulsions", when the Soviet Union was a giant prison nation that refused to allow people to leave. And then talk about "rights of nationality", when the very basis of the national belief was in absolutely eliminating any "National Identity" other than that of being a Soviet.

In addition to being Atheistic, so also trying to eliminate any traces of any religion.

As my ancestors were often quoted in old movies, you "speak with forked tongue". Which completely destroys any claims you tried to make.


Moscow 🇷🇺 empire will never chnage (as long as it exists in the imperial borders ):

 
The media seems to be the problem when it sanctions violations of the Constitution for political reasons. FDR's notorious EO9066 and Biden/Fauci's Covid edicts are a good example. It's not hard for the media to convince Americans that Constitutional violations are O.K. and for their own benefit.
Hitler and Stalin were basically two sides of one coin:

Nora Levin states that "Hitler used the Protocols (MOSCOW ANTI- SEMITIC FAKE) as a manual in his war to exterminate the Jews"


The Protocols ( 🇷🇺 MOSCOW made ANTI- SEMITIC FAKE) also became a part of the Nazi propaganda effort to justify persecution of the Jews. In The Holocaust: The Destruction of European Jewry 1933–1945, Nora Levin states that "Hitler used the Protocols as a manual in his war to exterminate the Jews"

 
From the very beginning of hostilities on the Eastern Front on June 22, 1941, the Soviet government began to implement a policy of evacuating the population and material assets beyond the Urals and to Central Asia.

During the transfer of industrial enterprises and the relocation of the civilian population, which began in the early days of the war and continued until 1942, a large number of Jews living in the USSR were saved. According to rough estimates, as already noted, more than 3 million Jews lived in the Soviet Union within its 1939 borders. After the annexation of the western parts of Belarus, Ukraine, and Moldova, the Jewish population increased by another 2 million people.

Even taking into account the difficulties of the evacuation policy, the number of Jews in the USSR who survived was very large. The greatest difficulties were caused by the evacuation of the population from the western border areas of the country, which bordered Germany and were the first to be attacked.

Due to the success of the first months of the “blitzkrieg,” out of the 2 million Jews living in Western Belarus, Western Ukraine, the Baltic States, and Moldova, no more than 12%, or about 200,000 people, were evacuated. From the rest of the USSR, which was further away from the front line, more than 1 million Jews, or one-third of the Jewish population of the European part of the Soviet Union, had been transported beyond the Urals by the time the German troops arrived.

In addition, a significant number of Jews, although the exact number is unknown due to the lack of reliable statistics, escaped without the involvement of the state services responsible for evacuation.


Thus, the total number of Soviet Jews who were outside the German occupation zone throughout the war and therefore not at risk of physical destruction was 2,250,000 (of whom, as noted above, about 200,000 people were taken from the western regions of the USSR, just over 1 million from the European part of the country, including Moscow and Leningrad, and finally, about 1 million Jews lived in territories that were not occupied by Germany at all).

Immediately after the start of the war, on June 24, 1941, an Evacuation Council was created under the USSR Council of People's Commissars, chaired by L.M. Kaganovich. Although the Council did not issue any direct and separate directives regarding the relocation of Jews, the percentage of Jews among the 12 million people deported beyond the Urals was high in practice.

According to materials from the Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee, a significant portion of those evacuated were resettled in Western Siberia, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan. The fate of those who remained in the territories occupied by the German army was similar to that of Eastern European Jews: they were placed in ghettos, their property was confiscated, and they were subsequently exterminated.
 
Somebody forgot the 14th amendment which negates Jim Crow etc. But nobody seemed to care so we get stuck with a bunch history that should not have happened the way it did.,

Exactly what I am saying. Read Harlan's dissent on Plessey for a great example of someone pointing out how the Court was getting it wrong.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom