The Hill: So Who Is Paying Avenatti?

[Dragonlady]

Even the MSM smells the BS.


So exactly who is paying Michael Avenatti? And is he a lawyer, an opposition researcher, a journalist, or a campaign operative?

He wants to make the discussion all about where Michael Cohen, President Trump’s personal attorney, got his money but, to have clean hands, Avenatti needs to come forward with exactly who is financing his operation, who his sources were for detailed banking information, and whether he really is an attorney solely representing Stormy Daniels or just using her as cover to wage a political operation.

From the beginning, this has been fishy. Daniels’s previous lawyer advised her to stick to her agreements. In contrast, Avenatti okayed her violating with impunity her non-disclosure agreement on “60 Minutes” despite a binding arbitration judgment against her. She acknowledged on Twitter that she is not paying for her lawyer. So who is? And did he indemnify her against all multimillion-dollar penalties?

It took a long time and even a court battle to find out that the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid for the Fusion GPS dossier, a fact that was disclosed only after the damage was done, as former British spy and the dossier’s compiler, Christopher Steele, had already created a vast echo chamber as though the material he was peddling had been verified in some way, which of course, it never was. Now Avenatti is being allowed to repeat this same process, mixing truths with half truths and evading accountability.

Keep reading…

Given you haven’t made a single true statement in your post, why would anyone have a reason to continue reading.

Much of the Steele Dossier has now been verified. Some of it by Dutch security forces. Trump continues to dodge complying with sanctions already imposed by Congress and certainly hasn’t added any of his own or even a word of criticism of Putin.

As for Michael Avenatti, all of the corporations who paid money into that Michael Cohen shell corporation, has confirmed that they did make such payments to Cohen. Why would they corporations all pay money to Trump’s bag man?

You didn’t seem to mind when Russians were leaking damaging stuff about Clinton to Americans. You were just happy to see the truth exposed. How is this different?

 

[toomuchtime_]

You must be referring to all the leaked rumors from the Mueller-Rosenstein faux investigation that have produced nothing.

Yeah, except for all the indictments, guilty pleas, and Trump henchmen suddenly realizing that oh yeah, they did meet woth Russians after all

OMG! THEY MET RUSSIANS!

Good thing I never met a Russian while in Russia.

I wonder if Bernie did when he spent his honeymoon in the USSR.

If he petitioned Russia to sabotage the election, then I might wonder too

Actually there is evidence the Russian trolls supported Bernie over Hillary in the primaries so why isn't there a special counsel to investigate all the crimes connected to the Democratic primaries? Perhaps Bernie did petition them for help. After all, he is a socialist.

Yeah the Russians reaaaaaaally wanted Hillary to lose. How many people from Bernie’s campaign coordinated attacks on Hillary with the Russians? If you find evidence, I’m perfectly fine with a special counsel investigating him.

There is at least as much evidence that the Sanders campaign colluded with the Russian government as there is that the Trump campaign colluded with them, so why aren't you calling for a special counsel right now?

 

[Meathead]

Even the MSM smells the BS.


So exactly who is paying Michael Avenatti? And is he a lawyer, an opposition researcher, a journalist, or a campaign operative?

He wants to make the discussion all about where Michael Cohen, President Trump’s personal attorney, got his money but, to have clean hands, Avenatti needs to come forward with exactly who is financing his operation, who his sources were for detailed banking information, and whether he really is an attorney solely representing Stormy Daniels or just using her as cover to wage a political operation.

From the beginning, this has been fishy. Daniels’s previous lawyer advised her to stick to her agreements. In contrast, Avenatti okayed her violating with impunity her non-disclosure agreement on “60 Minutes” despite a binding arbitration judgment against her. She acknowledged on Twitter that she is not paying for her lawyer. So who is? And did he indemnify her against all multimillion-dollar penalties?

It took a long time and even a court battle to find out that the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid for the Fusion GPS dossier, a fact that was disclosed only after the damage was done, as former British spy and the dossier’s compiler, Christopher Steele, had already created a vast echo chamber as though the material he was peddling had been verified in some way, which of course, it never was. Now Avenatti is being allowed to repeat this same process, mixing truths with half truths and evading accountability.

