The Democrat Search Has Begun

Indeed. The Dems have a strict "no Jews" policy now. So strict, it probably contributed to their loss in November.

<snip>
But 78% of Jews voted for dimocrap scum.

There are many exit polls that demonstrate high percentages of Jewish voters supporting Kamala Harris – this CNN/Edison exit poll indicates that 78 percent of Jewish voters supported Kamala Harris, while 22 percent supported Donald Trump. According to this poll, 88 percent of Jewish women and 71 percent of Jewish men supported Kamala Harris over Trump.

The term 'self-gassing Jew' comes to mind. Sadly. And you should hear what Israelis think of American Jews. Better yet -- Not

I couldn't care less what religion a person is. But this is ridiculous. dimocrap scum openly express their hatred of all things Jewish and Jews turn around and vote for them in astounding numbers.

Disturbing. I don't get it. But -- There's a lot of things I don't get.
 
The Republican Party will split into Globalists scum and Nationalists to supplant the loss of the democrat Party
The GOP will solidify into a Constitutionalist Nationalist Populist Middle Right Party and get 25% of the Democrat / Turd Party voters to join up
 
But 78% of Jews voted for dimocrap scum.



The term 'self-gassing Jew' comes to mind. Sadly. And you should hear what Israelis think of American Jews. Better yet -- Not

I couldn't care less what religion a person is. But this is ridiculous. dimocrap scum openly express their hatred of all things Jewish and Jews turn around and vote for them in astounding numbers.

Disturbing. I don't get it. But -- There's a lot of things I don't get.
I have tried many times myself, to understand why so many Jews vote Democrat, and the best I can do is believe that there is such a strong desire to be "real Americans" that they bond to the larger party.

Hopefully it is changing.

BTW, I've been to Israel several times and consider myself a Zionist. Been to several Middle East nations, on the first El Al plane to land in Cairo.
 
I have tried many times myself, to understand why so many Jews vote Democrat, and the best I can do is believe that there is such a strong desire to be "real Americans" that they bond to the larger party.

Hopefully it is changing.

BTW, I've been to Israel several times and consider myself a Zionist. Been to several Middle East nations, on the first El Al plane to land in Cairo.
I don't care enough to look but I'd bet that the difference in how Jews vote as compared to how everybody else in their Zip Code votes is infinitesimal.

IOW, I suspect they vote about like everybody else in their neighborhood.

No matter, it's still disturbing. Maybe they're too afraid to vote against dimocraps, who are little more than modern Nazis :dunno:
 
I don't care enough to look but I'd bet that the difference in how Jews vote as compared to how everybody else in their Zip Code votes is infinitesimal.

IOW, I suspect they vote about like everybody else in their neighborhood.

No matter, it's still disturbing. Maybe they're too afraid to vote against dimocraps, who are little more than modern Nazis :dunno:
A good enough theory.
I remain puzzled.
 
You lost too yidnar, you just haven't realized it yet. But you will.
we lost 4 yrs ago when Briben entered the WH and the costs of living skyrocketed , we had an invasion at the border , and major wars breaking out in the ME and Europe .. but your were to stupid to realize it .. and now laughingly dims are complaining aboutt the price of eggs that skyrocketed in late Dec after the Biden admin slaughtered 100 million layers .. ya just cant make this crap up .. y'all are absolute childish idiots ..
 
Liberal Bill Maher has not only learned the lesson that the American people have taught, but he is trying his best to mentor Democrats.


1.Current approval rating for the Democrat Party is 21%

2. ... according to a new Gallup poll, 45 percent of Democrats want the party to moveto the center, which is up 11 points from four years ago.

3. Well, the Democrats need to find their Trump

4. ....where a politician bonds with everyday Americans because he talks like them. And the-- -(AUDIENCE CLAPPING) The good news for Democrats is they have that guy, and his name is John Fetterman.




5. After the election, instead of curling up in a ball, Fetterman went to Mar-a-Lago,
And afterwards, Trump said "He's not liberal or conservative. He's just a commonsense person, which is beautiful."


6. Trump and Fetterman actually have a lot in common. They're both plain spoken anti-elitists who come from money, married exotic immigrant ladies, went to Ivy League schools, and aren't afraid to take on their own party.

7. Fetterman is that rare Democrat who's not afraid to put the woke nonsense peddlers in his own party in their place, saying things like
"Wanting a secure border and realizing that it was out of control.
That doesn't mean you're a xenophobe or a racist."
He's been unequivocally pro-Israel, as are most Americans, and when pro-Palestinian protesters showed up at his home, he went up on the roof and waved an Israeli flag.




8. Fetterman says the four words that strike fear in the heart of every Republican who wants to hang on to power,
"I am not woke."


9. That's why Trump won, not because Americans were clamoring for tariffs
Going where the American people are on crime
and immigration, gosh, it's so crazy, it just might work.
See, that's how you get these things called votes.




Bob Hope knows Democrats


 
Last edited:
Bob Hope knows Democrats



Why you always gotta be hatin' on Democrats PoliticalChica?
Are you just a born hater?
Did a Democrat steal your lunch money back when you were in grade school?
Maybe you don't really have much of a life so imaginining you're in some epic battle against some "boogie-man" gives you a reason to live?
What is the origin of this obsession of yours?
Why does the DNC live rent free in your head 24/7?
 
Why you always gotta be hatin' on Democrats PoliticalChica?
Are you just a born hater?
Did a Democrat steal your lunch money back when you were in grade school?
Maybe you don't really have much of a life so imaginining you're in some epic battle against some "boogie-man" gives you a reason to live?
What is the origin of this obsession of yours?
Why does the DNC live rent free in your head 24/7?
"Why you always gotta be hatin' on Democrats PoliticalChica?

'cause I love America and Democrats hate America.

You didn't know that????



This is what you voted for....can you explain it?


Race and gender preferences

Language police

No punishment for criminals

Open borders

Attacks on the Supreme Court

Transgender sports competitions

Antisemitism

Wealth tax

Cancel culture

Welfare State

Government run healthcare mandates

Sanctuary Cities

Two-Tiered Justice system




I bet you can't, proving what Bob Hope said about you.
 
Newsom/ Booker 28 or Newsom / Jeffries 28
Don't count out Titty Caca, she's workin' it hard. So is Sambo Crockett. And we all know how much dimocrap scum loves them some non-white wimmins
 
"Why you always gotta be hatin' on Democrats PoliticalChica?

'cause I love America and Democrats hate America.

You didn't know that????



This is what you voted for....can you explain it?


Race and gender preferences

Language police

No punishment for criminals

Open borders

Attacks on the Supreme Court

Transgender sports competitions

Antisemitism

Wealth tax

Cancel culture

Welfare State

Government run healthcare mandates

Sanctuary Cities

Two-Tiered Justice system




I bet you can't, proving what Bob Hope said about you.
So that's your answer huh? You've simply swallowed hook, line, and sinker, a bunch of propaganda soundbites the unholy Christian Taliban has fed you and that propaganda fuels your obsessive hatred?
The reality is nothing is as simple as you make it out here to be. Most of these issues are not black and white with a clearly defined "right" and "wrong" side of the issue. I get the impression you might be a very simple minded person to have to distill complicated issues down to simple black and white choices in order for you to understand them.
I will concede that yes, the Democrat Party has certainly chosen a lot of really stupid issues to stand on lately. A bunch of the wrong hills to die on so to speak, but this doesn't mean Democrats "hate America."
If you look HONESTLY at the issues, you have to admit that this current, criminal administration is actively and aggressively dismantling our democracy right before our eyes and serving the interests of our adversaries (like Putin) and the only thing standing in it's way are democrats.
So the FACTS before us right now....right in front of our faces would indicate just the opposite of your claim here.
It would appear to be the Republican senators and U.S. Representatives right now who are shirking their oaths of office, serving as Donald Trump's loyal lap dogs rather than doing their JOBS and serving as a seperate but coequal check and balance on the executive branch, that actually hate this country.
 
So that's your answer huh? You've simply swallowed hook, line, and sinker, a bunch of propaganda soundbites the unholy Christian Taliban has fed you and that propaganda fuels your obsessive hatred?
The reality is nothing is as simple as you make it out here to be. Most of these issues are not black and white with a clearly defined "right" and "wrong" side of the issue. I get the impression you might be a very simple minded person to have to distill complicated issues down to simple black and white choices in order for you to understand them.
I will concede that yes, the Democrat Party has certainly chosen a lot of really stupid issues to stand on lately. A bunch of the wrong hills to die on so to speak, but this doesn't mean Democrats "hate America."
If you look HONESTLY at the issues, you have to admit that this current, criminal administration is actively and aggressively dismantling our democracy right before our eyes and serving the interests of our adversaries (like Putin) and the only thing standing in it's way are democrats.
So the FACTS before us right now....right in front of our faces would indicate just the opposite of your claim here.
It would appear to be the Republican senators and U.S. Representatives right now who are shirking their oaths of office, serving as Donald Trump's loyal lap dogs rather than doing their JOBS and serving as a seperate but coequal check and balance on the executive branch, that actually hate this country.
It has been so helpful, you allowing me to demonstrate the level of Democrat voter, that I will provide some instruction that you need, and that even a gnat-brain like you should be able to comprehend.


