www.politico.com
freebeacon.com
en.wikipedia.org
I'm telling you that Cohen needs his permission one way or another..... If he proceeds without it he will be made to seek it... There are no "ifs" about this.You are completely full of shit. There are no such exemptions for permissions.
Nope, there are different laws for subscription services like Amazon Prime. But hey, Rudy can feel free to reach into his legal briefs and whip out his subpoenas.
It's understandable that you feel foolish for not realizing that Giuliani had to give permission or will be compensated but you're insistence that someone's image can be used for profit without their permission is a total bologna sandwich dude.
Jo
So Rudy agreed to let folks see him spank his monkey for a fee? Link or I call BS.
What's so ******* funny watching this unfold you leftists are quickly calling this fake and a sham there is one thing you didn't have during the Schiff Sham that we have AN EYEWITNESS who came forwardIs Donald actually PAYING Crazy Rudy and reimbursing him for all his globetrotting to meet with Russian spies for "dirt"? Oh yea - never mind. Donald doesn't pay any of his legal bills. Rudy does this shit because he can't stand the idea of not being relevant anymore.
The primary sub-source that former British spy Christopher Steele used to compile his anti-Trump dossier in 2016 was the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation a decade ago, according to details authorized for release by U.S. Attorney John Durham, who is investigating the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe.........
Graham said that Thursday’s revelation further underscores that the FBI withheld potentially exculpatory information from the court.
“To me, failure of the FBI to inform the court that the primary sub-source was suspected of being a Russian agent is a breach of every duty owed by law enforcement to the judicial system,” Graham said in a statement, calling it “the most stunning and damning revelation the committee has uncovered.”
According to the summary of the counterintelligence investigation as prepared by Barr and the FBI, the primary sub-source was in contact with known Russian intelligence officers in 2006. The investigation into the primary sub-source was closed in 2011 and “remains closed to this day,” according to the summary.
Steele dossier sub-source was suspected of spying for Russia, DOJ reveals
But the new release by U.S. Attorney John Durham suggests indictments on that aspect of the Justice Department's review aren't forthcoming.
DURR
The primary sub-source that former British spy Christopher Steele used to compile his anti-Trump dossier in 2016 was the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation a decade ago, according to details authorized for release by U.S. Attorney John Durham, who is investigating the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe.........
Graham said that Thursday’s revelation further underscores that the FBI withheld potentially exculpatory information from the court.
“To me, failure of the FBI to inform the court that the primary sub-source was suspected of being a Russian agent is a breach of every duty owed by law enforcement to the judicial system,” Graham said in a statement, calling it “the most stunning and damning revelation the committee has uncovered.”
According to the summary of the counterintelligence investigation as prepared by Barr and the FBI, the primary sub-source was in contact with known Russian intelligence officers in 2006. The investigation into the primary sub-source was closed in 2011 and “remains closed to this day,” according to the summary.
Steele dossier sub-source was suspected of spying for Russia, DOJ reveals
But the new release by U.S. Attorney John Durham suggests indictments on that aspect of the Justice Department's review aren't forthcoming.
DURR
We knew early on that one of Steele's sources was a Russian agent, or former. He had a lot of sources from his career.
What has been disproven from the Steele Dossier?
The primary sub-source that former British spy Christopher Steele used to compile his anti-Trump dossier in 2016 was the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation a decade ago, according to details authorized for release by U.S. Attorney John Durham, who is investigating the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe.........
Graham said that Thursday’s revelation further underscores that the FBI withheld potentially exculpatory information from the court.
“To me, failure of the FBI to inform the court that the primary sub-source was suspected of being a Russian agent is a breach of every duty owed by law enforcement to the judicial system,” Graham said in a statement, calling it “the most stunning and damning revelation the committee has uncovered.”
According to the summary of the counterintelligence investigation as prepared by Barr and the FBI, the primary sub-source was in contact with known Russian intelligence officers in 2006. The investigation into the primary sub-source was closed in 2011 and “remains closed to this day,” according to the summary.
Steele dossier sub-source was suspected of spying for Russia, DOJ reveals
But the new release by U.S. Attorney John Durham suggests indictments on that aspect of the Justice Department's review aren't forthcoming.
