the destruction of herman cain, from an election far far away.

[Correll]

1. Your request that Republicans take the high road, while you dems fight dirty is rejected. McCain was a grumpy old man who attacked Trump supporters and was insulted back in turn.

2. YOur request that Republicans take the high road while you dems fight dirty is rejected. The reporter's handicap was such that he FROZEN JOINTS, not spastic flailing. The media is lying about Trump mocking a disability. He was mocking the reporter who deserved it.

3. Your request that the Republicans take the high road while you dems fight dirty is rejected. Megan Kelly betrayed her professional responsibility, behaved unethically and deserved to be called on her bullshit.

4. Meanwhile you libs are happy to personally smear just about EVERYONE who disagrees with you, one at a time or a half the country at a time. Or have you never considered the implication of calling someone a "racist"? Or "deplorable"? YOur don't get to sling so much vile mud and then whine when someone uses far less offensive language BACK at you.

Well, you do. But I am here to call you on it.

Odd what you call the high road

McCain called Trump supporters nuts (they are nuts as you know very well)
Trump should have stood up for his supporters and condemned McCain for what he said
Attacking POWs for being captured does nothing to prove that Trump supporters are not nuts. If anything, it proves they are nuts for supporting a candidate who would attack those who are defending their country

1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole.

LOLOLOLOL

Crazy Donald doesn't have the best interest of the Republicans at heart.

You're too ******* rightarded to get that. He's doing more damage to the Republican party than any Democrat could have done. He may very possibly single handedly cost Republicans the Senate. And if that happens, and Hillary wins as she's on a path to do, Scalia's replacement is a Liberal along the lines of Kagan and Sotomayor.

As a Liberal Democrat, all I can say is .... thank you Crazy Donald, the Manchurian Republican.

YOur opinions are self serving bullshit.

Me? A ******* righttard?

You are a ******* asshole.

President Obama says you should stop whining

I note you've given up on trying to defend your bullshit above.

And you are down to JUST being an asshole.


My points stand.




1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole

 

[rightwinger]

Odd what you call the high road

McCain called Trump supporters nuts (they are nuts as you know very well)
Trump should have stood up for his supporters and condemned McCain for what he said
Attacking POWs for being captured does nothing to prove that Trump supporters are not nuts. If anything, it proves they are nuts for supporting a candidate who would attack those who are defending their country

1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole.

LOLOLOLOL

Crazy Donald doesn't have the best interest of the Republicans at heart.

You're too ******* rightarded to get that. He's doing more damage to the Republican party than any Democrat could have done. He may very possibly single handedly cost Republicans the Senate. And if that happens, and Hillary wins as she's on a path to do, Scalia's replacement is a Liberal along the lines of Kagan and Sotomayor.

As a Liberal Democrat, all I can say is .... thank you Crazy Donald, the Manchurian Republican.

YOur opinions are self serving bullshit.

Me? A ******* righttard?

You are a ******* asshole.

President Obama says you should stop whining

I note you've given up on trying to defend your bullshit above.

And you are down to JUST being an asshole.


My points stand.




1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole

My point

Trump responded like a child to criticism

Demonstrating why he lacks the temperament to be President

 

[Dragonlady]

If she had made that claim about a dem, it would have been a blip and that would have been the end of it.

As it was about a Republican the media made it their top story for weeks.

Really. Let's compare.

Trailer Trash Paula makes a bogus claim and had to hear about that shit for years.

Ginger made a claim, Uncle Tom dropped out o the race the minute he knew the Klan would probably lynch him the next time he showed up at a GOP event.

[...EDIA]

Your racism against southern whites is noted. YOu are a racist asshole.

Paula's claim was completely credible. You are a liar.

Herman Cain was a serious contender is a crowded field. YOu are a racist asshole.

The Klan is irrelevant. You are a race baiting asshole.

**** you.

Paula's claim was dismissed with prejudice, because there was no proof either she or her husband suffered any damages as a result of her refusing to have sex with Bill Clinton. Jones appealed the dismissal and rather than fight the Jones trial and the upcoming Impeachment Trial, Clinton settled the Jones suit without admitting liability or apologizing to Paula Jones.

