The Democrat Plan Is Working Exactly As Planned

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
131,874
Reaction score
67,668
Points
2,615
Location
Brooklyn, NY
1. The Democrat side has been woking tirelessly since before they passed Hart Cellers, 1965. They gave up favoring American heritage, values and founding in favor of power.


2. The plan is to flood the country with uneducated, welfare requiring newcomers from third world nations, they would vote Democrat.


3.AI Overview
The Hart–Celler Act, also known as the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, ended the national origins quota system that had limited immigration to the U.S. based on race and country of origin. It established a new immigration system that prioritized family reunification and employment skills, while also setting an annual cap on immigration numbers. The act dramatically changed the demographic landscape of the United States by increasing immigration from Asia, Africa, and South America.

,

4.
Evidence is that there were some 50 to 80 million illegals let in since the Democrats authored the Hart-Celler Act in 1965, and the 12 million Biden waved in.
That and the fact that it took no effort for many...most of them....to get fake documentation.




5. In the aftermath of the New York City mayoral debate, Patriot Polling conducted a citywide poll of 715 registered voters between October 18 and 19.

In a rematch of the Democratic Primary, State Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani leads Former Governor Andrew Cuomo by 43% to 32%, an 11% margin. Republican Curtis Sliwa stands in a distant third place, at 19% of the vote.

The most groundbreaking results of this poll are found in the cross-tabs. Among American-born New Yorkers, Cuomo leads by a healthy margin, with Mamdani only winning 31% of the vote.

Among foreign-born New Yorkers, Mamdani earns an extraordinary 62% of the vote,
far outpacing Cuomo and Sliwa.
 
1. The Democrat side has been woking tirelessly since before they passed Hart Cellers, 1965. They gave up favoring American heritage, values and founding in favor of power.


2. The plan is to flood the country with uneducated, welfare requiring newcomers from third world nations, they would vote Democrat.

The MAGAts don't consider you white enough to live here.

You should probably consider that.
 
The MAGAts don't consider you white enough to live here.

You should probably consider that.
Speaking of "white";

Wealthy white liberals dominate "diverse" anti-Trump protests

The anti-Trump No Kings protests that swept the nation over the weekend promised to showcase America’s "diverse resistance" to the President’s agenda.

Instead, they revealed an inconvenient truth that has Democrats squirming — the protests were dominated by rich, old white people.¹

In Atlanta, where the population is predominantly black, the liberal protesters who took to the streets on Saturday were mostly white, even though whites make up just 38 percent of the city.²

The same embarrassing pattern emerged at protests in Washington, D.C., New York, and Los Angeles — the diversity and inclusion crowd couldn’t attract anyone outside their own privileged demographic.³

"These protests were overwhelmingly white, they were overwhelmingly elderly people," CNN commentator Batya Ungar-Sargon observed.⁴ "White boomers have the right to have a mass therapy session about the fact that Donald Trump won. But to call it a No Kings protest, to act like he is a king, is so utterly preposterous."

The protesters included predictable Hollywood elites like Pedro Pascal, 50, John Cusack, 59, Jamie Lee Curtis, 66, and Glenn Close, 78 — wealthy celebrities completely disconnected from working Americans.⁵
....

The real reason wealthy boomers are protesting Trump

These aren’t oppressed minorities fighting for justice — they’re wealthy suburbanites throwing a tantrum.

The vast majority of protesters appeared to be white, privileged, and elderly suburbanites holding signs comparing Trump to Hitler and ICE to the Gestapo.¹²

Here’s the kicker — this is the exact demographic that benefited most from Trump’s first term. Boomers gained $10 trillion in wealth expansion, record stock gains, and soaring property values.

Big Government Cat2 Donald Trump News Politics

The Left’s dirty little secret about the No Kings protests just blew up in their faces​

Oct 23, 2025
shutterstock_2176854641-Editor.jpg
Image by Prostock-studio via Shutterstock


The radical Left got caught red-handed in their biggest lie of the year.

Their phony "grassroots" movement just exposed who they really are.

And the Left’s dirty little secret about the No Kings protests just blew up in their faces.

Wealthy white liberals dominate "diverse" anti-Trump protests

The anti-Trump No Kings protests that swept the nation over the weekend promised to showcase America’s "diverse resistance" to the President’s agenda.

