The Giuliani Smear Campaign Gets Very Interesting







That's when he isn't fondling himself in front of 15 year old girls in hotel rooms. Fucking pervert.


That's outrageous!!!!

Only the Clinton campaign is supposed to get disinformation from Russian agents, eh comrade?

Post your proof, loser.


Where do you think the Steele dossier came from? Silly twat.

An ex-British agent, funded by the Free Beacon, a bunch of Conservatives who wanted Cruz and didn't want Trump.


Conservative Free Beacon originally funded firm that created Trump-Russia dossier
 






That's when he isn't fondling himself in front of 15 year old girls in hotel rooms. Fucking pervert.


That's outrageous!!!!

Only the Clinton campaign is supposed to get disinformation from Russian agents, eh comrade?

Post your proof, loser.


Where do you think the Steele dossier came from? Silly twat.

An ex-British agent, funded by the Free Beacon, a bunch of Conservatives who wanted Cruz and didn't want Trump.


Conservative Free Beacon originally funded firm that created Trump-Russia dossier


The primary sub-source that former British spy Christopher Steele used to compile his anti-Trump dossier in 2016 was the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation a decade ago, according to details authorized for release by U.S. Attorney John Durham, who is investigating the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe.........

Graham said that Thursday’s revelation further underscores that the FBI withheld potentially exculpatory information from the court.

“To me, failure of the FBI to inform the court that the primary sub-source was suspected of being a Russian agent is a breach of every duty owed by law enforcement to the judicial system,” Graham said in a statement, calling it “the most stunning and damning revelation the committee has uncovered.”

According to the summary of the counterintelligence investigation as prepared by Barr and the FBI, the primary sub-source was in contact with known Russian intelligence officers in 2006. The investigation into the primary sub-source was closed in 2011 and “remains closed to this day,” according to the summary.





DURR
 






That's when he isn't fondling himself in front of 15 year old girls in hotel rooms. Fucking pervert.


That's outrageous!!!!

Only the Clinton campaign is supposed to get disinformation from Russian agents, eh comrade?

Post your proof, loser.


Where do you think the Steele dossier came from? Silly twat.

An ex-British agent, funded by the Free Beacon, a bunch of Conservatives who wanted Cruz and didn't want Trump.


Conservative Free Beacon originally funded firm that created Trump-Russia dossier



Since its launch in February of 2012, the Washington Free Beacon has retained third party firms to conduct research on many individuals and institutions of interest to us and our readers. In that capacity, during the 2016 election cycle we retained Fusion GPS to provide research on multiple candidates in the Republican presidential primary, just as we retained other firms to assist in our research into Hillary Clinton. All of the work that Fusion GPS provided to the Free Beacon was based on public sources, and none of the work product that the Free Beacon received appears in the Steele dossier. The Free Beacon had no knowledge of or connection to the Steele dossier, did not pay for the dossier, and never had contact with, knowledge of, or provided payment for any work performed by Christopher Steele. Nor did we have any knowledge of the relationship between Fusion GPS and the Democratic National Committee, Perkins Coie, and the Clinton campaign.


In October 2015, Fusion GPS was contracted by conservative political website The Washington Free Beacon to provide general opposition research on Trump and other Republican presidential candidates. Separately, in April 2016, an attorney for Hillary Clinton's campaign and the DNC hired Fusion GPS to investigate Trump, while The Free Beacon stopped its backing in May 2016.[8] In June 2016, Fusion GPS subcontracted Steele's firm to compile the dossier. DNC officials denied knowing their attorney had contracted with Fusion GPS, and Steele asserted he was not aware the Clinton campaign was the recipient of his research until months after he contracted with Fusion GPS.[20][21] Following Trump's election as president, funding from Clinton and the DNC ceased, but Steele continued his research and was reportedly paid directly by Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn R. Simpson.[22] While compiling the dossier, Steele passed some of his findings to both British and American intelligence services.[23][24]

.
 
Like I said you're not very bright....it doesn't matter who they are they cannot show Giuliani's image in a sales transaction without his consent....sooooo if he has consented how stupid does that make you look?

JO

The film is already released. As I said, I don't believe Amazon Prime needs the kind of permission one would need to release a movie in theaters or air something on regular television. I suppose Rudy could sue but good luck with that.

Face it, Rudy got punked and it serves him right for cavorting with Russian spies.

