The Left Continues Its Unholy Attack on the Supreme Court

[excalibur]

The once fairly non-partisan SCOTUS blog posts multiple loopy articles. Why? Because the left took hold of SCOTUS blog and as with everything else, whatever the left touches it ruins.


Multiple dreck articles linked to by them.

The morning read for Tuesday, Sept. 17

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Tuesday morning read: How Elizabeth Prelogar Stands Up […]

www.scotusblog.com

 

[sealybobo]

The once fairly non-partisan SCOTUS blog posts multiple loopy articles. Why? Because the left took hold of SCOTUS blog and as with everything else, whatever the left touches it ruins.


Multiple dreck articles linked to by them.

The morning read for Tuesday, Sept. 17

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Tuesday morning read: How Elizabeth Prelogar Stands Up […]

www.scotusblog.com

Dude. This Supreme Court is a big Vergogna

 

[Care4all]

The once fairly non-partisan SCOTUS blog posts multiple loopy articles. Why? Because the left took hold of SCOTUS blog and as with everything else, whatever the left touches it ruins.


Multiple dreck articles linked to by them.

The morning read for Tuesday, Sept. 17

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Tuesday morning read: How Elizabeth Prelogar Stands Up […]

www.scotusblog.com

About Us

Led by Amy Howe, SCOTUSblog is devoted to covering the U.S. Supreme Court comprehensively, without bias and according to the highest journalistic and legal ethical standards. The site is provided […]

www.scotusblog.com

ABOUT US​

SCOTUSblog is devoted to covering the U.S. Supreme Court comprehensively, without bias and according to the highest journalistic and legal ethical standards. The site is provided as a public service.
Tom Goldstein and Amy Howe, husband and wife, founded SCOTUSblog in 2002. For over 20 years, our staff and contributors have included talented lawyers, law professors, and journalists covering the court with clarity and precision.
SCOTUSblog generally reports on major merits cases before the court at least three times: before argument, after argument, and after the decision. We note all of the paid cert petitions that raise a legal question we believe may interest the justices; we give additional coverage to particularly significant petitions and emergency applications. For the merits cases and the petitions we cover, we provide access to all the briefs.
On each day that the court announces decisions, we host our popular live blog feature with real-time breaking news coverage. Readers join us from around the world to have their questions answered and hear first how the justices rule.
Beyond the court’s docket, we provide significant coverage and analysis of nominations to the court, special projects, such as our 2019-20 Courtroom Access project, and coverage of the justices’ financial disclosures. Significant books related to the court are covered in our Book reviews/Ask the author series. We maintain a calendar of the court’s schedule. We also regularly publish statistics relating to the court’s term.
We are committed to ensuring that all the material we collect and publish is easily accessible on our site. If your work is featured on SCOTUSblog, please let us know if we have accidentally failed to credit you. We will correct the error immediately.

 

[JGalt]

Dude. This Supreme Court is a big Vergogna

What's your beef, Sealybubba? You already have three SC justices who support your socialist aspirations, four if you count Roberts.

 

[sealybobo]

What's your beef, Sealybubba? You already have three SC justices who support your socialist aspirations, four if you count Roberts.

3 out of how many?

 

[konradv]

The once fairly non-partisan SCOTUS blog posts multiple loopy articles. Why? Because the left took hold of SCOTUS blog and as with everything else, whatever the left touches it ruins.


Multiple dreck articles linked to by them.

The morning read for Tuesday, Sept. 17

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Tuesday morning read: How Elizabeth Prelogar Stands Up […]

www.scotusblog.com

The title of this thread proves that OP doesn’t understand the Constitution!

#TOTALLYLEGAL

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

RWNJ's are always on the side of corruption.
Defending the Supreme Court.
Defending Trump.
Defending Putin.

 

[sealybobo]

The title of this thread proves that OP doesn’t understand the Constitution!

#TOTALLYLEGAL

You remind me of the muulas running Iran. Or Afghanistan. They believe gods on their side. Vergogna

 

[konradv]

You remind me of the muulas running Iran. Or Afghanistan. They believe gods on their side. Vergogna

What ARE you talking about? OP is the mullah-lover!

#HUH

 

[sealybobo]

RWNJ's are always on the side of corruption.
Defending the Supreme Court.
Defending Trump.
Defending Putin.

After that women went under cover and caught the alitos saying crazy shit and Clarence in bed with billionaires, the nation overwhelmingly have zero confidence in the court. Specifically bush and trump appointments.

At least alito and Clarence got to go

 

[sealybobo]

What ARE you talking about? OP is the mullah-lover!

#HUH

Oh. Then he’s right. Conservatives misunderstand the Bible and constitution

 

[JLW]

I guess the OP is not too versed in the history of SCOTUS. There were brutal attacks on the Warren Court by Republicans in the 50s and 60s and vicious attacks on SCOTUS during the 70s and 80s for being too liberal. SCOTUS has been a political football almost since the birth of nation starting with Marbury v, Madison.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

After that women went under cover and caught the alitos saying crazy shit and Clarence in bed with billionaires, the nation overwhelmingly have zero confidence in the court. Specifically bush and trump appointments.

At least alito and Clarence got to go

Total immunity for themselves.
Partial immunity for Trump.
Some people ARE above the law.
And never have been, ethical.

 

[rightwinger]

The Supreme Court has ruled that a President is above the law

They have also made it clear that they are above the law

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The greedy corrupt Democrat Cult wants a one-party dictatorship, and the Conservatives on the Supreme Court is stopping them.

 

[JoeB131]

he once fairly non-partisan SCOTUS blog posts multiple loopy articles. Why? Because the left took hold of SCOTUS blog and as with everything else, whatever the left touches it ruins.


Multiple dreck articles linked to by them.

Hey, Stupid.

The Roberts Court is delegitimizing SCOTUS, not some blog.

When you throw out well-reasoned precedents that have stood for decades because the Heritage Foundation told you to, you've just made SCOTUS another government committee that can controlled by appointing hacks.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The Supreme Court has ruled that a President is above the law

They have also made it clear that they are above the law

Wrong again.
The Supreme Court ruled that presidents have immunity.
BTW, so does congress and judges.
Can you imagine if Barry Obama and Joe Biden did not have immunity?
They would be in prison right now lol.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Hey, Stupid.

The Roberts Court is delegitimizing SCOTUS, not some blog.

When you throw out well-reasoned precedents that have stood for decades because the Heritage Foundation told you to, you've just made SCOTUS another government committee that can controlled by appointing hacks.

The Supreme Court is protecting the Citizens from the totalitarian Democrat Cult.

 

[JoeB131]

The Supreme Court is protecting the Citizens from the totalitarian Democrat Cult.

um, yeah, what kind of a world do we live in where big corporations can't pollute our water?

 

[22lcidw]

3 out of how many?

Progs have a massive number of shill judges in lower courts who make laws for them. They even reversed a California popular vote on gay marriage. You are Communists. There are outside powers who have infected your party and most of our organizations entangled near everywhere. To convince parents that their five-year-old needs to have transexual surgery is the ultimate in a nation that has lost a revolution without a shot being fired. So, the Supreme Court is not entirely taken over. And Trump may not be compromised like most of the other politicians. This makes you impatient, as you smell victory. unfortunately like the arrow on Prog campaign slogans, you cannot stop. It will not be worth it to have two parent families at some point. It is much more expensive in any other way.