The killing goes on...

[Manchester]

You have to kill even more defending against acts of terrorism, and that is what Israel are doing

You must be out of bullets. You are playing the terrorist card.

Hamas and hezbolla are both terrorist organisations, so if they are involved then terrorism is not that far away. As all the UN resolutions state the Palestinians have to stop all acts of belligerence to achieve peace.

Under what criteria are they terrorist organisations. Because the last time I looked

Palestinian legislative election, 2006 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hezbollah Wins Easy Victory In Elections in Southern Lebanon

They were democratically elected "terrorist" organisations.

 

[Sweet_Caroline]

Colonel Richard Kemp, former commander of British forces in Afghanistan has issued a damning verdict on the Amnesty report in the Jewish Chronicle:

Amnesty’s latest report is far from impartial. A piece of naked anti-Israel propaganda, it is a stark reminder of just how far they have lost their way. The cynical timing of the report, published during Israel Apartheid Week, can only have been intended to fuel the demonisation of the Jewish state in schools and on campuses.

There is no attempt to place the actions of the Israeli security forces in context. No mention of the willful orchestration by Palestinian extremists of violent demonstrations to provoke Israeli troops into a response intended to result in death and injury among their own people for propaganda purposes — or even to lure security forces into lethal terrorist attacks. These are criminal actions.

Salil Shetty, Amnesty’s Secretary General, said in an interview only a few days ago: “Amnesty International is not an organisation with expertise on military situations”. This report shows just how true that is.

For example, the glib dismissal of petrol bombs as posing “little or no threat” to the lives of Israeli soldiers. I have seen first-hand how horrifically a petrol bomb can wound a soldier.

Amnesty’s recommendation that the US and EU ban the transfer of crowd control devices and training not only betrays its politicised support for anti-Israel boycotts but is naively counter-productive. Such systems could only help reduce violence.

Instead of using its resources to make a serious contribution towards easing the plight of the Palestinian people, Amnesty has produced a distorted report that will be exploited as a tool to incite even more hatred.


Full article here: Media Shills For "Trigger Happy" Amnesty Report | HonestReporting

 

[P F Tinmore]

Colonel Richard Kemp, former commander of British forces in Afghanistan has issued a damning verdict on the Amnesty report in the Jewish Chronicle:

Amnesty’s latest report is far from impartial. A piece of naked anti-Israel propaganda, it is a stark reminder of just how far they have lost their way. The cynical timing of the report, published during Israel Apartheid Week, can only have been intended to fuel the demonisation of the Jewish state in schools and on campuses.

There is no attempt to place the actions of the Israeli security forces in context. No mention of the willful orchestration by Palestinian extremists of violent demonstrations to provoke Israeli troops into a response intended to result in death and injury among their own people for propaganda purposes — or even to lure security forces into lethal terrorist attacks. These are criminal actions.

Salil Shetty, Amnesty’s Secretary General, said in an interview only a few days ago: “Amnesty International is not an organisation with expertise on military situations”. This report shows just how true that is.

For example, the glib dismissal of petrol bombs as posing “little or no threat” to the lives of Israeli soldiers. I have seen first-hand how horrifically a petrol bomb can wound a soldier.

Amnesty’s recommendation that the US and EU ban the transfer of crowd control devices and training not only betrays its politicised support for anti-Israel boycotts but is naively counter-productive. Such systems could only help reduce violence.

Instead of using its resources to make a serious contribution towards easing the plight of the Palestinian people, Amnesty has produced a distorted report that will be exploited as a tool to incite even more hatred.


Full article here: Media Shills For "Trigger Happy" Amnesty Report | HonestReporting

Colonel Richard Kemp,

Oh no, not stooge Kemp again.

All he does is read Israel's propaganda talking points.

 

[bedowin62]

You must be out of bullets. You are playing the terrorist card.

Hamas and hezbolla are both terrorist organisations, so if they are involved then terrorism is not that far away. As all the UN resolutions state the Palestinians have to stop all acts of belligerence to achieve peace.