Jones got $200,000 from the settlement, a publicist, a makeover, a nose job, top notch legal representation, and a new wardrobe from the Republican Party.

Hermann Cain was a fringe candidate but the hardcore racist 30% of the Republican Party would never have voted for him.

This is what the Clown Car does every election. They claw, scratch and attack each other until they're all such damaged goods, no one will vote for any of them at the end of it. This election has been no exception.

Usually the surviving Clown cleans up his act and spares some thought for policy while shooting himself in the foot. Trump is the exception, continuing his Clown Car routine throughout the campaign.

The problem with Trump is the number of skeletons in his own closet. Every time he goes after Clinton, his own history is far worse than anything she's ever done.

Trump is running around shooting his mouth about Clinton, using easily disproven lies and half truths, while every day new problems surface with his charities, his policies, and his character.

His ongoing court cases are pretty much in abeyance, for now, but there's two Trump University fraud trial, questions about his assets, and more importantly, his debts, his own confession of sexual assault.

Rigged election indeed.

 

[Correll]

1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole.

LOLOLOLOL

Crazy Donald doesn't have the best interest of the Republicans at heart.

You're too ******* rightarded to get that. He's doing more damage to the Republican party than any Democrat could have done. He may very possibly single handedly cost Republicans the Senate. And if that happens, and Hillary wins as she's on a path to do, Scalia's replacement is a Liberal along the lines of Kagan and Sotomayor.

As a Liberal Democrat, all I can say is .... thank you Crazy Donald, the Manchurian Republican.

YOur opinions are self serving bullshit.

Me? A ******* righttard?

You are a ******* asshole.

President Obama says you should stop whining

I note you've given up on trying to defend your bullshit above.

And you are down to JUST being an asshole.


My points stand.




1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole

My point

Trump responded like a child to criticism

Demonstrating why he lacks the temperament to be President

1. First of all, that's a completely different argument than you were making. Are you being serious now?

2. Trump has a brash, even vulgar public persona. If you think that that is beneath the dignity of the Oval Office that is a legitimate complaint. IMO, it is vastly out weighted by other factors.

3. All reports indicate that Trump's persona is a carefully controlled tool used for persuasion techniques. Hillary is the one who actually is a hothead who has been known to viciously brow beat Secret Service personal and to throw things at Bill.

 

[Correll]

If she had made that claim about a dem, it would have been a blip and that would have been the end of it.

As it was about a Republican the media made it their top story for weeks.

Really. Let's compare.

Trailer Trash Paula makes a bogus claim and had to hear about that shit for years.

Ginger made a claim, Uncle Tom dropped out o the race the minute he knew the Klan would probably lynch him the next time he showed up at a GOP event.

[...EDIA]

Your racism against southern whites is noted. YOu are a racist asshole.

Paula's claim was completely credible. You are a liar.

Herman Cain was a serious contender is a crowded field. YOu are a racist asshole.

The Klan is irrelevant. You are a race baiting asshole.

**** you.

Paula's claim was dismissed with prejudice, because there was no proof either she or her husband suffered any damages as a result of her refusing to have sex with Bill Clinton. Jones appealed the dismissal and rather than fight the Jones trial and the upcoming Impeachment Trial, Clinton settled the Jones suit without admitting liability or apologizing to Paula Jones.

Jones got $200,000 from the settlement, a publicist, a makeover, a nose job, top notch legal representation, and a new wardrobe from the Republican Party.

Hermann Cain was a fringe candidate but the hardcore racist 30% of the Republican Party would never have voted for him.

This is what the Clown Car does every election. They claw, scratch and attack each other until they're all such damaged goods, no one will vote for any of them at the end of it. This election has been no exception.

Usually the surviving Clown cleans up his act and spares some thought for policy while shooting himself in the foot. Trump is the exception, continuing his Clown Car routine throughout the campaign.

The problem with Trump is the number of skeletons in his own closet. Every time he goes after Clinton, his own history is far worse than anything she's ever done.

