The Lie of 9-11 and it's after effects

When are you going to fly a 757 at 530mph with nose 8 feet above ground for us?
1775592882774.webp
 
I am trying to be kind since you have checked and somehow got the idea it was not a fuel tank. What you now speak of also was fully investigated and to answer your question, investigators said when it blew up, the nose was blown off, causing the tail to drop, and the plane in its final moments was headed up. Since it was on fire, some thought they saw a missile, but it was the airplane in fact.
I have a hunch you won't believe them so perhaps the friendly thing to do is just stop talking about it since you have the theory the Feds did it and are dedicated to that concept.
"investigators said when it blew up, the nose was blown off, causing the tail to drop, and the plane in its final moments was headed up."

Provide that Documentation
 
It wasn't the fuel tank Robert, it was a missile, and it was a coverup. Have your reached that point in your life yet where you understand that the US government lies and deceives as a matter of daily practice?
Says the liar of the message board
 
I go by official reports. I believe you said you are a pilot? Why are you so eager to claim the FAA, ATC, CT people, are all criminals? Have you ever gone inside a CT to see how they operate? The missile theory was checked out. Every Navy ship has tight control of their missiles and not one was missing. How do you account for there not being any missing missiles? You going to claim the Navy also is crooked and shoots down our airliners? Why are you relying on gladio?

I know you go by official reports Robert. We've been through this. You buy into every single claim made by known liars. You are an authoritarian.

I never claimed that the FAA and the rest are all criminals. Your silly ass position requires that you make false claims. In fact, I've worked closely with the FAA in several jobs as production test pilot I've had going back 20 years. Several friends work for the FAA.

When the debate is lost Robert, slander becomes the tool of the loser.
 
I know you go by official reports Robert. We've been through this. You buy into every single claim made by known liars. You are an authoritarian.

I never claimed that the FAA and the rest are all criminals. Your silly ass position requires that you make false claims. In fact, I've worked closely with the FAA in several jobs as production test pilot I've had going back 20 years. Several friends work for the FAA.

When the debate is lost Robert, slander becomes the tool of the loser.
Here on this forum, per law, it is Libel. Known liars? Because you said so?
Or has Gladio instructed you? Do you believe the NTSB lies about all crashes? Is this your objective, to as you see it, win? Or is it truth?
 
I know you go by official reports Robert. We've been through this. You buy into every single claim made by known liars. You are an authoritarian.

I never claimed that the FAA and the rest are all criminals. Your silly ass position requires that you make false claims. In fact, I've worked closely with the FAA in several jobs as production test pilot I've had going back 20 years. Several friends work for the FAA.

When the debate is lost Robert, slander becomes the tool of the loser.
Are you ever going to address teh physical evidence--the wreckage, the light poles, the personal effects, the bodies, the DNA, etc....?


 
"investigators said when it blew up, the nose was blown off, causing the tail to drop, and the plane in its final moments was headed up."

Provide that Documentation

Cause of crash and conspiracy theories​


The National Transportation Safety Board inquiry determined that the cause of the crash was an explosion of a combustible mixture of fuel and air in the center wing fuel tank. The investigators believed that the explosion was caused by an electrical short circuit that affected fuel gauge wiring within the tank. Traces of explosives were found in the cabin, but it was suggested that they were residue from an explosive detection training exercise that had recently been staged on the airplane. Among the FBI’s witnesses were 258 people who claimed to have seen a streak of light approaching the airplane just before the crash. According to investigators, these witnesses actually saw a stream of burning fuel leaking from the crippled craft.


Nevertheless, some people continued to believe that flight 800 had been shot down, either by terrorists or by the U.S. military in a disastrous mistake. Skeptics stated their cases in the documentary feature film TWA Flight 800 (2013). Other claims included a bomb on the plane and a meteorite strike. These alternate theories proved popular online, leading some to consider the crash the first major conspiracy on the Internet.

Consider this. We have "witnesses" on land, 8 miles distant, from an airplane almost 15,000 feet (almost 3 miles up) saying they identified a missile, and not because they saw one, but they claim they saw a flame going up. I ask all, how can non experts, seeing light go up (assume they told the truth) and rule out the center tank exploded? All navy ships with missiles were inventoried for this and all missiles were still on the ships.
It was dark and where were the missiles given the navy officers accounted for their missiles?
 
Provide that "Pentagon Security footage".
Please note the following comes from the truth gang.
But we can analyze the photos easily.

The huge fireball is typical of an airliner, full of fuel, burning on impact. A missile does not produce such a massive fire, rather it produces a huge explosion. The massive fire is your tip to what hit the pentagon.

1775680671483.webp
 
Here on this forum, per law, it is Libel. Known liars? Because you said so?
Or has Gladio instructed you? Do you believe the NTSB lies about all crashes? Is this your objective, to as you see it, win? Or is it truth?
You don't get to invoke Gladio Robert, LOL... you don't even know what it is 🤣
 
I know you go by official reports Robert.
What does it say about your "theories" when you can't poke a single hole in the official report?

