The dreaded gay-wedding-cake saga ends: bakers must pay 135 K

[PaintMyHouse]

You still pissed? Cuz gays have been using bathrooms like singles bars? Is your party over now?

They have? I had no idea. I've been going into public restrooms and showering in public showers when necessary for over 40 years and never once have I heard a pickup line or seen a disco ball. Where ARE you peeing? Are you sure you've been using public restrooms?

What is the remarkable difference between a Married Lesbian and a Married Male. Are they not similarily situated?

In regards to marriage- they are similarily situated. In regards to gender they are not.

Since locker rooms are segregated by gender for everyone, and not by marital status- your question is irrelevant.

Appears you are wrong again:

Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller

Unrelated to what you think your argument is.

Based upon his argument, if only Pop would turn gay, and get married, he'd be equal? This problem seems to bother him but I have no issues with the lesbians down the street, they like the same porn that I do...

 

[Pop23]

You still pissed? Cuz gays have been using bathrooms like singles bars? Is your party over now?

They have? I had no idea. I've been going into public restrooms and showering in public showers when necessary for over 40 years and never once have I heard a pickup line or seen a disco ball. Where ARE you peeing? Are you sure you've been using public restrooms?

What is the remarkable difference between a Married Lesbian and a Married Male. Are they not similarily situated?

In regards to marriage- they are similarily situated. In regards to gender they are not.

Since locker rooms are segregated by gender for everyone, and not by marital status- your question is irrelevant.

Appears you are wrong again:

Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller

That doesn't help you at all since that is a genital issue, not a spousal issue. That invalidates your point completely.

Ummm, dudes a male, in a woman's locker room.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

They have? I had no idea. I've been going into public restrooms and showering in public showers when necessary for over 40 years and never once have I heard a pickup line or seen a disco ball. Where ARE you peeing? Are you sure you've been using public restrooms?

What is the remarkable difference between a Married Lesbian and a Married Male. Are they not similarily situated?

In regards to marriage- they are similarily situated. In regards to gender they are not.

Since locker rooms are segregated by gender for everyone, and not by marital status- your question is irrelevant.

Appears you are wrong again:

Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller

That doesn't help you at all since that is a genital issue, not a spousal issue. That invalidates your point completely.

Ummm, dudes a male, in a woman's locker room.

She is transgender, but not completely yet obviously, and that doesn't help you at all because the woman is upset not about a spouse in her locker room, but a penis, which we can legally discriminate based upon.

 

[Pop23]

So having access to a separate but equal Civil Marriage was actually constitutional then.

Who's side are you on?

Can you stay focused for more than 2 seconds? You said some were being discriminated against. When it's pointed out to you that's false since no one is being discriminated against, you shift to separate but equal.

Meanwhile, there remains no discrimination in your silly example. Everyone has access to those same locker rooms regardless of their race, religion, gender, or sexual preference.

And again, compare that to SSM, where until recently, gays were denied access to their right to marry the person they love.

You just love distraction. The male in a straight couple cannot escort his wife into the women's locker room as the lesbian partners can, which is odd since the USSC said all four in my example are the same.

No, it said they were equal. If the sign says Married People Only, and they are, they can both go in.

So it's ok to discriminate against groups, just not individuals.

So the sign SeaWytch posted saying "no queers allowed" is not discrimination?

Then, of course there's this link.....Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller

Hmmmmmm

There is legal discrimination, bathrooms, and illegal discrimination, marriage licenses. Is this news to you? A lot of us got over this after taking baths with our sisters. Seems to be a problem for you still?

Ahhhhh, the marriage license issue was when your hero Justice Kennedy declared we were like situated.

See how easy that was, like playing dominoes.

So, you go ahead and bathe with your sister if you like, us adults will deal with the USSC's societal ramifications.

 

[Pop23]

What is the remarkable difference between a Married Lesbian and a Married Male. Are they not similarily situated?

In regards to marriage- they are similarily situated. In regards to gender they are not.

Since locker rooms are segregated by gender for everyone, and not by marital status- your question is irrelevant.

Appears you are wrong again:

Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller

That doesn't help you at all since that is a genital issue, not a spousal issue. That invalidates your point completely.

Ummm, dudes a male, in a woman's locker room.

She is transgender, but not completely yet obviously, and that doesn't help you at all because the woman is upset not about a spouse in her locker room, but a penis, which we can legally discriminate based upon.

Get it? They allow dicks in the locker room, unless it's a straight dick, then they'd call the cops b

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Can you stay focused for more than 2 seconds? You said some were being discriminated against. When it's pointed out to you that's false since no one is being discriminated against, you shift to separate but equal.

Meanwhile, there remains no discrimination in your silly example. Everyone has access to those same locker rooms regardless of their race, religion, gender, or sexual preference.

And again, compare that to SSM, where until recently, gays were denied access to their right to marry the person they love.

You just love distraction. The male in a straight couple cannot escort his wife into the women's locker room as the lesbian partners can, which is odd since the USSC said all four in my example are the same.

No, it said they were equal. If the sign says Married People Only, and they are, they can both go in.

So it's ok to discriminate against groups, just not individuals.