Trump is running around shooting his mouth about Clinton, using easily disproven lies and half truths, while every day new problems surface with his charities, his policies, and his character.

His ongoing court cases are pretty much in abeyance, for now, but there's two Trump University fraud trial, questions about his assets, and more importantly, his debts, his own confession of sexual assault.

Rigged election indeed.

1. It is absurd to claim the JOnes has suffered no damage from being vilified by the President and his vicious wife and their army of partisans.

2. Cain rose to the top of the pack in a crowed field. Your description of him as a fringe candidate is disproved by his months in the lead. Your belief that 30% of the GOP is racist is unsupported bullshit, you ass.

3. Your opinion on crowded primary fields/primary process is noted.

4. Hillary's record is infinitely worse than Trump's. Hillary has been an enabler of a sexual predatory for most of her life.

5. Your claim that he has confessed to sexual assault shows how little credibility you should be given, as you are pretending to not know what the word "let" means.

 

[Faun]

Your continued whining is noted and dismissed. Herman Cain is still responsible for his actions.

Only to his wife.

The media was WAY out of line.

Says you. Cain's actions said othewise.

That fact that the media's vile actions were successful in no way supports your position that they were in the right to do what they did.

Try to be less stupid.

You're ******* deranged.

Ginger White came forward to claim she had a 13 year affair with Herman Cain. As a candidate for president, that was a yuge news story and the press rightfully covered it. Including rightwing news. That's not "vile," that's the press doing their job. And as you've been shown, the press has covered accusations of sexual misconduct by many presidential candidates, regardless of political parties.

The reality is you're a devoted Crazy Donald sycophant and it burns you no end because it's happening to him.

Guess what...?

Tough shit.

Sex doesn't matter. YOu libs taught us that.


All you are doing now is being hypocrites.

That's still a strawman ... I still never said Cain should have dropped ... so I'm still not a hypocrite.

 

[Faun]

If McCain is grumpy and insults your supporters ...attack what he said, don't attack him for being captured in defense of his country

If a reporter says something you disagree with...attack what he said and why he is wrong, don't encourage your supporters to mock his handicap

If women say things you don't like...attack what they said, don't call them fat pigs, ugly or having their period

Like Michelle Obama said, its human decency

1. Your request that Republicans take the high road, while you dems fight dirty is rejected. McCain was a grumpy old man who attacked Trump supporters and was insulted back in turn.

2. YOur request that Republicans take the high road while you dems fight dirty is rejected. The reporter's handicap was such that he FROZEN JOINTS, not spastic flailing. The media is lying about Trump mocking a disability. He was mocking the reporter who deserved it.

3. Your request that the Republicans take the high road while you dems fight dirty is rejected. Megan Kelly betrayed her professional responsibility, behaved unethically and deserved to be called on her bullshit.

4. Meanwhile you libs are happy to personally smear just about EVERYONE who disagrees with you, one at a time or a half the country at a time. Or have you never considered the implication of calling someone a "racist"? Or "deplorable"? YOur don't get to sling so much vile mud and then whine when someone uses far less offensive language BACK at you.

Well, you do. But I am here to call you on it.

Odd what you call the high road

McCain called Trump supporters nuts (they are nuts as you know very well)
Trump should have stood up for his supporters and condemned McCain for what he said
Attacking POWs for being captured does nothing to prove that Trump supporters are not nuts. If anything, it proves they are nuts for supporting a candidate who would attack those who are defending their country

1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole.

LOLOLOLOL

Crazy Donald doesn't have the best interest of the Republicans at heart.

You're too ******* rightarded to get that. He's doing more damage to the Republican party than any Democrat could have done. He may very possibly single handedly cost Republicans the Senate. And if that happens, and Hillary wins as she's on a path to do, Scalia's replacement is a Liberal along the lines of Kagan and Sotomayor.

As a Liberal Democrat, all I can say is .... thank you Crazy Donald, the Manchurian Republican.

YOur opinions are self serving bullshit.

Me? A ******* righttard?

