The Horowitz Report: Yes, It Gets Worse

[depotoo]

Dance all you want but the conclusion of the Horowitz report was that there was NO political bias in any actions taken

Read that slowly and let it sink in

Honey, listen carefully-

 

[depotoo]

 

[Ame®icano]

Dance all you want but the conclusion of the Horowitz report was that there was NO political bias in any actions taken

Read that slowly and let it sink in

From the report:

"As part of our review, we sought to determine whether there was evidence that political bias or other improper considerations affected decision making in Crossfire Hurricane, including the decision to open the investigation. Such evidence would raise questions as to whether Crossfire Hurricane was opened for an authorized purpose, and serious concerns about whether the decision compromised the constitutional rights of any U.S. persons. We discussed the issue of political bias in a prior OIG report, Review of Various Actions in Advance of the 2016 Election, where we described text messages between then Special Counsel to the Deputy Director Lisa Page and then Section Chief Peter Strzok, among others. These text messages included statements of hostility toward then candidate Trump and statements of support for then candidate Hillary Clinton. These messages, most of which pertained to the Russia investigation, potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations. Our prior review stated that the text messages were "not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, imply a willingness to take official action to impact [Trump's] electoral prospects."

 

[WEATHER53]

Dance all you want but the conclusion of the Horowitz report was that there was NO political bias in any actions taken

Read that slowly and let it sink in

From the report:

"As part of our review, we sought to determine whether there was evidence that political bias or other improper considerations affected decision making in Crossfire Hurricane, including the decision to open the investigation. Such evidence would raise questions as to whether Crossfire Hurricane was opened for an authorized purpose, and serious concerns about whether the decision compromised the constitutional rights of any U.S. persons. We discussed the issue of political bias in a prior OIG report, Review of Various Actions in Advance of the 2016 Election, where we described text messages between then Special Counsel to the Deputy Director Lisa Page and then Section Chief Peter Strzok, among others. These text messages included statements of hostility toward then candidate Trump and statements of support for then candidate Hillary Clinton. These messages, most of which pertained to the Russia investigation, potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations. Our prior review stated that the text messages were "not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, imply a willingness to take official action to impact [Trump's] electoral prospects."

The last thing on earth that says is”no political bias”

 

[Lesh]

The last thing on earth that says is”no political bias”

If by "that" you mean the Horowitz Report, you are flat out wrong or lying.

You pick

 

[Lesh]

No political bias

Horowitz: 'We found no bias' in decision to open probe

 

[candycorn]

meanwhile back in reality the report found that the investigation into the Cheeto stained blob was fully warranted and no bias existed in the investigation

That is not what he said at all.

Who did he say was biased when they were investigating your blob? Just give us a name

If you watch the hearings, you would notice that Horowitz couldn't mention any names during Senate hearings.

He also said that based on documents that were available to him, he couldn't find the bias in initial FISA warrant. I don't expect any official document to show bias, but unofficial documents including text and emails gave more than enough.

Did you read the report or you're parrotting Fredo and Madcow?

So he identified no one who was biased.

thanks for confirming that fact.

 

[lennypartiv]

No political bias
Horowitz: 'We found no bias' in decision to open probe

<<...Obama was aware of the spying operation that targeted his campaign in 2016. The president also said Clinton should be in jail for obstructing justice during the investigation into her use of an unauthorized email server.
When asked if he believes that Obama orchestrated the spy operation, Drumpf said Obama “certainly must have known about it.”>>

Trump: Obama 'Had to Know' of Spying, Clinton 'Should Be in Jail'

 

[depotoo]

No political bias

Horowitz: 'We found no bias' in decision to open probe

They didn’t read far enough. You guys wish to be blind. The skin it is hurting is your own. Videos as well as the report prove you wrong. Your bias is showing.

 

[depotoo]

meanwhile back in reality the report found that the investigation into the Cheeto stained blob was fully warranted and no bias existed in the investigation

That is not what he said at all.

Who did he say was biased when they were investigating your blob? Just give us a name

If you watch the hearings, you would notice that Horowitz couldn't mention any names during Senate hearings.

He also said that based on documents that were available to him, he couldn't find the bias in initial FISA warrant. I don't expect any official document to show bias, but unofficial documents including text and emails gave more than enough.

Did you read the report or you're parrotting Fredo and Madcow?

So he identified no one who was biased.

thanks for confirming that fact.

Start at 20 seconds. If you claim he says otherwise, you are lying.

 

[Ame®icano]

meanwhile back in reality the report found that the investigation into the Cheeto stained blob was fully warranted and no bias existed in the investigation

That is not what he said at all.

Who did he say was biased when they were investigating your blob? Just give us a name

If you watch the hearings, you would notice that Horowitz couldn't mention any names during Senate hearings.

