The Left Exposes Itself Over White South African Émigrés

Well, some of us have been willing to state that the third world immigration is to remake America. To de-white America as much as possible.

Now, any doubters should see that as the truth. The Episcopalian immigration agency, which has worked resettling third world immigrants for ~40 years, has said they will not do this.

Over at MSNBC, they have lost their minds over this.


Beginning at 17:20.



ONe problem. The Episcopal Refugee agency was one of ten agencies that helped settle 100,000 Ukrainians, that the Trump admin is now trying to kick back out. Ukrainians are quite pale Europeans. South Afrikaans aren't.
 
I know MAGAts can't accept reality but this is the supreme law of the land in the US.
The 1951 Refugee Convention | UNHCR
Sorry to pop the bubble.
You brought this up before.

Now, as then, I suggest you look at the convention's definition of "refugee", and then return here to desperately attempt to explain how it is at all relevant to... anything.

And again , now as them, I suggest you look at the Supremacy clause, which does not work as you want to believe -- it does not superimpose treaties above the constitution or federal law, but places them coordinately with the constitution and federal law over state laws and constitutions.

Time for your pony to come up with another trick.
 
cant abide 50 whites being let in from South Africa but defend over 10 million flooding in from South America .. liberal logic is insane ..
It's almost as though the US isn't signatory to the 1967 Protocol to the 1951 Convention on the Status of Refugees, making it the supreme law of the land.
 
Now, as then, I suggest you look at the convention's definition of "refugee", and then return here to desperately attempt to explain how it is at all relevant to... anything.
Asylum claimants have access to courts in the country of refuge.
That is the supreme law of the land in the US.
 
So you've got nothing but shit talk, as usual.
1747155045990.webp
 
Now, as then, I suggest you look at the convention's definition of "refugee", and then return here to desperately attempt to explain how it is at all relevant to... anything.
Asylum claimants have access to courts in the country of refuge.
That is the supreme law of the land in the US.
 
It's almost as though the US isn't signatory to the 1967 Protocol to the 1951 Convention on the Status of Refugees, making it the supreme law of the land.

It's a treaty, it does NOT become the "law of the land"

Only the Constitution has that status.
 
What is the definition of a refugee?
Article 1 of the 1951 Convention defines a refugee as someone who "owing to well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of [their] nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail [themself] of the protection of that country; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of [their] former habitual residence, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it."
 
What rights do refugees have under the 1951 Convention?
The cornerstone of the 1951 Convention is the principle of non-refoulement contained in Article 33. According to this principle, a refugee should not be returned to a country where they face serious threats to their life or freedom.
Other rights contained in the 1951 Convention include:
The right not to be expelled, except under certain, strictly defined conditions (Article 32)
The right not to be punished for irregular entry into the territory of a contracting State (Article 31)
The right to non-discrimination (Articles 3 and 5)
The right to decent work (Articles 17 to 19 and 24)
The right to housing, land and property, including intellectual property (Articles 13, 14 and 21)
The right to education (Article 22)
The right to freedom of religion (Article 4)
The right to access to justice (Article 16)
The right to freedom of movement within the territory (Article 26 and Article 31 (2))
The right to be issued civil, identity and travel documents (Articles 12, 27 and 28)
The right to social protection (Articles 23 and 24 (2-4)).
 
What rights do refugees have under the 1951 Convention?
The cornerstone of the 1951 Convention is the principle of non-refoulement contained in Article 33. According to this principle, a refugee should not be returned to a country where they face serious threats to their life or freedom.
Other rights contained in the 1951 Convention include:
The right not to be expelled, except under certain, strictly defined conditions (Article 32)
The right not to be punished for irregular entry into the territory of a contracting State (Article 31)
The right to non-discrimination (Articles 3 and 5)
The right to decent work (Articles 17 to 19 and 24)
The right to housing, land and property, including intellectual property (Articles 13, 14 and 21)
The right to education (Article 22)
The right to freedom of religion (Article 4)
The right to access to justice (Article 16)
The right to freedom of movement within the territory (Article 26 and Article 31 (2))
The right to be issued civil, identity and travel documents (Articles 12, 27 and 28)
The right to social protection (Articles 23 and 24 (2-4)).

The definition of a refugee isn't covered, and to the US, someone stuck in a poor shithole doesn't become a refugee because of that.
 
The definition of a refugee isn't covered, and to the US, someone stuck in a poor shithole doesn't become a refugee because of that.
Unless they're Cuban, of course.
 
Those are actual POLITICAL refugees, and specific laws cover their status.

Advocate for laws like that for your favorites.
What makes them "political" refugees other than not liking the government of Cuba?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom