The latest Merchan decision (postponing the Trump sentencing) and where it still fell short.

[BackAgain]

ANDREW McCARTHY: Anti-Trump judge stumbles into the right decision in delaying sentencing

Legal analyst Andrew McCarthy says New York Judge Juan Merchan had little choice but to delay former President Trump's sentencing. But the judge's explanation for why he did it made no sense and continued his pattern of bias against Trump.

www.foxnews.com

First off, a clear, concise and very smart analysis of the ruling from Merchan.

Andrew McCarthy is spot on.

Yes: the sentencing should have been delayed. But, more importantly, there shouldn’t even be a sentencing. The case needs to be swiftly dismissed on defendant’s motion before it ever gets to sentencing. The conviction was and is legally invalid.

(Just read Mc Carthy’s piece.)

 

[eagle7-31]

ANDREW McCARTHY: Anti-Trump judge stumbles into the right decision in delaying sentencing

Legal analyst Andrew McCarthy says New York Judge Juan Merchan had little choice but to delay former President Trump's sentencing. But the judge's explanation for why he did it made no sense and continued his pattern of bias against Trump.

www.foxnews.com

First off, a clear, concise and very smart analysis of the ruling from Merchan.

Andrew McCarthy is spot on.

Yes: the sentencing should have been delayed. But, more importantly, there shouldn’t even be a sentencing. The case needs to be swiftly dismissed on defendant’s motion before it ever gets to sentencing. The conviction was and is legally invalid.

(Just read Mc Carthy’s piece.)

I believe the dems got to him to delay because they were afraid Trump getting sentenced before the election might get Trump more votes.

 

[DGS49]

Honestly, everyone with even a modicum of legal knowledge knows that this entire trial was a travesty. Merchan knows this as well as anybody. He DOES NOT want to go down in history as the New York judge who tried to torpedo the election of the President, AND whose decision was violently* overturned on appeal. Not a good look for your legacy.


_____________________
* That is to say, the appeals court decision will criticize Merchan's behavior in colorful detail and with great emphasis.

 

[Crepitus]

ANDREW McCARTHY: Anti-Trump judge stumbles into the right decision in delaying sentencing

Legal analyst Andrew McCarthy says New York Judge Juan Merchan had little choice but to delay former President Trump's sentencing. But the judge's explanation for why he did it made no sense and continued his pattern of bias against Trump.

www.foxnews.com

First off, a clear, concise and very smart analysis of the ruling from Merchan.

Andrew McCarthy is spot on.

Yes: the sentencing should have been delayed. But, more importantly, there shouldn’t even be a sentencing. The case needs to be swiftly dismissed on defendant’s motion before it ever gets to sentencing. The conviction was and is legally invalid.

(Just read Mc Carthy’s piece.)

This keeps the SC(r)OTUS from getting their slimey hands on it before the election.

 

[Grumpyolman]

Sentencing Trump to prison for a "Bookkeeping Error" would not sit well with the general public. Merchan, biased jackass that he is, figured this out.

 

[Dante]

ANDREW McCARTHY: Anti-Trump judge stumbles into the right decision in delaying sentencing

Legal analyst Andrew McCarthy says New York Judge Juan Merchan had little choice but to delay former President Trump's sentencing. But the judge's explanation for why he did it made no sense and continued his pattern of bias against Trump.

www.foxnews.com

First off, a clear, concise and very smart analysis of the ruling from Merchan.

Andrew McCarthy is spot on.

Yes: the sentencing should have been delayed. But, more importantly, there shouldn’t even be a sentencing. The case needs to be swiftly dismissed on defendant’s motion before it ever gets to sentencing. The conviction was and is legally invalid.

(Just read Mc Carthy’s piece.)

Andrew McCarthy?

Uhm, okay.

 

[Dante]

This keeps the SC(r)OTUS from getting their slimey hands on it before the election.

from the idiots:

"The conviction was and is legally invalid."

Partisan Opinion Posing As Fact

 

[BackAgain]

This keeps the SC(r)OTUS from getting their slimey hands on it before the election.

You’re too stupid to breathe Crappy.

The SCOTUS decision may be the most exemplary job they did these past 80 days or so years.

 

[BackAgain]

Andrew McCarthy?

Uhm, okay.

Yep. A guy far tougher intelligent and knowledgeable for folks like you.

 

[Crepitus]

You’re too stupid to breathe Crappy.

The SCOTUS decision may be the most exemplary job they did these past 80 days or so years.

It's absolute crap, as is almost every ruling for the past half decade or so.

The whole court is hopelessly corrupt.

Time to flush and start over.