Under what criteria are they terrorist organisations. Because the last time I looked

Palestinian legislative election, 2006 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hezbollah Wins Easy Victory In Elections in Southern Lebanon

They were democratically elected "terrorist" organisations.

buth HAMAS and Hezbollah are on the list of terrorist or terrorism-supporting organizations in Japan the European Union for one.
comical the way left-wing nutjobs on these boards try to be "open-minded" and imply that repubs are backwards; that the opinions of the outside world are closer to what the American Left thinks; and it isnt even true


idiots and hypocrites

 

[toastman]

Colonel Richard Kemp, former commander of British forces in Afghanistan has issued a damning verdict on the Amnesty report in the Jewish Chronicle:

Amnesty’s latest report is far from impartial. A piece of naked anti-Israel propaganda, it is a stark reminder of just how far they have lost their way. The cynical timing of the report, published during Israel Apartheid Week, can only have been intended to fuel the demonisation of the Jewish state in schools and on campuses.

There is no attempt to place the actions of the Israeli security forces in context. No mention of the willful orchestration by Palestinian extremists of violent demonstrations to provoke Israeli troops into a response intended to result in death and injury among their own people for propaganda purposes — or even to lure security forces into lethal terrorist attacks. These are criminal actions.

Salil Shetty, Amnesty’s Secretary General, said in an interview only a few days ago: “Amnesty International is not an organisation with expertise on military situations”. This report shows just how true that is.

For example, the glib dismissal of petrol bombs as posing “little or no threat” to the lives of Israeli soldiers. I have seen first-hand how horrifically a petrol bomb can wound a soldier.

Amnesty’s recommendation that the US and EU ban the transfer of crowd control devices and training not only betrays its politicised support for anti-Israel boycotts but is naively counter-productive. Such systems could only help reduce violence.

Instead of using its resources to make a serious contribution towards easing the plight of the Palestinian people, Amnesty has produced a distorted report that will be exploited as a tool to incite even more hatred.


Full article here: Media Shills For "Trigger Happy" Amnesty Report | HonestReporting

Colonel Richard Kemp,

Oh no, not stooge Kemp again.

All he does is read Israel's propaganda talking points.

You say that about everyone who doesnt kiss Palestinian ass

 

[bedowin62]

Hamas and hezbolla are both terrorist organisations, so if they are involved then terrorism is not that far away. As all the UN resolutions state the Palestinians have to stop all acts of belligerence to achieve peace.

Under what criteria are they terrorist organisations. Because the last time I looked

Palestinian legislative election, 2006 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hezbollah Wins Easy Victory In Elections in Southern Lebanon

They were democratically elected "terrorist" organisations.

buth HAMAS and Hezbollah are on the list of terrorist or terrorism-supporting organizations in Japan the European Union for one.
comical the way left-wing nutjobs on these boards try to be "open-minded" and imply that repubs are backwards; that the opinions of the outside world are closer to what the American Left thinks; and it isnt even true


idiots and hypocrites

oh and they are on the American list also. GO CRY TO OBAMA that they were elected democratically; or maybe Jimmy Carter will listen to your whine

idiot

 

[Sweet_Caroline]

Colonel Richard Kemp, former commander of British forces in Afghanistan has issued a damning verdict on the Amnesty report in the Jewish Chronicle:

Amnesty’s latest report is far from impartial. A piece of naked anti-Israel propaganda, it is a stark reminder of just how far they have lost their way. The cynical timing of the report, published during Israel Apartheid Week, can only have been intended to fuel the demonisation of the Jewish state in schools and on campuses.

There is no attempt to place the actions of the Israeli security forces in context. No mention of the willful orchestration by Palestinian extremists of violent demonstrations to provoke Israeli troops into a response intended to result in death and injury among their own people for propaganda purposes — or even to lure security forces into lethal terrorist attacks. These are criminal actions.

Salil Shetty, Amnesty’s Secretary General, said in an interview only a few days ago: “Amnesty International is not an organisation with expertise on military situations”. This report shows just how true that is.

For example, the glib dismissal of petrol bombs as posing “little or no threat” to the lives of Israeli soldiers. I have seen first-hand how horrifically a petrol bomb can wound a soldier.

Amnesty’s recommendation that the US and EU ban the transfer of crowd control devices and training not only betrays its politicised support for anti-Israel boycotts but is naively counter-productive. Such systems could only help reduce violence.

Instead of using its resources to make a serious contribution towards easing the plight of the Palestinian people, Amnesty has produced a distorted report that will be exploited as a tool to incite even more hatred.


