The Lawless Left

[PoliticalChic]

1. As it is essential a religion, anything that is contrary to the Left/Democrat/Progressive agenda, can, according to their canons, be ignored.

And when they say 'rules'......they mean the Constitution.


2. The most pertinent example is the recent presidential election, where Democrats and their allies allowed some states to ignore...
"Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.
Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”
McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)

Instead, Democrats allowed other bodies and agents to alter voting procedures.


3. And the recent Court decision of the second amendment is to be ignored in New York State.

"NY Defies the Supreme Court​

After losing a huge gun case, the state willfully ignores the parameters of the Court’s ruling.

When a right is delineated in the Constitution, leftists hate it. When a right is fabricated out of nowhere, they love it. That is the essence of much of the division between the two political sides. We can’t even agree on what rights actually are.
Such is the case in New York, which just lost a Supreme Court case over its unconstitutional restrictions on concealed carry permits. New York’s “may issue” regime meant that authorities could deny carry permits for no reason at all. Oh, they’d say the applicant is the one who failed to demonstrate a “special need” for obtaining a permit, but the reality is that approval or denial could depend on what New York authorities had for breakfast that morning. Few permits were approved.



4. Via Justice Clarence Thomas’s thorough defense of the Second Amendment, the Court’s 6-3 majority said this violates the most basic constitutional right “to bear” arms outside the home. The Court is absolutely right.

Nevertheless, leftists hate gun rights with the intensity of a thousand suns, and they won’t rest when it comes to chipping away at those rights. New York Democrat Governor Kathy Hochul called the Court’s ruling “frightful in its scope” and called a special legislative session because, she insisted, “We are not powerless to respond to this.”



5. Respond they did. The state Senate (43-20) and Assembly (91-51) approved legislation that casts to the curb the Supreme Court’s decision. Hochul rang in Independence Day weekend by signing it.
New York’s new law heavily regulates the permitting process and greatly expands a list of what Thomas’s ruling called “sensitive places” where guns may be reasonably restricted. Perhaps Thomas missed an opportunity to more specifically define those “sensitive places,” but he did include a warning for New York and other states: “Expanding the category of ‘sensitive places’ simply to all places of public congregation that are not isolated from law enforcement defines the category of ‘sensitive places’ far too broadly,” which he said would “eviscerate the general right to publicly carry arms for self-defense.”

NY Defies the Supreme Court

After losing a huge gun case, the state willfully ignores the parameters of the Court's ruling.

patriotpost.us

Essentially, NYS now forbids the carrying of weapons anyplace there there is the possibility of encountering an oxygen molecule.




No American can vote for the lawless Democrat Party.

 

[Calypso Jones]

The Left has embarked on a Crusade of Lawlessness. We see it. Their supporters do not...i won't talk about that right now. Later. The Question is WHY have they embarked on a Crusade of Lawlessness.

What is the Law? | Frontpage Mag

Why the progressive, socialist Left has embarked upon a crusade of lawlessness.

www.frontpagemag.com

The reason the progressive socialist left has embarked upon this crusade of lawlessness is that they have no regard for individual rights, unless they align with their ideological rights. Leftists do not study or read the philosophies of Locke, Bastiat, DeTocqueville, or anyone who advocates for individual rights. The leftists in America are grounded in the rantings of Karl Marx, Antonio Gramsci, Saul Alinsky, and other proponents of collectivism. This is why we should not refer to these progressive socialists as liberals. True liberals — classical liberals — are today’s constitutional conservatives who believe in and understand that the individual is supreme over the institution of government, not vice versa.

Just recently, Kamala Harris misquoted the Declaration of Independence by intentionally excluding “Creator” of the first unalienable right, “life.” Bastiat, if alive today, would have immediately called her out on this purposeful omission. As well, when the government is making decisions to release violent criminals back onto our streets, that is a violation of the Law. We have a government that is allowing millions of illegal immigrants to violate our national sovereignty which endangers our lives by way of drug, human, and sex trafficking, not to mention the destruction of private property. This is a violation of the Law.

When our government believes in the theory of Karl Marx which states, “from those according to their ability, to those according to their need,” that is the premise of economic socialism. It is also a violation of the Law because it is not the raison d’etre of the government to decide how the property of one must be taken away for others. That is what Bastiat termed “legal plunder.” How could it be part of the Law to have the government decide which businesses are essential, or not?

Even Benjamin Franklin asserted, “those who would surrender essential liberty for temporary security, in the end, will deserve neither liberty, nor security.”

THIS is the political/man inspired reason for the lefti's veering off the course of truth. Nothing wrong with that but in my opinion there is more to it.