the destruction of herman cain, from an election far far away.

[Correll]

I note you've given up on trying to defend your bullshit above.

And you are down to JUST being an asshole.


My points stand.




1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole

My point

Trump responded like a child to criticism

Demonstrating why he lacks the temperament to be President

1. First of all, that's a completely different argument than you were making. Are you being serious now?

2. Trump has a brash, even vulgar public persona. If you think that that is beneath the dignity of the Oval Office that is a legitimate complaint. IMO, it is vastly out weighted by other factors.

3. All reports indicate that Trump's persona is a carefully controlled tool used for persuasion techniques. Hillary is the one who actually is a hothead who has been known to viciously brow beat Secret Service personal and to throw things at Bill.

Trump has the temperament of a young spoiled child and has shown repeatedly that he is incapable of tolerating criticism without a childlike retort. That is not being brash, it is being unable to control your emotions

Hillary is well known to have had actual tantrums where she has screamed at Secret Service personnel and thrown items at BIll.

That is a real "unable to control your emotions".

Trump has a tactic of responding harshly to critics and criticism. I have not heard any reports of the type of real tantrums that Hillary has had.

As the vast majority of what passes as "criticism" in these days, is complete ******* bullshit, a harsh response is completely called for.

That is the anecdotal claim of Republicans......I know a guy

NONE of it is supported by actual video or audio. Doesn't it seem strange with everyone having a smartphone in their pocket, there is no evidence supporting your tantrum claims

Meanwhile, with Trump we get both audio and video evidence of his lack of control on a weekly basis

No, a dysfunction and corrupt couple have learned to hide their fights behind closed doors. A dishonest bully only bullies her staff when no one is taking pictures.

NOt strange at all.


Meanwhile the "video" that you speak of it twisted into lies. Or have you forgotten all the people pretending to not know what the word "let" means?

Have you forgotten how you took Trump's attack on McCain and lied about him attacking all pows?

 

[rightwinger]

My point

Trump responded like a child to criticism

Demonstrating why he lacks the temperament to be President

1. First of all, that's a completely different argument than you were making. Are you being serious now?

2. Trump has a brash, even vulgar public persona. If you think that that is beneath the dignity of the Oval Office that is a legitimate complaint. IMO, it is vastly out weighted by other factors.

3. All reports indicate that Trump's persona is a carefully controlled tool used for persuasion techniques. Hillary is the one who actually is a hothead who has been known to viciously brow beat Secret Service personal and to throw things at Bill.

Trump has the temperament of a young spoiled child and has shown repeatedly that he is incapable of tolerating criticism without a childlike retort. That is not being brash, it is being unable to control your emotions

Hillary is well known to have had actual tantrums where she has screamed at Secret Service personnel and thrown items at BIll.

That is a real "unable to control your emotions".

Trump has a tactic of responding harshly to critics and criticism. I have not heard any reports of the type of real tantrums that Hillary has had.

As the vast majority of what passes as "criticism" in these days, is complete ******* bullshit, a harsh response is completely called for.

That is the anecdotal claim of Republicans......I know a guy

NONE of it is supported by actual video or audio. Doesn't it seem strange with everyone having a smartphone in their pocket, there is no evidence supporting your tantrum claims

Meanwhile, with Trump we get both audio and video evidence of his lack of control on a weekly basis

No, a dysfunction and corrupt couple have learned to hide their fights behind closed doors. A dishonest bully only bullies her staff when no one is taking pictures.

NOt strange at all.


Meanwhile the "video" that you speak of it twisted into lies. Or have you forgotten all the people pretending to not know what the word "let" means?

Have you forgotten how you took Trump's attack on McCain and lied about him attacking all pows?

If Hillary is subject of tantrums as you say, there would be ample evidence from anyone within earshot. People will pay for stuff like that yet you have nothing on Hillary

Video after video, you robots have to defend your boy and " explain what he really meant"

Trump is out of control and is getting worse as the campaign goes on

 

[Correll]

1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole.

LOLOLOLOL

Crazy Donald doesn't have the best interest of the Republicans at heart.

