The Lazy Poor

[PoliticalChic]

? you do know reading and comprehension is not the same right?

If you want to defend PC's arguments in this thread, to extent they even exist, by all means do so?

You can start by convincing me that giving free education to poor kids at the expense of other taxpayers is not a redistribution of wealth.

I never said pc was perfect, but I do enjoy where she can get truth matters mad...... lol

Shhhhh.....you're gonna spoil my gig!!!

 

[Truthmatters]

http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-flame-zone/291099-people-good-damn-it.html


this thread YOU started proved you a lair with your won words PC

 

[PoliticalChic]

If you want to defend PC's arguments in this thread, to extent they even exist, by all means do so?

You can start by convincing me that giving free education to poor kids at the expense of other taxpayers is not a redistribution of wealth.

I never said pc was perfect, but I do enjoy where she can get truth matters mad...... lol

yes I get mad when people lie

I get mad when they then claim Jesus is on the side of their lies

I never lie....

...and, I don't believe I'm mentioned Jesus, except maybe in a quote.

Wanna check me on that?

 

[Truthmatters]

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/226349-pacifism-and-the-left-10.html#post7156193





6. The Right understands that man’s nature, while not inherently evil, is not good


this is your own words and you started a whole thread denying you said it

 

[PoliticalChic]

Since it appears that the otherwise anti-welfare state anti-socialism conservatives in this thread have unanimously conceded that our socialist educational system is acceptable,

what about healthcare for Americans regardless of their ability to pay?

Can you also accept that a socialist healthcare system is acceptable?

Or would you rather argue that one's health is not as important as one's education, or that one's access to healthcare ought to be directly proportionate to one's income/wealth?

"...anti-welfare..."

Where ever did you get that view?

Oh...your usual?
You simply made it up.


It seems that both you and your girlfriend snip off tiny parts of posts to attempt to prove some fib....


Example: I am a proponent of welfare.

a. To the poor

b. ...and not necessarily carried out by government.

You made up the bumper-sticker, didn't you.
Isn't that the truth?

If you could read you would have seen in the post above I referred to the 'anti-welfare state'.

Since you just said "...welfare... not necessarily carried out by government"

you in fact defined yourself as exactly the kind of person I was referring to.

Now,

try addressing the questions posed above.

Or, answer this:

Is free healthcare given to poor/low income Americans a redistribution of wealth? Should it thus be ended entirely,

since you profess to believe that the government has no business redistributing wealth?

State not federal.


fed·er·al·ism (fdr--lzm, fdr-)
n.
1.
a. A system of government in which power is divided between a central authority and constituent political units.


See article 1, section 8

 

[Truthmatters]

I never said pc was perfect, but I do enjoy where she can get truth matters mad...... lol

yes I get mad when people lie

I get mad when they then claim Jesus is on the side of their lies

I never lie....

...and, I don't believe I'm mentioned Jesus, except maybe in a quote.

Wanna check me on that?

are you now claiming your not a christain?

 

[Truthmatters]

you are a proven liar and still continue to deny you lied right in the face of cold hard facts,

Now go get the quote of mine you claims to exists

 

[PoliticalChic]

you lied again.


go get the quote of mine wehre I said that you lying sack of shit

Don't be afraid to answer:

If all people are good... they would choose only the good to lead them. Doesn't that make sense? Imagine that an elected official had to vote on the following bill:
"If a baby happens to be born healthy, even though the intention of both mother and doctor had been to abort the child......
...let's make certain that swift medical attention is provided."

a. Kinda like what would be done in the case of an auto accident. If there is an injury...'good' folks would see that medical care is provided.....even if the injured party was a bank robber trying to escape....right?

b. But if that official decides not to agree to the procedure, and instead acts in such a way
that the infant is simply set aside to languish until it dies...

c. Is that official proof that people are "good"?

d. And, knowing of the official's view, e.g., that its children need not be "punished" by having to have a baby in the above situation....would any who voted for that official, in your view, be your "good" people?



C'mon now....the world is hanging on your every word.....


Gotcha, huh?

Go get the quote of mine saying all people are "good" like you are claiming I said

WHAT???


You don't want to answer?


Is that because it proves my point?




C'mon.....you can do it!
Take your medicine.