Instead, they revealed an inconvenient truth that has Democrats squirming — the protests were dominated by rich, old white people.¹

In Atlanta, where the population is predominantly black, the liberal protesters who took to the streets on Saturday were mostly white, even though whites make up just 38 percent of the city.²


The same embarrassing pattern emerged at protests in Washington, D.C., New York, and Los Angeles — the diversity and inclusion crowd couldn’t attract anyone outside their own privileged demographic.³

"These protests were overwhelmingly white, they were overwhelmingly elderly people," CNN commentator Batya Ungar-Sargon observed.⁴ "White boomers have the right to have a mass therapy session about the fact that Donald Trump won. But to call it a No Kings protest, to act like he is a king, is so utterly preposterous."

The protesters included predictable Hollywood elites like Pedro Pascal, 50, John Cusack, 59, Jamie Lee Curtis, 66, and Glenn Close, 78 — wealthy celebrities completely disconnected from working Americans.⁵

George Soros’ millions fund the "spontaneous" protests

Look, here’s what they’re not telling you about these supposedly grassroots protests — they’re bankrolled by billionaire George Soros.


Fox News Digital uncovered that Soros’ Open Society Foundations awarded a $3 million grant to Indivisible in 2023, the primary organization behind the No Kings protests.⁶

That’s not all. Since Indivisible was founded in 2017, Soros’ foundations have pumped a staggering $7.61 million into the group.⁷


"There’s considerable evidence that George Soros and his network are behind funding these rallies, which may well be riots all across the country," Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) warned on Fox News.⁸

Cruz introduced legislation that would allow the Department of Justice to use RICO charges against individuals funding violent protests — exactly the kind of accountability these professional agitators fear.⁹

The Trump Administration is already investigating the funding networks behind these protests, especially following the September 10 assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.¹⁰

A White House official confirmed they’re "exploring a wide variety of options to address left-wing political violence and the network of organizations that fuel and fund it."¹¹

The real reason wealthy boomers are protesting Trump

These aren’t oppressed minorities fighting for justice — they’re wealthy suburbanites throwing a tantrum.

The vast majority of protesters appeared to be white, privileged, and elderly suburbanites holding signs comparing Trump to Hitler and ICE to the Gestapo.¹²

Here’s the kicker — this is the exact demographic that benefited most from Trump’s first term. Boomers gained $10 trillion in wealth expansion, record stock gains, and soaring property values.¹³

But now they’re upset because tariffs and inflation have led to sharp losses in their retirement portfolios.¹⁴ Only 38 percent of boomers feel the economy has improved under Trump, while 50 percent say it has weakened.¹⁵

"The funny thing is the protests didn’t seem too diverse, in fact, they appeared to be primarily comprised of old, white liberals. You know, the old hippie crowd who never grew up," observed Lindell TV anchor Allison Steinberg.¹⁶
....
 
The MAGAts don't consider you white enough to live here.

You should probably consider that.
You should ask all five of them before you claim to speak for them.
 
Speaking of "white";

Wealthy white liberals dominate "diverse" anti-Trump protests

The anti-Trump No Kings protests that swept the nation over the weekend promised to showcase America’s "diverse resistance" to the President’s agenda.

Instead, they revealed an inconvenient truth that has Democrats squirming — the protests were dominated by rich, old white people.¹

In Atlanta, where the population is predominantly black, the liberal protesters who took to the streets on Saturday were mostly white, even though whites make up just 38 percent of the city.²

The same embarrassing pattern emerged at protests in Washington, D.C., New York, and Los Angeles — the diversity and inclusion crowd couldn’t attract anyone outside their own privileged demographic.³

"These protests were overwhelmingly white, they were overwhelmingly elderly people," CNN commentator Batya Ungar-Sargon observed.⁴ "White boomers have the right to have a mass therapy session about the fact that Donald Trump won. But to call it a No Kings protest, to act like he is a king, is so utterly preposterous."

The protesters included predictable Hollywood elites like Pedro Pascal, 50, John Cusack, 59, Jamie Lee Curtis, 66, and Glenn Close, 78 — wealthy celebrities completely disconnected from working Americans.⁵
....

The real reason wealthy boomers are protesting Trump

These aren’t oppressed minorities fighting for justice — they’re wealthy suburbanites throwing a tantrum.

The vast majority of protesters appeared to be white, privileged, and elderly suburbanites holding signs comparing Trump to Hitler and ICE to the Gestapo.¹²

Here’s the kicker — this is the exact demographic that benefited most from Trump’s first term. Boomers gained $10 trillion in wealth expansion, record stock gains, and soaring property values.

Big Government Cat2 Donald Trump News Politics

The Left’s dirty little secret about the No Kings protests just blew up in their faces​

Oct 23, 2025
shutterstock_2176854641-Editor.jpg
Image by Prostock-studio via Shutterstock


The radical Left got caught red-handed in their biggest lie of the year.

Their phony "grassroots" movement just exposed who they really are.

