The hidden provision in the Big Ugly Bill that makes Trump king - Don't let this happen

[C_Clayton_Jones]

‘In a separate case, U.S. District Court Judge Paula Xinis has demanded that the Trump administration explain why it is not complying with the Supreme Court order to “facilitate” the release of Abrego Garcia.

Xinis questions whether the administration intends to comply with the order at all, citing a statement from U.S. Department of Homeland Security chief Kristi Noem that Abrego Garcia “will never be allowed to return to the United States.” According to Xinis, “That sounds to me like an admission. That’s about as clear as it can get.”

So what’s next? Will the Supreme Court and lower courts hold the administration in contempt and enforce contempt citations?

Not if the Big Ugly Bill is enacted with the following provision, now hidden in the bill:

“No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued….”

Translated: No federal court may enforce a contempt citation.’

The hidden provision in the Big Ugly Bill that makes Trump king

Don’t let this happen

robertreich.substack.com

Yet another example of the right’s contempt for the Constitution and rule of law.

 

[Oddball]

 

[1srelluc]

In other words....Put up 100K or shut up.

Hey, maybe you leftists can start a "go fund me" to run to liberal courts since your usual grift streams have dried-up.

 

[Oddball]

I'm almost maybe thinking about the marginal possibility of liking that shit heap bill.

 

[Meathead]

‘In a separate case, U.S. District Court Judge Paula Xinis has demanded that the Trump administration explain why it is not complying with the Supreme Court order to “facilitate” the release of Abrego Garcia.

Xinis questions whether the administration intends to comply with the order at all, citing a statement from U.S. Department of Homeland Security chief Kristi Noem that Abrego Garcia “will never be allowed to return to the United States.” According to Xinis, “That sounds to me like an admission. That’s about as clear as it can get.”

So what’s next? Will the Supreme Court and lower courts hold the administration in contempt and enforce contempt citations?

Not if the Big Ugly Bill is enacted with the following provision, now hidden in the bill:

“No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued….”

Translated: No federal court may enforce a contempt citation.’

The hidden provision in the Big Ugly Bill that makes Trump king

Don’t let this happen

robertreich.substack.com

Yet another example of the right’s contempt for the Constitution and rule of law.

When you say big and ugly I think Stacy Abrams.

 

[Crepitus]

‘In a separate case, U.S. District Court Judge Paula Xinis has demanded that the Trump administration explain why it is not complying with the Supreme Court order to “facilitate” the release of Abrego Garcia.

Xinis questions whether the administration intends to comply with the order at all, citing a statement from U.S. Department of Homeland Security chief Kristi Noem that Abrego Garcia “will never be allowed to return to the United States.” According to Xinis, “That sounds to me like an admission. That’s about as clear as it can get.”

So what’s next? Will the Supreme Court and lower courts hold the administration in contempt and enforce contempt citations?

Not if the Big Ugly Bill is enacted with the following provision, now hidden in the bill:

“No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued….”

Translated: No federal court may enforce a contempt citation.’

The hidden provision in the Big Ugly Bill that makes Trump king

Don’t let this happen

robertreich.substack.com

Yet another example of the right’s contempt for the Constitution and rule of law.

Writing their own "get out of jail free" card.

That's just dirty.

Low even.

 

[Crepitus]

When you say big and ugly I think Stacy Abrams.

Got a thing for her, huh?

 

[Tyrion234]

Writing their own "get out of jail free" card.

That's just dirty.

Low even.

So like, Bidens blanket pardons? Dumbass

 

[Cellblock2429]

‘In a separate case, U.S. District Court Judge Paula Xinis has demanded that the Trump administration explain why it is not complying with the Supreme Court order to “facilitate” the release of Abrego Garcia.

Xinis questions whether the administration intends to comply with the order at all, citing a statement from U.S. Department of Homeland Security chief Kristi Noem that Abrego Garcia “will never be allowed to return to the United States.” According to Xinis, “That sounds to me like an admission. That’s about as clear as it can get.”

So what’s next? Will the Supreme Court and lower courts hold the administration in contempt and enforce contempt citations?

Not if the Big Ugly Bill is enacted with the following provision, now hidden in the bill:

“No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued….”

Translated: No federal court may enforce a contempt citation.’

The hidden provision in the Big Ugly Bill that makes Trump king

Don’t let this happen

robertreich.substack.com

Yet another example of the right’s contempt for the Constitution and rule of law.

/—-/ That puts a grinding halt to judicial activism. You wanna file suit, put of a bond.

 

[Papageorgio]

‘In a separate case, U.S. District Court Judge Paula Xinis has demanded that the Trump administration explain why it is not complying with the Supreme Court order to “facilitate” the release of Abrego Garcia.

Xinis questions whether the administration intends to comply with the order at all, citing a statement from U.S. Department of Homeland Security chief Kristi Noem that Abrego Garcia “will never be allowed to return to the United States.” According to Xinis, “That sounds to me like an admission. That’s about as clear as it can get.”

So what’s next? Will the Supreme Court and lower courts hold the administration in contempt and enforce contempt citations?

Not if the Big Ugly Bill is enacted with the following provision, now hidden in the bill:

“No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued….”

Translated: No federal court may enforce a contempt citation.’

The hidden provision in the Big Ugly Bill that makes Trump king

Don’t let this happen

robertreich.substack.com

Yet another example of the right’s contempt for the Constitution and rule of law.

You sniff way too much glue dude,

 

[Sunni Man]

‘In a separate case, U.S. District Court Judge Paula Xinis has demanded that the Trump administration explain why it is not complying with the Supreme Court order to “facilitate” the release of Abrego Garcia.

The wacky Supreme Court order is nonsense.

Trump can't make the President of El Salvador send an El Salvadorian citizen Abrego Garcia to the U.S.

 

[Edgetho]

‘In a separate case, U.S. District Court Judge Paula Xinis has demanded that the Trump administration explain why it is not complying with the Supreme Court order to “facilitate” the release of Abrego Garcia.

Xinis questions whether the administration intends to comply with the order at all, citing a statement from U.S. Department of Homeland Security chief Kristi Noem that Abrego Garcia “will never be allowed to return to the United States.” According to Xinis, “That sounds to me like an admission. That’s about as clear as it can get.”

So what’s next? Will the Supreme Court and lower courts hold the administration in contempt and enforce contempt citations?

Not if the Big Ugly Bill is enacted with the following provision, now hidden in the bill:

“No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued….”

Translated: No federal court may enforce a contempt citation.’

The hidden provision in the Big Ugly Bill that makes Trump king

Don’t let this happen

robertreich.substack.com

Yet another example of the right’s contempt for the Constitution and rule of law.

FUCK the Judiciary. In the ass.

95% of lawyers are dimocrap scum and 100% of Judges are lawyers.

The Judiciary IS The Deep State. Period

 

[marvin martian]

‘In a separate case, U.S. District Court Judge Paula Xinis has demanded that the Trump administration explain why it is not complying with the Supreme Court order to “facilitate” the release of Abrego Garcia.

Xinis questions whether the administration intends to comply with the order at all, citing a statement from U.S. Department of Homeland Security chief Kristi Noem that Abrego Garcia “will never be allowed to return to the United States.” According to Xinis, “That sounds to me like an admission. That’s about as clear as it can get.”

So what’s next? Will the Supreme Court and lower courts hold the administration in contempt and enforce contempt citations?

Not if the Big Ugly Bill is enacted with the following provision, now hidden in the bill:

“No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued….”

Translated: No federal court may enforce a contempt citation.’

The hidden provision in the Big Ugly Bill that makes Trump king

Don’t let this happen

robertreich.substack.com

Yet another example of the right’s contempt for the Constitution and rule of law.

It's "hidden", but a retard like you knows all about it?

Lol, ok nazi.

 

[22lcidw]

‘In a separate case, U.S. District Court Judge Paula Xinis has demanded that the Trump administration explain why it is not complying with the Supreme Court order to “facilitate” the release of Abrego Garcia.

Xinis questions whether the administration intends to comply with the order at all, citing a statement from U.S. Department of Homeland Security chief Kristi Noem that Abrego Garcia “will never be allowed to return to the United States.” According to Xinis, “That sounds to me like an admission. That’s about as clear as it can get.”

So what’s next? Will the Supreme Court and lower courts hold the administration in contempt and enforce contempt citations?

Not if the Big Ugly Bill is enacted with the following provision, now hidden in the bill:

“No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued….”

Translated: No federal court may enforce a contempt citation.’

The hidden provision in the Big Ugly Bill that makes Trump king

Don’t let this happen

robertreich.substack.com

Yet another example of the right’s contempt for the Constitution and rule of law.

There are 667 Judges or so I read. The author of the article stipulating that we are supposed to be a Republic and we have a Judge Oligarchy now.

 

[Seymour Flops]

‘In a separate case, U.S. District Court Judge Paula Xinis has demanded that the Trump administration explain why it is not complying with the Supreme Court order to “facilitate” the release of Abrego Garcia.

Xinis questions whether the administration intends to comply with the order at all, citing a statement from U.S. Department of Homeland Security chief Kristi Noem that Abrego Garcia “will never be allowed to return to the United States.” According to Xinis, “That sounds to me like an admission. That’s about as clear as it can get.”

What has Xinis told the Trump Administration to do, exactly? Why did she not clarify her order, as she herself was ordered to do by the USSC?