 

[Truthmatters]

you lied again.


go get the quote of mine wehre I said that you lying sack of shit

Don't be afraid to answer:

If all people are good... they would choose only the good to lead them. Doesn't that make sense? Imagine that an elected official had to vote on the following bill:
"If a baby happens to be born healthy, even though the intention of both mother and doctor had been to abort the child......
...let's make certain that swift medical attention is provided."

a. Kinda like what would be done in the case of an auto accident. If there is an injury...'good' folks would see that medical care is provided.....even if the injured party was a bank robber trying to escape....right?

b. But if that official decides not to agree to the procedure, and instead acts in such a way
that the infant is simply set aside to languish until it dies...

c. Is that official proof that people are "good"?

d. And, knowing of the official's view, e.g., that its children need not be "punished" by having to have a baby in the above situation....would any who voted for that official, in your view, be your "good" people?



C'mon now....the world is hanging on your every word.....


Gotcha, huh?

Go get the quote of mine saying all people are "good" like you are claiming I said

go get the quote wehre I say what you claimed.

I have never said all people are good.

NEVER

 

[PoliticalChic]

produce the quote from me you claim exists

'she has promoted ideas that include things like "most people are bad".'


Wanna take that back, you naughty thing?

 

[Truthmatters]

why did you say that people are NOT GOOD and then start a thread whwere you claimed you did not say it?

 

[Truthmatters]

produce the quote from me you claim exists

'she has promoted ideas that include things like "most people are bad".'


Wanna take that back, you naughty thing?

You clearly said you thought people are not good.


why do you pretend you didnt when the facts are clear?

 

[PoliticalChic]

yes I get mad when people lie

I get mad when they then claim Jesus is on the side of their lies

I never lie....

...and, I don't believe I'm mentioned Jesus, except maybe in a quote.

Wanna check me on that?

are you now claiming your not a christain?

Are you obsessed with me?

The fame I must live with, I guess.....

 

[Truthmatters]

have you in the past claimed to be a christain?


why wont you answer that one?

 

[Truthmatters]

I never lie....

...and, I don't believe I'm mentioned Jesus, except maybe in a quote.

Wanna check me on that?

are you now claiming your not a christain?

Are you obsessed with me?

The fame I must live with, I guess.....

calling a liar a liar is fact not obession

 

[PoliticalChic]

why did you say that people are NOT GOOD and then start a thread whwere you claimed you did not say it?

See post #450....

 

[PoliticalChic]

produce the quote from me you claim exists

'she has promoted ideas that include things like "most people are bad".'


Wanna take that back, you naughty thing?

You clearly said you thought people are not good.


why do you pretend you didnt when the facts are clear?

Calm down.....


S-E-E- P-O-S-T #450.

 

[PoliticalChic]

are you now claiming your not a christain?

Are you obsessed with me?

The fame I must live with, I guess.....

calling a liar a liar is fact not obession

Why are you asking my religion?

I don't ask if you are a Druid and paint yourself blue?

You might look good in blue.....

 

[PoliticalChic]

As an either/or situation, I'd say that resenting the Rich is far less reprehensible than resenting the Poor.

Your resentment for the Poor is interesting. As an immigrant, is that something you acquired since you arrived here,

thinking it was part of how to be more 'American'?

1. Here comes another bursting of your imaginary bubbles!

Ready?

The is no perennial category known as 'the rich.'
It is a momentary snapshot in time.

It is a bête noire created to inflame covetous buffoons such as you.

a. "It’s a common misperception that earnings or wealth quintiles are static, closed, private clubs with very little turnover, so that once a household finds itself in an earnings quintile or living below the poverty line in a given year, it’s doomed to stay there for life. But the empirical evidence tells a much different story of dynamic change and turnover in the U.S. economy—people and households move up and down the earnings and wealth quintiles throughout their careers and lives. Many of today’s poor are tomorrow’s rich, and many of today’s rich are tomorrow’s middle class, reflecting the significant upward and downward mobility in the U.S. economy."
OneLife: Income Mobility in the Dynamic U.S. Economy


Feel like a fool?
Fitting.


2. "...resenting the Poor..."

As prevarication is your mode of operation, a definition will obviate the attempt.

Poor is defined as follows: no home, no heat, no food.

Can you find any who resent such?
No?

Good.



Putting you in your place has become, it seems, my hobby.

Are you aware that you also are nothing more than a 'snapshot in time'?

Thus by your 'reasoning', that would mean that you do not exist, as you said there are no 'rich'.

Which in a way would answer what is an often asked question around here...

...how can someone that stupid even exist!!???

Can I get a wallet-size?

 

[PoliticalChic]

When the life of a person, her/his time, is considered as nothing, values are stood on their head.

An autobiography.


As was true of Franz Kafka, so much of your writing becomes clear based on the above.