Keep reading…

Avenatti is the pimp, Stormy the whore and Democrats the johns, clearly.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

The false standard put forth by the OP is reprehensible.

All Avenatti has to do is represent his client faithfully to the canons and ethics of the bar.

He is doing that.

And Cohen has been breaking the canons and ethics regularly. He is going to get his legal nuts fried.

Speaking of ethical lawyers. Just shy did Muller hire Wiseman?

I can wait

-Geaux

You mean Weissmann?

I'm sure he hired him because Weissmann is a well-known and successful prosecuted and investigator.

 

[BlackFlag]

Yeah, except for all the indictments, guilty pleas, and Trump henchmen suddenly realizing that oh yeah, they did meet woth Russians after all

OMG! THEY MET RUSSIANS!

Good thing I never met a Russian while in Russia.

I wonder if Bernie did when he spent his honeymoon in the USSR.

If he petitioned Russia to sabotage the election, then I might wonder too

Actually there is evidence the Russian trolls supported Bernie over Hillary in the primaries so why isn't there a special counsel to investigate all the crimes connected to the Democratic primaries? Perhaps Bernie did petition them for help. After all, he is a socialist.

Yeah the Russians reaaaaaaally wanted Hillary to lose. How many people from Bernie’s campaign coordinated attacks on Hillary with the Russians? If you find evidence, I’m perfectly fine with a special counsel investigating him.

There is at least as much evidence that the Sanders campaign colluded with the Russian government as there is that the Trump campaign colluded with them, so why aren't you calling for a special counsel right now?

Alright I’m calling for it right now. Good luck.

 

[Meathead]

You mean Weissmann?

I'm sure he hired him because Weissmann is a well-known and successful prosecuted and investigator.

Sure, that's what they were saying about Schneiderman until a week ago.

 

[OKTexas]

I am sure that Avenatti is working on contingency.

Contingency for what, the ***** has already been paid and willingly, with advice of counsel, signed an NDA. She has no claim beyond that.


.

I'm sure that he'll get a cut of what she makes if he frees her from the NDA.

Why, he says he's getting paid up front. They're trying to raise 850K, they have about half so far.


.

 

[OKTexas]

The false standard put forth by the OP is reprehensible.

All Avenatti has to do is represent his client faithfully to the canons and ethics of the bar.

He is doing that.

And Cohen has been breaking the canons and ethics regularly. He is going to get his legal nuts fried.

Who is paying the bills is totally relevant, it's claimed to be crowd sourcing, yet he hasn't provided what crowd sourcing service he's using. My guess he's he being paid by dem donors and this is nothing but a political stunt.


.

What??? Are you saying allowing porn actresses to extort many from men they sleep and then sell their stories is not a worthwhile cause?

I'm saying the extortion was already complete, she got her 5 pieces of silver. This attorney is working on getting himself disbarred.


.

On what grounds do you see Avenatti being disbarred?

He has confidential banking records, someone broke the law to get them. Did he steal the records himself or is he guilty of receiving stolen property?


.

 

[Weatherman2020]

lol Because it's such a worthy cause? No, he set up a crowd funding site. It's a good way to launder donations from Obama and Clinton supporters.

Lol a Trump sheep probably shouldn’t bring up anything about money laundering

You must be referring to all the leaked rumors from the Mueller-Rosenstein faux investigation that have produced nothing.

Yeah, except for all the indictments, guilty pleas, and Trump henchmen suddenly realizing that oh yeah, they did meet woth Russians after all

OMG! THEY MET RUSSIANS!

Good thing I never met a Russian while in Russia.

I wonder if Bernie did when he spent his honeymoon in the USSR.

If he petitioned Russia to sabotage the election, then I might wonder too

Hilarious.

You leftists and your fantasy world

 

[Weatherman2020]

Even the MSM smells the BS.


