The disorienting nature of gaslighting.

berg80

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2017
Messages
25,045
Reaction score
21,016
Points
2,320
Gaslighting is defined as the manipulation of someone into questioning their own perception of reality.

It’s not just impeachments. Republicans are eyeing other ways to rein in federal judges.​

House Republicans don’t have the votes to impeach any federal judges. But a growing number of hard-liners is discussing several other legislative options as GOP leaders search for a release valve for the MAGA fury building over recent court rulings checking President Donald Trump.

Top Republicans are likely to put at least one bill, California Rep. Darrell Issa’s “No Rogue Rulings Act,” on the floor in early April, according to two people granted anonymity to discuss scheduling plans. The legislation would crack down on the ability of lower-court judges to issue far-reaching injunctions.

House Republicans have filed impeachment resolutions targeting four district judges, including one this week targeting the jurist who sought to block Trump’s effort to deport alleged gang members to El Salvador. Trump publicly backed the impeachment push, and Musk quickly fanned the flames on X, his social-media platform, calling the deportations ruling part of a “judicial coup.”

But there is widespread recognition inside the House GOP that impeachments — besides being costly in time and political capital — do not have the votes to succeed given Republicans’ narrow majority. That has prompted GOP hard-liners to back-channel with Trump allies on alternatives they could push across the House floor.

“Activist judges, particularly in D.C., think that they are the Trump resistance — the Trump political resistance,” said Mike Davis, a close Trump ally who runs an outside judicial advocacy group. “What they are doing is lawless and dangerous, and it must be stopped.”


I've pointed out a number of times how effective the Right has been in creating specious, counter factual narratives to address political vulnerabilities. Karl Rove was expert at it. Bush had a weakness relative to John Kerry over their respective service in the military. Kerry went to war in Vietnam, George stayed home and pretended to be a pilot in the ANG. So Kerry got swift boated, problem solved. trump's epic corruption and law breaking leading up to the 2024 election needed obfuscation. So the Right fabricated a fiction that he was the victim of persecution.

Darrel Issa, in Orwellian fashion, has introduced a bill named the "No Rogue Rulings Act" to deal with judges making rulings on rogue EO's and directives coming from the regime. How very diabolically clever. Some trump ally said of judges, “What they are doing is lawless and dangerous, and it must be stopped.” I can hardly think of a better way to describe what trump and Co have been attempting. Joe Biden was accused of weaponizing the DoJ because it tried to respond to trump's lawlessness. A preemptive strike to provide cover for trump turning Pam Bondi in to his personal attack dog and protector.

Justice Dept. Tries to Intervene on Trump’s Behalf in Jan. 6 Lawsuits​

The department employed a maneuver that could protect the president from legal and financial consequences in a series of civil suits.

Every utterance coming from the regime requires independent, critical thought. Because the construct it's trying to create doesn't match objective reality. Is a policy induced slowdown in the economy and the resultant decline in the stock market a "healthy correction?" In trumpworld it is. Are rulings blocking the regime's unconstitutional actions coming from "activist judges?" Or is it necessary to discredit the rulings in order to manipulate the public's perception of what is happening.

Even GOP-appointed judges are resisting Trump's agenda​


Gaslighting is defined as the manipulation of someone into questioning their own perception of reality.
 
Gaslighting is defined as the manipulation of someone into questioning their own perception of reality.

It’s not just impeachments. Republicans are eyeing other ways to rein in federal judges.​

House Republicans don’t have the votes to impeach any federal judges. But a growing number of hard-liners is discussing several other legislative options as GOP leaders search for a release valve for the MAGA fury building over recent court rulings checking President Donald Trump.

Top Republicans are likely to put at least one bill, California Rep. Darrell Issa’s “No Rogue Rulings Act,” on the floor in early April, according to two people granted anonymity to discuss scheduling plans. The legislation would crack down on the ability of lower-court judges to issue far-reaching injunctions.

House Republicans have filed impeachment resolutions targeting four district judges, including one this week targeting the jurist who sought to block Trump’s effort to deport alleged gang members to El Salvador. Trump publicly backed the impeachment push, and Musk quickly fanned the flames on X, his social-media platform, calling the deportations ruling part of a “judicial coup.”