When one votes, or champions a party, the intelligent voter is able to explain and defent said vote. You can't.....I proved that by listing the sort of insane and anti-American agenda that Democrats propose to oppress free people with.

"Most of these issues are not black and white with a clearly defined "right" and "wrong" side of the issue."

Of course they are. 77 million Americans saw what you missed.


"I will concede that yes, the Democrat Party has certainly chosen a lot of really stupid issues to stand on lately. A bunch of the wrong hills to die on so to speak, ...."

BINGO!
Yet you voted for them!
Here's what most of us voted for, but you didn't out of fear of confronting your masters:
Under Trump gasoline was about $1.80 a gallon….but you voted against that

Under Trump we were energy independent….but you voted against that.

Under Trump 80% of illegal alien were kept in Mexico….but you voted against that.

Under Trump inflation was 1.4%….but you voted against that.

Under Trump crime was far lower, as were homicides….but you voted against that.

Under Trump Iran was kept in a box….but you voted against that.

Under Trump America had an airbase near both China and Iran….but you voted against that.

Under Trump our President wasn’t on China’s payroll….but you voted against that.

Under Trump cartels weren’t free to operate….but you voted against that.

Under Trump government didn’t favor racism, CRT, gender mutilation….but you voted against that.

Under Trump we didn’t have confiscatory tax policy….but you voted against that.

Under Trump we didn’t have a government working with big tech to end free speech….but you voted against that.

Under Trump, Putin didn’t invade Ukraine….but you voted against that

Under Trump, the savages of Hamas didn’t dare to slaughter concert goers….but you voted against that.

Under Trump, peace in the Middle East….but you voted against that.

Under Trump, three peace treaties between Israel and their Arab neighbors…..but you voted against that.

Under Trump, securing our borders and not waiving in murderous MS13 gang members…..but you voted against that

Under Trump we avoided some 100,000 fatal drug overdoses…but you voted against that.

Under Trump we didn’t have lawfare, a legal system corrupted to use fake charges against political enemies….but you voted for Lawfare.

Under Trump, his side didn’t try to imprison or assassinate opponents.
 
So that's your answer huh? You've simply swallowed hook, line, and sinker, a bunch of propaganda soundbites the unholy Christian Taliban has fed you and that propaganda fuels your obsessive hatred?
The reality is nothing is as simple as you make it out here to be. Most of these issues are not black and white with a clearly defined "right" and "wrong" side of the issue. I get the impression you might be a very simple minded person to have to distill complicated issues down to simple black and white choices in order for you to understand them.
I will concede that yes, the Democrat Party has certainly chosen a lot of really stupid issues to stand on lately. A bunch of the wrong hills to die on so to speak, but this doesn't mean Democrats "hate America."
If you look HONESTLY at the issues, you have to admit that this current, criminal administration is actively and aggressively dismantling our democracy right before our eyes and serving the interests of our adversaries (like Putin) and the only thing standing in it's way are democrats.
So the FACTS before us right now....right in front of our faces would indicate just the opposite of your claim here.
It would appear to be the Republican senators and U.S. Representatives right now who are shirking their oaths of office, serving as Donald Trump's loyal lap dogs rather than doing their JOBS and serving as a seperate but coequal check and balance on the executive branch, that actually hate this country.
Did it affect your view of your party when an attempted assassination of Trump took place?