So exactly who is paying Michael Avenatti? And is he a lawyer, an opposition researcher, a journalist, or a campaign operative?

He wants to make the discussion all about where Michael Cohen, President Trump’s personal attorney, got his money but, to have clean hands, Avenatti needs to come forward with exactly who is financing his operation, who his sources were for detailed banking information, and whether he really is an attorney solely representing Stormy Daniels or just using her as cover to wage a political operation.

From the beginning, this has been fishy. Daniels’s previous lawyer advised her to stick to her agreements. In contrast, Avenatti okayed her violating with impunity her non-disclosure agreement on “60 Minutes” despite a binding arbitration judgment against her. She acknowledged on Twitter that she is not paying for her lawyer. So who is? And did he indemnify her against all multimillion-dollar penalties?

It took a long time and even a court battle to find out that the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid for the Fusion GPS dossier, a fact that was disclosed only after the damage was done, as former British spy and the dossier’s compiler, Christopher Steele, had already created a vast echo chamber as though the material he was peddling had been verified in some way, which of course, it never was. Now Avenatti is being allowed to repeat this same process, mixing truths with half truths and evading accountability.

Keep reading…

Given you haven’t made a single true statement in your post, why would anyone have a reason to continue reading.

Much of the Steele Dossier has now been verified. Some of it by Dutch security forces. Trump continues to dodge complying with sanctions already imposed by Congress and certainly hasn’t added any of his own or even a word of criticism of Putin.

As for Michael Avenatti, all of the corporations who paid money into that Michael Cohen shell corporation, has confirmed that they did make such payments to Cohen. Why would they corporations all pay money to Trump’s bag man?

You didn’t seem to mind when Russians were leaking damaging stuff about Clinton to Americans. You were just happy to see the truth exposed. How is this different?

Shitforbrains thinks I am a reporter for The Hill.

 

[OKTexas]

I am sure that Avenatti is working on contingency.

Contingency for what, the ***** has already been paid and willingly, with advice of counsel, signed an NDA. She has no claim beyond that.


.

I'm sure that he'll get a cut of what she makes if he frees her from the NDA.

lol She has already broken the NDA in every way possible, so the only money she is or will make is from the publicity.

And she is chancing losing a million per violation. The NDA is valid and enforceable.


.

 

[Weatherman2020]

I am sure that Avenatti is working on contingency.

Contingency for what, the ***** has already been paid and willingly, with advice of counsel, signed an NDA. She has no claim beyond that.


.

I'm sure that he'll get a cut of what she makes if he frees her from the NDA.

Hilarious GUESS.

 

[JakeStarkey]

This is fake news, "He has confidential banking records, someone broke the law to get them. Did he steal the records himself or is he guilty of receiving stolen property?" It is a lie. It is told by an alt righty for a pernicious reason: to cover up the fact that Cohen is in sooper dooper pooper problems.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The false standard put forth by the OP is reprehensible.

All Avenatti has to do is represent his client faithfully to the canons and ethics of the bar.

He is doing that.

And Cohen has been breaking the canons and ethics regularly. He is going to get his legal nuts fried.

Speaking of ethical lawyers. Just shy did Muller hire Wiseman? I can wait -Geaux

Deflection gains you nothing, sweet pea. Mueller and the DAs of the NY Southern District are bending Cohen over.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You must be referring to all the leaked rumors from the Mueller-Rosenstein faux investigation that have produced nothing.

Yeah, except for all the indictments, guilty pleas, and Trump henchmen suddenly realizing that oh yeah, they did meet woth Russians after all

OMG! THEY MET RUSSIANS!

Good thing I never met a Russian while in Russia.

I wonder if Bernie did when he spent his honeymoon in the USSR.

If he petitioned Russia to sabotage the election, then I might wonder too

Actually there is evidence the Russian trolls supported Bernie over Hillary in the primaries so why isn't there a special counsel to investigate all the crimes connected to the Democratic primaries? Perhaps Bernie did petition them for help. After all, he is a socialist.

