The Cowardly Liberals on USMB

[Ray From Cleveland]

APR 3, 2012
John Stossel: Tax The Rich? The Rich Don't Have Enough. Really.

John Stossel: Tax The Rich? The Rich Don't Have Enough. Really.

Who cares what John Stossel says..

There is $83 trillion in private hands of which $80 trillion is held by our wealthy. Are you and Stossel claiming the rich don't have $200 billion?

Maybe you should care what Stossel says because it's the absolute truth.

Anytime you libs want to spend money--tax the rich. So easy. So simple.

So where do you get this 80 trillion dollar figure from?

America’s Ridiculously Rich: the 2014 Edition
October 10, 2014
by Sam Pizzigati

Even better, now you get your name printed in the annual Forbes magazine list of America’s 400 richest. At $5.2 billion, your fortune would nearly rate as an average Forbes 400 stash. America’s top 400, Forbes revealed last month, now hold a combined net worth of $2.29 trillion. That places the average Forbes 400 fortune at $5.7 billion, an all-time record high.

America’s Ridiculously Rich: the 2014 Edition | BillMoyers.com

So the top 400 richest people in America only have a little over 2 trillion dollars in combined wealth. Now we need to find that other 78 trillion you were talking about.

For the third time look at Household Assets at the bottom
$83 Trillion
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

That's Household Assets and WTF does that have to do with taxing the wealthy anyway?

Wish you guys could keep your story straight
I make a statement that we could get $200 billion a year from the wealthiest Americans and you howl that they do not have that much money ( Even Stossel says they do ). I show they have around $80 trillion in assets and you whine about taxing wealth
Our wealthy have the assets to pay our debt four times over. Our wealthy have seen their household assets increase over $30 trillion since Obama became President and you still whine they do not have the money

 

[rightwinger]

$2 trillion over ten years is $200 billion extra each year. All we have to do is raise taxes on the rich to pay for it

Everyone knows that tax increases on the rich always pay for themselves

you should actually do homework. you can't reach that figure taking every penny they own. Funny how the libturds have trained you all.

They own $80 trillion
Amazing how you all tell the same lies

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

I stand by statement, prove me wrong, let's see your 80 trillion.

Look at household wealth at the bottom
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

Your turn to prove the wealthy don't have $200 billion
<Bill Gates alone has $80 billion>

There are only 1% million aires right? There are only 300 million in the country, right? 1% of 300 million is, 3,000k multiply your 80 billion. What is your answer?

The answer is you have no idea what you are talking about and no math skills

 

[rightwinger]

Who cares what John Stossel says..

There is $83 trillion in private hands of which $80 trillion is held by our wealthy. Are you and Stossel claiming the rich don't have $200 billion?

Maybe you should care what Stossel says because it's the absolute truth.

Anytime you libs want to spend money--tax the rich. So easy. So simple.

So where do you get this 80 trillion dollar figure from?

America’s Ridiculously Rich: the 2014 Edition
October 10, 2014
by Sam Pizzigati

Even better, now you get your name printed in the annual Forbes magazine list of America’s 400 richest. At $5.2 billion, your fortune would nearly rate as an average Forbes 400 stash. America’s top 400, Forbes revealed last month, now hold a combined net worth of $2.29 trillion. That places the average Forbes 400 fortune at $5.7 billion, an all-time record high.

America’s Ridiculously Rich: the 2014 Edition | BillMoyers.com

So the top 400 richest people in America only have a little over 2 trillion dollars in combined wealth. Now we need to find that other 78 trillion you were talking about.

For the third time look at Household Assets at the bottom
$83 Trillion
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

That's Household Assets and WTF does that have to do with taxing the wealthy anyway?

Wish you guys could keep your story straight
I make a statement that we could get $200 billion a year from the wealthiest Americans and you howl that they do not have that much money ( Even Stossel says they do ). I show they have around $80 trillion in assets and you whine about taxing wealth
Our wealthy have the assets to pay our debt four times over. Our wealthy have seen their household assets increase over $30 trillion since Obama became President and you still whine they do not have the money

How many times you need the same link?

dense?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Maybe you should care what Stossel says because it's the absolute truth.

Anytime you libs want to spend money--tax the rich. So easy. So simple.

So where do you get this 80 trillion dollar figure from?

America’s Ridiculously Rich: the 2014 Edition
October 10, 2014
by Sam Pizzigati

Even better, now you get your name printed in the annual Forbes magazine list of America’s 400 richest. At $5.2 billion, your fortune would nearly rate as an average Forbes 400 stash. America’s top 400, Forbes revealed last month, now hold a combined net worth of $2.29 trillion. That places the average Forbes 400 fortune at $5.7 billion, an all-time record high.