You are totally wrong....if it got released then Giuliani was compensated for it or will be compensated for it.....you simply cannot do what you're dreaming of. Actually I now remember the original news story from well over six weeks ago....this is not something that just happened the other day that I know for sure. No question there has been a business arrangement or will be by court order......

JO

Interesting - Got a link to share with the class?

Don't need one....it's common law. He might get away with it if he was giving the movie away for free as some kind of public information service...but charging money for it? Giuliani will have half the profits if they did it wrong trust me......he may be a fool....but he's not ignorant of corporate law or personal law for that matter.

JO

Nope, there are different laws for subscription services like Amazon Prime. But hey, Rudy can feel free to reach into his legal briefs and whip out his subpoenas. :cool-45:
You are completely full of shit. There are no such exemptions for permissions.
It's understandable that you feel foolish for not realizing that Giuliani had to give permission or will be compensated but you're insistence that someone's image can be used for profit without their permission is a total bologna sandwich dude.

Jo

So Rudy agreed to let folks see him spank his monkey for a fee? Link or I call BS. :rolleyes-41:
I'm telling you that Cohen needs his permission one way or another..... If he proceeds without it he will be made to seek it... There are no "ifs" about this.
 
Is Donald actually PAYING Crazy Rudy and reimbursing him for all his globetrotting to meet with Russian spies for "dirt"? Oh yea - never mind. Donald doesn't pay any of his legal bills. Rudy does this shit because he can't stand the idea of not being relevant anymore.

4QhMFJ_0XMrWa2x00
What's so fucking funny watching this unfold you leftists are quickly calling this fake and a sham there is one thing you didn't have during the Schiff Sham that we have AN EYEWITNESS who came forward
 






That's when he isn't fondling himself in front of 15 year old girls in hotel rooms. Fucking pervert.


That's outrageous!!!!

Only the Clinton campaign is supposed to get disinformation from Russian agents, eh comrade?

Post your proof, loser.


Where do you think the Steele dossier came from? Silly twat.

An ex-British agent, funded by the Free Beacon, a bunch of Conservatives who wanted Cruz and didn't want Trump.


Conservative Free Beacon originally funded firm that created Trump-Russia dossier


The primary sub-source that former British spy Christopher Steele used to compile his anti-Trump dossier in 2016 was the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation a decade ago, according to details authorized for release by U.S. Attorney John Durham, who is investigating the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe.........

Graham said that Thursday’s revelation further underscores that the FBI withheld potentially exculpatory information from the court.

“To me, failure of the FBI to inform the court that the primary sub-source was suspected of being a Russian agent is a breach of every duty owed by law enforcement to the judicial system,” Graham said in a statement, calling it “the most stunning and damning revelation the committee has uncovered.”

According to the summary of the counterintelligence investigation as prepared by Barr and the FBI, the primary sub-source was in contact with known Russian intelligence officers in 2006. The investigation into the primary sub-source was closed in 2011 and “remains closed to this day,” according to the summary.





DURR

We knew early on that one of Steele's sources was a Russian agent, or former. He had a lot of sources from his career.

What has been disproven from the Steele Dossier?
 






That's when he isn't fondling himself in front of 15 year old girls in hotel rooms. Fucking pervert.


That's outrageous!!!!

Only the Clinton campaign is supposed to get disinformation from Russian agents, eh comrade?

Post your proof, loser.


Where do you think the Steele dossier came from? Silly twat.

An ex-British agent, funded by the Free Beacon, a bunch of Conservatives who wanted Cruz and didn't want Trump.


Conservative Free Beacon originally funded firm that created Trump-Russia dossier


The primary sub-source that former British spy Christopher Steele used to compile his anti-Trump dossier in 2016 was the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation a decade ago, according to details authorized for release by U.S. Attorney John Durham, who is investigating the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe.........

Graham said that Thursday’s revelation further underscores that the FBI withheld potentially exculpatory information from the court.

“To me, failure of the FBI to inform the court that the primary sub-source was suspected of being a Russian agent is a breach of every duty owed by law enforcement to the judicial system,” Graham said in a statement, calling it “the most stunning and damning revelation the committee has uncovered.”

According to the summary of the counterintelligence investigation as prepared by Barr and the FBI, the primary sub-source was in contact with known Russian intelligence officers in 2006. The investigation into the primary sub-source was closed in 2011 and “remains closed to this day,” according to the summary.





DURR

We knew early on that one of Steele's sources was a Russian agent, or former. He had a lot of sources from his career.