But there is widespread recognition inside the House GOP that impeachments — besides being costly in time and political capital — do not have the votes to succeed given Republicans’ narrow majority. That has prompted GOP hard-liners to back-channel with Trump allies on alternatives they could push across the House floor.

“Activist judges, particularly in D.C., think that they are the Trump resistance — the Trump political resistance,” said Mike Davis, a close Trump ally who runs an outside judicial advocacy group. “What they are doing is lawless and dangerous, and it must be stopped.”


I've pointed out a number of times how effective the Right has been in creating specious, counter factual narratives to address political vulnerabilities. Karl Rove was expert at it. Bush had a weakness relative to John Kerry over their respective service in the military. Kerry went to war in Vietnam, George stayed home and pretended to be a pilot in the ANG. So Kerry got swift boated, problem solved. trump's epic corruption and law breaking leading up to the 2024 election needed obfuscation. So the Right fabricated a fiction that he was the victim of persecution.

Darrel Issa, in Orwellian fashion, has introduced a bill named the "No Rogue Rulings Act" to deal with judges making rulings on rogue EO's and directives coming from the regime. How very diabolically clever. Some trump ally said of judges, “What they are doing is lawless and dangerous, and it must be stopped.” I can hardly think of a better way to describe what trump and Co have been attempting. Joe Biden was accused of weaponizing the DoJ because it tried to respond to trump's lawlessness. A preemptive strike to provide cover for trump turning Pam Bondi in to his personal attack dog and protector.

Justice Dept. Tries to Intervene on Trump’s Behalf in Jan. 6 Lawsuits​

The department employed a maneuver that could protect the president from legal and financial consequences in a series of civil suits.

Every utterance coming from the regime requires independent, critical thought. Because the construct it's trying to create doesn't match objective reality. Is a policy induced slowdown in the economy and the resultant decline in the stock market a "healthy correction?" In trumpworld it is. Are rulings blocking the regime's unconstitutional actions coming from "activist judges?" Or is it necessary to discredit the rulings in order to manipulate the public's perception of what is happening.

Even GOP-appointed judges are resisting Trump's agenda​


Gaslighting is defined as the manipulation of someone into questioning their own perception of reality.
You speak from experience don't you?
 
The far-left activist judges need to be reigned in.

In what world is it normal for a judge to try to stop the deportation of criminal aliens and return the flights of violent thugs back to America?
Dems are unable to understand why the country opposes them. Lawless judges, willful dismissal of a national election by the people. Willful undermining of the fairly elected president. Lies, propaganda, architecting the invasion of 15 million illegals who prey on American citizens. Degenerate MEN competing in women's sports gravely injuring women. None of this registers in the Dem brain as wrong.
 
Dems are unable to understand why the country opposes them. Lawless judges, willful dismissal of a national election by the people. Willful undermining of the fairly elected president. Lies, propaganda, architecting the invasion of 15 million illegals who prey on American citizens. Degenerate MEN competing in women's sports gravely injuring women. None of this registers in the Dem brain as wrong.
.


Plus everyone who disagrees with them is a poopyhead.


.
 
Gaslighting is defined as the manipulation of someone into questioning their own perception of reality.

It’s not just impeachments. Republicans are eyeing other ways to rein in federal judges.​

House Republicans don’t have the votes to impeach any federal judges. But a growing number of hard-liners is discussing several other legislative options as GOP leaders search for a release valve for the MAGA fury building over recent court rulings checking President Donald Trump.

Top Republicans are likely to put at least one bill, California Rep. Darrell Issa’s “No Rogue Rulings Act,” on the floor in early April, according to two people granted anonymity to discuss scheduling plans. The legislation would crack down on the ability of lower-court judges to issue far-reaching injunctions.

House Republicans have filed impeachment resolutions targeting four district judges, including one this week targeting the jurist who sought to block Trump’s effort to deport alleged gang members to El Salvador. Trump publicly backed the impeachment push, and Musk quickly fanned the flames on X, his social-media platform, calling the deportations ruling part of a “judicial coup.”

