The Ever Brilliant Legal Scholar Jonathan Turley: January 6 Wasn’t Insurrection or Rebellion — 14th Amendment Doesn’t Apply

[Donald H]

What dead cops? Ashley Babbitt wasn't a cop.

View attachment 877232

Keep the questions alive!

 

[Anomalism]

What dead cops? Ashley Babbitt wasn't a cop.

View attachment 877232

I think there was a cop that died of stroke sometime after the incident. He'll probably try to tie that in as the fault of Trump and the protesters. Funny how left wingers care about our boys in blue all of a sudden though.

 

[MarathonMike]

What makes Turdley "brilliant"?

In fact, what makes him a "legal scholar"?

I'm thinking it has to do with him being brilliant and a legal scholar. Hope that helps.

 

[MarathonMike]

I think there was a cop that died of stroke sometime after the incident. He'll probably try to tie that in as the fault of Trump and the protesters. Funny how left wingers care about our boys in blue all of a sudden though.h

Left winger caring/hatred flips faster than a light switch based on how their Democratic Party is affected.

 

[Doc7505]

He's Fox's MAGA lawyer. And that's about it.

~~~~~~
Yet, he is a Democrat by choice.

Jonathan Turley: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Jonathan Turley is the Republican legal expert who appeared before the House Judiciary Committee on December 4 as part of the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.

heavy.com

 

[Rawley]

What makes Turdley "brilliant"?

He's consistently right in his legal analysis

In fact, what makes him a "legal scholar"?

Being a law professor for 30+ years, writing law review articles, you know, scholarly stuff like that.

 

[HikerGuy83]

What makes Turdley "brilliant"?

In fact, what makes him a "legal scholar"?

Certainly not the fact that he is 100x smarter than you.

I have a broom that is at least as much.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Amen! Squirrelly Turley is usually on the wrong side of everything. He ain't very bright. This thread has THREE things against it:

1. The OP
2. Turley
3. Breitbart

Which are all TRUMPED by the fact you posted in the thread.

Look at you: using the non-word ain't in a sentence about not being bright.

 

[Rawley]

Amen! Squirrelly Turley is usually on the wrong side of everything. He ain't very bright. This thread has THREE things against it:

1. The OP
2. Turley
3. Breitbart

Got some examples of him being "on the wrong side of everything?"

 

[Moonglow]

But the democrat planned January 6 WAS an Insurrection that day. An insurrection as mentioned in the 14A has to be declared by a relevant authority. The Insurrection Act of 1807 gives the president that power.

((Calling an insurrection allows him certain powers, such as federalizing the national guard.))

Did he?

Did Donald Trump call an insurrection on himself? No! January 6 was a planned counterintelligence operation orchestrated by our own government. Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff were becoming Junior G-Men acting as CIA agents.

Turley: January 6 Wasn't Insurrection or Rebellion — 14th Amendment Doesn't Apply

Thursday on FNC's "The Story," network contributor Jonathan Turley questioned the merits of the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to bar former President Donald Trump from the 2024 primary election ballot. |

www.breitbart.com

God damn it life just ain't working out for the Trump kidz ozone.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Got some examples of him being "on the wrong side of everything?"

They'll only go back so far.

Turley used to call if the democratic side on a pretty consistent basis.

But even he figured out the left is a bunch of traitors.

 

[CowboyTed]

To hell with the evidence. The decision is dependent of the enormous weight of the establishment to stop Trump.

America can't allow it to happen!

To hell with the evidence.

At your honest... You don't want to see the evidence you have Fox News and a conspiracy theory

 

[ColonelAngus]

At your honest... You don't want to see the evidence you have Fox News and a conspiracy theory

Good lord dude, why so racist? You people are supposed to be closeted about that shit.

 

[dudmuck]

But the democrat planned January 6 WAS an Insurrection that day. An insurrection as mentioned in the 14A has to be declared by a relevant authority. The Insurrection Act of 1807 gives the president that power.

((Calling an insurrection allows him certain powers, such as federalizing the national guard.))

Did he?

Did Donald Trump call an insurrection on himself? No! January 6 was a planned counterintelligence operation orchestrated by our own government. Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff were becoming Junior G-Men acting as CIA agents.

Turley: January 6 Wasn't Insurrection or Rebellion — 14th Amendment Doesn't Apply

Thursday on FNC's "The Story," network contributor Jonathan Turley questioned the merits of the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to bar former President Donald Trump from the 2024 primary election ballot. |

www.breitbart.com

democrats attempted to stop the electoral vote count because they wanted four more years of Trump instead of Biden. ya.

 

[kyzr]

I think there was a cop that died of stroke sometime after the incident. He'll probably try to tie that in as the fault of Trump and the protesters. Funny how left wingers care about our boys in blue all of a sudden though.

1. True
2. His claim of "dead cops" is a lie.
3. Their claim that the protesters were "armed" is also a lie.

 

[martybegan]

Dead cops are molehills to Republicans.

Got it.

The only direct death was of an unarmed helpless protesters, shot by a idiot cop.

 

[konradv]

But the democrat planned January 6 WAS an Insurrection that day. An insurrection as mentioned in the 14A has to be declared by a relevant authority. The Insurrection Act of 1807 gives the president that power.

((Calling an insurrection allows him certain powers, such as federalizing the national guard.))

Did he?

Did Donald Trump call an insurrection on himself? No! January 6 was a planned counterintelligence operation orchestrated by our own government. Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff were becoming Junior G-Men acting as CIA agents.

Turley: January 6 Wasn't Insurrection or Rebellion — 14th Amendment Doesn't Apply

Thursday on FNC's "The Story," network contributor Jonathan Turley questioned the merits of the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to bar former President Donald Trump from the 2024 primary election ballot. |

www.breitbart.com

The COSC says different. It was 7-0 on the insurrection issue. The 4-3 vote was on what to do about it. The facts were settled, as far as the court was concerned,

 

[martybegan]

The COSC says different. It was 7-0 on the insurrection issue. The 4-3 vote was on what to do about it. The facts were settled, as far as the court was concerned,

The Court is full of partisan hacks.

 

[konradv]

The Court is full of partisan hacks.

You’re talking the USSC, right?

 

[martybegan]

You’re talking the USSC, right?

No, the Colorado court.