What has been disproven from the Steele Dossier?


We knew early on that one of Steele's sources was a Russian agent, or former.

Back to my original comment....

That's outrageous!!!!

Only the Clinton campaign is supposed to get disinformation from Russian agents, eh comrade?


What has been disproven from the Steele Dossier?

How many items were proven? Any of them?

Was Cohen in Prague for a secret meeting with Russians?
 






That's when he isn't fondling himself in front of 15 year old girls in hotel rooms. Fucking pervert.


That's outrageous!!!!

Only the Clinton campaign is supposed to get disinformation from Russian agents, eh comrade?

Post your proof, loser.


Where do you think the Steele dossier came from? Silly twat.

An ex-British agent, funded by the Free Beacon, a bunch of Conservatives who wanted Cruz and didn't want Trump.


Conservative Free Beacon originally funded firm that created Trump-Russia dossier


The primary sub-source that former British spy Christopher Steele used to compile his anti-Trump dossier in 2016 was the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation a decade ago, according to details authorized for release by U.S. Attorney John Durham, who is investigating the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe.........

Graham said that Thursday’s revelation further underscores that the FBI withheld potentially exculpatory information from the court.

“To me, failure of the FBI to inform the court that the primary sub-source was suspected of being a Russian agent is a breach of every duty owed by law enforcement to the judicial system,” Graham said in a statement, calling it “the most stunning and damning revelation the committee has uncovered.”

According to the summary of the counterintelligence investigation as prepared by Barr and the FBI, the primary sub-source was in contact with known Russian intelligence officers in 2006. The investigation into the primary sub-source was closed in 2011 and “remains closed to this day,” according to the summary.





DURR

We knew early on that one of Steele's sources was a Russian agent, or former. He had a lot of sources from his career.

What has been disproven from the Steele Dossier?


We knew early on that one of Steele's sources was a Russian agent, or former.

Back to my original comment....

That's outrageous!!!!

Only the Clinton campaign is supposed to get disinformation from Russian agents, eh comrade?


What has been disproven from the Steele Dossier?

How many items were proven? Any of them?

Was Cohen in Prague for a secret meeting with Russians?


The Steele Dossier was a collection of "raw intelligence". Steele made no claims as to the veracity of everything in his report, and yet a TON of stuff has been proven accurate.
 






That's when he isn't fondling himself in front of 15 year old girls in hotel rooms. Fucking pervert.

He wasnt fondling himself in front of 15 year old girls. Fucking liar.

He should not have been in a hotel room with a 15 year old, period.

She wasnt 15, holy shit. The woman is actually 24 and she was posing as a conservative journalist. Borat said she was 15 as a joke, you fucking moron.


Doesn't matter - Rudy THOUGHT she was 15 and twiddled the Rudy Tootie. That's the way cops catch predators. With decoys.

No he didnt. Goddamn, did yall retarded mfers even read about it?

In one scene of the film, which officially premieres Friday on Amazon Prime, the former New York City mayor is seen touching himself in the presence of a woman who’s posing as a conservative reporter.
The woman is Bulgarian actress Maria Bakalova, 24, who in the movie portrays Borat’s teenage daughter.

The scene ends when star Sacha Baron Cohen, playing Borat, bursts into the room and says, “She’s 15, she’s too old for you!”
Yes, we know: Pictures or it didn’t happen.

Let me put it to you this way:

Giuliani is 76 years old, what the fuck was he trying to do with a woman younger than his grandchildren?


His kids won't even speak to him. Dude is a slime ball - Crappy husband and crappy father. Perfect for Trump.

It doesn't look like Rudy Giuliani's two children will have a role in his presidential campaign. According to media reports, the GOP frontrunner's third marriage has alienated his son, Andrew, 21, and daughter, Caroline, 18, from their father.​
Giuliani's 21-year-old son, Andrew, told The New York Times that he would be too busy working on his golf game to participate in his father's presidential campaign.​
"There's obviously a little problem that exists between me and his wife," the younger Giuliani told the newspaper. "And we're trying to figure that out. But as of right now it's not working as well as we would like."​
The New York Daily News reported that Giuliani rarely spends time with his children and that he had failed to attend many important events in their lives, including Andrew's golf tournaments and Caroline's school plays.​


Yep. His daughter is urging people to vote for Biden.


If I had the misfortune of having Rudy as a father, I'd have found a way to leave home by the age of 16 and changed my last name. At this point, the guy is downright embarrassing!
 
