The eldest of the Duggar children resigns from FRC: Child Molestation Charges

Keep in mind that the media is still ignoring that, Terry Bean, a major Obama donor in Oregon, and founder of the HRC, the largest LGBT rights group, was charged with raping a 15 year old boy.

but but but, that's just different.
a bunch of two faced hypocrites on the left. If they can't destroy a political candidate then they go after the NEXT BEST THING. American citizens. such small people

Stephanie

What political candidate are you talking about?

Dad Duggar isn't running for any office but the child molester says he wants a career in politics.

You okay with an ADMITTED CHILD MOLESTER in politics?

Or are you defending snake oil salesman/friend of child predators, Huckster?

You were when it was Harvey Milk.

I'm not buying your fake outrage here.
 
19 kids!!!..its a womb not a Xerox copier.....

It's none of your business what a women decides to do with her body. If she had 19 abortions you wouldn't say a word. She has a choice, you want a choice and opinion? Get a womb.
should gays be able to marry ?? how the Fk is that the business of "Christians"
 
more concern is being shown for the molester than the victims


Yes. That just breaks my heart.


Apparently, the parents didn't give a flying **** about the young girls who were sexually abused. It was far more important for the Duggars to obtain fame and fortune than to protect their own daughters.

This is truly disgusting.
Statistik: is there evidence that the parents tolerated the behaviour?

They spoke with their son, and when his behaviour persisted, they disciplined him, forgave him, and reconciled him to his sisters ten years ago. Beyond that, there's no evidence the problem persisted. All of this happened well before they were famous.

On what basis are you claiming they didn't care about their daughters?
 
19 kids!!!..its a womb not a Xerox copier.....

It's none of your business what a women decides to do with her body. If she had 19 abortions you wouldn't say a word. She has a choice, you want a choice and opinion? Get a womb.

Libs think they own womens wombs. That's why. Choice only matters when it's what they want you to do.
 
How fleeting will be stats sudden moral clarity here concerning child sex offenders? Right now Obama is granting amnesty to known child sex offenders and libs applaud.

Well, they have to be certain kinds of sex offenders and only they can pick and choose which ones that is
hypocrites, because the Duggers are Religious.

Exactly. They overlook all sexual predators that hurt the gay agenda or the democrat party.

Until they start being honest... Their scandals of the week don't interest me.
Liberals also ingore not only that there is a higher rate of domestic violence in gay relationships, but that it exists, period. Only positive stories allowed about protected status groups.

Yep I have brought that up before along with the fact that gays shame others in their community not to report domestic abuse in a lot of cases.
 
19 kids!!!..its a womb not a Xerox copier.....

It's none of your business what a women decides to do with her body. If she had 19 abortions you wouldn't say a word. She has a choice, you want a choice and opinion? Get a womb.
should gays be able to marry ?? how the Fk is that the business of "Christians"
What does this have to do with homosexuals? We are talking about a woman's choice, do you not believe a woman has a choice? Are you only for pro choice if they are gay or are for abortion? WTF?
 
How fleeting will be stats sudden moral clarity here concerning child sex offenders? Right now Obama is granting amnesty to known child sex offenders and libs applaud.

Well, they have to be certain kinds of sex offenders and only they can pick and choose which ones that is
hypocrites, because the Duggers are Religious.

Exactly. They overlook all sexual predators that hurt the gay agenda or the democrat party.

Until they start being honest... Their scandals of the week don't interest me.


Nope.

I hate all sexual predators equally.

Unlike you RWs, I'll happily call them all out. Put them in front of a jury and let's find out what they've done.

In the past, various RWs here have defended child predators Ted Nugent and Phil Robertson and now, this little pervert. In the case of these three, all have openly admitted they are perverts and yet RWs defend them.

While thumping on their bibles.

Indefensible.

I am inclined to side with the poster that said it depends on if the sexual conduct was a 14 year olds curiosity with others around the same age and stopped there. I'm not ready to pass judgement in this just because the anti Christian zealots have an ax to grind.


If they were actually Christian, I would think differently and they would act differently, but they're not.

14yo's know right from wrong and are tried as adults all the time in this country and others. RWs here have said that 14 is plenty old enough for Phil Robertson, Warren Jeffs and Ted Nugent to victimize so why isn't this 14yo old enough to be accountable for his actions?

More than anything else, I'm passing judgement on the parents, church, Huckster and others who knew but hid it, thus further victimizing the girls - including his own sisters.

IOW, the parents, church, etc did not protect their daughters.

Child molesting is never an isolated incident and he has three young kids.

I get the feeling you would be the first in line to lynch anyone you don't like. Guilty or not.
 
Roman Polanski drugged and raped a 13 year old, then fled the country before sentencing and HE IS A PROGRESIVE ICON AND HERO.
Who says?
Many liberals believe it is wrong to hold such a great artist responsible for his act several years ago. Harvey Milk is also excused for having a relationship with a 16 year old kid.
 
15th post
Is there evidence the son's behaviour persisted beyond the parents' disciplinary intervention 10 years ago?

Weeeeeee! It's all good. He stopped fingering little girls. It's all good.
The issue is whether the parents addressed the issue in an appropriate manner, and all the evidence we have points to 'yes'.

If you dispute that, perhaps you should articulate how a different course of action would have led to a better outcome.
 
Roman Polanski drugged and raped a 13 year old, then fled the country before sentencing and HE IS A PROGRESIVE ICON AND HERO.
Who says?
Many liberals believe it is wrong to hold such a great artist responsible for his act several years ago. Harvey Milk is also excused for having a relationship with a 16 year old kid.

Their reasoning with Milk was the kid was a runaway and deserved it

A run away druggie that was lucky to have a molester take him under his wing.
 
these types of threads we should all just laugh about.

I refuse to accept this Faux outrage from two faced Hypocrites who champions abortions on demand. they are the last people I take as caring about the, childern

you all carry on. they (those fine upstanding people on the left with the morals of a snake) will go on and on and on for days. :rofl:
 
Back
Top Bottom