Full article here: Media Shills For "Trigger Happy" Amnesty Report | HonestReporting

Colonel Richard Kemp,

Oh no, not stooge Kemp again.

All he does is read Israel's propaganda talking points.

Take the rest of the article then. It loses all the fun when I have to guide you. Try and think for yourself for a change.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Hamas and hezbolla are both terrorist organisations, so if they are involved then terrorism is not that far away. As all the UN resolutions state the Palestinians have to stop all acts of belligerence to achieve peace.

Under what criteria are they terrorist organisations. Because the last time I looked

Palestinian legislative election, 2006 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hezbollah Wins Easy Victory In Elections in Southern Lebanon

They were democratically elected "terrorist" organisations.

buth HAMAS and Hezbollah are on the list of terrorist or terrorism-supporting organizations in Japan the European Union for one.
comical the way left-wing nutjobs on these boards try to be "open-minded" and imply that repubs are backwards; that the opinions of the outside world are closer to what the American Left thinks; and it isnt even true


idiots and hypocrites

Under what criteria are they terrorist organisations.

Of course that question is never answered.

 

[bedowin62]

Under what criteria are they terrorist organisations. Because the last time I looked

Palestinian legislative election, 2006 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hezbollah Wins Easy Victory In Elections in Southern Lebanon

They were democratically elected "terrorist" organisations.

buth HAMAS and Hezbollah are on the list of terrorist or terrorism-supporting organizations in Japan the European Union for one.
comical the way left-wing nutjobs on these boards try to be "open-minded" and imply that repubs are backwards; that the opinions of the outside world are closer to what the American Left thinks; and it isnt even true


idiots and hypocrites

Under what criteria are they terrorist organisations.

Of course that question is never answered.

Once a target is identified, the Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism prepares a detailed "administrative record," which is a compilation of information, typically including both classified and open sources information, demonstrating that the statutory criteria for designation have been satisfied. If the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, decides to make the designation, United States Congress is notified of the Secretary's intent to designate the organization and given seven days to review the designation, as the INA requires. Upon the expiration of the seven-day waiting period, notice of the designation is published in the Federal Register, at which point the designation takes effect. An organization designated as an FTO may seek judicial review of the designation in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit not later than 30 days after the designation is published in the Federal Register.

Legal criteria for designation

(Reflecting Amendments to Section 219 of the INA in the 2001 USA PATRIOT Act)
It must be a foreign organization.
The organization must engage in terrorist activity, as defined in section 212 (a)(3)(B) of the INA (8 U.S.C. § 1182(a) (3)(B)),* or terrorism, as defined in section 140(d)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989 (22 U.S.C. § 2656f(d) (2)),** or retain the capability and intent to engage in terrorist activity or terrorism.
The organization’s terrorist activity or terrorism must threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security (national defense, foreign relations, or the economic interests) of the United States.


here; it's from Wiki; NOT the best source; but i doubt it matters to you; your really looking only for a reason to engage in moral relativism anyway. This should be enough to keep you crying for a while

 

[P F Tinmore]

Colonel Richard Kemp, former commander of British forces in Afghanistan has issued a damning verdict on the Amnesty report in the Jewish Chronicle:

Amnesty’s latest report is far from impartial. A piece of naked anti-Israel propaganda, it is a stark reminder of just how far they have lost their way. The cynical timing of the report, published during Israel Apartheid Week, can only have been intended to fuel the demonisation of the Jewish state in schools and on campuses.

There is no attempt to place the actions of the Israeli security forces in context. No mention of the willful orchestration by Palestinian extremists of violent demonstrations to provoke Israeli troops into a response intended to result in death and injury among their own people for propaganda purposes — or even to lure security forces into lethal terrorist attacks. These are criminal actions.

Salil Shetty, Amnesty’s Secretary General, said in an interview only a few days ago: “Amnesty International is not an organisation with expertise on military situations”. This report shows just how true that is.

For example, the glib dismissal of petrol bombs as posing “little or no threat” to the lives of Israeli soldiers. I have seen first-hand how horrifically a petrol bomb can wound a soldier.