And the Left’s dirty little secret about the No Kings protests just blew up in their faces.

Wealthy white liberals dominate "diverse" anti-Trump protests

The anti-Trump No Kings protests that swept the nation over the weekend promised to showcase America’s "diverse resistance" to the President’s agenda.

Instead, they revealed an inconvenient truth that has Democrats squirming — the protests were dominated by rich, old white people.¹

In Atlanta, where the population is predominantly black, the liberal protesters who took to the streets on Saturday were mostly white, even though whites make up just 38 percent of the city.²


The same embarrassing pattern emerged at protests in Washington, D.C., New York, and Los Angeles — the diversity and inclusion crowd couldn’t attract anyone outside their own privileged demographic.³

"These protests were overwhelmingly white, they were overwhelmingly elderly people," CNN commentator Batya Ungar-Sargon observed.⁴ "White boomers have the right to have a mass therapy session about the fact that Donald Trump won. But to call it a No Kings protest, to act like he is a king, is so utterly preposterous."

The protesters included predictable Hollywood elites like Pedro Pascal, 50, John Cusack, 59, Jamie Lee Curtis, 66, and Glenn Close, 78 — wealthy celebrities completely disconnected from working Americans.⁵

George Soros’ millions fund the "spontaneous" protests

Look, here’s what they’re not telling you about these supposedly grassroots protests — they’re bankrolled by billionaire George Soros.


Fox News Digital uncovered that Soros’ Open Society Foundations awarded a $3 million grant to Indivisible in 2023, the primary organization behind the No Kings protests.⁶

That’s not all. Since Indivisible was founded in 2017, Soros’ foundations have pumped a staggering $7.61 million into the group.⁷


"There’s considerable evidence that George Soros and his network are behind funding these rallies, which may well be riots all across the country," Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) warned on Fox News.⁸

Cruz introduced legislation that would allow the Department of Justice to use RICO charges against individuals funding violent protests — exactly the kind of accountability these professional agitators fear.⁹

The Trump Administration is already investigating the funding networks behind these protests, especially following the September 10 assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.¹⁰

A White House official confirmed they’re "exploring a wide variety of options to address left-wing political violence and the network of organizations that fuel and fund it."¹¹

The real reason wealthy boomers are protesting Trump

These aren’t oppressed minorities fighting for justice — they’re wealthy suburbanites throwing a tantrum.

The vast majority of protesters appeared to be white, privileged, and elderly suburbanites holding signs comparing Trump to Hitler and ICE to the Gestapo.¹²

Here’s the kicker — this is the exact demographic that benefited most from Trump’s first term. Boomers gained $10 trillion in wealth expansion, record stock gains, and soaring property values.¹³

But now they’re upset because tariffs and inflation have led to sharp losses in their retirement portfolios.¹⁴ Only 38 percent of boomers feel the economy has improved under Trump, while 50 percent say it has weakened.¹⁵

"The funny thing is the protests didn’t seem too diverse, in fact, they appeared to be primarily comprised of old, white liberals. You know, the old hippie crowd who never grew up," observed Lindell TV anchor Allison Steinberg.¹⁶
....
They did make it look like they told the black people to stay home, didn't they?
 
I was asked to help an acquaintance on finding a job. She is in her late 30s, single parent. In our conversation, she asked me what my thoughts were about paid protests like the NO Kings protest held last week because she was told by a friend that they “pay well.”

Mind you, the conversation was non-political and structured around job prospects and she is point blank bringing up Paid Protests as a means.

I’m not saying No Kings was ALL paid protests but much like ANTIFA and BLM, protests, some entities feel compelled to finance the protests. No faith in relying on grass roots for success.
 
Nothing sadder than a self-loathing person of color who thinks the racists will ever love her.
I am not the only one to mention that this sort does nothing but lie...


"..... substantial percentages of both independents and Republicans stressed that they felt the Democratic Party is untrustworthy, either because they lie or because they are corrupt. One Republican respondent reported feeling that the Democratic Party “has become extremely corrupt while pointing the blame at others. [They are] more interested in helping themselves than helping their constituents.” Along similar lines, an independent respondent charged that the Democrats were the “party of the rich and fraudulent.”"
Why Americans Hate the Democratic Party
 
Nothing sadder than a self-loathing person of color who thinks the racists will ever love her.
Actually she has moved on to the next tier... Above the simplistic stupidity of skin color. It is the advancement of society not it's regression that welcomes color blindness.
 
“Replacement theory” is a racist conspiracy that twists normal demographic change into a false story of invasion. Populations shift because of economics, opportunity, and freedom of movement - not secret plots or manipulation. It replaces facts with fear, turning diversity and democracy into scapegoats for problems they didn’t cause. No credible data, policy, or document supports the idea of a coordinated “replacement.”
 
