.
not really. How many african world explorers can you name?
They
No but the pretense that the Land was already theirs was.
um, you do realize that the thirteen colonies were established by the time the Constitution was signed, eh?
Slavery cost less thus hired workers would not have been as economically enticing as slavery. If we are really ruling out assumptions then you can not assume that the european hired immigrants would have done the work to the same standard. We would be left witht he fact that African Americans DID do the work and establish an economic boom in the south.
Yet the fact of indentured servants and sharecropping invalidates your assumption that slavery, ergo africans, were the validating factor in the creation of this nation. Cheap cotton labor did not cause the thirteen colonies to rebel against England. Sorry to burst your bubble.
Only you brought up marco polo's asian adventure. I simply stated the fact of the wealth of knowledge gathered from other countries
do I need to quote you again? YOU brought up the adventures of Euros and Asians as some kind of laughable measure of the success of white people in North America. Again, Marco Polo's Asian adventure is not the catylist that gave us the United States. I don't recall that it was tru that white people came to the new world in order to practice math.
Slavery was ended because white people wanted black people to help them win a war. You should probably retake 7th grade history and then continue the conversation.
Yea, dude.. Lincoln sure did merely want freed blacks just to win the civil war!

speaking of 7th grade history class...
hey, dude.. again, name some names or kiss my white ass. don't get angry because your current freedom was granted to you by WHITE people.