But there is widespread recognition inside the House GOP that impeachments — besides being costly in time and political capital — do not have the votes to succeed given Republicans’ narrow majority. That has prompted GOP hard-liners to back-channel with Trump allies on alternatives they could push across the House floor.

“Activist judges, particularly in D.C., think that they are the Trump resistance — the Trump political resistance,” said Mike Davis, a close Trump ally who runs an outside judicial advocacy group. “What they are doing is lawless and dangerous, and it must be stopped.”


I've pointed out a number of times how effective the Right has been in creating specious, counter factual narratives to address political vulnerabilities. Karl Rove was expert at it. Bush had a weakness relative to John Kerry over their respective service in the military. Kerry went to war in Vietnam, George stayed home and pretended to be a pilot in the ANG. So Kerry got swift boated, problem solved. trump's epic corruption and law breaking leading up to the 2024 election needed obfuscation. So the Right fabricated a fiction that he was the victim of persecution.

Darrel Issa, in Orwellian fashion, has introduced a bill named the "No Rogue Rulings Act" to deal with judges making rulings on rogue EO's and directives coming from the regime. How very diabolically clever. Some trump ally said of judges, “What they are doing is lawless and dangerous, and it must be stopped.” I can hardly think of a better way to describe what trump and Co have been attempting. Joe Biden was accused of weaponizing the DoJ because it tried to respond to trump's lawlessness. A preemptive strike to provide cover for trump turning Pam Bondi in to his personal attack dog and protector.

Justice Dept. Tries to Intervene on Trump’s Behalf in Jan. 6 Lawsuits​

The department employed a maneuver that could protect the president from legal and financial consequences in a series of civil suits.

Every utterance coming from the regime requires independent, critical thought. Because the construct it's trying to create doesn't match objective reality. Is a policy induced slowdown in the economy and the resultant decline in the stock market a "healthy correction?" In trumpworld it is. Are rulings blocking the regime's unconstitutional actions coming from "activist judges?" Or is it necessary to discredit the rulings in order to manipulate the public's perception of what is happening.

Even GOP-appointed judges are resisting Trump's agenda​


Gaslighting is defined as the manipulation of someone into questioning their own perception of reality.
you do it too berg....
 
You've successfully been gaslighted. The regime needs to be reined in. Judges appointed by liberals and conservatives think so.
LOL. Anyone calling the Trump Administration a “regime” ans fighting to keep criminal aliens in this country to do more harm to citizens is beyond help.

Guess what? Trump will be president for another 3 years and 10 months, Gd-willing.
 
It’s not just impeachments. Republicans are eyeing other ways to rein in federal judges.
Judges, press, FBI, Congress, any institution that can hold him accountable, any individual who has tried to hold him accountable, is a target.

Our former friends in Europe are doing everything they can to warn us. From experience.
 
Last edited:
You've successfully been gaslighted. The regime needs to be reined in. Judges appointed by liberals and conservatives think so.
The turtle let the Progs put many Progressive Socialist Communist judges in the last two years. I say to you now. At some point the people will tell the judges to fuck off for pure survival. We have extremists living on the edge and infecting a fair amount of the population controlling the many. Insanity. This is beyond giving people respect and dignity which I agree with.
 
LOL. Anyone calling the Trump Administration a “regime” ans fighting to keep criminal aliens in this country to do more harm to citizens is beyond help.

Guess what? Trump will be president for another 3 years and 10 months, Gd-willing.
A federal judge tore into Justice Department lawyers Friday as they struggled to defend Donald Trump’s order banning transgender people from serving in the military.

U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes said that she would not be “gaslit” by the lawyers’ attempts to convince her that the policy did not constitute a transgender ban, according to Politico’s senior legal affairs reporter Kyle Cheney.


You are in support of a admin committing illegal acts virtually every day.
 
Judges, press, FBI, Congress, any institution that can hold him accountable, any individual who has tried to hold him accountable, is a target.

Our former friends in Europe are doing everything they can to warn us. From experience.
It is classic sociopathic behavior. He is trying to remove barriers to his illegal impulses.
 