He also said that based on documents that were available to him, he couldn't find the bias in initial FISA warrant. I don't expect any official document to show bias, but unofficial documents including text and emails gave more than enough.

Did you read the report or you're parrotting Fredo and Madcow?

So he identified no one who was biased.

thanks for confirming that fact.

Since you're extra stupid, let me repeat it just for you:

From the report:

"As part of our review, we sought to determine whether there was evidence that political bias or other improper considerations affected decision making in Crossfire Hurricane, including the decision to open the investigation. Such evidence would raise questions as to whether Crossfire Hurricane was opened for an authorized purpose, and serious concerns about whether the decision compromised the constitutional rights of any U.S. persons. We discussed the issue of political bias in a prior OIG report, Review of Various Actions in Advance of the 2016 Election, where we described text messages between then Special Counsel to the Deputy Director Lisa Page and then Section Chief Peter Strzok, among others. These text messages included statements of hostility toward then candidate Trump and statements of support for then candidate Hillary Clinton. These messages, most of which pertained to the Russia investigation, potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations. Our prior review stated that the text messages were "not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, imply a willingness to take official action to impact [Trump's] electoral prospects."

 

[lennypartiv]

So he identified no one who was biased.
thanks for confirming that fact.

Barr is still investigating the Deep State. Expect indictments.

 

[AntonToo]

Just because Carter co-operated with CIA on something does not mean he didn’t have something going on with Russia.

He didn’t! He was charged with Nothing! What don’t you get??

Warrant based on reasonable suspicion is not the same as getting charged. That’s why they do investigations. DUH.

Here, a repeat for you-
'Corroboration Zero': An Inspector General's Report Reveals the Steele Dossier Was Always a Joke


Press figures have derided the idea that Steele was crucial to the FISA application, with some insisting it was only a “small part” of the application. Horowitz is clear:

We determined that the Crossfire Hurricane team’s receipt of Steele’s election reporting on September 19, 2016 played a central and essential role in the FBI’s and Department’s decision to seek the FISA order.

The report describes how, prior to receiving Steele’s reports, the FBI General Counsel (OGC) and/or the National Security Division’s Office of Intelligence (OI) wouldn’t budge on seeking FISA authority. But after getting the reports, the OGC unit chief said, “receipt of the Steele reporting changed her mind on whether they could establish probable cause.”


And that is from the rollingstone

I don't know what you think you are refuting, but it's certainly not that Carter could've been working with Russians, even if he was cooperating with CIA at one point.

Quit. You don’t see how foolish you sound. As an asset if you think they weren’t watching him like a hawk...

Are they watching him like a hawk now?

He may have been co-operating in bringing down a Russian spy recruit ring back in 2013-14 period. (Russian Spy Met Trump Adviser Carter Page and Thought He Was an ‘Idiot’)

Doesn't mean that he was working with CIA by the time he joined Trump campaign.

 

[CowboyTed]

I believe the Steele dossier. It had little to do with FiSA warrant on Page.

McCabe said under oath that without the Steele Dossier there would have been no FISA application on Carter Page.
IG Report: No FISA Warrant On Carter Page Without Steele Dossier

Thanks for playing. Please stop lying all the time, and put up links to prove your assertions.

Also, the Steele Dossier has been proven to be totally bogus.

"updated report reflects the accurate description of the Carter Page FISA applications that did not contain the information the FBI obtained from Steele’s Primary Sub-source in January 2017 that raised significant questions about the reliability of the Steele reporting. "

https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf

Amazing when you can read it yourself... Getting the right wing rags you want to read it for you and then lie to you...

bottom of second page... simple word search

 

[Dragonlady]

The IG can look at those "errors" as unbiased and innocent, but I'm sure that Barr, Durham, and a jury won't.

You need EVIDENCE not only that the errors were made on purpose, but also with the intent of misleading the court.

As for the Dossier being unverified:

1. The part of the Dossier that was used was verified BEFORE it was used;

2. The Dossier was not a primary source of information in the application. It was a secondary source, referenced in 1/2 page of information in a 70 plus page application.

3. No unverified parts of the Dossier were used in the FISA application, so all that bullshit points about the FBI using the unverified Dossier and not telling the court it was unverified, is just bullshit, and doesn't apply to the Carter Page FISA application.

And the errors in the Page FISA app are all you have in your "investigation of the investigators.

Three years of Trump investigation Hillary (3 different investigations - all came up empty), Inspector General's Report cleared Comey of any wrong doing, Inspector General cleared security agencies spying on the Trump Campaign.

But one investigation of Donald Trump yields over 100 charges against 22 individuals and companies, $40 million+ in fines, which pays for the entire investigation, 7 Trump staffers jailed or awaiting sentencing, and the grounds for impeachment.