Did you know:
Historic review: every presidential assassin in the history of the nation has been a liberal- or has not been associated with a political outlook- none were right-wingers.



a. John Wilkes Booth was opposed to President Lincoln’s Republican war policies. His letter to is family explained he was furious with Lincoln for having brought war to the South! THE MURDERER OF MR. LINCOLN.; Extraordinary Letter of John Wilkes Booth Proof that He Meditated His Crime Months Ago His Excuses for the Contemplated Act His Participation in the Execution of John Brown. Commissioners of Public Charities and Correction. Fires. The Seventh Ward Fire Note from Chief Engineer Decker. (Published 1865)

Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth, “…an angry Copperhead, a.k.a., ‘peace democrat,’ (when that meant pro-slavery, of course.) John Wilkes Booth - Liberapedia

liberapedia.wikia.com



John Wilkes Booth was the assassin of President Abraham Lincoln. (By Executive Order Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation on Jan. 1, 1863, which changed the federal legal status of more than 3 million enslaved people). Booth was a Confederate sympathizer during the Civil War and resented...
liberapedia.wikia.com


liberapedia.wikia.com



"In the 1860s, the Copperheads comprised a vocal faction of Democrats in the Northern United States of the Union who opposed the American Civil War, wanting an immediate peace settlement with the Confederates. Republicans started calling anti-war Democrats "Copperheads", likening them to the venomous snake."

en.wikipedia.org




en.wikipedia.org


en.wikipedia.org





b. Charles J. Guiteau, who shot President James Garfield, was part of a utopian commune, the Oneida Community, where free love was practiced. Ackerman, “Dark Horse: The Surprise Election and Political Murder of President James A. Garfield,” p.135



c. Leon Czolgosz, who killed President McKinley, was a socialist and anarchist, whose act was instigated by a speech he heard by socialist Emma Goldman. American Experience | PBS



d. John Schrank, who shot and wounded Teddy Roosevelt in 1912, seemed to have no affiliation other than opposition to a third term. Theodore Roosevelt shot in Milwaukee



e. Giuseppe Zangara, who came close to killing President Roosevelt in 1933, (he killed Mayor Cermak) hated the rich and sought to “make even with the capitalists.” Outside of shooting elected officials, he would have made an ideal pick for Obama’ws cabinet. http://digital.library.miami.edu/gov/FDRAssn.html



f. Lee Harvey Oswald, who shot JFK, had been a communist ever since he read a communist pamphlet about the Rosenbergs. As soon as he was arrested, he called John Abt, lawyer for the American Communist Party. "CIA confirmed Oswald contacted Cubans, Soviets before assassination, memo shows" CIA confirmed Oswald contacted Cubans, Soviets before assassination, memo shows





4. Let's add these non-presidential assassinations by Leftists.



g. Sirhan Sirhan, who killed Robert Kennedy, was a Palestinian who hated Kennedy’s support of Israel.



h. Arthur Bremer shot George Wallace in 1972, due to Wallace’s support for segregation.

http://basicfamouspeople.com//index.php?aid=7134

Upon his release, Bremer showed no remorse: “ ‘shooting segregationist dinosaurs’ is not like shooting people because ‘they are extinct by act of God.’ This mention of God was the only blemish on Bremer’s otherwise impeccable liberal credentials.” Coulter, “Guilty,” p. 260.



i. Lynette ‘Squeaky’ Fromme, tried to shoot President Ford because she was incensed about the plight of the California redwoods. http://minx.cc/?blog=86&post=209933



j. Sara Jane Moore also tried to kill President Ford because “the government had declared war on the left.” http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local&id=4900159







k. John Hinckley shot President Reagan to impress a girl. The jury found him “not guilty by reason of insanity.” “

…which is as good a definition of liberalism as I’ve heard.”

Coulter, “Guilty.” P. 260.





Or that the agenda of Hitler's Nazi Party was identical with your party:
 
So that's your answer huh? You've simply swallowed hook, line, and sinker, a bunch of propaganda soundbites the unholy Christian Taliban has fed you and that propaganda fuels your obsessive hatred?
The reality is nothing is as simple as you make it out here to be. Most of these issues are not black and white with a clearly defined "right" and "wrong" side of the issue. I get the impression you might be a very simple minded person to have to distill complicated issues down to simple black and white choices in order for you to understand them.
I will concede that yes, the Democrat Party has certainly chosen a lot of really stupid issues to stand on lately. A bunch of the wrong hills to die on so to speak, but this doesn't mean Democrats "hate America."
If you look HONESTLY at the issues, you have to admit that this current, criminal administration is actively and aggressively dismantling our democracy right before our eyes and serving the interests of our adversaries (like Putin) and the only thing standing in it's way are democrats.
So the FACTS before us right now....right in front of our faces would indicate just the opposite of your claim here.
It would appear to be the Republican senators and U.S. Representatives right now who are shirking their oaths of office, serving as Donald Trump's loyal lap dogs rather than doing their JOBS and serving as a seperate but coequal check and balance on the executive branch, that actually hate this country.
Or that the agenda of Hitler's Nazi Party was identical with your party:

You really should study history. The Nazis are what the Nazis were......guess which party has the very same agenda?