Gaslighting is defined as the manipulation of someone into questioning their own perception of reality.

It’s not just impeachments. Republicans are eyeing other ways to rein in federal judges.​

House Republicans don’t have the votes to impeach any federal judges. But a growing number of hard-liners is discussing several other legislative options as GOP leaders search for a release valve for the MAGA fury building over recent court rulings checking President Donald Trump.

Top Republicans are likely to put at least one bill, California Rep. Darrell Issa’s “No Rogue Rulings Act,” on the floor in early April, according to two people granted anonymity to discuss scheduling plans. The legislation would crack down on the ability of lower-court judges to issue far-reaching injunctions.

House Republicans have filed impeachment resolutions targeting four district judges, including one this week targeting the jurist who sought to block Trump’s effort to deport alleged gang members to El Salvador. Trump publicly backed the impeachment push, and Musk quickly fanned the flames on X, his social-media platform, calling the deportations ruling part of a “judicial coup.”

But there is widespread recognition inside the House GOP that impeachments — besides being costly in time and political capital — do not have the votes to succeed given Republicans’ narrow majority. That has prompted GOP hard-liners to back-channel with Trump allies on alternatives they could push across the House floor.

“Activist judges, particularly in D.C., think that they are the Trump resistance — the Trump political resistance,” said Mike Davis, a close Trump ally who runs an outside judicial advocacy group. “What they are doing is lawless and dangerous, and it must be stopped.”


I've pointed out a number of times how effective the Right has been in creating specious, counter factual narratives to address political vulnerabilities. Karl Rove was expert at it. Bush had a weakness relative to John Kerry over their respective service in the military. Kerry went to war in Vietnam, George stayed home and pretended to be a pilot in the ANG. So Kerry got swift boated, problem solved. trump's epic corruption and law breaking leading up to the 2024 election needed obfuscation. So the Right fabricated a fiction that he was the victim of persecution.

Darrel Issa, in Orwellian fashion, has introduced a bill named the "No Rogue Rulings Act" to deal with judges making rulings on rogue EO's and directives coming from the regime. How very diabolically clever. Some trump ally said of judges, “What they are doing is lawless and dangerous, and it must be stopped.” I can hardly think of a better way to describe what trump and Co have been attempting. Joe Biden was accused of weaponizing the DoJ because it tried to respond to trump's lawlessness. A preemptive strike to provide cover for trump turning Pam Bondi in to his personal attack dog and protector.

Justice Dept. Tries to Intervene on Trump’s Behalf in Jan. 6 Lawsuits​

The department employed a maneuver that could protect the president from legal and financial consequences in a series of civil suits.

Every utterance coming from the regime requires independent, critical thought. Because the construct it's trying to create doesn't match objective reality. Is a policy induced slowdown in the economy and the resultant decline in the stock market a "healthy correction?" In trumpworld it is. Are rulings blocking the regime's unconstitutional actions coming from "activist judges?" Or is it necessary to discredit the rulings in order to manipulate the public's perception of what is happening.

Even GOP-appointed judges are resisting Trump's agenda​


Gaslighting is defined as the manipulation of someone into questioning their own perception of reality.

Your game.

Your rules.

I said you would hate it.
 
A federal judge tore into Justice Department lawyers Friday as they struggled to defend Donald Trump’s order banning transgender people from serving in the military.

U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes said that she would not be “gaslit” by the lawyers’ attempts to convince her that the policy did not constitute a transgender ban, according to Politico’s senior legal affairs reporter Kyle Cheney.


You are in support of a admin committing illegal acts virtually every day.
So you quote an activist judge who hates Trump. Big whoop.

The judges are part of the problem. Do you honestly side with the judge who tried to stop the flight of criminal illegal aliens and get them back to the U.S.?
 
Judges, press, FBI, Congress, any institution that can hold him accountable, any individual who has tried to hold him accountable, is a target.

Our former friends in Europe are doing everything they can to warn us. From experience.

This is so freaking insulting to anyone who died in the Holocaust or anyone who fought for the allies in WW2. Do you even realize how insulting this is, or are you too stupid, or you just don't care?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom