The democrats will not stop at 10 round magazines.........

2aguy

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Messages
112,556
Reaction score
52,800
Points
2,290
The gun grabbers tell us that 10 round magazines will be just fine.....until they decide they are not fine......and these guys are already leading the way to make 10 round magazines illegal.....and, that would include 6 shot revolvers....

And in Massachusetts, gun control activist John Rosenthal and a coalition of prohibitions are demanding Congress enact a ban on both “assault weapons” (another invented term with no fixed definition beyond “gun I want to ban”) and “large capacity” magazines that can accept more than five rounds.
---------
It’s also worth noting that nowhere in Rosenthal’s missive does he limit that magazine capacity to detachable magazines. Based on his writing, Rosenthal and his fellow prohibitionists want to outlaw not only standard magazines used in semi-automatic handguns and long guns, but even commonly-owned rifles with fixed magazines… and perhaps even six-shot revolvers as well.


 
The gun grabbers tell us that 10 round magazines will be just fine.....until they decide they are not fine......and these guys are already leading the way to make 10 round magazines illegal.....and, that would include 6 shot revolvers....

And in Massachusetts, gun control activist John Rosenthal and a coalition of prohibitions are demanding Congress enact a ban on both “assault weapons” (another invented term with no fixed definition beyond “gun I want to ban”) and “large capacity” magazines that can accept more than five rounds.
---------
It’s also worth noting that nowhere in Rosenthal’s missive does he limit that magazine capacity to detachable magazines. Based on his writing, Rosenthal and his fellow prohibitionists want to outlaw not only standard magazines used in semi-automatic handguns and long guns, but even commonly-owned rifles with fixed magazines… and perhaps even six-shot revolvers as well.


Hmmmm. You mean my 15 in the mag, 1 in the pipe, with two spare fully loaded magazines, all personal defense rounds, in the holster I wear present some type of problem? :cool:
 
What the hell good is a lousy 10 round magazine going to do you when the government pulls up in your driveway with a squad of soldiers sent to drag you and your family off to the concentration camps?
 
Democrats, Marxist, Fascist and Criminals fear people being able to defend themselves.
 
What the hell good is a lousy 10 round magazine going to do you when the government pulls up in your driveway with a squad of soldiers sent to drag you and your family off to the concentration camps?
Hopefully you will do the same thing you did last times it happened to you. If not,
1173568_1.jpg
 
What the hell good is a lousy 10 round magazine going to do you when the government pulls up in your driveway with a squad of soldiers sent to drag you and your family off to the concentration camps?

That's exactly why we have 30, 50, and 75 round magazines. No law-enforcement or military personnel of any country is invincible, especially in the groin, hip, leg, and face areas that body armor doesn't protect.
 
Last edited:
The gun grabbers tell us that 10 round magazines will be just fine.....until they decide they are not fine......and these guys are already leading the way to make 10 round magazines illegal.....and, that would include 6 shot revolvers....

And in Massachusetts, gun control activist John Rosenthal and a coalition of prohibitions are demanding Congress enact a ban on both “assault weapons” (another invented term with no fixed definition beyond “gun I want to ban”) and “large capacity” magazines that can accept more than five rounds.
---------
It’s also worth noting that nowhere in Rosenthal’s missive does he limit that magazine capacity to detachable magazines. Based on his writing, Rosenthal and his fellow prohibitionists want to outlaw not only standard magazines used in semi-automatic handguns and long guns, but even commonly-owned rifles with fixed magazines… and perhaps even six-shot revolvers as well.


Give the Demwits an inch and they'll take a marathon. They won't be happy until we're back to the caveman era, using clubs and jagged rocks for self-protection. They'd be absolute fools if they weren't complete idiots.
 
Give the Demwits an inch and they'll take a marathon. They won't be happy until we're back to the caveman era, using clubs and jagged rocks for self-protection. They'd be absolute fools if they weren't complete idiots.
Says the guy that just posted the stupidest fucking thing that I've ever read, anywhere.
 
You can kill the first ten guys or gals that come through the door. Once a few people have done that, it’s going to be hard to find liberals brave enough to try confiscating weapons.
 
Give the Demwits an inch and they'll take a marathon. They won't be happy until we're back to the caveman era, using clubs and jagged rocks for self-protection. They'd be absolute fools if they weren't complete idiots.
That's what the French are reduced to. Invaders have guns. The French have baseball bats.
 
For the Dems / Socialists, the magazine limit is one more incremental step they can take towards their eventual goal of a disarmed public.
 
The gun grabbers tell us that 10 round magazines will be just fine.....until they decide they are not fine......and these guys are already leading the way to make 10 round magazines illegal.....and, that would include 6 shot revolvers....

And in Massachusetts, gun control activist John Rosenthal and a coalition of prohibitions are demanding Congress enact a ban on both “assault weapons” (another invented term with no fixed definition beyond “gun I want to ban”) and “large capacity” magazines that can accept more than five rounds.
---------
It’s also worth noting that nowhere in Rosenthal’s missive does he limit that magazine capacity to detachable magazines. Based on his writing, Rosenthal and his fellow prohibitionists want to outlaw not only standard magazines used in semi-automatic handguns and long guns, but even commonly-owned rifles with fixed magazines… and perhaps even six-shot revolvers as well.


Didnt the supreme court already decide that a government cant infringe on the rights of the Citizens to use a weapon?
 
Just like they won't stop at AR15s. If an AR15 is unacceptable then so is a Ruger 10-22. They function exactly the same. As we have seen so much in recent years demfacists LIE LIKE HELL to get what they want. Guns and the 2nd are no different.
 
Just like they won't stop at AR15s. If an AR15 is unacceptable then so is a Ruger 10-22. They function exactly the same. As we have seen so much in recent years demfacists LIE LIKE HELL to get what they want. Guns and the 2nd are no different.
They don't care about function. They care about appearance. They are not that smart.

I guess my Henry Big Boy 45 LC with a 10 round fixed magazine would be on the chopping block if they are dumb enough to write such a proposal into a bill.

Glad I don't live in MA.
 
Democrats will not stop until they have effectively removed the right to keep and bear arms.
This is proven by the fact they will never, ever, tell you what level of gun control is "enough" or "too much".
They want it all.
Thus:
Not one inch.
 
Didnt the supreme court already decide that a government cant infringe on the rights of the Citizens to use a weapon?
Democrats do not care about the Constitution, as proven by their various "Bruen response bills" and continued calls for laws they know will be struck by the court.
 
Back
Top Bottom