You are a ******* asshole.

LOLOL

Your infantile foot-stomping is noted.

 

[rightwinger]

LOLOLOLOL

Crazy Donald doesn't have the best interest of the Republicans at heart.

You're too ******* rightarded to get that. He's doing more damage to the Republican party than any Democrat could have done. He may very possibly single handedly cost Republicans the Senate. And if that happens, and Hillary wins as she's on a path to do, Scalia's replacement is a Liberal along the lines of Kagan and Sotomayor.

As a Liberal Democrat, all I can say is .... thank you Crazy Donald, the Manchurian Republican.

YOur opinions are self serving bullshit.

Me? A ******* righttard?

You are a ******* asshole.

President Obama says you should stop whining

I note you've given up on trying to defend your bullshit above.

And you are down to JUST being an asshole.


My points stand.




1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole

My point

Trump responded like a child to criticism

Demonstrating why he lacks the temperament to be President

1. First of all, that's a completely different argument than you were making. Are you being serious now?

2. Trump has a brash, even vulgar public persona. If you think that that is beneath the dignity of the Oval Office that is a legitimate complaint. IMO, it is vastly out weighted by other factors.

3. All reports indicate that Trump's persona is a carefully controlled tool used for persuasion techniques. Hillary is the one who actually is a hothead who has been known to viciously brow beat Secret Service personal and to throw things at Bill.

Trump has the temperament of a young spoiled child and has shown repeatedly that he is incapable of tolerating criticism without a childlike retort. That is not being brash, it is being unable to control your emotions

 

[Faun]

Okay, but the Democrats elected a black man and are about to elect a woman. So it seems they have this down.

But you keep nominating white men.

You present me, and/or the GOP with a woman or a black or anyone or anything, that has a set of policies or a resume or a campaign that fits what we want out of a candidate, and we will support that candidate.


We judge candidates based on what they have to offer.


Your dem inability to understand that can be seen in how you kept trying to make an issue of Romney's religion and how you failed at doing so.


WE have that down, ie judging candidates, (or people) on their actions and/or the content of their character, not their skin color or their gender.


But you keep checking off boxes.

Bullshit. Many on the right just can't seem to find any blacks or women they think are as capable as white men.

Actually to choose a certain individual candidate over another, they should be MORE capable than the other candidate. You dumb ass.


Do you think that Ben Carson was more capable than Donald Trump?

I actually don't care. It was a trick question.

Ben Carson's appeal was more to social conservatives, my support of Donald Trump stemmed from his Trade and Immigration issues.


That you assume that my decision had ANYTHING TO do with the skin color or gender of the candidates in question, is just you having a bad opinion of me. A completely unsupported opinion.


I would LIKE for the final candidate to be a woman or a black. Just to see the pretzel logic that you libs would twist your little brains in to rationalize it away.

BUT, I will not pass over, imo, better candidate in favor of a lesser candidate based on such petty concerns.



Do you have any doubt that if it came down to Ben Carson vs Hillary Clinton that there would be ANY hesitation on my part for voting for the "black"?

Rhetorical question. Only a complete moron would think so.

You've stated nothing which counters my point that many on the right don't think blacks or women are as capable as white men.

And if you could understand what others write, you probably would have noticed I didn't say that about you personally.

I was discussing the ACTUAL way that we on the right make our voting decisions.

EVERYTHING I said contradicted your biased and partisan bullshit theory on what you think your enemies do.

ANd your insulting of a group that I am a member of means that you are insulting me.

Screw you, dumb ass.

Nope, none of your post did. All you did was say folks on the right generally vote for whom they find most qualified. That in no way refutes my claim that many just happen to generally find white men superior to blacks and women, especially blacks, no matter who tbe candidates are. You look stupid contesting that when one need look no further than the make up of Congress.

 

[Correll]

Only to his wife.

The media was WAY out of line.

Says you. Cain's actions said othewise.

That fact that the media's vile actions were successful in no way supports your position that they were in the right to do what they did.

Try to be less stupid.

You're ******* deranged.

Ginger White came forward to claim she had a 13 year affair with Herman Cain. As a candidate for president, that was a yuge news story and the press rightfully covered it. Including rightwing news. That's not "vile," that's the press doing their job. And as you've been shown, the press has covered accusations of sexual misconduct by many presidential candidates, regardless of political parties.

The reality is you're a devoted Crazy Donald sycophant and it burns you no end because it's happening to him.

Guess what...?

Tough shit.

Sex doesn't matter. YOu libs taught us that.


All you are doing now is being hypocrites.

That's still a strawman ... I still never said Cain should have dropped ... so I'm still not a hypocrite.

You are supporting the media in their hypocritical actions.

 

[Correll]

You present me, and/or the GOP with a woman or a black or anyone or anything, that has a set of policies or a resume or a campaign that fits what we want out of a candidate, and we will support that candidate.


We judge candidates based on what they have to offer.


Your dem inability to understand that can be seen in how you kept trying to make an issue of Romney's religion and how you failed at doing so.


WE have that down, ie judging candidates, (or people) on their actions and/or the content of their character, not their skin color or their gender.


But you keep checking off boxes.

Bullshit. Many on the right just can't seem to find any blacks or women they think are as capable as white men.

Actually to choose a certain individual candidate over another, they should be MORE capable than the other candidate. You dumb ass.


Do you think that Ben Carson was more capable than Donald Trump?

I actually don't care. It was a trick question.

Ben Carson's appeal was more to social conservatives, my support of Donald Trump stemmed from his Trade and Immigration issues.


That you assume that my decision had ANYTHING TO do with the skin color or gender of the candidates in question, is just you having a bad opinion of me. A completely unsupported opinion.


I would LIKE for the final candidate to be a woman or a black. Just to see the pretzel logic that you libs would twist your little brains in to rationalize it away.

BUT, I will not pass over, imo, better candidate in favor of a lesser candidate based on such petty concerns.



Do you have any doubt that if it came down to Ben Carson vs Hillary Clinton that there would be ANY hesitation on my part for voting for the "black"?

Rhetorical question. Only a complete moron would think so.

You've stated nothing which counters my point that many on the right don't think blacks or women are as capable as white men.

And if you could understand what others write, you probably would have noticed I didn't say that about you personally.

I was discussing the ACTUAL way that we on the right make our voting decisions.

EVERYTHING I said contradicted your biased and partisan bullshit theory on what you think your enemies do.

ANd your insulting of a group that I am a member of means that you are insulting me.

Screw you, dumb ass.

Nope, none of your post did. All you did was say folks on the right generally vote for whom they find most qualified. That in no way refutes my claim that many just happen to generally find white men superior to blacks and women, especially blacks, no matter who tbe candidates are. You look stupid contesting that when one need look no further than the make up of Congress.

That is not what I said.

I specifically stated that my support of Trump as opposed to Carson was NOT based on any personal qualifications, but on their policy positions.

Having policy positions that more closely match my own is NOT a claim of "most qualified" but more "most agreement with".


The make up of congress does NOT support your smearing of the Good People of the GOP.

The "make up of congress", ie the lack of black gop congressmen, is driven primarily by the low percentage of blacks who are in the GOP.

That has zero to do with the voting choices of the republican voters.

You are being an ass in your insistence that those you disagree with MUST be motivated by some form of Evulness.

 

[Correll]

1. Your request that Republicans take the high road, while you dems fight dirty is rejected. McCain was a grumpy old man who attacked Trump supporters and was insulted back in turn.

2. YOur request that Republicans take the high road while you dems fight dirty is rejected. The reporter's handicap was such that he FROZEN JOINTS, not spastic flailing. The media is lying about Trump mocking a disability. He was mocking the reporter who deserved it.

3. Your request that the Republicans take the high road while you dems fight dirty is rejected. Megan Kelly betrayed her professional responsibility, behaved unethically and deserved to be called on her bullshit.