Amnesty’s recommendation that the US and EU ban the transfer of crowd control devices and training not only betrays its politicised support for anti-Israel boycotts but is naively counter-productive. Such systems could only help reduce violence.

Instead of using its resources to make a serious contribution towards easing the plight of the Palestinian people, Amnesty has produced a distorted report that will be exploited as a tool to incite even more hatred.


Full article here: Media Shills For "Trigger Happy" Amnesty Report | HonestReporting

Colonel Richard Kemp,

Oh no, not stooge Kemp again.

All he does is read Israel's propaganda talking points.

Take the rest of the article then. It loses all the fun when I have to guide you. Try and think for yourself for a change.

Of course this clown never mentions why Israeli troops are in Palestine at a Palestinian protest. The troops are only there to start a confrontation.

 

[Sweet_Caroline]

Oh no, not stooge Kemp again.

All he does is read Israel's propaganda talking points.

Take the rest of the article then. It loses all the fun when I have to guide you. Try and think for yourself for a change.

Of course this clown never mentions why Israeli troops are in Palestine at a Palestinian protest. The troops are only there to start a confrontation.

Do you mean the Palestinian controlled area of the West Bank when you say Palestine?

 

[P F Tinmore]

buth HAMAS and Hezbollah are on the list of terrorist or terrorism-supporting organizations in Japan the European Union for one.
comical the way left-wing nutjobs on these boards try to be "open-minded" and imply that repubs are backwards; that the opinions of the outside world are closer to what the American Left thinks; and it isnt even true


idiots and hypocrites

Under what criteria are they terrorist organisations.

Of course that question is never answered.

Once a target is identified, the Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism prepares a detailed "administrative record," which is a compilation of information, typically including both classified and open sources information, demonstrating that the statutory criteria for designation have been satisfied. If the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, decides to make the designation, United States Congress is notified of the Secretary's intent to designate the organization and given seven days to review the designation, as the INA requires. Upon the expiration of the seven-day waiting period, notice of the designation is published in the Federal Register, at which point the designation takes effect. An organization designated as an FTO may seek judicial review of the designation in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit not later than 30 days after the designation is published in the Federal Register.

Legal criteria for designation

(Reflecting Amendments to Section 219 of the INA in the 2001 USA PATRIOT Act)
It must be a foreign organization.
The organization must engage in terrorist activity, as defined in section 212 (a)(3)(B) of the INA (8 U.S.C. § 1182(a) (3)(B)),* or terrorism, as defined in section 140(d)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989 (22 U.S.C. § 2656f(d) (2)),** or retain the capability and intent to engage in terrorist activity or terrorism.
The organization’s terrorist activity or terrorism must threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security (national defense, foreign relations, or the economic interests) of the United States.


here; it's from Wiki; NOT the best source; but i doubt it matters to you; your really looking only for a reason to engage in moral relativism anyway. This should be enough to keep you crying for a while

Yeah, we know all of the monkey motions, but what have they done to receive this name calling?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Take the rest of the article then. It loses all the fun when I have to guide you. Try and think for yourself for a change.

Of course this clown never mentions why Israeli troops are in Palestine at a Palestinian protest. The troops are only there to start a confrontation.

Do you mean the Palestinian controlled area of the West Bank when you say Palestine?

Whatever, it is not Israel. They are foreign troops if outside of Israel.

 

[Sweet_Caroline]

One of the primary reasons that peace is so difficult in Palestine is the hate generated by the IDF....Mark my words if peace is achieved, war crimes will be adjudicated for many years...

Amnesty International accuses Israeli armed forces of possible war crimes | World news | theguardian.com

Israeli forces are using excessive, reckless violence in the occupied West Bank, killing dozens of Palestinians over the past three years in what might constitute a war crime, Amnesty International said.

In a report entitled Trigger Happy, the human rights group accused Israel of allowing its soldiers to act with virtual impunity and urged an independent review of the deaths.

The Israeli army dismissed the allegations, saying security forces had seen a "substantial increase" in Palestinian violence and Amnesty had revealed a "complete lack of understanding" about the difficulties soldiers faced.

According to UN data, 45 Palestinians were killed in the West Bank between 2011 and 2013, including six children. Amnesty said it had documented the deaths of 25 civilians during this period, all but three of whom died last year.