DURR
We knew early on that one of Steele's sources was a Russian agent, or former. He had a lot of sources from his career.
What has been disproven from the Steele Dossier?
We knew early on that one of Steele's sources was a Russian agent, or former.
Back to my original comment....
That's outrageous!!!!
Only the Clinton campaign is supposed to get disinformation from Russian agents, eh comrade?
What has been disproven from the Steele Dossier?
How many items were proven? Any of them?
Was Cohen in Prague for a secret meeting with Russians?
No he didnt. Goddamn, did yall retarded mfers even read about it?
Rudy Giuliani's 'Borat 2' Appearance Arouses Interest Of Twitter Users
One person wondered "which sank lower" -- Giuliani's reputation, "or his hand down his pants?"www.huffpost.com
In one scene of the film, which officially premieres Friday on Amazon Prime, the former New York City mayor is seen touching himself in the presence of a woman who’s posing as a conservative reporter.
The woman is Bulgarian actress Maria Bakalova, 24, who in the movie portrays Borat’s teenage daughter.
The scene ends when star Sacha Baron Cohen, playing Borat, bursts into the room and says, “She’s 15, she’s too old for you!”
Yes, we know: Pictures or it didn’t happen.
Let me put it to you this way:
Giuliani is 76 years old, what the **** was he trying to do with a woman younger than his grandchildren?
His kids won't even speak to him. Dude is a slime ball - Crappy husband and crappy father. Perfect for Trump.
It doesn't look like Rudy Giuliani's two children will have a role in his presidential campaign. According to media reports, the GOP frontrunner's third marriage has alienated his son, Andrew, 21, and daughter, Caroline, 18, from their father.Giuliani's 21-year-old son, Andrew, told The New York Times that he would be too busy working on his golf game to participate in his father's presidential campaign."There's obviously a little problem that exists between me and his wife," the younger Giuliani told the newspaper. "And we're trying to figure that out. But as of right now it's not working as well as we would like."The New York Daily News reported that Giuliani rarely spends time with his children and that he had failed to attend many important events in their lives, including Andrew's golf tournaments and Caroline's school plays.
Giuliani Estranged From His 2 Children
Son And Daughter Of GOP Frontrunner Won't Participate In His Presidential Campaignwww.cbsnews.com
Yep. His daughter is urging people to vote for Biden.
I watched Borat 2. Rudy definitely thought he was gonna get some.
The primary sub-source that former British spy Christopher Steele used to compile his anti-Trump dossier in 2016 was the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation a decade ago, according to details authorized for release by U.S. Attorney John Durham, who is investigating the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe.........
Graham said that Thursday’s revelation further underscores that the FBI withheld potentially exculpatory information from the court.
“To me, failure of the FBI to inform the court that the primary sub-source was suspected of being a Russian agent is a breach of every duty owed by law enforcement to the judicial system,” Graham said in a statement, calling it “the most stunning and damning revelation the committee has uncovered.”
According to the summary of the counterintelligence investigation as prepared by Barr and the FBI, the primary sub-source was in contact with known Russian intelligence officers in 2006. The investigation into the primary sub-source was closed in 2011 and “remains closed to this day,” according to the summary.
Steele dossier sub-source was suspected of spying for Russia, DOJ reveals
But the new release by U.S. Attorney John Durham suggests indictments on that aspect of the Justice Department's review aren't forthcoming.
DURR
We knew early on that one of Steele's sources was a Russian agent, or former. He had a lot of sources from his career.
What has been disproven from the Steele Dossier?
We knew early on that one of Steele's sources was a Russian agent, or former.
Back to my original comment....
That's outrageous!!!!
Only the Clinton campaign is supposed to get disinformation from Russian agents, eh comrade?
What has been disproven from the Steele Dossier?
How many items were proven? Any of them?
Was Cohen in Prague for a secret meeting with Russians?
The Steele Dossier was a collection of "raw intelligence". Steele made no claims as to the veracity of everything in his report, and yet a TON of stuff has been proven accurate.
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective
Not all of the material in the dossier has been proven. But none has been disproven. As a raw intelligence document, the Steele dossier holds up well.www.lawfareblog.com
The primary sub-source that former British spy Christopher Steele used to compile his anti-Trump dossier in 2016 was the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation a decade ago, according to details authorized for release by U.S. Attorney John Durham, who is investigating the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe.........