“Replacement theory” is a racist conspiracy that twists normal demographic change into a false story of invasion. Populations shift because of economics, opportunity, and freedom of movement - not secret plots or manipulation. It replaces facts with fear, turning diversity and democracy into scapegoats for problems they didn’t cause. No credible data, policy, or document supports the idea of a coordinated “replacement.”
I just proved it, you buffoon.
 
Another book worth reading;


1761252436742.webp
"In Adios, America she touches the third rail in American politics, attacking the immigration issue head-on and flying in the face of La Raza, the Democrats, a media determined to cover up immigrants' crimes, churches that get paid by the government for their "charity," and greedy Republican businessmen and campaign consultants—all of whom are profiting handsomely from mass immigration that's tearing the country apart. Applying her trademark biting humor to the disaster that is U.S. immigration policy, Coulter proves that immigration is the most important issue facing America today."
Amazon
 
For many years now, my bucket list includes pissing on the graves of Emanuel Celler, and Philip Hart. Lyndon Johnson deserves it too, but likely would be hard to pull it off.

1761252586475.webp




1761252639667.webp
 
15th post
And there is this:



“In all, nearly 60 percent of immigrants—legal and illegal—are on government assistance, compared with 39 percent of native households. Why would any country voluntarily bring in people who have to be supported by the taxpayer?”
Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole



“The conservative Heritage Foundation estimated unlawful immigrant households paid $39.2 billion in 2010, but received $93.7 billion in government services.” -- Oliver Darcy
Of course it is far greater today.

It is re-distribution of wealth from earners to Democrat voters.



“The Federation for American Immigration Reform Monday put the five-year price tag at $8.8 billion in federal and state costs, or nearly $80,000 per refugee. There are some 18 federal and state programs refugees can tap for financial help, including food stamps, child care, public housing and school loans.

On a yearly average, it is $1.8 billion, or $15,900 per refugee. Included in that are enormous refugee resettlement costs such as $867 million in welfare, housing assistance and education.

… 50 percent of refugees remain on Medicaid for five years.

The Fiscal Cost of Resettling Refugees in the United States

  • The cost per refugee to American taxpayers just under $79,600 every year in the first five years after a refugee is resettled in the U.S.
  • In 2016, the State Department spent nearly $545 million to process and resettle refugees, including $140,389,177 on transportation costs.
  • Of the $1.8 billion in resettlement costs, $867 billion was spent on welfare alone.
  • In their first five years, approximately 54 percent of all refugees will hold jobs that pay less than $11 an hour.
  • $71 million will be spent to educate refugees and asylum-seekers, a majority of which will be paid by state and local governments.
  • Over five years, an estimated 15.7 percent of all refugees will need housing assistance, which is roughly $7,600 per household in 2014 dollars.
Refugee costs: $8.8 billion, $80,000 per immigrant, free welfare, Medicaid - Washington Examiner
 
1. The Democrat side has been woking tirelessly since before they passed Hart Cellers, 1965. They gave up favoring American heritage, values and founding in favor of power.


2. The plan is to flood the country with uneducated, welfare requiring newcomers from third world nations, they would vote Democrat.


3.AI Overview
The Hart–Celler Act, also known as the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, ended the national origins quota system that had limited immigration to the U.S. based on race and country of origin. It established a new immigration system that prioritized family reunification and employment skills, while also setting an annual cap on immigration numbers. The act dramatically changed the demographic landscape of the United States by increasing immigration from Asia, Africa, and South America.

,

4.
Evidence is that there were some 50 to 80 million illegals let in since the Democrats authored the Hart-Celler Act in 1965, and the 12 million Biden waved in.
That and the fact that it took no effort for many...most of them....to get fake documentation.




5. In the aftermath of the New York City mayoral debate, Patriot Polling conducted a citywide poll of 715 registered voters between October 18 and 19.

In a rematch of the Democratic Primary, State Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani leads Former Governor Andrew Cuomo by 43% to 32%, an 11% margin. Republican Curtis Sliwa stands in a distant third place, at 19% of the vote.

The most groundbreaking results of this poll are found in the cross-tabs. Among American-born New Yorkers, Cuomo leads by a healthy margin, with Mamdani only winning 31% of the vote.

Among foreign-born New Yorkers, Mamdani earns an extraordinary 62% of the vote,
far outpacing Cuomo and Sliwa.
By God if Democrats can't bribe Americans to vote Dem they will import a bunch of brown slaves and force them to vote Dem.
 
Back
Top Bottom