The pee tape will come out eventually.

I think the Pee Pee Tape is a tiny fraction of the kompromat Das Poot has on the Orange-atan. It explains the never ending fealty. Hell, most recently Donald was the ONLY world leader who didn't condemn Vlad for poisoning Alexei Navalny.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2






That's when he isn't fondling himself in front of 15 year old girls in hotel rooms. Fucking pervert.


That's outrageous!!!!

Only the Clinton campaign is supposed to get disinformation from Russian agents, eh comrade?

Post your proof, loser.


Where do you think the Steele dossier came from? Silly twat.

An ex-British agent, funded by the Free Beacon, a bunch of Conservatives who wanted Cruz and didn't want Trump.


Conservative Free Beacon originally funded firm that created Trump-Russia dossier


The primary sub-source that former British spy Christopher Steele used to compile his anti-Trump dossier in 2016 was the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation a decade ago, according to details authorized for release by U.S. Attorney John Durham, who is investigating the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe.........

Graham said that Thursday’s revelation further underscores that the FBI withheld potentially exculpatory information from the court.

“To me, failure of the FBI to inform the court that the primary sub-source was suspected of being a Russian agent is a breach of every duty owed by law enforcement to the judicial system,” Graham said in a statement, calling it “the most stunning and damning revelation the committee has uncovered.”

According to the summary of the counterintelligence investigation as prepared by Barr and the FBI, the primary sub-source was in contact with known Russian intelligence officers in 2006. The investigation into the primary sub-source was closed in 2011 and “remains closed to this day,” according to the summary.





DURR

We knew early on that one of Steele's sources was a Russian agent, or former. He had a lot of sources from his career.

What has been disproven from the Steele Dossier?


We knew early on that one of Steele's sources was a Russian agent, or former.

Back to my original comment....

That's outrageous!!!!

Only the Clinton campaign is supposed to get disinformation from Russian agents, eh comrade?


What has been disproven from the Steele Dossier?

How many items were proven? Any of them?

Was Cohen in Prague for a secret meeting with Russians?


The Steele Dossier was a collection of "raw intelligence". Steele made no claims as to the veracity of everything in his report, and yet a TON of stuff has been proven accurate.


The Steele Dossier was a collection of "raw intelligence".

Yes, disinformation from a Russian spy.

Steele made no claims as to the veracity of everything in his report,

Who lied and said it was corroborated? FBI?

and yet a TON of stuff has been proven accurate.

Which stuff was proven accurate showing cooperation between the campaign and the Russians?
Which stuff showed wrongdoing or crimes by anyone in the campaign? Anything?
 






That's when he isn't fondling himself in front of 15 year old girls in hotel rooms. Fucking pervert.


That's outrageous!!!!

Only the Clinton campaign is supposed to get disinformation from Russian agents, eh comrade?

Post your proof, loser.


Where do you think the Steele dossier came from? Silly twat.

An ex-British agent, funded by the Free Beacon, a bunch of Conservatives who wanted Cruz and didn't want Trump.


Conservative Free Beacon originally funded firm that created Trump-Russia dossier


The primary sub-source that former British spy Christopher Steele used to compile his anti-Trump dossier in 2016 was the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation a decade ago, according to details authorized for release by U.S. Attorney John Durham, who is investigating the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe.........

Graham said that Thursday’s revelation further underscores that the FBI withheld potentially exculpatory information from the court.

“To me, failure of the FBI to inform the court that the primary sub-source was suspected of being a Russian agent is a breach of every duty owed by law enforcement to the judicial system,” Graham said in a statement, calling it “the most stunning and damning revelation the committee has uncovered.”

According to the summary of the counterintelligence investigation as prepared by Barr and the FBI, the primary sub-source was in contact with known Russian intelligence officers in 2006. The investigation into the primary sub-source was closed in 2011 and “remains closed to this day,” according to the summary.





DURR

We knew early on that one of Steele's sources was a Russian agent, or former. He had a lot of sources from his career.

What has been disproven from the Steele Dossier?


We knew early on that one of Steele's sources was a Russian agent, or former.

Back to my original comment....

That's outrageous!!!!

Only the Clinton campaign is supposed to get disinformation from Russian agents, eh comrade?


What has been disproven from the Steele Dossier?

How many items were proven? Any of them?

Was Cohen in Prague for a secret meeting with Russians?