Graham said that Thursday’s revelation further underscores that the FBI withheld potentially exculpatory information from the court.
“To me, failure of the FBI to inform the court that the primary sub-source was suspected of being a Russian agent is a breach of every duty owed by law enforcement to the judicial system,” Graham said in a statement, calling it “the most stunning and damning revelation the committee has uncovered.”
According to the summary of the counterintelligence investigation as prepared by Barr and the FBI, the primary sub-source was in contact with known Russian intelligence officers in 2006. The investigation into the primary sub-source was closed in 2011 and “remains closed to this day,” according to the summary.
Steele dossier sub-source was suspected of spying for Russia, DOJ reveals
But the new release by U.S. Attorney John Durham suggests indictments on that aspect of the Justice Department's review aren't forthcoming.
DURR
We knew early on that one of Steele's sources was a Russian agent, or former. He had a lot of sources from his career.
What has been disproven from the Steele Dossier?
We knew early on that one of Steele's sources was a Russian agent, or former.
Back to my original comment....
That's outrageous!!!!
Only the Clinton campaign is supposed to get disinformation from Russian agents, eh comrade?
What has been disproven from the Steele Dossier?
How many items were proven? Any of them?
Was Cohen in Prague for a secret meeting with Russians?
The Steele Dossier was a collection of "raw intelligence". Steele made no claims as to the veracity of everything in his report, and yet a TON of stuff has been proven accurate.
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective
Not all of the material in the dossier has been proven. But none has been disproven. As a raw intelligence document, the Steele dossier holds up well.
The Steele Dossier was a collection of "raw intelligence".
Yes, disinformation from a Russian spy.
Steele made no claims as to the veracity of everything in his report,
Who lied and said it was corroborated? FBI?
and yet a TON of stuff has been proven accurate.
Which stuff was proven accurate showing cooperation between the campaign and the Russians?
Which stuff showed wrongdoing or crimes by anyone in the campaign? Anything?
The primary sub-source that former British spy Christopher Steele used to compile his anti-Trump dossier in 2016 was the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation a decade ago, according to details authorized for release by U.S. Attorney John Durham, who is investigating the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe.........
Graham said that Thursday’s revelation further underscores that the FBI withheld potentially exculpatory information from the court.
“To me, failure of the FBI to inform the court that the primary sub-source was suspected of being a Russian agent is a breach of every duty owed by law enforcement to the judicial system,” Graham said in a statement, calling it “the most stunning and damning revelation the committee has uncovered.”
According to the summary of the counterintelligence investigation as prepared by Barr and the FBI, the primary sub-source was in contact with known Russian intelligence officers in 2006. The investigation into the primary sub-source was closed in 2011 and “remains closed to this day,” according to the summary.
Steele dossier sub-source was suspected of spying for Russia, DOJ reveals
But the new release by U.S. Attorney John Durham suggests indictments on that aspect of the Justice Department's review aren't forthcoming.
DURR
We knew early on that one of Steele's sources was a Russian agent, or former. He had a lot of sources from his career.
What has been disproven from the Steele Dossier?
We knew early on that one of Steele's sources was a Russian agent, or former.
Back to my original comment....
That's outrageous!!!!
Only the Clinton campaign is supposed to get disinformation from Russian agents, eh comrade?
What has been disproven from the Steele Dossier?
How many items were proven? Any of them?
Was Cohen in Prague for a secret meeting with Russians?
The Steele Dossier was a collection of "raw intelligence". Steele made no claims as to the veracity of everything in his report, and yet a TON of stuff has been proven accurate.
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective
Not all of the material in the dossier has been proven. But none has been disproven. As a raw intelligence document, the Steele dossier holds up well.
The Steele Dossier was a collection of "raw intelligence".
Yes, disinformation from a Russian spy.
Steele made no claims as to the veracity of everything in his report,
Who lied and said it was corroborated? FBI?
and yet a TON of stuff has been proven accurate.
Which stuff was proven accurate showing cooperation between the campaign and the Russians?
Which stuff showed wrongdoing or crimes by anyone in the campaign? Anything?
Read my link and get back to me.
I watched Borat 2. Rudy definitely thought he was gonna get some.