America’s Ridiculously Rich: the 2014 Edition | BillMoyers.com

So the top 400 richest people in America only have a little over 2 trillion dollars in combined wealth. Now we need to find that other 78 trillion you were talking about.

For the third time look at Household Assets at the bottom
$83 Trillion
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

That's Household Assets and WTF does that have to do with taxing the wealthy anyway?

Wish you guys could keep your story straight
I make a statement that we could get $200 billion a year from the wealthiest Americans and you howl that they do not have that much money ( Even Stossel says they do ). I show they have around $80 trillion in assets and you whine about taxing wealth
Our wealthy have the assets to pay our debt four times over. Our wealthy have seen their household assets increase over $30 trillion since Obama became President and you still whine they do not have the money

How many times you need the same link?

dense?

Not as dense as you. I asked how that link was supposed to tell me the wealthy can afford Democrat robbery for their goodies. That link doesn't tell you anything except combined "assets" of all Americans combined.

 

[jc456]

$2 trillion over ten years is $200 billion extra each year. All we have to do is raise taxes on the rich to pay for it

Everyone knows that tax increases on the rich always pay for themselves

you should actually do homework. you can't reach that figure taking every penny they own. Funny how the libturds have trained you all.

They own $80 trillion
Amazing how you all tell the same lies

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

I stand by statement, prove me wrong, let's see your 80 trillion.

Look at household wealth at the bottom
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

Your turn to prove the wealthy don't have $200 billion
<Bill Gates alone has $80 billion>

There are only 1% million aires right? There are only 300 million in the country, right? 1% of 300 million is, 3,000k multiply your 80 billion. What is your answer?

By the way, once you have their money there is no more, no jobs, no welfare, no nothing, so nice move. The end of the country and then the world. Good move!

 

[jc456]

For the third time look at Household Assets at the bottom
$83 Trillion
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

That's Household Assets and WTF does that have to do with taxing the wealthy anyway?

Wish you guys could keep your story straight
I make a statement that we could get $200 billion a year from the wealthiest Americans and you howl that they do not have that much money ( Even Stossel says they do ). I show they have around $80 trillion in assets and you whine about taxing wealth
Our wealthy have the assets to pay our debt four times over. Our wealthy have seen their household assets increase over $30 trillion since Obama became President and you still whine they do not have the money

How many times you need the same link?

dense?

Not as dense as you. I asked how that link was supposed to tell me the wealthy can afford Democrat robbery for their goodies. That link doesn't tell you anything except combined "assets" of all Americans combined.

See my last post, it would be the end of life.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

That's Household Assets and WTF does that have to do with taxing the wealthy anyway?

Wish you guys could keep your story straight
I make a statement that we could get $200 billion a year from the wealthiest Americans and you howl that they do not have that much money ( Even Stossel says they do ). I show they have around $80 trillion in assets and you whine about taxing wealth
Our wealthy have the assets to pay our debt four times over. Our wealthy have seen their household assets increase over $30 trillion since Obama became President and you still whine they do not have the money

How many times you need the same link?

dense?

Not as dense as you. I asked how that link was supposed to tell me the wealthy can afford Democrat robbery for their goodies. That link doesn't tell you anything except combined "assets" of all Americans combined.

See my last post, it would be the end of life.

I agree.

If we took all the so-called poor people and were able to move them to an island somewhere, they wouldn't be missed. In fact, the country would do much better.

If we did the same with all the wealthy people, the country would collapse.

How are we going to pay for free college?
Tax the rich.

How are we going to pay for new infrastructure?
Tax the rich.

How are we going to pay for more social programs?
Tax the rich.

If liberals had their way, the rich would be supporting the entire country.

If you tax people at 0%, the federal government would collect 0 dollars.
If you tax people at 100%, the government would still collect 0 dollars because who would be stupid enough to create wealth?

"Liberals believe if you make money, you are not entitled to it. But if you want money, you are."
Ken Blackwell

 

[rightwinger]

For the third time look at Household Assets at the bottom
$83 Trillion
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

That's Household Assets and WTF does that have to do with taxing the wealthy anyway?

Wish you guys could keep your story straight
I make a statement that we could get $200 billion a year from the wealthiest Americans and you howl that they do not have that much money ( Even Stossel says they do ). I show they have around $80 trillion in assets and you whine about taxing wealth
Our wealthy have the assets to pay our debt four times over. Our wealthy have seen their household assets increase over $30 trillion since Obama became President and you still whine they do not have the money

How many times you need the same link?

dense?