Yeah the Russians reaaaaaaally wanted Hillary to lose. How many people from Bernie’s campaign coordinated attacks on Hillary with the Russians? If you find evidence, I’m perfectly fine with a special counsel investigating him.

Deflections like the above gaineth the wicked alt righties an extra thrashing.

 

[bendog]

Lol a Trump sheep probably shouldn’t bring up anything about money laundering

You must be referring to all the leaked rumors from the Mueller-Rosenstein faux investigation that have produced nothing.

Yeah, except for all the indictments, guilty pleas, and Trump henchmen suddenly realizing that oh yeah, they did meet woth Russians after all

OMG! THEY MET RUSSIANS!

Good thing I never met a Russian while in Russia.

I wonder if Bernie did when he spent his honeymoon in the USSR.

If he petitioned Russia to sabotage the election, then I might wonder too

Hilarious.

You leftists and your fantasy world

No one would ever think that.

 

[Weatherman2020]

This is fake news, "He has confidential banking records, someone broke the law to get them. Did he steal the records himself or is he guilty of receiving stolen property?" It is a lie. It is told by an alt righty for a pernicious reason: to cover up the fact that Cohen is in sooper dooper pooper problems.

Nothing gets past Fakey Jakey!

Everyone's wondering how Michael Avenatti obtained his bombshell information on Michael Cohen — and there's already an investigation launched

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profil...natti-could-be-in-some-serious-legal-trouble/

 

[Dragonlady]

Even the MSM smells the BS.


So exactly who is paying Michael Avenatti? And is he a lawyer, an opposition researcher, a journalist, or a campaign operative?

He wants to make the discussion all about where Michael Cohen, President Trump’s personal attorney, got his money but, to have clean hands, Avenatti needs to come forward with exactly who is financing his operation, who his sources were for detailed banking information, and whether he really is an attorney solely representing Stormy Daniels or just using her as cover to wage a political operation.

From the beginning, this has been fishy. Daniels’s previous lawyer advised her to stick to her agreements. In contrast, Avenatti okayed her violating with impunity her non-disclosure agreement on “60 Minutes” despite a binding arbitration judgment against her. She acknowledged on Twitter that she is not paying for her lawyer. So who is? And did he indemnify her against all multimillion-dollar penalties?

It took a long time and even a court battle to find out that the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid for the Fusion GPS dossier, a fact that was disclosed only after the damage was done, as former British spy and the dossier’s compiler, Christopher Steele, had already created a vast echo chamber as though the material he was peddling had been verified in some way, which of course, it never was. Now Avenatti is being allowed to repeat this same process, mixing truths with half truths and evading accountability.

Keep reading…

Given you haven’t made a single true statement in your post, why would anyone have a reason to continue reading.

Much of the Steele Dossier has now been verified. Some of it by Dutch security forces. Trump continues to dodge complying with sanctions already imposed by Congress and certainly hasn’t added any of his own or even a word of criticism of Putin.

As for Michael Avenatti, all of the corporations who paid money into that Michael Cohen shell corporation, has confirmed that they did make such payments to Cohen. Why would they corporations all pay money to Trump’s bag man?

You didn’t seem to mind when Russians were leaking damaging stuff about Clinton to Americans. You were just happy to see the truth exposed. How is this different?

Shitforbrains thinks I am a reporter for The Hill.

I didn’t comment on who authored the post, I said why would I want to read further when the entire premise of the article was based on lies.

 

[Dragonlady]

This is fake news, "He has confidential banking records, someone broke the law to get them. Did he steal the records himself or is he guilty of receiving stolen property?" It is a lie. It is told by an alt righty for a pernicious reason: to cover up the fact that Cohen is in sooper dooper pooper problems.

Nothing gets past Fakey Jakey!

Everyone's wondering how Michael Avenatti obtained his bombshell information on Michael Cohen — and there's already an investigation launched

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profil...natti-could-be-in-some-serious-legal-trouble/

Lawandcrime.com sounds about as credible as the Gateway Pundit.

I don’t get breathlessly excited by the ramblings of bloggers.

 

[JakeStarkey]