Don't feel bad, no 9/11 twoofers can either. So they have to bring up Project Gladiola (or whatever the hell it is wist43 keeps talking about), Northwoods, subsequent times when the government wasn't fourthcoming etc....

When you can't account for the physical evidence that we all saw with our own eyeballs...you haven't got much of a case.
 
What does it say about your "theories" when you can't poke a single hole in the official report?

Don't feel bad, no 9/11 twoofers can either. So they have to bring up Project Gladiola (or whatever the hell it is wist43 keeps talking about), Northwoods, subsequent times when the government wasn't fourthcoming etc....

When you can't account for the physical evidence that we all saw with our own eyeballs...you haven't got much of a case.
We are together on this. He told me he was a test pilot. Test pilots pick up all kinds of wild tales and most know those tales are fiction. Sort of like men from space located at Roswell NM. I am a pilot and read accounts from a pilot who flew at DC the time flight 77 crashed and he reported it to ATC. He alerted them when the plane was still in the air. I am a pilot and things like crashes are easy to spot when flying in the same area. As far as TWA800, what makes sense was reported by experts. A spark from a higher voltage wire outside the center tank caused a current to flash into the inside of the fuel tank causing the explosion. A very unlucky break and the event was completely investigated for bombs too. TWA 800 only fired 3 engines until it was ready to fly then engine 3 was started. This flight was very strange.
 
15th post

The Video, at 1:36, taken at the security gate, is the only Video offered by the Pentagon/Federal Government, in it's support of an Air Liner crashing in to the Pentagon.

There is Absolutely Nothing in that video, that even remotely suggests that a Jet Air Liner is crashing in to the Pentagon, at Ground Level.

I actually thought that after all of Your previous "Ranting", that You might've, due to some form of Research, have finally come up with something substantial. LMAO! That was equivalent to the "Old Lady" telling me "Tonights the Night", only to find her snoring, with her hair in curlers"!!! :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Matter of fact Robert,.... TRUTHFULLY Tell me why is it, that the Security Camera Videos of the Gas Station across the highway from the Pentagon, have Never Been Released.

While You are at it,..... Have You got any Video from Military Personnel/Civilians that were in the Pentagon Parking lot, that they took of the Alleged Jet Air Liner???
 
The Video, at 1:36, taken at the security gate, is the only Video offered by the Pentagon/Federal Government, in it's support of an Air Liner crashing in to the Pentagon.

There is Absolutely Nothing in that video, that even remotely suggests that a Jet Air Liner is crashing in to the Pentagon, at Ground Level.

I actually thought that after all of Your previous "Ranting", that You might've, due to some form of Research, have finally come up with something substantial. LMAO! That was equivalent to the "Old Lady" telling me "Tonights the Night", only to find her snoring, with her hair in curlers"!!! :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Matter of fact Robert,.... TRUTHFULLY Tell me why is it, that the Security Camera Videos of the Gas Station across the highway from the Pentagon, have Never Been Released.

While You are at it,..... Have You got any Video from Military Personnel/Civilians that were in the Pentagon Parking lot, that they took of the Alleged Jet Air Liner???
I have supplied evidence a pilot was a witness to the crash. There were other witnesses.
 
The Video, at 1:36, taken at the security gate, is the only Video offered by the Pentagon/Federal Government, in it's support of an Air Liner crashing in to the Pentagon.

There is Absolutely Nothing in that video, that even remotely suggests that a Jet Air Liner is crashing in to the Pentagon, at Ground Level.

I actually thought that after all of Your previous "Ranting", that You might've, due to some form of Research, have finally come up with something substantial. LMAO! That was equivalent to the "Old Lady" telling me "Tonights the Night", only to find her snoring, with her hair in curlers"!!! :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Matter of fact Robert,.... TRUTHFULLY Tell me why is it, that the Security Camera Videos of the Gas Station across the highway from the Pentagon, have Never Been Released.

While You are at it,..... Have You got any Video from Military Personnel/Civilians that were in the Pentagon Parking lot, that they took of the Alleged Jet Air Liner???

There is Absolutely Nothing in that video, that even remotely suggests that a cruise missile is crashing into the Pentagon, at Ground Level.
 
There is Absolutely Nothing in that video, that even remotely suggests that a cruise missile is crashing into the Pentagon, at Ground Level.
So now You resort to lying about what I've stated? Precisely show, where I said "the alternative was a cruise missile".
I also see that You've ignored what I stated:

"Matter of fact Robert,.... TRUTHFULLY Tell me why is it, that the Security Camera Videos of the Gas Station across the highway from the Pentagon, have Never Been Released.

While You are at it,..... Have You got any Video from Military Personnel/Civilians that were in the Pentagon Parking lot, that they took of the Alleged Jet Air Liner???"

Admit it Todd,..... You have No Desire to firmly establish the Truth about what happened during 9-11.
 
Back
Top Bottom