4. Meanwhile you libs are happy to personally smear just about EVERYONE who disagrees with you, one at a time or a half the country at a time. Or have you never considered the implication of calling someone a "racist"? Or "deplorable"? YOur don't get to sling so much vile mud and then whine when someone uses far less offensive language BACK at you.

Well, you do. But I am here to call you on it.

Odd what you call the high road

McCain called Trump supporters nuts (they are nuts as you know very well)
Trump should have stood up for his supporters and condemned McCain for what he said
Attacking POWs for being captured does nothing to prove that Trump supporters are not nuts. If anything, it proves they are nuts for supporting a candidate who would attack those who are defending their country

1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole.

LOLOLOLOL

Crazy Donald doesn't have the best interest of the Republicans at heart.

You're too ******* rightarded to get that. He's doing more damage to the Republican party than any Democrat could have done. He may very possibly single handedly cost Republicans the Senate. And if that happens, and Hillary wins as she's on a path to do, Scalia's replacement is a Liberal along the lines of Kagan and Sotomayor.

As a Liberal Democrat, all I can say is .... thank you Crazy Donald, the Manchurian Republican.

YOur opinions are self serving bullshit.

Me? A ******* righttard?

You are a ******* asshole.

LOLOL

Your infantile foot-stomping is noted.

YOu call me a "******* righttard" and then pretend that my insulting you back is childish?


LIberals: All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.

 

[Correll]

YOur opinions are self serving bullshit.

Me? A ******* righttard?

You are a ******* asshole.

President Obama says you should stop whining

I note you've given up on trying to defend your bullshit above.

And you are down to JUST being an asshole.


My points stand.




1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole

My point

Trump responded like a child to criticism

Demonstrating why he lacks the temperament to be President

1. First of all, that's a completely different argument than you were making. Are you being serious now?

2. Trump has a brash, even vulgar public persona. If you think that that is beneath the dignity of the Oval Office that is a legitimate complaint. IMO, it is vastly out weighted by other factors.

3. All reports indicate that Trump's persona is a carefully controlled tool used for persuasion techniques. Hillary is the one who actually is a hothead who has been known to viciously brow beat Secret Service personal and to throw things at Bill.

Trump has the temperament of a young spoiled child and has shown repeatedly that he is incapable of tolerating criticism without a childlike retort. That is not being brash, it is being unable to control your emotions

Hillary is well known to have had actual tantrums where she has screamed at Secret Service personnel and thrown items at BIll.

That is a real "unable to control your emotions".

Trump has a tactic of responding harshly to critics and criticism. I have not heard any reports of the type of real tantrums that Hillary has had.

As the vast majority of what passes as "criticism" in these days, is complete ******* bullshit, a harsh response is completely called for.

 

[Faun]

Says you. Cain's actions said othewise.

That fact that the media's vile actions were successful in no way supports your position that they were in the right to do what they did.

Try to be less stupid.

You're ******* deranged.

Ginger White came forward to claim she had a 13 year affair with Herman Cain. As a candidate for president, that was a yuge news story and the press rightfully covered it. Including rightwing news. That's not "vile," that's the press doing their job. And as you've been shown, the press has covered accusations of sexual misconduct by many presidential candidates, regardless of political parties.

The reality is you're a devoted Crazy Donald sycophant and it burns you no end because it's happening to him.

Guess what...?

Tough shit.

Sex doesn't matter. YOu libs taught us that.


All you are doing now is being hypocrites.

That's still a strawman ... I still never said Cain should have dropped ... so I'm still not a hypocrite.

You are supporting the media in their hypocritical actions.

I can't help you're too ******* rightarded to notice the media reports on sexual misconduct regardless of political party, even though I cited examples.

 

[rightwinger]

President Obama says you should stop whining

I note you've given up on trying to defend your bullshit above.

And you are down to JUST being an asshole.


My points stand.




1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole

My point

Trump responded like a child to criticism

Demonstrating why he lacks the temperament to be President

1. First of all, that's a completely different argument than you were making. Are you being serious now?

2. Trump has a brash, even vulgar public persona. If you think that that is beneath the dignity of the Oval Office that is a legitimate complaint. IMO, it is vastly out weighted by other factors.

