Papageorgio
The Ultimate Winner
Who says?Roman Polanski drugged and raped a 13 year old, then fled the country before sentencing and HE IS A PROGRESIVE ICON AND HERO.
IMDb Celebs Who Have Defended Roman Polanski Publically - a list by fedor8
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who says?Roman Polanski drugged and raped a 13 year old, then fled the country before sentencing and HE IS A PROGRESIVE ICON AND HERO.
The issue is whether the parents addressed the issue in an appropriate manner, and all the evidence we have points to 'yes'.Is there evidence the son's behaviour persisted beyond the parents' disciplinary intervention 10 years ago?
Weeeeeee! It's all good. He stopped fingering little girls. It's all good.
If you dispute that, perhaps you should articulate how a different course of action would have led to a better outcome.
Statistik: is there evidence that the parents tolerated the behaviour?more concern is being shown for the molester than the victims
Yes. That just breaks my heart.
Apparently, the parents didn't give a flying **** about the young girls who were sexually abused. It was far more important for the Duggars to obtain fame and fortune than to protect their own daughters.
This is truly disgusting.
They spoke with their son, and when his behaviour persisted, they disciplined him, forgave him, and reconciled him to his sisters ten years ago. Beyond that, there's no evidence the problem persisted. All of this happened well before they were famous.
On what basis are you claiming they didn't care about their daughters?
Statistik: is there evidence that the parents tolerated the behaviour?more concern is being shown for the molester than the victims
Yes. That just breaks my heart.
Apparently, the parents didn't give a flying **** about the young girls who were sexually abused. It was far more important for the Duggars to obtain fame and fortune than to protect their own daughters.
This is truly disgusting.
They spoke with their son, and when his behaviour persisted, they disciplined him, forgave him, and reconciled him to his sisters ten years ago. Beyond that, there's no evidence the problem persisted. All of this happened well before they were famous.
On what basis are you claiming they didn't care about their daughters?
Statistik: is there evidence that the parents tolerated the behaviour?more concern is being shown for the molester than the victims
Yes. That just breaks my heart.
Apparently, the parents didn't give a flying **** about the young girls who were sexually abused. It was far more important for the Duggars to obtain fame and fortune than to protect their own daughters.
This is truly disgusting.
They spoke with their son, and when his behaviour persisted, they disciplined him, forgave him, and reconciled him to his sisters ten years ago. Beyond that, there's no evidence the problem persisted. All of this happened well before they were famous.
On what basis are you claiming they didn't care about their daughters?
Jim Bob could not afford to risk his powerful public position in Arkansas; there
Statistik: is there evidence that the parents tolerated the behaviour?more concern is being shown for the molester than the victims
Yes. That just breaks my heart.
Apparently, the parents didn't give a flying **** about the young girls who were sexually abused. It was far more important for the Duggars to obtain fame and fortune than to protect their own daughters.
This is truly disgusting.
They spoke with their son, and when his behaviour persisted, they disciplined him, forgave him, and reconciled him to his sisters ten years ago. Beyond that, there's no evidence the problem persisted. All of this happened well before they were famous.
On what basis are you claiming they didn't care about their daughters?
Is it love when a father chooses his powerful public position over his daughters?
Who knows what goes on inside the Josh Dugger home? His wife is a second-class citizen; therefore, she would never disclose her husband's misdeeds.
Statistik: is there evidence that the parents tolerated the behaviour?more concern is being shown for the molester than the victims
Yes. That just breaks my heart.
Apparently, the parents didn't give a flying **** about the young girls who were sexually abused. It was far more important for the Duggars to obtain fame and fortune than to protect their own daughters.
This is truly disgusting.
They spoke with their son, and when his behaviour persisted, they disciplined him, forgave him, and reconciled him to his sisters ten years ago. Beyond that, there's no evidence the problem persisted. All of this happened well before they were famous.
On what basis are you claiming they didn't care about their daughters?