You're too ******* rightarded to get that. He's doing more damage to the Republican party than any Democrat could have done. He may very possibly single handedly cost Republicans the Senate. And if that happens, and Hillary wins as she's on a path to do, Scalia's replacement is a Liberal along the lines of Kagan and Sotomayor.

As a Liberal Democrat, all I can say is .... thank you Crazy Donald, the Manchurian Republican.

YOur opinions are self serving bullshit.

Me? A ******* righttard?

You are a ******* asshole.

LOLOL

Your infantile foot-stomping is noted.

YOu call me a "******* righttard" and then pretend that my insulting you back is childish?


LIberals: All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.

Again you prove to be too ******* rightarded. My observation of your infantile behavior was not over you calling me names. Who cares about that? It was over your infantile objection my claims are bullshit since the polls reflect what I said. Hillary is on a clear path to victory, Republicans can very possibly lose the Senate, and Hillary will pick a very Liberal SC justice. And that's more to do with Crazy Donald than Hillary Clinton. She's a very flawed candidate with more baggage than a prince on a world tour. She would have been easy to beat with just about any of the other Republicans. The dumbfucking right picked the most unelectable candidate running.

ANd that is the type of republicans dick dems like you like.

For me to just let you call me vile names while trying to address your vile lies.


**** that shit.


Your are a lying asshole.

Lefties have been gloating for years about how demographic change, driven primarily be high immigration, is turning this nation into a defacto One Party State.

Those factors are set in stone. No republicans would be getting more than 5% of the black vote. No republican would be getting much more than 25% of the Hispanic vote.

For you to pretend the closeness of the Race is Trump's fault is you being a liar.

For you to claim that any other republican would be winning in you rubbing salt in the wound.

FUTHERMORE, the possible bad outcome does not support your claim that Trump doesn't care about the GOP. That is just more of you talking shit.

 

[Correll]

1. First of all, that's a completely different argument than you were making. Are you being serious now?

2. Trump has a brash, even vulgar public persona. If you think that that is beneath the dignity of the Oval Office that is a legitimate complaint. IMO, it is vastly out weighted by other factors.

3. All reports indicate that Trump's persona is a carefully controlled tool used for persuasion techniques. Hillary is the one who actually is a hothead who has been known to viciously brow beat Secret Service personal and to throw things at Bill.

Trump has the temperament of a young spoiled child and has shown repeatedly that he is incapable of tolerating criticism without a childlike retort. That is not being brash, it is being unable to control your emotions

Hillary is well known to have had actual tantrums where she has screamed at Secret Service personnel and thrown items at BIll.

That is a real "unable to control your emotions".

Trump has a tactic of responding harshly to critics and criticism. I have not heard any reports of the type of real tantrums that Hillary has had.

As the vast majority of what passes as "criticism" in these days, is complete ******* bullshit, a harsh response is completely called for.

That is the anecdotal claim of Republicans......I know a guy

NONE of it is supported by actual video or audio. Doesn't it seem strange with everyone having a smartphone in their pocket, there is no evidence supporting your tantrum claims

Meanwhile, with Trump we get both audio and video evidence of his lack of control on a weekly basis

No, a dysfunction and corrupt couple have learned to hide their fights behind closed doors. A dishonest bully only bullies her staff when no one is taking pictures.

NOt strange at all.


Meanwhile the "video" that you speak of it twisted into lies. Or have you forgotten all the people pretending to not know what the word "let" means?

Have you forgotten how you took Trump's attack on McCain and lied about him attacking all pows?

If Hillary is subject of tantrums as you say, there would be ample evidence from anyone within earshot. People will pay for stuff like that yet you have nothing on Hillary

Video after video, you robots have to defend your boy and " explain what he really meant"

Trump is out of control and is getting worse as the campaign goes on

1. Nope. THe Clintions, and their allies in the media, have proven that anyone who crosses the Clinton get fucked. It is not surprising that there is no video.

2. And pointing out the definition of the word "let" is NOT explaining what he really meant. It is calling you lefties on your bs.


3. You lefties are out of control. And getting worse as you gain more and more margin of control.

The future is very bright.