3. All reports indicate that Trump's persona is a carefully controlled tool used for persuasion techniques. Hillary is the one who actually is a hothead who has been known to viciously brow beat Secret Service personal and to throw things at Bill.

Trump has the temperament of a young spoiled child and has shown repeatedly that he is incapable of tolerating criticism without a childlike retort. That is not being brash, it is being unable to control your emotions

Hillary is well known to have had actual tantrums where she has screamed at Secret Service personnel and thrown items at BIll.

That is a real "unable to control your emotions".

Trump has a tactic of responding harshly to critics and criticism. I have not heard any reports of the type of real tantrums that Hillary has had.

As the vast majority of what passes as "criticism" in these days, is complete ******* bullshit, a harsh response is completely called for.

That is the anecdotal claim of Republicans......I know a guy

NONE of it is supported by actual video or audio. Doesn't it seem strange with everyone having a smartphone in their pocket, there is no evidence supporting your tantrum claims

Meanwhile, with Trump we get both audio and video evidence of his lack of control on a weekly basis

 

[washamericom]

That fact that the media's vile actions were successful in no way supports your position that they were in the right to do what they did.

Try to be less stupid.

You're ******* deranged.

Ginger White came forward to claim she had a 13 year affair with Herman Cain. As a candidate for president, that was a yuge news story and the press rightfully covered it. Including rightwing news. That's not "vile," that's the press doing their job. And as you've been shown, the press has covered accusations of sexual misconduct by many presidential candidates, regardless of political parties.

The reality is you're a devoted Crazy Donald sycophant and it burns you no end because it's happening to him.

Guess what...?

Tough shit.

Sex doesn't matter. YOu libs taught us that.


All you are doing now is being hypocrites.

That's still a strawman ... I still never said Cain should have dropped ... so I'm still not a hypocrite.

You are supporting the media in their hypocritical actions.

I can't help you're too ******* rightarded to notice the media reports on sexual misconduct regardless of political party, even though I cited examples.

they just report it differently.

 

[washamericom]

I note you've given up on trying to defend your bullshit above.

And you are down to JUST being an asshole.


My points stand.




1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole

My point

Trump responded like a child to criticism

Demonstrating why he lacks the temperament to be President

1. First of all, that's a completely different argument than you were making. Are you being serious now?

2. Trump has a brash, even vulgar public persona. If you think that that is beneath the dignity of the Oval Office that is a legitimate complaint. IMO, it is vastly out weighted by other factors.

3. All reports indicate that Trump's persona is a carefully controlled tool used for persuasion techniques. Hillary is the one who actually is a hothead who has been known to viciously brow beat Secret Service personal and to throw things at Bill.

Trump has the temperament of a young spoiled child and has shown repeatedly that he is incapable of tolerating criticism without a childlike retort. That is not being brash, it is being unable to control your emotions

Hillary is well known to have had actual tantrums where she has screamed at Secret Service personnel and thrown items at BIll.

That is a real "unable to control your emotions".

Trump has a tactic of responding harshly to critics and criticism. I have not heard any reports of the type of real tantrums that Hillary has had.

As the vast majority of what passes as "criticism" in these days, is complete ******* bullshit, a harsh response is completely called for.

That is the anecdotal claim of Republicans......I know a guy

NONE of it is supported by actual video or audio. Doesn't it seem strange with everyone having a smartphone in their pocket, there is no evidence supporting your tantrum claims

Meanwhile, with Trump we get both audio and video evidence of his lack of control on a weekly basis

the clintons' roosters will be home soon.

 

[Correll]

That fact that the media's vile actions were successful in no way supports your position that they were in the right to do what they did.

Try to be less stupid.

You're ******* deranged.

Ginger White came forward to claim she had a 13 year affair with Herman Cain. As a candidate for president, that was a yuge news story and the press rightfully covered it. Including rightwing news. That's not "vile," that's the press doing their job. And as you've been shown, the press has covered accusations of sexual misconduct by many presidential candidates, regardless of political parties.