"The report presents a body of evidence that shows a harrowing pattern of unlawful killings and unwarranted injuries of Palestinian civilians by Israeli forces in the West Bank," said Philip Luther, the director of the Middle East and north Africa programme at Amnesty International.

Media Shills For “Trigger Happy” Amnesty Report

FEBRUARY 27, 2014 15:21
BY SIMON PLOSKER

Amnesty-palestinian-violenceThere exists a symbiotic relationship between non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the media. NGOs rely on the publicity and exposure that the media gives to their activities while the media are only too happy to oblige, often taking the claims of NGO reports at face value.

It’s all too easy to throw around emotive language that contributes to the demonization of Israel: “war crimes,” “excessive force,” “callous disregard for human life.”

With the release of Amnesty International’s report “Trigger-happy: Israel’s use of excessive force in the West Bank,” the so-called human rights organization would certainly be thrilled with headlines such as these:

“Amnesty says some Israeli West Bank killings may be war crimes” – Reuters
“US and EU Urged To Halt Weapons Sales To Israel” – Sky News
“Amnesty International accuses Israel of wilfully killing of Palestinians in the West Bank” – ABC News (Australia)

According to Reuters:

Israeli forces are using excessive, reckless violence in the occupied West Bank, killing dozens of Palestinians over the past three years in what might constitute a war crime, Amnesty International said on Thursday.

In a report entitled “Trigger Happy”, the human rights group accused Israel of allowing its soldiers to act with virtual impunity and urged an independent review of the deaths.

Sky News reports:

The US and EU governments must suspend all supplies of crowd-control “weapons and devices” to Israel until the country reigns in its use of force against Palestinians on the West Bank, a report has demanded

In the report “Trigger Happy: Israel’s Use of Excessive Force on the West Bank”, Amnesty International criticises what it calls Israel’s “callous disregard for human life” in its handling of Palestinian protests against occupation.

It points to an increase in the number of Palestinians killed by Israeli forces – with 27 people killed last year, in comparison to eight in 2012 and 10 in 2011, according to figures from the UN.

The IDF has responded by stating that Amnesty report wholly ignores the substantial increase in Palestinian violence initiated over the past year, and shows a complete lack of understanding as to operational challenges the IDF faces:

2013 saw a sharp increase in rock hurling incidents, gravely jeopardizing the lives of civilians and military personnel. 132 Israelis were injured during that year alone, almost double the number in 2012. This is no surprise considering that over 5,000 incidents of rock hurling took place, half of which were along main roads.

Sadly, rock throwing and violent demonstrations present only part of the operational challenges posed to the IDF by Palestinian violence in Judea and Samaria. Indeed in 2013 there were 66 further terror attacks which included shootings, the planting of IEDs, blunt weapon attacks and the abduction and murder of a soldier.

The IDF operates in Judea and Samaria in order to contain violence initiated by Palestinians. When feasible, the IDF contains this life-threatening violence using riot dispersal means, including loud sirens, water cannons, sound grenades and tear gas. Only once IDF forces exhaust these tools and human life and safety remains in danger, is the use of precision munition authorized.

The IDF holds itself to the highest of professional standards and trains and equips itself as such. When there is any suspicion of wrong doing, or breach of discipline, the IDF reviews, investigates and takes action where appropriate.

Meanwhile, Colonel Richard Kemp, former commander of British forces in Afghanistan has issued a damning verdict on the Amnesty report in the Jewish Chronicle:

Amnesty’s latest report is far from impartial. A piece of naked anti-Israel propaganda, it is a stark reminder of just how far they have lost their way. The cynical timing of the report, published during Israel Apartheid Week, can only have been intended to fuel the demonisation of the Jewish state in schools and on campuses.

There is no attempt to place the actions of the Israeli security forces in context. No mention of the willful orchestration by Palestinian extremists of violent demonstrations to provoke Israeli troops into a response intended to result in death and injury among their own people for propaganda purposes — or even to lure security forces into lethal terrorist attacks. These are criminal actions.

Salil Shetty, Amnesty’s Secretary General, said in an interview only a few days ago: “Amnesty International is not an organisation with expertise on military situations”. This report shows just how true that is.

For example, the glib dismissal of petrol bombs as posing “little or no threat” to the lives of Israeli soldiers. I have seen first-hand how horrifically a petrol bomb can wound a soldier.

