The debates

So, where are Israel's borders. You can't have land without borders.

The territory has one set of borders. There is absolutely no dispute that the territory has external borders. With every neighboring Sovereign. Thus the dispute is an internal, civil dispute over sovereignty within those borders.
It is Israel's dispute. There is no dispute for the Palestinians.



Don't be daft. There is no dispute over the territory's external borders. There are two internal groups in conflict for the territory, within those borders.

Indeed, Palestine's international borders have not been changed by any treaty.
 
So, where are Israel's borders. You can't have land without borders.

The territory has one set of borders. There is absolutely no dispute that the territory has external borders. With every neighboring Sovereign. Thus the dispute is an internal, civil dispute over sovereignty within those borders.
It is Israel's dispute. There is no dispute for the Palestinians.



Obviously there was before 1967
 
So, where are Israel's borders. You can't have land without borders.

The territory has one set of borders. There is absolutely no dispute that the territory has external borders. With every neighboring Sovereign. Thus the dispute is an internal, civil dispute over sovereignty within those borders.
It is Israel's dispute. There is no dispute for the Palestinians.



Don't be daft. There is no dispute over the territory's external borders. There are two internal groups in conflict for the territory, within those borders.

Indeed, Palestine's international borders have not been changed by any treaty.

You cannot change something that doesn't exist.
 
So, where are Israel's borders. You can't have land without borders.

The territory has one set of borders. There is absolutely no dispute that the territory has external borders. With every neighboring Sovereign. Thus the dispute is an internal, civil dispute over sovereignty within those borders.
It is Israel's dispute. There is no dispute for the Palestinians.



Obviously there was before 1967

Obvious to whom?

Link?
 
So, where are Israel's borders. You can't have land without borders.

The territory has one set of borders. There is absolutely no dispute that the territory has external borders. With every neighboring Sovereign. Thus the dispute is an internal, civil dispute over sovereignty within those borders.
It is Israel's dispute. There is no dispute for the Palestinians.



Don't be daft. There is no dispute over the territory's external borders. There are two internal groups in conflict for the territory, within those borders.

Indeed, Palestine's international borders have not been changed by any treaty.

You cannot change something that doesn't exist.

Why do you spout false Israeli talking points?
 
So, where are Israel's borders. You can't have land without borders.

The territory has one set of borders. There is absolutely no dispute that the territory has external borders. With every neighboring Sovereign. Thus the dispute is an internal, civil dispute over sovereignty within those borders.
It is Israel's dispute. There is no dispute for the Palestinians.




Actually, there are some Palestinians who believe in a 2-state solution.
 
So, where are Israel's borders. You can't have land without borders.

The territory has one set of borders. There is absolutely no dispute that the territory has external borders. With every neighboring Sovereign. Thus the dispute is an internal, civil dispute over sovereignty within those borders.
It is Israel's dispute. There is no dispute for the Palestinians.




Actually, there are some Palestinians who believe in a 2-state solution.

OK, but not the bantustans proposed by Israel.
 
The idea that "some" Palestinians advocate a two-state "solution" is specious. No prominent Palestinian has ever acknowledged Israel's right to exist AS A JEWISH STATE. [Were one to do so, s/he would quickly be assassinated].

And to put that in context, there are literally scores of countries in the world that are avowedly Islamic, and no one bats an eyelash, but the possible existence of one Jewish state is something that no Muslim will countenance.

Please 'splain how that works. It is a position that in fact totally obviates the nominal "two-state solution."
 
The idea that "some" Palestinians advocate a two-state "solution" is specious. No prominent Palestinian has ever acknowledged Israel's right to exist AS A JEWISH STATE. [Were one to do so, s/he would quickly be assassinated].

And to put that in context, there are literally scores of countries in the world that are avowedly Islamic, and no one bats an eyelash, but the possible existence of one Jewish state is something that no Muslim will countenance.

Please 'splain how that works. It is a position that in fact totally obviates the nominal "two-state solution."
but the possible existence of one Jewish state is something that no Muslim will countenance.
That isn't the issue.
 
The idea that "some" Palestinians advocate a two-state "solution" is specious. No prominent Palestinian has ever acknowledged Israel's right to exist AS A JEWISH STATE. [Were one to do so, s/he would quickly be assassinated].

And to put that in context, there are literally scores of countries in the world that are avowedly Islamic, and no one bats an eyelash, but the possible existence of one Jewish state is something that no Muslim will countenance.

Please 'splain how that works. It is a position that in fact totally obviates the nominal "two-state solution."
but the possible existence of one Jewish state is something that no Muslim will countenance.
That isn't the issue.
It is.
 
The idea that "some" Palestinians advocate a two-state "solution" is specious. No prominent Palestinian has ever acknowledged Israel's right to exist AS A JEWISH STATE. [Were one to do so, s/he would quickly be assassinated].