 

[Faun]

Odd what you call the high road

McCain called Trump supporters nuts (they are nuts as you know very well)
Trump should have stood up for his supporters and condemned McCain for what he said
Attacking POWs for being captured does nothing to prove that Trump supporters are not nuts. If anything, it proves they are nuts for supporting a candidate who would attack those who are defending their country

1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole.

LOLOLOLOL

Crazy Donald doesn't have the best interest of the Republicans at heart.

You're too ******* rightarded to get that. He's doing more damage to the Republican party than any Democrat could have done. He may very possibly single handedly cost Republicans the Senate. And if that happens, and Hillary wins as she's on a path to do, Scalia's replacement is a Liberal along the lines of Kagan and Sotomayor.

As a Liberal Democrat, all I can say is .... thank you Crazy Donald, the Manchurian Republican.

YOur opinions are self serving bullshit.

Me? A ******* righttard?

You are a ******* asshole.

LOLOL

Your infantile foot-stomping is noted.

YOu call me a "******* righttard" and then pretend that my insulting you back is childish?


LIberals: All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.

How many times need I repeat that I didn't say that about you personally, for you to understand I didn't say that about you personally? <smh>

 

[Correll]

1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole.

LOLOLOLOL

Crazy Donald doesn't have the best interest of the Republicans at heart.

You're too ******* rightarded to get that. He's doing more damage to the Republican party than any Democrat could have done. He may very possibly single handedly cost Republicans the Senate. And if that happens, and Hillary wins as she's on a path to do, Scalia's replacement is a Liberal along the lines of Kagan and Sotomayor.

As a Liberal Democrat, all I can say is .... thank you Crazy Donald, the Manchurian Republican.

YOur opinions are self serving bullshit.

Me? A ******* righttard?

You are a ******* asshole.

LOLOL

Your infantile foot-stomping is noted.

YOu call me a "******* righttard" and then pretend that my insulting you back is childish?


LIberals: All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.

How many times need I repeat that I didn't say that about you personally, for you to understand I didn't say that about you personally? <smh>

Your words.


"You're too ******* rightarded to get that."


Jeez, why would I think you were talking to me.

 

[Faun]

1. First of all, that's a completely different argument than you were making. Are you being serious now?

2. Trump has a brash, even vulgar public persona. If you think that that is beneath the dignity of the Oval Office that is a legitimate complaint. IMO, it is vastly out weighted by other factors.

3. All reports indicate that Trump's persona is a carefully controlled tool used for persuasion techniques. Hillary is the one who actually is a hothead who has been known to viciously brow beat Secret Service personal and to throw things at Bill.

Trump has the temperament of a young spoiled child and has shown repeatedly that he is incapable of tolerating criticism without a childlike retort. That is not being brash, it is being unable to control your emotions

Hillary is well known to have had actual tantrums where she has screamed at Secret Service personnel and thrown items at BIll.

That is a real "unable to control your emotions".

Trump has a tactic of responding harshly to critics and criticism. I have not heard any reports of the type of real tantrums that Hillary has had.

As the vast majority of what passes as "criticism" in these days, is complete ******* bullshit, a harsh response is completely called for.

That is the anecdotal claim of Republicans......I know a guy

NONE of it is supported by actual video or audio. Doesn't it seem strange with everyone having a smartphone in their pocket, there is no evidence supporting your tantrum claims

Meanwhile, with Trump we get both audio and video evidence of his lack of control on a weekly basis

the clintons' roosters will be home soon.

The Clinton's will be back in their White House roost soon enough

I can hear the howls now from the loony right when Bill Clinton is referred to as the First Gentleman.

 

[washamericom]

Trump has the temperament of a young spoiled child and has shown repeatedly that he is incapable of tolerating criticism without a childlike retort. That is not being brash, it is being unable to control your emotions

Hillary is well known to have had actual tantrums where she has screamed at Secret Service personnel and thrown items at BIll.

That is a real "unable to control your emotions".

Trump has a tactic of responding harshly to critics and criticism. I have not heard any reports of the type of real tantrums that Hillary has had.

As the vast majority of what passes as "criticism" in these days, is complete ******* bullshit, a harsh response is completely called for.