Amnesty’s recommendation that the US and EU ban the transfer of crowd control devices and training not only betrays its politicised support for anti-Israel boycotts but is naively counter-productive. Such systems could only help reduce violence.

Instead of using its resources to make a serious contribution towards easing the plight of the Palestinian people, Amnesty has produced a distorted report that will be exploited as a tool to incite even more hatred.

NGO Monitor has also criticized Amnesty:

In its report, Amnesty makes numerous non-specific claims without any supporting evidence, such as “Palestinians killed by Israeli soldiers did not appear to be posing a direct and immediate threat to life” and the use of “arbitrary” force. In contrast, other monitoring groups such as B’Tselem acknowledge that the majority of Palestinian casualties occurred during combat or violent clashes and confrontations with Israeli security personnel. Amnesty’s removal of this essential context and abuse of the term “civilian” further highlights the lack of credibility. Similarly, in 2009, Amnesty played a central role in the discredited Goldstone report on the Gaza conflict, as well as in a number of other allegations targeting Israel. …

In the current report, no definitions or comparative data is provided to support Amnesty’s politicized allegations that Israeli forces are “trigger happy” and “reckless.” In fact, a review of police conduct around the world reveals that Israeli police and military conduct is far more restrained, considering the constant state of armed conflict and the sheer number of lethal situations that justify the use of deadly force, including violent riots and terror attacks.

If there is any doubt as to Amnesty’s anti-Israel agenda, its hosting at its London headquarters of a book launch in March 2014 for Israel-hating extremist Ben White’s book “Israeli Apartheid: A Beginner’s Guide” should dispel any doubts as to the organization’s real motivations.

Meanwhile, the recent arrest by British police of Moazzem Begg, a former Guantanamo detainee whose cause was championed by Amnesty, says much about whose human rights are prioritized by the organization. Begg was arrested in connection with alleged Syria-related terrorism offences and is accused of attending a terrorist training camp and facilitating terrorism overseas.

Why then does Amnesty International continue to benefit from the “halo effect” - whereby because of its humanitarian focus, it is insulated from scrutiny and regarded as above reproach by the media?

In response to the report and the media outlets that have given it oxygen, HonestReporting CEO Joe Hyams said:

Amnesty International has demonstrated time after time a politicized anti-Israel agenda that betrays its claim to be advocating for human rights. It’s high time that the media start to ask questions of organizations such as Amnesty.

Stop giving cheap publicity to one-sided and biased reports attacking the IDF and those soldiers tasked with protecting themselves and Israeli civilians and start acknowledging the very real and potentially deadly threat of Palestinian violence.

Media Shills For "Trigger Happy" Amnesty Report | HonestReporting

 

[Manchester]

Under what criteria are they terrorist organisations. Because the last time I looked

Palestinian legislative election, 2006 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hezbollah Wins Easy Victory In Elections in Southern Lebanon

They were democratically elected "terrorist" organisations.

buth HAMAS and Hezbollah are on the list of terrorist or terrorism-supporting organizations in Japan the European Union for one.
comical the way left-wing nutjobs on these boards try to be "open-minded" and imply that repubs are backwards; that the opinions of the outside world are closer to what the American Left thinks; and it isnt even true


idiots and hypocrites

Under what criteria are they terrorist organisations.

Of course that question is never answered.

No. Some insults, as usual. Referring to me as a liberal when I'm not, as usual. And a total ignoring ofthe point that in this case was these are not just organizations but governmental organizations as they have won elections, as usual.

Of course these organizations would be much more obvious goverments if Israel didn't bomb them back to the stone age whenever they feel the need to flex their muscles, and then act with with incredulity whenever any meagre and symbolic attempt at retaliation comes their way and all of their fansboys around the globe cry anti-semitism collectively point at Auschwitz as more innocents die.

 

[Sweet_Caroline]

buth HAMAS and Hezbollah are on the list of terrorist or terrorism-supporting organizations in Japan the European Union for one.
comical the way left-wing nutjobs on these boards try to be "open-minded" and imply that repubs are backwards; that the opinions of the outside world are closer to what the American Left thinks; and it isnt even true


idiots and hypocrites

Under what criteria are they terrorist organisations.