Government spending as a percentage of GDP averaged around 40% pre-war. Additionally (at least in the beginning) 80% of the budget was spent on social programs, not the hallmark of an "evil, right wing, capitalist economy." Sign in



-------------------------------------------------------------

Workers Welfare Programs:


In the best passage of Government largess, the Nazi regime fostered a purified liberal concept to enhance the living standard of German citizens across all segments of society. In order to stimulate the spirit of integrity, comradeship and happiness, Adolf Hitler fanned numerous programs and instituted strict rules for officials to carry them in eternal way.

a) Highly Subsidized International vacation trips.

b) Between 1933-1938 Strength through Joy (KDF) movement Organized 134,000 theater and concert events for 32 million people. 2 million people went on cruises and weekend trips and 11 million went on theater trips.

c) Nazis ensured that every citizen had a Radio.

d) 5 day week.

e) Free Public Health.

f) Trade Unions were banned. All workers had to join German labor Front. Strikes for higher wages were banned. People who refused to work were imprisoned. With fall in Inflation, purchasing power increased and wages actually fell.

g) Large factories had to provide rest areas, cafeterias, dressing rooms, even playing fields and swimming pools

h) They also banned "lock outs" for industries. No "reverse strikes"for them either.

lovkap.blogspot.com

Nazi Hitler Economic Social and Political Policies

Click Here for Adolf Hitler and World War 2. What is NAtional SoZIalism. Economic, Social and Political policies of Adolf Hitler and NA...
lovkap.blogspot.com
lovkap.blogspot.com





1933-1945: In 1933 Hitler disbands the labor movement and strips Jews of citizenship. Jews, dissidents, and other minorities are put in concentration camps, where they are forced to work or killed outright. The Reich centralizes social programs and education as a means of control. The regime extends health insurance to retirees in 1941, and expands health care and maternity leave the following year. Commanding Heights : Germany | on PBS



During the 12 years of Hitler’s Third Reich, the National Socialists expanded and extended the welfare state to the point where over 17 million German citizens were receiving assistance under the auspices of the National Socialist People's Welfare (NSV) by 1939, an agency that had projected a powerful image of caring and support. Welfare state - Wikipedia







The Nazi rule under Adolf Hitler in the 1930s and 1940s led to an improvement in medical care and old age provision largely financed by high taxes on the wealthy, and theft from Jews and the people of the conquered territories (Aly 2007, 7). The Viability of the European Social Model: The German Welfare State and Labor Market Reform











The Nationalsozialistische Volkswohlfahrt (NSV), meaning "National Socialist People's Welfare", was a social welfare organization during the Third Reich. The NSV was established in 1933,.... The NSV became established as the single Nazi Party welfare organ in May 1933.[1] .... the programme was massively expanded, so that the régime deemed it worthy to be called the "greatest social institution in the world." One method of expansion was to absorb, or in NSDAP parlance coordinate, already existing but non-Nazi charity organizations. NSV was the second largest Nazi group organization by 1939, second only to the German Labor Front.

The National Socialists provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft which promoted the collectivity of a “people’s community” where citizens would sacrifice themselves for the greater good. The NSV operated “8,000 day-nurseries” by 1939, and funded holiday homes for mothers, distributed additional food for large families, and was involved with a “wide variety of other facilities.”[4]

The Nazi social welfare provisions included old age insurance, rent supplements, unemployment and disability benefits, old-age homes, interest-free loans for married couples, along with healthcare insurance, which was not decreed mandatory until 1941[5] One of the NSV branches, the Office of Institutional and Special Welfare, was responsible “for travellers’ aid at railway stations; relief for ex-convicts; ‘support’ for re-migrants from abroad; assistance for the physically disabled, hard-of-hearing, deaf, mute, and blind; relief for the elderly, homeless and alcoholics; and the fight against illicit drugs and epidemics.”