Hillary Clinton - Over 20 investigations spanning over 25 years and not one charge against Hillary or any of her staffers or advisors. No evidence of ANY crime- , no witnesses, no documents or paper trail of any kind. In each and every case, investigators found that Clinton hadn't actually committed any of the crimes that Republicans continue to accuse her of.

And still you fools think that Trump is the innocent one and that Hillary, literally gets away with murder.

 

[WEATHER53]

No political bias

Horowitz: 'We found no bias' in decision to open probe

They didn’t read far enough. You guys wish to be blind. The skin it is hurting is your own. Videos as well as the report prove you wrong. Your bias is showing.

It’s on video playing right in front of them and they say it’s not.

 

[WEATHER53]

The last thing on earth that says is”no political bias”

If by "that" you mean the Horowitz Report, you are flat out wrong or lying.

You pick

Mighty strong words for a one eyed fat man.

 

[candycorn]

meanwhile back in reality the report found that the investigation into the Cheeto stained blob was fully warranted and no bias existed in the investigation

That is not what he said at all.

Who did he say was biased when they were investigating your blob? Just give us a name

If you watch the hearings, you would notice that Horowitz couldn't mention any names during Senate hearings.

He also said that based on documents that were available to him, he couldn't find the bias in initial FISA warrant. I don't expect any official document to show bias, but unofficial documents including text and emails gave more than enough.

Did you read the report or you're parrotting Fredo and Madcow?

So he identified no one who was biased.

thanks for confirming that fact.

Since you're extra stupid, let me repeat it just for you:

From the report:

"As part of our review, we sought to determine whether there was evidence that political bias or other improper considerations affected decision making in Crossfire Hurricane, including the decision to open the investigation. Such evidence would raise questions as to whether Crossfire Hurricane was opened for an authorized purpose, and serious concerns about whether the decision compromised the constitutional rights of any U.S. persons. We discussed the issue of political bias in a prior OIG report, Review of Various Actions in Advance of the 2016 Election, where we described text messages between then Special Counsel to the Deputy Director Lisa Page and then Section Chief Peter Strzok, among others. These text messages included statements of hostility toward then candidate Trump and statements of support for then candidate Hillary Clinton. These messages, most of which pertained to the Russia investigation, potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations. Our prior review stated that the text messages were "not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, imply a willingness to take official action to impact [Trump's] electoral prospects."

Again...stupid....just give us the name of an FBI investigator who was found by the IG to be biased in their investigation of your blob.

 

[candycorn]

meanwhile back in reality the report found that the investigation into the Cheeto stained blob was fully warranted and no bias existed in the investigation

That is not what he said at all.

Who did he say was biased when they were investigating your blob? Just give us a name

If you watch the hearings, you would notice that Horowitz couldn't mention any names during Senate hearings.

He also said that based on documents that were available to him, he couldn't find the bias in initial FISA warrant. I don't expect any official document to show bias, but unofficial documents including text and emails gave more than enough.

Did you read the report or you're parrotting Fredo and Madcow?

So he identified no one who was biased.

thanks for confirming that fact.

Start at 20 seconds. If you claim he says otherwise, you are lying.

Again...stupid jr...just give us the name of an FBI investigator who was found by the IG to be biased in their investigation of your blob.

 

[AntonToo]

Just because Carter co-operated with CIA on something does not mean he didn’t have something going on with Russia.

He didn’t! He was charged with Nothing! What don’t you get??

Warrant based on reasonable suspicion is not the same as getting charged. That’s why they do investigations. DUH.

Here, a repeat for you-
'Corroboration Zero': An Inspector General's Report Reveals the Steele Dossier Was Always a Joke


Press figures have derided the idea that Steele was crucial to the FISA application, with some insisting it was only a “small part” of the application. Horowitz is clear:

We determined that the Crossfire Hurricane team’s receipt of Steele’s election reporting on September 19, 2016 played a central and essential role in the FBI’s and Department’s decision to seek the FISA order.

The report describes how, prior to receiving Steele’s reports, the FBI General Counsel (OGC) and/or the National Security Division’s Office of Intelligence (OI) wouldn’t budge on seeking FISA authority. But after getting the reports, the OGC unit chief said, “receipt of the Steele reporting changed her mind on whether they could establish probable cause.”


And that is from the rollingstone

I don't know what you think you are refuting, but it's certainly not that Carter could've been working with Russians, even if he was cooperating with CIA at one point.

He was a CIA asset, and there isn't one shred of evidence that says Carter was not loyal to the US.

There is MUCH of evidence Carter was a sketchy character constantly flying out to Moscow trying to make money in energy sector relate...whatever the fuck.

Don't know if FBI would have gotten the warrant if they played it straight, but there were PROPER FISA warants on him well before he ever got with Trump's campaign, so your story about "not a shread!" is kinda rediculous.