Of course that question is never answered.

No. Some insults, as usual. Referring to me as a liberal when I'm not, as usual. And a total ignoring ofthe point that in this case was these are not just organizations but governmental organizations as they have won elections, as usual.

Of course these organizations would be much more obvious goverments if Israel didn't bomb them back to the stone age whenever they feel the need to flex their muscles, and then act with with incredulity whenever any meagre and symbolic attempt at retaliation comes their way and all of their fansboys around the globe cry anti-semitism collectively point at Auschwitz as more innocents die.

Bomb who back to the stone age? There is only one type of bomb that could do that.

 

[Indeependent]

International Rules of Engagement prevent nations from quickly and painfully crushing the enemy.
The West Bank Jordanian issue, devoid of International anti-Semetic interference, would have seen Jordan, one of the losers of the 1967 Six Day War, abosrbing the losing populace.

Israel, in 2014, doesnt quite have to put up with as much nonsense anymore.

 

[toastman]

buth HAMAS and Hezbollah are on the list of terrorist or terrorism-supporting organizations in Japan the European Union for one.
comical the way left-wing nutjobs on these boards try to be "open-minded" and imply that repubs are backwards; that the opinions of the outside world are closer to what the American Left thinks; and it isnt even true


idiots and hypocrites

Under what criteria are they terrorist organisations.

Of course that question is never answered.

No. Some insults, as usual. Referring to me as a liberal when I'm not, as usual. And a total ignoring ofthe point that in this case was these are not just organizations but governmental organizations as they have won elections, as usual.

Of course these organizations would be much more obvious goverments if Israel didn't bomb them back to the stone age whenever they feel the need to flex their muscles, and then act with with incredulity whenever any meagre and symbolic attempt at retaliation comes their way and all of their fansboys around the globe cry anti-semitism collectively point at Auschwitz as more innocents die.

Please tell us, why does Israel bomb them?

 

[bedowin62]

Of course that question is never answered.

Once a target is identified, the Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism prepares a detailed "administrative record," which is a compilation of information, typically including both classified and open sources information, demonstrating that the statutory criteria for designation have been satisfied. If the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, decides to make the designation, United States Congress is notified of the Secretary's intent to designate the organization and given seven days to review the designation, as the INA requires. Upon the expiration of the seven-day waiting period, notice of the designation is published in the Federal Register, at which point the designation takes effect. An organization designated as an FTO may seek judicial review of the designation in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit not later than 30 days after the designation is published in the Federal Register.

Legal criteria for designation

(Reflecting Amendments to Section 219 of the INA in the 2001 USA PATRIOT Act)
It must be a foreign organization.
The organization must engage in terrorist activity, as defined in section 212 (a)(3)(B) of the INA (8 U.S.C. § 1182(a) (3)(B)),* or terrorism, as defined in section 140(d)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989 (22 U.S.C. § 2656f(d) (2)),** or retain the capability and intent to engage in terrorist activity or terrorism.
The organization’s terrorist activity or terrorism must threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security (national defense, foreign relations, or the economic interests) of the United States.


here; it's from Wiki; NOT the best source; but i doubt it matters to you; your really looking only for a reason to engage in moral relativism anyway. This should be enough to keep you crying for a while

Yeah, we know all of the monkey motions, but what have they done to receive this name calling?

seriously idiot?

i mean did you come here to play ignorant and waste time?

you want a list of activities that are considered terror-supporting that HAMAS OR Hezbollah engage in or support with money?

ok

 

[bedowin62]

Of course that question is never answered.

No. Some insults, as usual. Referring to me as a liberal when I'm not, as usual. And a total ignoring ofthe point that in this case was these are not just organizations but governmental organizations as they have won elections, as usual.

Of course these organizations would be much more obvious goverments if Israel didn't bomb them back to the stone age whenever they feel the need to flex their muscles, and then act with with incredulity whenever any meagre and symbolic attempt at retaliation comes their way and all of their fansboys around the globe cry anti-semitism collectively point at Auschwitz as more innocents die.

Please tell us, why does Israel bomb them?

YAWN
WHY DONT YOU try answering your own question; instead of some idiotic rant about Israel bombing them "whenever they feel the need to flex their muslces...."?

what an idiot.