These social welfare programs represented a Hitlerian endeavor to lift the community above the individual while promoting the wellbeing of all bona fide citizens. As Hitler told a reporter in 1934, he was determined to give Germans “the highest possible standard of living.” National Socialist People's Welfare - Wikipedia

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hitler’s Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Nazi Welfare State, by Götz Aly,

While underemphasized by modern historians, this socialism was stressed in many contemporaneous accounts of fascism, especially by libertarian thinkers. F.A. Hayek famously dedicated The Road to Serfdom to “the socialists of all parties”—that is, Labourites, Bolsheviks, and National Socialists.



Ludwig von Mises agreed, arguing in 1944 that “both Russia and Germany are right in calling their systems socialist.”

The Nazis themselves regarded the left-right convergence as integral to understanding fascism. Adolf Eichmann viewed National Socialism and communism as “quasi-siblings,” explaining in his memoirs that he “inclined towards the left and emphasized socialist aspects every bit as much as nationalist ones.” As late as 1944, Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels publicly celebrated “our socialism,” reminding his war-weary subjects that Germany “alone [has] the best social welfare measures.” Contrast this, he advised, with the Jews, who were the very “incarnation of capitalism.”


Using a farrago of previously unpublished statistics, Aly describes in detail a social system larded with benefits —open only to Aryan comrades, naturally.

According to Götz Aly’s Hitler’s Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Nazi Welfare State, most previous treatments of German complicity in genocide overlook a significant aspect of Nazi rule. Aly, a historian at the Fritz Bauer Institut in Frankfurt and the author of more than a dozen books on fascism, urges us to follow the money, arguing that the Nazis maintained popular support—a necessary precondition for the “final solution”—not because of terror or ideological affinity but through a simple system of “plunder,” “bribery,” and a generous welfare state.
reason.com

Hitler's Handouts

Inside the Nazis' welfare state
reason.com






To “achieve a truly socialist division of personal assets,” he writes, Hitler implemented a variety of interventionist economic policies, including price and rent controls, exorbitant corporate taxes, frequent “polemics against landlords,” subsidies to German farmers as protection “against the vagaries of weather and the world market,” and harsh taxes on capital gains, which Hitler himself had denounced as “effortless income.”

“The Nazi leadership did not transform the majority of Germans into ideological fanatics who were convinced that they were the master race,” Aly concludes. “Instead it succeeded in making them well-fed parasites.”

Hitler’s Beneficiaries demonstrates a correlation between moral collapse and government largess.

While Aly’s impressive economic history succeeds in reminding readers that Bolshevism and Nazism were, in the words of historian Richard Pipes, both “heresies of socialism,” that service is ultimately overshadowed by a needlessly radical conclusion." Hitler's Handouts






I'm here to educate you. Say thank you.
 
It has been so helpful, you allowing me to demonstrate the level of Democrat voter, that I will provide some instruction that you need, and that even a gnat-brain like you should be able to comprehend.


When one votes, or champions a party, the intelligent voter is able to explain and defent said vote. You can't.....I proved that by listing the sort of insane and anti-American agenda that Democrats propose to oppress free people with.

"Most of these issues are not black and white with a clearly defined "right" and "wrong" side of the issue."

Of course they are. 77 million Americans saw what you missed.


"I will concede that yes, the Democrat Party has certainly chosen a lot of really stupid issues to stand on lately. A bunch of the wrong hills to die on so to speak, ...."

BINGO!
Yet you voted for them!
Here's what most of us voted for, but you didn't out of fear of confronting your masters:
Under Trump gasoline was about $1.80 a gallon….but you voted against that

Under Trump we were energy independent….but you voted against that.

Under Trump 80% of illegal alien were kept in Mexico….but you voted against that.

Under Trump inflation was 1.4%….but you voted against that.

Under Trump crime was far lower, as were homicides….but you voted against that.

Under Trump Iran was kept in a box….but you voted against that.

Under Trump America had an airbase near both China and Iran….but you voted against that.

Under Trump our President wasn’t on China’s payroll….but you voted against that.

Under Trump cartels weren’t free to operate….but you voted against that.

Under Trump government didn’t favor racism, CRT, gender mutilation….but you voted against that.

Under Trump we didn’t have confiscatory tax policy….but you voted against that.

Under Trump we didn’t have a government working with big tech to end free speech….but you voted against that.

Under Trump, Putin didn’t invade Ukraine….but you voted against that

Under Trump, the savages of Hamas didn’t dare to slaughter concert goers….but you voted against that.

Under Trump, peace in the Middle East….but you voted against that.