That is the anecdotal claim of Republicans......I know a guy

NONE of it is supported by actual video or audio. Doesn't it seem strange with everyone having a smartphone in their pocket, there is no evidence supporting your tantrum claims

Meanwhile, with Trump we get both audio and video evidence of his lack of control on a weekly basis

the clintons' roosters will be home soon.

The Clinton's will be back in their White House roost soon enough

I can hear the howls now from the loony right when Bill Clinton is referred to as the First Gentleman.

he may be first, but he'll never be a gentleman.

 

[Faun]

My point

Trump responded like a child to criticism

Demonstrating why he lacks the temperament to be President

1. First of all, that's a completely different argument than you were making. Are you being serious now?

2. Trump has a brash, even vulgar public persona. If you think that that is beneath the dignity of the Oval Office that is a legitimate complaint. IMO, it is vastly out weighted by other factors.

3. All reports indicate that Trump's persona is a carefully controlled tool used for persuasion techniques. Hillary is the one who actually is a hothead who has been known to viciously brow beat Secret Service personal and to throw things at Bill.

Trump has the temperament of a young spoiled child and has shown repeatedly that he is incapable of tolerating criticism without a childlike retort. That is not being brash, it is being unable to control your emotions

Hillary is well known to have had actual tantrums where she has screamed at Secret Service personnel and thrown items at BIll.

That is a real "unable to control your emotions".

Trump has a tactic of responding harshly to critics and criticism. I have not heard any reports of the type of real tantrums that Hillary has had.

As the vast majority of what passes as "criticism" in these days, is complete ******* bullshit, a harsh response is completely called for.

That is the anecdotal claim of Republicans......I know a guy

NONE of it is supported by actual video or audio. Doesn't it seem strange with everyone having a smartphone in their pocket, there is no evidence supporting your tantrum claims

Meanwhile, with Trump we get both audio and video evidence of his lack of control on a weekly basis

No, a dysfunction and corrupt couple have learned to hide their fights behind closed doors. A dishonest bully only bullies her staff when no one is taking pictures.

NOt strange at all.


Meanwhile the "video" that you speak of it twisted into lies. Or have you forgotten all the people pretending to not know what the word "let" means?

As in, a married woman wouldn't "let" Crazy Donald **** her, despite his best efforts?

What a piece of scum he is.

 

[washamericom]

1. First of all, that's a completely different argument than you were making. Are you being serious now?

2. Trump has a brash, even vulgar public persona. If you think that that is beneath the dignity of the Oval Office that is a legitimate complaint. IMO, it is vastly out weighted by other factors.

3. All reports indicate that Trump's persona is a carefully controlled tool used for persuasion techniques. Hillary is the one who actually is a hothead who has been known to viciously brow beat Secret Service personal and to throw things at Bill.

Trump has the temperament of a young spoiled child and has shown repeatedly that he is incapable of tolerating criticism without a childlike retort. That is not being brash, it is being unable to control your emotions

Hillary is well known to have had actual tantrums where she has screamed at Secret Service personnel and thrown items at BIll.

That is a real "unable to control your emotions".

Trump has a tactic of responding harshly to critics and criticism. I have not heard any reports of the type of real tantrums that Hillary has had.

As the vast majority of what passes as "criticism" in these days, is complete ******* bullshit, a harsh response is completely called for.

That is the anecdotal claim of Republicans......I know a guy

NONE of it is supported by actual video or audio. Doesn't it seem strange with everyone having a smartphone in their pocket, there is no evidence supporting your tantrum claims

Meanwhile, with Trump we get both audio and video evidence of his lack of control on a weekly basis

No, a dysfunction and corrupt couple have learned to hide their fights behind closed doors. A dishonest bully only bullies her staff when no one is taking pictures.

NOt strange at all.


Meanwhile the "video" that you speak of it twisted into lies. Or have you forgotten all the people pretending to not know what the word "let" means?

Have you forgotten how you took Trump's attack on McCain and lied about him attacking all pows?

