- Thread starter
- #401
Sting ops do just that.Why is it that we can prosecute someone for prostitution without being concerned at all about those who paid to play?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sting ops do just that.Why is it that we can prosecute someone for prostitution without being concerned at all about those who paid to play?
It's in the book, it's online somewhere.Not that she wrote about showering with her father.
Lots of fake stuff in there. Just like the Epstein file. And it's crazy that Obama doctored up that file but never released it. Comey never released it. Even Biden didn't release the list in order to sink Trump. And Trump can vindicate himself....lol. OH COME ON! It's so obvious Trump was a frequent flier on the lolita expressIt's in the book, it's online somewhere.
Been verified.....same copy she acknowledged as hers.Lots of fake stuff in there
It's so obvious Trump was a frequent flier on the lolita express
Nonsense.Been verified.....same copy she acknowledged as hers.
Been verified too.
Flight logs have been verified and previously published.Nonsense
No she didn't verify the passages within the diary. The Biden's chose to not address this ridiculous allegation.Flight logs have been verified and previously published.
Biden's diary has been personally verified and published.
1. The flight logs show who visited the island.Reportedly a list of clients who visited the island. His two little black books are also full of his contacts.
The implications are Epstein was more of a 'House Madame' than anything, pimping for the three Intel services who do the high level blackmail games
No she didn't verify the passages within the diary.
Duh.....no they don't.1. The flight logs show who visited the island.
Methinks, as usual, you don't know what you're talking about.Me thinks you need to rethink that.....
The flight logs are mandated by FAA regulations. Trump nor anyone else has anything to do with them other than the pilot in command.Trump himself is telling you not to trust the flight logs
Well then I'll go back to what I originally said IF this is true. Nothing wrong with taking a shower with your daughter. Naked. Not in some families. Certainly not against the law. Would I do it? No. But I don't think Biden wanted to f his daughter like Trump does.Hey Boo:
Claim:
A diary authored by U.S. President Joe Biden's daughter, Ashley Biden, describes showers taken with her father when she was a child as "probably not appropriate."
Rating:
Rating: True
Rating: True
Fact Check: Posts Claim Contents of 'Ashley Biden's Diary' Have Been Verified. Here Are the Facts Fact Check: Posts Claim Contents of 'Ashley Biden's Diary' Have Been Verified. Here Are the Facts
Yes Trump said it on Howard Stern among other vulgar things he said.
The Biden pic reminded me of a line from a Jethro Tull song:Yes Trump said it on Howard Stern among other vulgar things he said.
I see poetic license, along with Trump, are very much alive in your little head.Trump is in those files.
I see poetic license, along with Trump, are very much alive in your little head.
Now, there appears to be no evidence to implicate Trump in any wrongdoing related to Epstein. Yes, there is a lot of what, in a long-ago scandal, one editor memorably called “hush hush and heavy breathing” — dramatic talk about an alleged Epstein client list, famous names, alleged blackmail, and the manner of Epstein’s death in prison. But anything implicating Trump, going back decades? No.
___________________
On Wednesday, Alan Dershowitz, who was one of Epstein’s lawyers beginning in the 2000s, published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal arguing that “there is really nothing much to see, beyond what has already been disclosed” in the Epstein files. Of course, it is important to remember that a lot has already been disclosed. But new stuff? This is what Dershowitz wrote:
Epstein never created a “client list.” The FBI interviewed alleged victims who named several “clients.” These names have been redacted. They should be disclosed but the courts have ordered them sealed. I know who they are. They don’t include any current officeholders. We don’t know whether the accusations are true. The courts have also sealed negative information about some of the accusers to protect them. Neither the Justice Department nor private defense lawyers are free to disregard court sealing orders. The media can and should petition the courts for the release of all names and information so the public can draw its own conclusions.”
__________________
If you don’t believe Dershowitz, there is David Schoen, another one of Epstein’s lawyers from the 2000s, who has said, “I don’t believe for a second there’s a client list out there. That wasn’t Jeffrey Epstein.”
Of course, Epstein did keep a “little black book” of contacts. It is public, released during a civil suit. You can buy it on Amazon. This points to the fact that an enormous amount of information about the Epstein case has already been released. You want to see the Justice Department inspector general’s report on Epstein’s death? It’s right there on the internet. Plus, there has been a huge amount of publicly available reporting on the case over the course of several years.
_____________________
In any event, the solution is for the Justice Department to release as much of the Epstein material as it legally can. Some items, as Dershowitz wrote, are under court seal. Others, like information about victims, are protected by privacy restrictions. But there is other information that could be released. In addition, journalists could appeal to the courts to reconsider the sealing of other information. The more that gets out, the better.
Regardless of the crime being committed by the Johns.Sting ops do just that.
When asked about files tied to the late convicted sex offender Trump claimed that the files were “made up” by ex-FBI Director James Comey, former President Barack Obama and former President Joe Biden’s administration.
According to Trump, the Democrats got together and said, ‘Let’s create some fake files that destroy Trump’s political career but don't use them. Let Trump get elected, don’t use them. Let Trump get elected again, still don’t use them? Then once he’s the president, hope he releases the files without ever looking at them"