The Steele Dossier was a collection of "raw intelligence". Steele made no claims as to the veracity of everything in his report, and yet a TON of stuff has been proven accurate.


The Steele Dossier was a collection of "raw intelligence".

Yes, disinformation from a Russian spy.

Steele made no claims as to the veracity of everything in his report,

Who lied and said it was corroborated? FBI?

and yet a TON of stuff has been proven accurate.

Which stuff was proven accurate showing cooperation between the campaign and the Russians?
Which stuff showed wrongdoing or crimes by anyone in the campaign? Anything?


Read my link and get back to me.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2






That's when he isn't fondling himself in front of 15 year old girls in hotel rooms. Fucking pervert.


That's outrageous!!!!

Only the Clinton campaign is supposed to get disinformation from Russian agents, eh comrade?

Post your proof, loser.


Where do you think the Steele dossier came from? Silly twat.

An ex-British agent, funded by the Free Beacon, a bunch of Conservatives who wanted Cruz and didn't want Trump.


Conservative Free Beacon originally funded firm that created Trump-Russia dossier


The primary sub-source that former British spy Christopher Steele used to compile his anti-Trump dossier in 2016 was the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation a decade ago, according to details authorized for release by U.S. Attorney John Durham, who is investigating the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe.........

Graham said that Thursday’s revelation further underscores that the FBI withheld potentially exculpatory information from the court.

“To me, failure of the FBI to inform the court that the primary sub-source was suspected of being a Russian agent is a breach of every duty owed by law enforcement to the judicial system,” Graham said in a statement, calling it “the most stunning and damning revelation the committee has uncovered.”

According to the summary of the counterintelligence investigation as prepared by Barr and the FBI, the primary sub-source was in contact with known Russian intelligence officers in 2006. The investigation into the primary sub-source was closed in 2011 and “remains closed to this day,” according to the summary.





DURR

We knew early on that one of Steele's sources was a Russian agent, or former. He had a lot of sources from his career.

What has been disproven from the Steele Dossier?


We knew early on that one of Steele's sources was a Russian agent, or former.

Back to my original comment....

That's outrageous!!!!

Only the Clinton campaign is supposed to get disinformation from Russian agents, eh comrade?


What has been disproven from the Steele Dossier?

How many items were proven? Any of them?

Was Cohen in Prague for a secret meeting with Russians?


The Steele Dossier was a collection of "raw intelligence". Steele made no claims as to the veracity of everything in his report, and yet a TON of stuff has been proven accurate.


The Steele Dossier was a collection of "raw intelligence".

Yes, disinformation from a Russian spy.

Steele made no claims as to the veracity of everything in his report,

Who lied and said it was corroborated? FBI?

and yet a TON of stuff has been proven accurate.

Which stuff was proven accurate showing cooperation between the campaign and the Russians?
Which stuff showed wrongdoing or crimes by anyone in the campaign? Anything?


Read my link and get back to me.


I glanced thru it, didn't see anything that proved collusion or criminal activity.
If you did, post it.
 
Best thing, ignore any last min negatives from either side its just garbage unless comes with verifiable facts.
 
Read my link and get back to me.

Your sig has the wrong title, it should be The Origins of Totalitarianism - plus the quote is misleading. It actually applies best to liberal, leftist, communist ideas. Here is the context:

In all fairness to those among the elite, on the other hand, who at one
time or another have let themselves be seduced by totalitarian movements,
and who sometimes, because of their intellectual abilities, are even accused
of having inspired totalitarianism, it must be stated that what these desperate
men of the twentieth century did or did not do had no influence on
totalitarianism whatsoever, although it did play some part in earlier, successful,
attempts of the movements to force the outside world to take their
doctrines seriously. Wherever totalitarian movements seized power, this
whole group of sympathizers was shaken off even before the regimes proceeded
toward their greatest crimes. Intellectual, spiritual, and artistic initiative
is as dangerous to totalitarianism as the gangster initiative of the mob,
and both are more dangerous than mere political opposition. The consistent
persecution of every higher form of intellectual activity by the new mass
leaders springs from more than their natural resentment against everything
they cannot understand. Total domination does not allow for free initiative
in any field of life, for any activity that is not entirely predictable. Totalitarianism
in power invariably replaces all first-rate talents, regardless of
their sympathies, with those crackpots and fools whose l ack of intelligence
and creativity is still the best guarantee of their loyalty.

Page 339 of 1973 edition.
 

Forum List

Back
Top