Under Trump, three peace treaties between Israel and their Arab neighbors…..but you voted against that.

Under Trump, securing our borders and not waiving in murderous MS13 gang members…..but you voted against that

Under Trump we avoided some 100,000 fatal drug overdoses…but you voted against that.

Under Trump we didn’t have lawfare, a legal system corrupted to use fake charges against political enemies….but you voted for Lawfare.

Under Trump, his side didn’t try to imprison or assassinate opponents.
You could have saved yourself a lot of effort by just typing, "You're a scumbag" and going for a walk or meet a friend for Tea or play a game of tennis.

Because trying to help a dimocrap understand more than complicated than 'Free Shit!' is a waste of time. And effort.
 
You could have saved yourself a lot of effort by just typing, "You're a scumbag" and going for a walk or meet a friend for Tea or play a game of tennis.

Because trying to help a dimocrap understand more than complicated than 'Free Shit!' is a waste of time. And effort.
Now, you must know that I never use language like that.

But....I have my own ways of saying similar thoughts.
 
Or that the agenda of Hitler's Nazi Party was identical with your party:

You really should study history. The Nazis are what the Nazis were......guess which party has the very same agenda?

Government spending as a percentage of GDP averaged around 40% pre-war. Additionally (at least in the beginning) 80% of the budget was spent on social programs, not the hallmark of an "evil, right wing, capitalist economy." Sign in



-------------------------------------------------------------

Workers Welfare Programs:


In the best passage of Government largess, the Nazi regime fostered a purified liberal concept to enhance the living standard of German citizens across all segments of society. In order to stimulate the spirit of integrity, comradeship and happiness, Adolf Hitler fanned numerous programs and instituted strict rules for officials to carry them in eternal way.

a) Highly Subsidized International vacation trips.

b) Between 1933-1938 Strength through Joy (KDF) movement Organized 134,000 theater and concert events for 32 million people. 2 million people went on cruises and weekend trips and 11 million went on theater trips.

c) Nazis ensured that every citizen had a Radio.

d) 5 day week.

e) Free Public Health.

f) Trade Unions were banned. All workers had to join German labor Front. Strikes for higher wages were banned. People who refused to work were imprisoned. With fall in Inflation, purchasing power increased and wages actually fell.

g) Large factories had to provide rest areas, cafeterias, dressing rooms, even playing fields and swimming pools

h) They also banned "lock outs" for industries. No "reverse strikes"for them either.

lovkap.blogspot.com

Nazi Hitler Economic Social and Political Policies

Click Here for Adolf Hitler and World War 2. What is NAtional SoZIalism. Economic, Social and Political policies of Adolf Hitler and NA...
lovkap.blogspot.com
lovkap.blogspot.com





1933-1945: In 1933 Hitler disbands the labor movement and strips Jews of citizenship. Jews, dissidents, and other minorities are put in concentration camps, where they are forced to work or killed outright. The Reich centralizes social programs and education as a means of control. The regime extends health insurance to retirees in 1941, and expands health care and maternity leave the following year. Commanding Heights : Germany | on PBS



During the 12 years of Hitler’s Third Reich, the National Socialists expanded and extended the welfare state to the point where over 17 million German citizens were receiving assistance under the auspices of the National Socialist People's Welfare (NSV) by 1939, an agency that had projected a powerful image of caring and support. Welfare state - Wikipedia







The Nazi rule under Adolf Hitler in the 1930s and 1940s led to an improvement in medical care and old age provision largely financed by high taxes on the wealthy, and theft from Jews and the people of the conquered territories (Aly 2007, 7). The Viability of the European Social Model: The German Welfare State and Labor Market Reform











The Nationalsozialistische Volkswohlfahrt (NSV), meaning "National Socialist People's Welfare", was a social welfare organization during the Third Reich. The NSV was established in 1933,.... The NSV became established as the single Nazi Party welfare organ in May 1933.[1] .... the programme was massively expanded, so that the régime deemed it worthy to be called the "greatest social institution in the world." One method of expansion was to absorb, or in NSDAP parlance coordinate, already existing but non-Nazi charity organizations. NSV was the second largest Nazi group organization by 1939, second only to the German Labor Front.