And to put that in context, there are literally scores of countries in the world that are avowedly Islamic, and no one bats an eyelash, but the possible existence of one Jewish state is something that no Muslim will countenance.

Please 'splain how that works. It is a position that in fact totally obviates the nominal "two-state solution."
but the possible existence of one Jewish state is something that no Muslim will countenance.
That isn't the issue.

That is the issue. Why should there be a “ Palestinian” NJA” state but not a Jewish one?

What should the borders of “ Palestine” be?
 
The idea that "some" Palestinians advocate a two-state "solution" is specious. No prominent Palestinian has ever acknowledged Israel's right to exist AS A JEWISH STATE. [Were one to do so, s/he would quickly be assassinated].

And to put that in context, there are literally scores of countries in the world that are avowedly Islamic, and no one bats an eyelash, but the possible existence of one Jewish state is something that no Muslim will countenance.

Please 'splain how that works. It is a position that in fact totally obviates the nominal "two-state solution."
but the possible existence of one Jewish state is something that no Muslim will countenance.
That isn't the issue.

That is the issue. Why should there be a “ Palestinian” NJA” state but not a Jewish one?

What should the borders of “ Palestine” be?
Palestine already has borders and there are Jews living in the West Bank.
 
Q. Why in the majority of these "debates" the pro- Israeli voice is overwhelmingly misrepresented?
Team Palestine can't hold a serious debate one-on-one without the help of Al-Jazeera or a team of cheerleaders singing in unison.

That's why You choose Frankenstein as an opponent, and go to IranTV to 'debate'.:lame2:
 
The idea that "some" Palestinians advocate a two-state "solution" is specious. No prominent Palestinian has ever acknowledged Israel's right to exist AS A JEWISH STATE. [Were one to do so, s/he would quickly be assassinated].

And to put that in context, there are literally scores of countries in the world that are avowedly Islamic, and no one bats an eyelash, but the possible existence of one Jewish state is something that no Muslim will countenance.

Please 'splain how that works. It is a position that in fact totally obviates the nominal "two-state solution."
but the possible existence of one Jewish state is something that no Muslim will countenance.
That isn't the issue.

That is the issue. Why should there be a “ Palestinian” NJA” state but not a Jewish one?

What should the borders of “ Palestine” be?
Palestine already has borders and there are Jews living in the West Bank.

And there're no Jews living in the East bank, what more do they need?
 
The idea that "some" Palestinians advocate a two-state "solution" is specious. No prominent Palestinian has ever acknowledged Israel's right to exist AS A JEWISH STATE. [Were one to do so, s/he would quickly be assassinated].

And to put that in context, there are literally scores of countries in the world that are avowedly Islamic, and no one bats an eyelash, but the possible existence of one Jewish state is something that no Muslim will countenance.

Please 'splain how that works. It is a position that in fact totally obviates the nominal "two-state solution."
but the possible existence of one Jewish state is something that no Muslim will countenance.
That isn't the issue.

That is the issue. Why should there be a “ Palestinian” NJA” state but not a Jewish one?

What should the borders of “ Palestine” be?
Palestine already has borders and there are Jews living in the West Bank.

No Jews In Gaza’istan. Not surprising you chose to islamo-tap dance around that.

Regarding Jews in the mini-caliphate of Fatah’istan:

Abbas: 'Not a single Israeli' in future Palestinian state
 
The idea that "some" Palestinians advocate a two-state "solution" is specious. No prominent Palestinian has ever acknowledged Israel's right to exist AS A JEWISH STATE. [Were one to do so, s/he would quickly be assassinated].

And to put that in context, there are literally scores of countries in the world that are avowedly Islamic, and no one bats an eyelash, but the possible existence of one Jewish state is something that no Muslim will countenance.

Please 'splain how that works. It is a position that in fact totally obviates the nominal "two-state solution."
but the possible existence of one Jewish state is something that no Muslim will countenance.
That isn't the issue.

That is the issue. Why should there be a “ Palestinian” NJA” state but not a Jewish one?

What should the borders of “ Palestine” be?
Palestine already has borders and there are Jews living in the West Bank.

Disney World has borders, too. Just like you your invented “country of Pally’Land”

Maps | Walt Disney World Resort
 
Q. Why in the majority of these "debates" the pro- Israeli voice is overwhelmingly misrepresented?
Team Palestine can't hold a serious debate one-on-one without the help of Al-Jazeera or a team of cheerleaders singing in unison.

That's why You choose Frankenstein as an opponent, and go to IranTV to 'debate'.:lame2:
You can post any debate you like. There aren't very many. Most are one sided panel discussions.
 
The Debate- Plight of Palestinians Ft. Catherine Shakdam on PressTV

 

Forum List

Back
Top