So the sign SeaWytch posted saying "no queers allowed" is not discrimination?

Then, of course there's this link.....Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller

Hmmmmmm

There is legal discrimination, bathrooms, and illegal discrimination, marriage licenses. Is this news to you? A lot of us got over this after taking baths with our sisters. Seems to be a problem for you still?

Ahhhhh, the marriage license issue was when your hero Justice Kennedy declared we were like situated.

See how easy that was, like playing dominoes.

So, you go ahead and bathe with your sister if you like, us adults will deal with the USSC's societal ramifications.

If this is your version of "dealing with it", I would hate to see what it's like when you don't. How about just dealing with equal bathrooms and equal standing before the law, instead of worrying about who might get aroused seeing others of their same sex standing around in their undies?

 

[Pop23]

So having access to a separate but equal Civil Marriage was actually constitutional then.

Who's side are you on?

Can you stay focused for more than 2 seconds? You said some were being discriminated against. When it's pointed out to you that's false since no one is being discriminated against, you shift to separate but equal.

Meanwhile, there remains no discrimination in your silly example. Everyone has access to those same locker rooms regardless of their race, religion, gender, or sexual preference.

And again, compare that to SSM, where until recently, gays were denied access to their right to marry the person they love.

You just love distraction. The male in a straight couple cannot escort his wife into the women's locker room as the lesbian partners can, which is odd since the USSC said all four in my example are the same.

No, it said they were equal. If the sign says Married People Only, and they are, they can both go in.

So it's ok to discriminate against groups, just not individuals.

So the sign SeaWytch posted saying "no queers allowed" is not discrimination?

Then, of course there's this link.....Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller

Hmmmmmm

A no Jews/blacks/gays sign would be discriminatory. One sign is legal in over half the states. It's still discrimination, it's just allowed.

Good luck with transitioning.

Transitioning? That's all I've been warning folks about. How the entire nation will have to transition to take care of the problems a few oddballs caused.

You got a date with Bruce Jenner yet? He is the king of transitioning after all.

 

[Pop23]

You just love distraction. The male in a straight couple cannot escort his wife into the women's locker room as the lesbian partners can, which is odd since the USSC said all four in my example are the same.

No, it said they were equal. If the sign says Married People Only, and they are, they can both go in.

So it's ok to discriminate against groups, just not individuals.

So the sign SeaWytch posted saying "no queers allowed" is not discrimination?

Then, of course there's this link.....Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller

Hmmmmmm

There is legal discrimination, bathrooms, and illegal discrimination, marriage licenses. Is this news to you? A lot of us got over this after taking baths with our sisters. Seems to be a problem for you still?

Ahhhhh, the marriage license issue was when your hero Justice Kennedy declared we were like situated.

See how easy that was, like playing dominoes.

So, you go ahead and bathe with your sister if you like, us adults will deal with the USSC's societal ramifications.

If this is your version of "dealing with it", I would hate to see what it's like when you don't. How about just dealing with equal bathrooms and equal standing before the law, instead of worrying about who might get aroused seeing others of their same sex standing around in their undies?

Lesbians get aroused looking at women (ask SeaWytch)

Men get aroused looking at women (ask me)

Making us similar situated.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

In regards to marriage- they are similarily situated. In regards to gender they are not.

Since locker rooms are segregated by gender for everyone, and not by marital status- your question is irrelevant.

Appears you are wrong again:

Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller

That doesn't help you at all since that is a genital issue, not a spousal issue. That invalidates your point completely.

Ummm, dudes a male, in a woman's locker room.

She is transgender, but not completely yet obviously, and that doesn't help you at all because the woman is upset not about a spouse in her locker room, but a penis, which we can legally discriminate based upon.

Get it? They allow dicks in the locker room, unless it's a straight dick, then they'd call the cops b

Transgender has nothing at all to do with sexual orientation. For all you know the TG woman digs chicks? It's their policy and they have a right to set it. I've used unisex locker rooms several times and it was absolutely no big deal.

 

[Pop23]

What is the remarkable difference between a Married Lesbian and a Married Male. Are they not similarily situated?

In regards to marriage- they are similarily situated. In regards to gender they are not.

Since locker rooms are segregated by gender for everyone, and not by marital status- your question is irrelevant.

Appears you are wrong again:

Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller

That doesn't help you at all since that is a genital issue, not a spousal issue. That invalidates your point completely.

Ummm, dudes a male, in a woman's locker room.

She is transgender, but not completely yet obviously, and that doesn't help you at all because the woman is upset not about a spouse in her locker room, but a penis, which we can legally discriminate based upon.

She? Where's she stick the tampon?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

No, it said they were equal. If the sign says Married People Only, and they are, they can both go in.

So it's ok to discriminate against groups, just not individuals.

So the sign SeaWytch posted saying "no queers allowed" is not discrimination?

Then, of course there's this link.....Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller

Hmmmmmm

There is legal discrimination, bathrooms, and illegal discrimination, marriage licenses. Is this news to you? A lot of us got over this after taking baths with our sisters. Seems to be a problem for you still?

Ahhhhh, the marriage license issue was when your hero Justice Kennedy declared we were like situated.

