Siete
Platinum Member
- May 19, 2014
- 34,325
- 3,988
- 1,130
According to the EXPERTS, isolating a country would be counterproductive. It would actually increase the chances of a worldwide pandemic.Our military doesn't exist to perform "humanitarian relief" missions.
So when does it become a military mission to you?
Do we need 1 million infected, or 1 billion? In your great wisdom, it does not make sense to stop it in its tracks before it becomes something worse? On one hand, you want anyone who travels within 1000 miles of one of these West African countries to be quarantined for 21 days, but you don't think we should be doing anything to fight the spread of this disease. How do people become so stupid?
Oh..I see...it is so dangerous that we must immediately send troops to africa to (somehow) stop the spread of this horrifically deadly disease....
...but on the other hand it isn't dangerous enough that we have to close our borders or have mandatory quarantines of people who have been in hot zones or exposed to the disease.
Careful with all that twisting and flip flopping..you might pull a muscle.
It is better to take the fight there than wait for it to come here. Which it inevitably would, big time, if you tried to isolate the countries which are currently affected.
so much for the RW "better there than here" mantra huh?
Mantra?...what mantra?..the one you just made up?
LMAO..
don't get out all that much do you rottieboi?