If Hillary is subject of tantrums as you say, there would be ample evidence from anyone within earshot. People will pay for stuff like that yet you have nothing on Hillary

Video after video, you robots have to defend your boy and " explain what he really meant"

Trump is out of control and is getting worse as the campaign goes on

that's true... that video has yet to pop up.

 

[Correll]

1. First of all, that's a completely different argument than you were making. Are you being serious now?

2. Trump has a brash, even vulgar public persona. If you think that that is beneath the dignity of the Oval Office that is a legitimate complaint. IMO, it is vastly out weighted by other factors.

3. All reports indicate that Trump's persona is a carefully controlled tool used for persuasion techniques. Hillary is the one who actually is a hothead who has been known to viciously brow beat Secret Service personal and to throw things at Bill.

Trump has the temperament of a young spoiled child and has shown repeatedly that he is incapable of tolerating criticism without a childlike retort. That is not being brash, it is being unable to control your emotions

Hillary is well known to have had actual tantrums where she has screamed at Secret Service personnel and thrown items at BIll.

That is a real "unable to control your emotions".

Trump has a tactic of responding harshly to critics and criticism. I have not heard any reports of the type of real tantrums that Hillary has had.

As the vast majority of what passes as "criticism" in these days, is complete ******* bullshit, a harsh response is completely called for.

That is the anecdotal claim of Republicans......I know a guy

NONE of it is supported by actual video or audio. Doesn't it seem strange with everyone having a smartphone in their pocket, there is no evidence supporting your tantrum claims

Meanwhile, with Trump we get both audio and video evidence of his lack of control on a weekly basis

No, a dysfunction and corrupt couple have learned to hide their fights behind closed doors. A dishonest bully only bullies her staff when no one is taking pictures.

NOt strange at all.


Meanwhile the "video" that you speak of it twisted into lies. Or have you forgotten all the people pretending to not know what the word "let" means?

As in, a married woman wouldn't "let" Crazy Donald **** her, despite his best efforts?

What a piece of scum he is.

Umm, no.

 

[washamericom]

1. First of all, that's a completely different argument than you were making. Are you being serious now?

2. Trump has a brash, even vulgar public persona. If you think that that is beneath the dignity of the Oval Office that is a legitimate complaint. IMO, it is vastly out weighted by other factors.

3. All reports indicate that Trump's persona is a carefully controlled tool used for persuasion techniques. Hillary is the one who actually is a hothead who has been known to viciously brow beat Secret Service personal and to throw things at Bill.

Trump has the temperament of a young spoiled child and has shown repeatedly that he is incapable of tolerating criticism without a childlike retort. That is not being brash, it is being unable to control your emotions

Hillary is well known to have had actual tantrums where she has screamed at Secret Service personnel and thrown items at BIll.

That is a real "unable to control your emotions".

Trump has a tactic of responding harshly to critics and criticism. I have not heard any reports of the type of real tantrums that Hillary has had.

As the vast majority of what passes as "criticism" in these days, is complete ******* bullshit, a harsh response is completely called for.

That is the anecdotal claim of Republicans......I know a guy

NONE of it is supported by actual video or audio. Doesn't it seem strange with everyone having a smartphone in their pocket, there is no evidence supporting your tantrum claims

Meanwhile, with Trump we get both audio and video evidence of his lack of control on a weekly basis

No, a dysfunction and corrupt couple have learned to hide their fights behind closed doors. A dishonest bully only bullies her staff when no one is taking pictures.

NOt strange at all.


Meanwhile the "video" that you speak of it twisted into lies. Or have you forgotten all the people pretending to not know what the word "let" means?

As in, a married woman wouldn't "let" Crazy Donald **** her, despite his best efforts?

What a piece of scum he is.

right, just like the president of the United States sitting at his desk at work figuring out what to do with the cuban cigar.

role models.

 

[rightwinger]

Trump has the temperament of a young spoiled child and has shown repeatedly that he is incapable of tolerating criticism without a childlike retort. That is not being brash, it is being unable to control your emotions

Hillary is well known to have had actual tantrums where she has screamed at Secret Service personnel and thrown items at BIll.

That is a real "unable to control your emotions".

