The government described in the Biblical Old Testament is a theocracy

[Midnight FM]

The type of government described in the Biblical Old Testament is an authoritarian, theocratic form of government. Which is incompatible with modern forms of government in which rights and civil liberties are encoded into law.

While I believe the the Bible contains valid social principles, such as how the 10 Commandments (e.x. "thou shalt not steal") contained some notion of concepts such as property rights, I am glad that most Christians do not believe the Biblical form of government was meant to be carried on into perpetuity, and that Christ made it clear that excessive adherence to the law to the point that it no longer served a valid moral purpose was wrong.

 

[BULLDOG]

Does this mean I can't beat my slave with a stick anymore? What am I supposed to do on Saturday afternoon now?

 

[Hafar1014]

The type of government described in the Biblical Old Testament is an authoritarian, theocratic form of government. Which is incompatible with modern forms of government in which rights and civil liberties are encoded into law.

While I believe the the Bible contains valid social principles, such as how the 10 Commandments (e.x. "thou shalt not steal") contained some notion of concepts such as property rights, I am glad that most Christians do not believe the Biblical form of government was meant to be carried on into perpetuity, and that Christ made it clear that excessive adherence to the law to the point that it no longer served a valid moral purpose was wrong.

Not true not even close. Leviticus is civil law which proves the old Kingdoms did apply the rule of law. They also gave us the Decalogue which even a king must obey. The entire message in Genesis is free will controlled my moral values.
The most oppressive governments in history were all atheist, the USSR Cambodia, N Korea, Red China, and the NAZIs were secular.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Genesis, free will, and moral values are very complex.

Genesis doesn’t present a single, unified message about free will being controlled by moral values—but it does weave a complex tapestry where human choice, divine sovereignty, and moral consequence are deeply intertwined.

Here’s how it plays out:

Free Will in Genesis

• Adam and Eve’s choice to eat from the Tree of Knowledge (Genesis 2–3) is the first major exercise of free will. God gives a command, but doesn’t prevent disobedience.
• Their decision introduces moral awareness—“knowing good and evil”—which suggests that moral values become part of human consciousness through choice and consequence.
• Later stories (Cain and Abel, Noah, Abraham) continue this theme: individuals make choices that reflect their values, and those choices shape their destinies.

Moral Values and Consequences

• Genesis doesn’t say moral values control free will—it shows that free will leads to moral accountability.
• The consequences of choices (banishment from Eden, the flood, blessings and curses) imply that moral values are the measuring stick by which choices are judged.
• God’s responses often reflect a balance between justice and mercy, reinforcing the idea that moral values matter, but humans are still free to choose.

Divine Sovereignty vs. Human Agency

• Genesis opens with God as the sovereign creator, but it quickly introduces human agency as a cooperative force in the unfolding story.
• Abraham’s covenant, for example, is initiated by God but depends on Abraham’s faithful response—a blend of divine plan and human choice.

So, Genesis doesn’t say free will is controlled by moral values—it shows that free will is the mechanism through which moral values are tested, revealed, and

refined. It’s less about control, more about consequence.

Would you like to explore how this theme evolves in later biblical books or theological traditions?

Globalministries.com
biblehub.com
www.godsfaithbook.com