The National Socialists provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft which promoted the collectivity of a “people’s community” where citizens would sacrifice themselves for the greater good. The NSV operated “8,000 day-nurseries” by 1939, and funded holiday homes for mothers, distributed additional food for large families, and was involved with a “wide variety of other facilities.”[4]

The Nazi social welfare provisions included old age insurance, rent supplements, unemployment and disability benefits, old-age homes, interest-free loans for married couples, along with healthcare insurance, which was not decreed mandatory until 1941[5] One of the NSV branches, the Office of Institutional and Special Welfare, was responsible “for travellers’ aid at railway stations; relief for ex-convicts; ‘support’ for re-migrants from abroad; assistance for the physically disabled, hard-of-hearing, deaf, mute, and blind; relief for the elderly, homeless and alcoholics; and the fight against illicit drugs and epidemics.”

These social welfare programs represented a Hitlerian endeavor to lift the community above the individual while promoting the wellbeing of all bona fide citizens. As Hitler told a reporter in 1934, he was determined to give Germans “the highest possible standard of living.” National Socialist People's Welfare - Wikipedia

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hitler’s Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Nazi Welfare State, by Götz Aly,

While underemphasized by modern historians, this socialism was stressed in many contemporaneous accounts of fascism, especially by libertarian thinkers. F.A. Hayek famously dedicated The Road to Serfdom to “the socialists of all parties”—that is, Labourites, Bolsheviks, and National Socialists.



Ludwig von Mises agreed, arguing in 1944 that “both Russia and Germany are right in calling their systems socialist.”

The Nazis themselves regarded the left-right convergence as integral to understanding fascism. Adolf Eichmann viewed National Socialism and communism as “quasi-siblings,” explaining in his memoirs that he “inclined towards the left and emphasized socialist aspects every bit as much as nationalist ones.” As late as 1944, Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels publicly celebrated “our socialism,” reminding his war-weary subjects that Germany “alone [has] the best social welfare measures.” Contrast this, he advised, with the Jews, who were the very “incarnation of capitalism.”


Using a farrago of previously unpublished statistics, Aly describes in detail a social system larded with benefits —open only to Aryan comrades, naturally.

According to Götz Aly’s Hitler’s Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Nazi Welfare State, most previous treatments of German complicity in genocide overlook a significant aspect of Nazi rule. Aly, a historian at the Fritz Bauer Institut in Frankfurt and the author of more than a dozen books on fascism, urges us to follow the money, arguing that the Nazis maintained popular support—a necessary precondition for the “final solution”—not because of terror or ideological affinity but through a simple system of “plunder,” “bribery,” and a generous welfare state.
reason.com

Hitler's Handouts

Inside the Nazis' welfare state
reason.com






To “achieve a truly socialist division of personal assets,” he writes, Hitler implemented a variety of interventionist economic policies, including price and rent controls, exorbitant corporate taxes, frequent “polemics against landlords,” subsidies to German farmers as protection “against the vagaries of weather and the world market,” and harsh taxes on capital gains, which Hitler himself had denounced as “effortless income.”

“The Nazi leadership did not transform the majority of Germans into ideological fanatics who were convinced that they were the master race,” Aly concludes. “Instead it succeeded in making them well-fed parasites.”

Hitler’s Beneficiaries demonstrates a correlation between moral collapse and government largess.

While Aly’s impressive economic history succeeds in reminding readers that Bolshevism and Nazism were, in the words of historian Richard Pipes, both “heresies of socialism,” that service is ultimately overshadowed by a needlessly radical conclusion." Hitler's Handouts






I'm here to educate you. Say thank you.
PC, they know they're scum. You're just not allowed to point it out.

Have you ever met an insane person that was convinced that everybody else was the problem, not them?

That's like, "Have you seen the episode of Gilligan's Island where they almost got off the Island but Gilligan screwd it up?"

You're dealing with emotionally unbalanced people.
 
PC, they know they're scum. You're just not allowed to point it out.

Have you ever met an insane person that was convinced that everybody else was the problem, not them?

That's like, "Have you seen the episode of Gilligan's Island where they almost got off the Island but Gilligan screwd it up?"

You're dealing with emotionally unbalanced people.
I know that I've said this before, but my mission here is education, and my "assistants" are the morons who vote Democrat with no understanding of why, or the belief that the lies the media tells them, is the truth.

My target audience are the 5 to 10 who read threads, don't post in them: they may not have heard the truth before, and I want to show how easily the "Magic Mike's" of the nation are dissected.

As one of my Asian forebears wrote, "Better to light one candle than to curse the darkness"
 
Back
Top Bottom