The Epstein Files

[CrusaderFrank]

No not sure what you are talking about


When are you going to read the contretemps of the Epstein files? It’s explosive stuff

Enjoy your stay in Flatlands

 

[JWBooth]

 

[struth]

Enjoy your stay in Flatlands

So, you haven't actually read it, and don't care about the content.

As, expected.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So, you haven't actually read it, and don't care about the content.

As, expected.

You're not too bright, are you?

I've posted several things from the files already

 

[struth]

You're not too bright, are you?

I've posted several things from the files already

All I have seen is you deflect from the content, as you have here.

 

[OldFlame]

So, you haven't actually read it, and don't care about the content.

As, expected.

They only care about the conspiracy bullshit, none of which can be proven. You would think people would have better things to do with their time than sit and listen to hours of unproven conspiracy theory rhetoric. I've tried to listen to a few, but it's nothing but hearsay.

 

[struth]

They only care about the conspiracy bullshit, none of which can be proven. You would think people would have better things to do with their time than sit and listen to hours of unproven conspiracy theory rhetoric. I've tried to listen to a few, but it's nothing but hearsay.

It is a way for the dembots to deflect from the actual content that shows their party was closely entangled with Epstein, even after he was a convicted sex offender, and how their party, protected him.

They can't handle reality, nor will they do anything to address what their party actually did.

 

[Ringo]

News from 2023:
“The launch of a trial balloon to lift the ban on sex with children with their consent went somewhat unnoticed. The balloon was launched by the ”human rights" organization International Commission of Jurists.
Along with pedophilia, they also advocated for the decriminalization of prostitution and homosexuality."

And we didn't pay any attention to it at the time.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

All I have seen is you deflect from the content, as you have here.

LIke I said, I've posted numerous files from the heavily redacted Epstein Files

 

[CrusaderFrank]

They only care about the conspiracy bullshit, none of which can be proven. You would think people would have better things to do with their time than sit and listen to hours of unproven conspiracy theory rhetoric. I've tried to listen to a few, but it's nothing but hearsay.

I'm convinced you and struth are either bots or paid by Trump or both. This devotion to Trump is unhealthy in a normal human

 

[sealybobo]

This is a thread solely dedicated to the Epstein Files, which has taken the American political scene by storm. Due to the significance of what these files entail, this thread will be permanently pinned in the Politics forum until otherwise noted by forum leadership.

All further discussion about the Epstein files should be placed here.

Here is my contribution:

Trump puts his name on everything. We need to change the name of the Epstein files to the Trump files. The only appropriate name change if you ask me.

 

[struth]

I'm convinced you and struth are either bots or paid by Trump or both. This devotion to Trump is unhealthy in a normal human

Trump has zero to do with your inability to address the Epstein files

That is purely your own dembot mind

 

[struth]

LIke I said, I've posted numerous files from the heavily redacted Epstein Files

Where?

Weird you call it heavily redacted. What do you base that on?

 

[jc456]

Enjoy your stay in Flatlands

WATCH: Labor Secretary Acosta resigns amid criticism over Epstein deal

May 2009: One of Epstein's accusers, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, files a lawsuit claiming Epstein and Maxwell arranged for her to have sexual encounters with "royalty, politicians, academicians, businessmen" and others. The lawsuit doesn't name the men.

July 2009: Epstein is released from jail. For the next decade, Epstein's accusers wage a legal fight to get his federal non-prosecution agreement voided.

Where are all of the supposed other victims? I need to see that before I go scorch earth over anyone else. Tom Massie said he'd stand for the victims, where is that? Let us see which victims accused someone. So far, only Virginia has. Doesn't make a very powerful statement for the way you're behaving on this.

 

[jc456]

I'm convinced you and struth are either bots or paid by Trump or both. This devotion to Trump is unhealthy in a normal human

Where are the victims suing people? Come on Frank, got to get it there dude.

 

[OldFlame]

I'm convinced you and struth are either bots or paid by Trump or both. This devotion to Trump is unhealthy in a normal human

I want the truth, not smear. I have asked you repeatedly to produce evidence from the 'files' that could be used to convict anyone in a court of law. As Struth said, all you do is deflect. You talk about all of this evidence of crimes that were committed, knowing full well that the DOJ CANNOT use emails to indict or convict anyone of anything. They need more than that, if you don't understand that, then there is no helping you. Keep on with your silly conspiracy theory rants against Trump and the DOJ, you just look like a fool.

 

[OldFlame]

WATCH: Labor Secretary Acosta resigns amid criticism over Epstein deal

May 2009: One of Epstein's accusers, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, files a lawsuit claiming Epstein and Maxwell arranged for her to have sexual encounters with "royalty, politicians, academicians, businessmen" and others. The lawsuit doesn't name the men.

July 2009: Epstein is released from jail. For the next decade, Epstein's accusers wage a legal fight to get his federal non-prosecution agreement voided.

Where are all of the supposed other victims? I need to see that before I go scorch earth over anyone else. Tom Massie said he'd stand for the victims, where is that? Let us see which victims accused someone. So far, only Virginia has. Doesn't make a very powerful statement for the way you're behaving on this.

Exactly.

 

[jc456]

I want the truth, not smear. I have asked you repeatedly to produce evidence from the 'files' that could be used to convict anyone in a court of law. As Struth said, all you do is deflect. You talk about all of this evidence of crimes that were committed, knowing full well that the DOJ CANNOT use emails to indict or convict anyone of anything. They need more than that, if you don't understand that, then there is no helping you. Keep on with your silly conspiracy theory rants against Trump and the DOJ, you just look like a fool.

what they need is the victims to identify those involved. That's it. It's really quite simple. And again I ask, where are the accusers?

 

[OldFlame]

what they need is the victims to identify those involved. That's it. It's really quite simple. And again I ask, where are the accusers?

Yep, I've been asking the same thing since this whole thing started. The only 'victims' I've seen come forward were those over the age of consent that were paid for their services.

 

[Delldude]

Ladies and gentlemen we have another winner.

Norway's former PM charged with gross corruption over Epstein links

Norway's former PM Jagland charged with gross corruption over Epstein links

The charge was brought after the Council of Europe lifted his immunity, which he had as its former secretary general.

www.bbc.com