Trump has a tactic of responding harshly to critics and criticism. I have not heard any reports of the type of real tantrums that Hillary has had.

As the vast majority of what passes as "criticism" in these days, is complete ******* bullshit, a harsh response is completely called for.

That is the anecdotal claim of Republicans......I know a guy

NONE of it is supported by actual video or audio. Doesn't it seem strange with everyone having a smartphone in their pocket, there is no evidence supporting your tantrum claims

Meanwhile, with Trump we get both audio and video evidence of his lack of control on a weekly basis

No, a dysfunction and corrupt couple have learned to hide their fights behind closed doors. A dishonest bully only bullies her staff when no one is taking pictures.

NOt strange at all.


Meanwhile the "video" that you speak of it twisted into lies. Or have you forgotten all the people pretending to not know what the word "let" means?

Have you forgotten how you took Trump's attack on McCain and lied about him attacking all pows?

If Hillary is subject of tantrums as you say, there would be ample evidence from anyone within earshot. People will pay for stuff like that yet you have nothing on Hillary

Video after video, you robots have to defend your boy and " explain what he really meant"

Trump is out of control and is getting worse as the campaign goes on

1. Nope. THe Clintions, and their allies in the media, have proven that anyone who crosses the Clinton get fucked. It is not surprising that there is no video.

2. And pointing out the definition of the word "let" is NOT explaining what he really meant. It is calling you lefties on your bs.


3. You lefties are out of control. And getting worse as you gain more and more margin of control.

The future is very bright.

More RW conspiracy theories. Cross the evil Clinton's and they will murder you like Vince Foster and Scalia. Reliease a video on Hillary is a death sentence

Don't you realize what raving assholes that makes you look like?

 

[jillian]

not that far away i think the phrase selective outrage will cover it.




KUHNER: The liberal lynching of Herman Cain - Washington Times
www.washingtontimes.com/.../the-liberal-lynching-of-herman-...
The Washington Times
Nov 4, 2011 - Liberals are determined to destroy Herman Cain. The Republican presidential candidate is tied or ahead of the presumptive front-runner, ...
Herman Cain Must Be Destroyed - Banner Newspaper
bannernewspaper.com/herman-cain-must-be-destroyed-p1052-121.htm
Herman Cain Must Be Destroyed. by Paul R. Hollrah I remember it well. I remember the Supreme Court's Brown v. Board of Education decision of May 1954.
'Know Your Place': Elite Media Target Herman Cain - Breitbart
www.breitbart.com/big.../elite-media-clarence-thomassing-herman-cain...
Breitbart News
Mar 1, 2013 - 'Know Your Place': Elite Media Target Herman Cain. ... others into “knowing their place,” the media targets “runners” for personal destruction.

in your fantasy, who "destroyed herman cain?"

i figure he was just a moron. *Shrug*

 

[Faun]

My point

Trump responded like a child to criticism

Demonstrating why he lacks the temperament to be President

1. First of all, that's a completely different argument than you were making. Are you being serious now?

2. Trump has a brash, even vulgar public persona. If you think that that is beneath the dignity of the Oval Office that is a legitimate complaint. IMO, it is vastly out weighted by other factors.

3. All reports indicate that Trump's persona is a carefully controlled tool used for persuasion techniques. Hillary is the one who actually is a hothead who has been known to viciously brow beat Secret Service personal and to throw things at Bill.

Trump has the temperament of a young spoiled child and has shown repeatedly that he is incapable of tolerating criticism without a childlike retort. That is not being brash, it is being unable to control your emotions

Hillary is well known to have had actual tantrums where she has screamed at Secret Service personnel and thrown items at BIll.

That is a real "unable to control your emotions".

Trump has a tactic of responding harshly to critics and criticism. I have not heard any reports of the type of real tantrums that Hillary has had.

As the vast majority of what passes as "criticism" in these days, is complete ******* bullshit, a harsh response is completely called for.

That is the anecdotal claim of Republicans......I know a guy

NONE of it is supported by actual video or audio. Doesn't it seem strange with everyone having a smartphone in their pocket, there is no evidence supporting your tantrum claims

Meanwhile, with Trump we get both audio and video evidence of his lack of control on a weekly basis

No, a dysfunction and corrupt couple have learned to hide their fights behind closed doors. A dishonest bully only bullies her staff when no one is taking pictures.