See how easy that was, like playing dominoes.

So, you go ahead and bathe with your sister if you like, us adults will deal with the USSC's societal ramifications.

If this is your version of "dealing with it", I would hate to see what it's like when you don't. How about just dealing with equal bathrooms and equal standing before the law, instead of worrying about who might get aroused seeing others of their same sex standing around in their undies?

Lesbians get aroused looking at women (ask SeaWytch)

Men get aroused looking at women (ask me)

Making us similar situated.

And bisexuals like both. So what? Oh right, there's nothing that matters here at all.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

In regards to marriage- they are similarily situated. In regards to gender they are not.

Since locker rooms are segregated by gender for everyone, and not by marital status- your question is irrelevant.

Appears you are wrong again:

Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller

That doesn't help you at all since that is a genital issue, not a spousal issue. That invalidates your point completely.

Ummm, dudes a male, in a woman's locker room.

She is transgender, but not completely yet obviously, and that doesn't help you at all because the woman is upset not about a spouse in her locker room, but a penis, which we can legally discriminate based upon.

She? Where's she stick the tampon?

She wouldn't need one, regardless of her junk. Many women don't, including XY females.

 

[Pop23]

Appears you are wrong again:

Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller

That doesn't help you at all since that is a genital issue, not a spousal issue. That invalidates your point completely.

Ummm, dudes a male, in a woman's locker room.

She is transgender, but not completely yet obviously, and that doesn't help you at all because the woman is upset not about a spouse in her locker room, but a penis, which we can legally discriminate based upon.

Get it? They allow dicks in the locker room, unless it's a straight dick, then they'd call the cops b

Transgender has nothing at all to do with sexual orientation. For all you know the TG woman digs chicks? It's their policy and they have a right to set it. I've used unisex locker rooms several times and it was absolutely no big deal.

God you're a dimwit. Of course he digs women, AND GETS IN THE SHOWER ROOM A STRAIGHT MARRIED GUY CAN'T enter with his OWN SPOUSE

God, you are desperate.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Of course he digs women...

More than likely not. Most people, even transgender people, are heterosexual. She most likely likes boys, not girls.

 

[Pop23]

Appears you are wrong again:

Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller

That doesn't help you at all since that is a genital issue, not a spousal issue. That invalidates your point completely.

Ummm, dudes a male, in a woman's locker room.

She is transgender, but not completely yet obviously, and that doesn't help you at all because the woman is upset not about a spouse in her locker room, but a penis, which we can legally discriminate based upon.

She? Where's she stick the tampon?

She wouldn't need one, regardless of her junk. Many women don't, including XY females.

OMG.

 

[Pop23]

Of course he digs women...

More than likely not. Most people, even transgender people, are heterosexual. She most likely likes boys, not girls.

Yes, talk to Bruce Jenner bout dat

 

[PaintMyHouse]

That doesn't help you at all since that is a genital issue, not a spousal issue. That invalidates your point completely.

Ummm, dudes a male, in a woman's locker room.

She is transgender, but not completely yet obviously, and that doesn't help you at all because the woman is upset not about a spouse in her locker room, but a penis, which we can legally discriminate based upon.

She? Where's she stick the tampon?

She wouldn't need one, regardless of her junk. Many women don't, including XY females.

OMG.

Learn some biology today: Androgen insensitivity syndrome - Genetics Home Reference

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Of course he digs women...

More than likely not. Most people, even transgender people, are heterosexual. She most likely likes boys, not girls.

Yes, talk to Bruce Jenner bout dat

That I know of, he's either straight or bisexual. Tell us Pop, if two bisexuals marry what locker room should they use?

 

[Pop23]

So it's ok to discriminate against groups, just not individuals.

So the sign SeaWytch posted saying "no queers allowed" is not discrimination?

Then, of course there's this link.....Woman Is Suing Planet Fitness Over Locker Room Policy The Daily Caller

Hmmmmmm

There is legal discrimination, bathrooms, and illegal discrimination, marriage licenses. Is this news to you? A lot of us got over this after taking baths with our sisters. Seems to be a problem for you still?

Ahhhhh, the marriage license issue was when your hero Justice Kennedy declared we were like situated.

See how easy that was, like playing dominoes.

So, you go ahead and bathe with your sister if you like, us adults will deal with the USSC's societal ramifications.

If this is your version of "dealing with it", I would hate to see what it's like when you don't. How about just dealing with equal bathrooms and equal standing before the law, instead of worrying about who might get aroused seeing others of their same sex standing around in their undies?

Lesbians get aroused looking at women (ask SeaWytch)

Men get aroused looking at women (ask me)

Making us similar situated.

And bisexuals like both. So what? Oh right, there's nothing that matters here at all.

Yet you keep answering my posts.

I do indeed love the power I have over you.

Now fetch

 

[Pop23]

Of course he digs women...

More than likely not. Most people, even transgender people, are heterosexual. She most likely likes boys, not girls.

Yes, talk to Bruce Jenner bout dat

That I know of, he's either straight or bisexual. Tell us Pop, if two bisexuals marry what locker room should they use?

Yours