The reality is you're a devoted Crazy Donald sycophant and it burns you no end because it's happening to him.

Guess what...?

Tough shit.

Sex doesn't matter. YOu libs taught us that.


All you are doing now is being hypocrites.

That's still a strawman ... I still never said Cain should have dropped ... so I'm still not a hypocrite.

You are supporting the media in their hypocritical actions.

I can't help you're too ******* rightarded to notice the media reports on sexual misconduct regardless of political party, even though I cited examples.

Did I mention "**** you"?

YOu could find a lot of stories about Bill's scandals. If you looked at the content you would find the vast majority of them carrying water for Bill, not attacking and smearing him.

 

[Faun]

Odd what you call the high road

McCain called Trump supporters nuts (they are nuts as you know very well)
Trump should have stood up for his supporters and condemned McCain for what he said
Attacking POWs for being captured does nothing to prove that Trump supporters are not nuts. If anything, it proves they are nuts for supporting a candidate who would attack those who are defending their country

1. McCain insulted Trump's supporters and Trump insulted McCain personally back. That should be the end of it.

2. Your opinion on what Trump should have done is noted. And dismissed as you do NOT have the best interests of the Republicans at heart.

3. Trump supporters are good people who have real issues. YOur dismissal and constant smearing of them is just you being as asshole.

LOLOLOLOL

Crazy Donald doesn't have the best interest of the Republicans at heart.

You're too ******* rightarded to get that. He's doing more damage to the Republican party than any Democrat could have done. He may very possibly single handedly cost Republicans the Senate. And if that happens, and Hillary wins as she's on a path to do, Scalia's replacement is a Liberal along the lines of Kagan and Sotomayor.

As a Liberal Democrat, all I can say is .... thank you Crazy Donald, the Manchurian Republican.

YOur opinions are self serving bullshit.

Me? A ******* righttard?

You are a ******* asshole.

LOLOL

Your infantile foot-stomping is noted.

YOu call me a "******* righttard" and then pretend that my insulting you back is childish?


LIberals: All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.

Again you prove to be too ******* rightarded. My observation of your infantile behavior was not over you calling me names. Who cares about that? It was over your infantile objection my claims are bullshit since the polls reflect what I said. Hillary is on a clear path to victory, Republicans can very possibly lose the Senate, and Hillary will pick a very Liberal SC justice. And that's more to do with Crazy Donald than Hillary Clinton. She's a very flawed candidate with more baggage than a prince on a world tour. She would have been easy to beat with just about any of the other Republicans. The dumbfucking right picked the most unelectable candidate running.

 

[rightwinger]

My point

Trump responded like a child to criticism

Demonstrating why he lacks the temperament to be President

1. First of all, that's a completely different argument than you were making. Are you being serious now?

2. Trump has a brash, even vulgar public persona. If you think that that is beneath the dignity of the Oval Office that is a legitimate complaint. IMO, it is vastly out weighted by other factors.

3. All reports indicate that Trump's persona is a carefully controlled tool used for persuasion techniques. Hillary is the one who actually is a hothead who has been known to viciously brow beat Secret Service personal and to throw things at Bill.

Trump has the temperament of a young spoiled child and has shown repeatedly that he is incapable of tolerating criticism without a childlike retort. That is not being brash, it is being unable to control your emotions

Hillary is well known to have had actual tantrums where she has screamed at Secret Service personnel and thrown items at BIll.

That is a real "unable to control your emotions".

Trump has a tactic of responding harshly to critics and criticism. I have not heard any reports of the type of real tantrums that Hillary has had.

As the vast majority of what passes as "criticism" in these days, is complete ******* bullshit, a harsh response is completely called for.

That is the anecdotal claim of Republicans......I know a guy

NONE of it is supported by actual video or audio. Doesn't it seem strange with everyone having a smartphone in their pocket, there is no evidence supporting your tantrum claims

Meanwhile, with Trump we get both audio and video evidence of his lack of control on a weekly basis

the clintons' roosters will be home soon.

The Clinton's will be back in their White House roost soon enough