NOt strange at all.


Meanwhile the "video" that you speak of it twisted into lies. Or have you forgotten all the people pretending to not know what the word "let" means?

Have you forgotten how you took Trump's attack on McCain and lied about him attacking all pows?

The hell he didn't....

"He [McCain] lost, he let us down. So I didn't like him as much after that because I don't like losers. ... He's not a war hero. He's a war hero, he's was a war hero because he was captured. I like people who weren’t captured." - Crazy Donald.

He sure does git you sportin' wood though.

 

[jillian]

Trump has the temperament of a young spoiled child and has shown repeatedly that he is incapable of tolerating criticism without a childlike retort. That is not being brash, it is being unable to control your emotions

Hillary is well known to have had actual tantrums where she has screamed at Secret Service personnel and thrown items at BIll.

That is a real "unable to control your emotions".

Trump has a tactic of responding harshly to critics and criticism. I have not heard any reports of the type of real tantrums that Hillary has had.

As the vast majority of what passes as "criticism" in these days, is complete ******* bullshit, a harsh response is completely called for.

That is the anecdotal claim of Republicans......I know a guy

NONE of it is supported by actual video or audio. Doesn't it seem strange with everyone having a smartphone in their pocket, there is no evidence supporting your tantrum claims

Meanwhile, with Trump we get both audio and video evidence of his lack of control on a weekly basis

No, a dysfunction and corrupt couple have learned to hide their fights behind closed doors. A dishonest bully only bullies her staff when no one is taking pictures.

NOt strange at all.


Meanwhile the "video" that you speak of it twisted into lies. Or have you forgotten all the people pretending to not know what the word "let" means?

As in, a married woman wouldn't "let" Crazy Donald **** her, despite his best efforts?

What a piece of scum he is.

right, just like the president of the United States sitting at his desk at work figuring out what to do with the cuban cigar.

role models.

at least that was consensual.... unlike dumb donald.

until you disavow him. you have no business talking about role modes.


p.s. bill clinton left office with almost a 70% approval rating.

thanks.

 

[washamericom]

not that far away i think the phrase selective outrage will cover it.




KUHNER: The liberal lynching of Herman Cain - Washington Times
www.washingtontimes.com/.../the-liberal-lynching-of-herman-...
The Washington Times
Nov 4, 2011 - Liberals are determined to destroy Herman Cain. The Republican presidential candidate is tied or ahead of the presumptive front-runner, ...
Herman Cain Must Be Destroyed - Banner Newspaper
bannernewspaper.com/herman-cain-must-be-destroyed-p1052-121.htm
Herman Cain Must Be Destroyed. by Paul R. Hollrah I remember it well. I remember the Supreme Court's Brown v. Board of Education decision of May 1954.
'Know Your Place': Elite Media Target Herman Cain - Breitbart
www.breitbart.com/big.../elite-media-clarence-thomassing-herman-cain...
Breitbart News
Mar 1, 2013 - 'Know Your Place': Elite Media Target Herman Cain. ... others into “knowing their place,” the media targets “runners” for personal destruction.

in your fantasy, who "destroyed herman cain?"

i figure he was just a moron. *Shrug*

i was going for the race angle. so it's complicated.

 

[Faun]

LOLOLOLOL

Crazy Donald doesn't have the best interest of the Republicans at heart.

You're too ******* rightarded to get that. He's doing more damage to the Republican party than any Democrat could have done. He may very possibly single handedly cost Republicans the Senate. And if that happens, and Hillary wins as she's on a path to do, Scalia's replacement is a Liberal along the lines of Kagan and Sotomayor.

As a Liberal Democrat, all I can say is .... thank you Crazy Donald, the Manchurian Republican.

YOur opinions are self serving bullshit.

Me? A ******* righttard?

You are a ******* asshole.

LOLOL

Your infantile foot-stomping is noted.

YOu call me a "******* righttard" and then pretend that my insulting you back is childish?