Jim Bob could not afford to risk his powerful public position in Arkansas; there
Statistik: is there evidence that the parents tolerated the behaviour?more concern is being shown for the molester than the victims
Yes. That just breaks my heart.
Apparently, the parents didn't give a flying **** about the young girls who were sexually abused. It was far more important for the Duggars to obtain fame and fortune than to protect their own daughters.
This is truly disgusting.
They spoke with their son, and when his behaviour persisted, they disciplined him, forgave him, and reconciled him to his sisters ten years ago. Beyond that, there's no evidence the problem persisted. All of this happened well before they were famous.
On what basis are you claiming they didn't care about their daughters?
Is it love when a father chooses his powerful public position over his daughters?
Who knows what goes on inside the Josh Dugger home? His wife is a second-class citizen; therefore, she would never disclose her husband's misdeeds.
It didn't bother you people when billy boy Clinton used his position of power over a young woman the same age as his daughter, while he screwed Gawd knows how many women under his wife's nose making her a Second class citizen. You small people have some nerve passing judgment on others
Look dude I was told its none of my business how many kids she has...well its none of the Christians business who marries who...get over itWhat does this have to do with homosexuals? We are talking about a woman's choice, do you not believe a woman has a choice? Are you only for pro choice if they are gay or are for abortion? WTF?should gays be able to marry ?? how the Fk is that the business of "Christians"19 kids!!!..its a womb not a Xerox copier.....
It's none of your business what a women decides to do with her body. If she had 19 abortions you wouldn't say a word. She has a choice, you want a choice and opinion? Get a womb.
Look dude I was told its none of my business how many kids she has...well its none of the Christians business who marries who...get over itWhat does this have to do with homosexuals? We are talking about a woman's choice, do you not believe a woman has a choice? Are you only for pro choice if they are gay or are for abortion? WTF?should gays be able to marry ?? how the Fk is that the business of "Christians"19 kids!!!..its a womb not a Xerox copier.....
It's none of your business what a women decides to do with her body. If she had 19 abortions you wouldn't say a word. She has a choice, you want a choice and opinion? Get a womb.
You judge others, you are no different than the Christians.
The issue is whether the parents addressed the issue in an appropriate manner, and all the evidence we have points to 'yes'.Is there evidence the son's behaviour persisted beyond the parents' disciplinary intervention 10 years ago?
Weeeeeee! It's all good. He stopped fingering little girls. It's all good.
If you dispute that, perhaps you should articulate how a different course of action would have led to a better outcome.
Roman Polanski was not strutting around pretending to be an icon of family goodness on TV serial shows...mucho different...
You judge others, you are no different than the Christians.
Sure its just that I do not claim God is my partner in making those Judgements...much different...
"oh Michael oh Jesus you know I am not to blame you know my reputation for playing a good clean game"
Right because Polanski wasn't religious, had he been religious then rape is bad and he should be shot.
Roman Polanski was not strutting around pretending to be an icon of family goodness on TV serial shows...mucho different...
So it's not rape, rape. It's just lib excused rape.
Sure its rape ...but Roman Polanski did not have a show in which he pretended to be an idealized version of a family man....so the contrast is not there ...he has paid a huge price for that...cannot come t the US ...has to fight extradition etc...its not the same situation...
Roman Polanski was not strutting around pretending to be an icon of family goodness on TV serial shows...mucho different...
So it's not rape, rape. It's just lib excused rape.
Right because Polanski wasn't religious, had he been religious then rape is bad and he should be shot.[/QUOTE]So it's not rape, rape. It's just lib excused rape.
His victim has paid a higher price.Sure its rape ...but Roman Polanski did not have a show in which he pretended to be an idealized version of a family man....so the contrast is not there ...he has paid a huge price for that...cannot come t the US ...has to fight extradition etc...its not the same situation...
Roman Polanski was not strutting around pretending to be an icon of family goodness on TV serial shows...mucho different...
So it's not rape, rape. It's just lib excused rape.
So did Jessica Hanh and so did the victims of Josh Duggar and Ted "I crapped in my pant" NuggentHis victim has paid a higher price.