The Lie of 9-11 and it's after effects

[EMH]

• 
  
• 
  

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

What made this hole?

• 
  
• 
  
• 
  

One of the 757 engines.

 

[TruthSeeker112125]

Ahh...

So according to you the plotters decided, for some reason I’ll ask you about later, to have light poles involved that were rigged to fall and a car involved that was to be hit by a falling light pole, and payments made to “the drivers and others” as you put it.

Why would the alleged plotters add all of that to their to-do list? Because when you have a plane crash, you don’t always have poles that are taken down, cars that are hit by the pole, and of course drivers who are in their cars when the superfluous poles and cars are included in the scheme.

Can you tell us why the plotters would do this?

Again...nobody forces you dumbfux to assume these ridiculous postures. You could just say AA77 hit the pentagon because, well, it did. What is the downside of that to your “it was an inside job” nonsense?

Anyway, tell us why they included all of this extra crap you have said they did if you would, please.




No but it seems you may have been.

"you dumbfux"

Clean Your language up Candy.

 

[EMH]

One of the 757 engines.

That you admit was 6 feet in the ground as the "757" approached??

LOL!!!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

That you admit was 6 feet in the ground as the "757" approached??

LOL!!!

I admit the plane was 10-20 feet off the ground when it struck the Pentagon.

 

[EMH]

I admit the plane was 10-20 feet off the ground when it struck the Pentagon.

Dailymotion

www.dailymotion.com

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Dailymotion

www.dailymotion.com

Even your links agree.

 

[TruthSeeker112125]

What made this hole?

• 
  
• 
  
• 
  

It wasn't the Fuselage, along with the Wings, & Engines of the alleged Jet Air Liner.

And, there is No Other Air Liner Crash, in Aviation History, that produced this kind of damage.

 

[TruthSeeker112125]

I admit the plane was 10-20 feet off the ground when it struck the Pentagon.

Explain how the 2nd & 3rd floor windows, were largely intact, when the first fire unit arrived.

 

[EMH]

It wasn't the Fuselage, along with the Wings, & Engines of the alleged Jet Air Liner.

And, there is No Other Air Liner Crash, in Aviation History, that produced this kind of damage.

because it was a bunker buster cruise missile, not a plane.

 

[EMH]

Even your links agree.

just make sure everyone gets to see them...

 

[TruthSeeker112125]

because it was a bunker buster cruise missile, not a plane.

I'm not sure what it was EMH,... The piercing of the concrete was as if it were machined, & there are no major fractures shown in the Pics, radiating out away from the penetration, that would normally be the result from a conventional war head.

I Know that it happened, but, I also know that it wasn't from an Air LIner.

 

[EMH]

I'm not sure what it was EMH,... The piercing of the concrete was as if it were machined, & there are no major fractures shown in the Pics, radiating out away from the penetration, that would normally be the result from a conventional war head.

I Know that it happened, but, I also know that it wasn't from an Air LIner.

That's the physics of a 600 mph bunker buster cruise missile....

• 
  
• 
  
• 
  

 

[TruthSeeker112125]

That's the physics of a 600 mph bunker buster cruise missile....

• 
  
• 
  
• 
  

The Massive soot, is the result of a Fire of "Poor Combustion", actually,.... The thought just entered my mind, that those who Fabricated this "Plane Crash" could have sprayed that soot on the concrete. SMH.

But look at the concrete EMH,... Where are the fractures that would have resulted by explosives?

I know very little about "Bunker Buster Bombs", but I'm thinking that at some point, they would explode.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Explain how the 2nd & 3rd floor windows, were largely intact, when the first fire unit arrived.

The windows were new and blast resistant.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

because it was a bunker buster cruise missile, not a plane.

Show me some info on "bunker buster cruise missiles.

How fast they go, how much they weigh, how they bust a bunker.

Use real sources, not your insane, rambling imaginings.

Thanks!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

just make sure everyone gets to see them...

Everyone sees that the plane was 10-20 feet of the ground when it hit.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The Massive soot, is the result of a Fire of "Poor Combustion", actually,.... The thought just entered my mind, that those who Fabricated this "Plane Crash" could have sprayed that soot on the concrete. SMH.

But look at the concrete EMH,... Where are the fractures that would have resulted by explosives?

I know very little about "Bunker Buster Bombs", but I'm thinking that at some point, they would explode.

But look at the concrete EMH,... Where are the fractures that would have resulted by explosives?

There were no explosives.

 

[candycorn]

"you dumbfux"

Clean Your language up Candy.

I’m good.

And my post is accurate

 

[Soupnazi630]

It wasn't the Fuselage, along with the Wings, & Engines of the alleged Jet Air Liner.

And, there is No Other Air Liner Crash, in Aviation History, that produced this kind of damage.

Yes there is