LIberals: All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.

Again you prove to be too ******* rightarded. My observation of your infantile behavior was not over you calling me names. Who cares about that? It was over your infantile objection my claims are bullshit since the polls reflect what I said. Hillary is on a clear path to victory, Republicans can very possibly lose the Senate, and Hillary will pick a very Liberal SC justice. And that's more to do with Crazy Donald than Hillary Clinton. She's a very flawed candidate with more baggage than a prince on a world tour. She would have been easy to beat with just about any of the other Republicans. The dumbfucking right picked the most unelectable candidate running.

ANd that is the type of republicans dick dems like you like.

For me to just let you call me vile names while trying to address your vile lies.


**** that shit.


Your are a lying asshole.

Lefties have been gloating for years about how demographic change, driven primarily be high immigration, is turning this nation into a defacto One Party State.

Those factors are set in stone. No republicans would be getting more than 5% of the black vote. No republican would be getting much more than 25% of the Hispanic vote.

For you to pretend the closeness of the Race is Trump's fault is you being a liar.

For you to claim that any other republican would be winning in you rubbing salt in the wound.

FUTHERMORE, the possible bad outcome does not support your claim that Trump doesn't care about the GOP. That is just more of you talking shit.

Trump himself inferred he didn't care about the GOP when he threatened to break ranks with them and run as an independent. You have to be dumber than dirt to not see he couldn't give two shits about the GOP. He's not a conservative either. He's pro-choice and pro-gun control. Imbeciles like you believe him when he says only now he no longer is, which he has to say to shore up rightards like you.

 

[washamericom]

Hillary is well known to have had actual tantrums where she has screamed at Secret Service personnel and thrown items at BIll.

That is a real "unable to control your emotions".

Trump has a tactic of responding harshly to critics and criticism. I have not heard any reports of the type of real tantrums that Hillary has had.

As the vast majority of what passes as "criticism" in these days, is complete ******* bullshit, a harsh response is completely called for.

That is the anecdotal claim of Republicans......I know a guy

NONE of it is supported by actual video or audio. Doesn't it seem strange with everyone having a smartphone in their pocket, there is no evidence supporting your tantrum claims

Meanwhile, with Trump we get both audio and video evidence of his lack of control on a weekly basis

No, a dysfunction and corrupt couple have learned to hide their fights behind closed doors. A dishonest bully only bullies her staff when no one is taking pictures.

NOt strange at all.


Meanwhile the "video" that you speak of it twisted into lies. Or have you forgotten all the people pretending to not know what the word "let" means?

As in, a married woman wouldn't "let" Crazy Donald **** her, despite his best efforts?

What a piece of scum he is.

right, just like the president of the United States sitting at his desk at work figuring out what to do with the cuban cigar.

role models.

at least that was consensual.... unlike dumb donald.

until you disavow him. you have no business talking about role modes.


p.s. bill clinton left office with almost a 70% approval rating.

thanks.

he's not a very good role model when it comes to teaching our kids. but that's the heart of hillary's campaign. i assume you've seen the ad set.

i disavowed the clintons a hundred years ago. sorry sweet pea, what's good for the goose.

 

[Faun]

Hillary is well known to have had actual tantrums where she has screamed at Secret Service personnel and thrown items at BIll.

That is a real "unable to control your emotions".

Trump has a tactic of responding harshly to critics and criticism. I have not heard any reports of the type of real tantrums that Hillary has had.

As the vast majority of what passes as "criticism" in these days, is complete ******* bullshit, a harsh response is completely called for.

That is the anecdotal claim of Republicans......I know a guy

NONE of it is supported by actual video or audio. Doesn't it seem strange with everyone having a smartphone in their pocket, there is no evidence supporting your tantrum claims

Meanwhile, with Trump we get both audio and video evidence of his lack of control on a weekly basis

the clintons' roosters will be home soon.

The Clinton's will be back in their White House roost soon enough

I can hear the howls now from the loony right when Bill Clinton is referred to as the First Gentleman.

he may be first, but he'll never be a gentleman.

That's true but that's only gonna make the right howl that much louder.