Not as dense as you. I asked how that link was supposed to tell me the wealthy can afford Democrat robbery for their goodies. That link doesn't tell you anything except combined "assets" of all Americans combined.

85% of the wealth is held by 20% of the population
That's $70 Trillion in assets

 

[jc456]

That's Household Assets and WTF does that have to do with taxing the wealthy anyway?

Wish you guys could keep your story straight
I make a statement that we could get $200 billion a year from the wealthiest Americans and you howl that they do not have that much money ( Even Stossel says they do ). I show they have around $80 trillion in assets and you whine about taxing wealth
Our wealthy have the assets to pay our debt four times over. Our wealthy have seen their household assets increase over $30 trillion since Obama became President and you still whine they do not have the money

How many times you need the same link?

dense?

Not as dense as you. I asked how that link was supposed to tell me the wealthy can afford Democrat robbery for their goodies. That link doesn't tell you anything except combined "assets" of all Americans combined.

85% of the wealth is held by 20% of the population
That's $70 Trillion in assets

What happens if it's all gone?

 

[rightwinger]

you should actually do homework. you can't reach that figure taking every penny they own. Funny how the libturds have trained you all.

They own $80 trillion
Amazing how you all tell the same lies

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

I stand by statement, prove me wrong, let's see your 80 trillion.

Look at household wealth at the bottom
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

Your turn to prove the wealthy don't have $200 billion
<Bill Gates alone has $80 billion>

There are only 1% million aires right? There are only 300 million in the country, right? 1% of 300 million is, 3,000k multiply your 80 billion. What is your answer?

By the way, once you have their money there is no more, no jobs, no welfare, no nothing, so nice move. The end of the country and then the world. Good move!

Hyperbole much?

Who said anything about taking all their money?
Why do discussions of asking the wealthy to pay more always end up with accusations of taking ALL their money?

 

[jc456]

They own $80 trillion
Amazing how you all tell the same lies

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

I stand by statement, prove me wrong, let's see your 80 trillion.

Look at household wealth at the bottom
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

Your turn to prove the wealthy don't have $200 billion
<Bill Gates alone has $80 billion>

There are only 1% million aires right? There are only 300 million in the country, right? 1% of 300 million is, 3,000k multiply your 80 billion. What is your answer?

By the way, once you have their money there is no more, no jobs, no welfare, no nothing, so nice move. The end of the country and then the world. Good move!

Hyperbole much?

Who said anything about taking all their money?
Why do discussions of asking the wealthy to pay more always end up with accusations of taking ALL their money?

You did

 

[rightwinger]

I stand by statement, prove me wrong, let's see your 80 trillion.

Look at household wealth at the bottom
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

Your turn to prove the wealthy don't have $200 billion
<Bill Gates alone has $80 billion>

There are only 1% million aires right? There are only 300 million in the country, right? 1% of 300 million is, 3,000k multiply your 80 billion. What is your answer?

By the way, once you have their money there is no more, no jobs, no welfare, no nothing, so nice move. The end of the country and then the world. Good move!

Hyperbole much?

Who said anything about taking all their money?
Why do discussions of asking the wealthy to pay more always end up with accusations of taking ALL their money?

You did

Link

 

[jc456]

Look at household wealth at the bottom
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

Your turn to prove the wealthy don't have $200 billion
<Bill Gates alone has $80 billion>

There are only 1% million aires right? There are only 300 million in the country, right? 1% of 300 million is, 3,000k multiply your 80 billion. What is your answer?

By the way, once you have their money there is no more, no jobs, no welfare, no nothing, so nice move. The end of the country and then the world. Good move!

Hyperbole much?

Who said anything about taking all their money?
Why do discussions of asking the wealthy to pay more always end up with accusations of taking ALL their money?

You did

Link

This thread

 

[rdean]

Come on, you don't really believe anyone but a white guy would win the GOP nomination do you?
And besides, don't all believe the world is only thousands of years old? Aren't they all Christian, like 90% of the party. Sorry sweetheart, them's facts.

Yes, I do believe somebody other than a white guy could win the nomination, and it wouldn't be solely because of his or her race like with you guys.

And where is this evidence that the GOP voters are 90% Christian anyway?

Wait a second. You think Republicans aren't 90% white and mostly Christian? Forget that the facts have been linked to dozens of times here on this site.

Give us what you imagine the numbers to be.

Give us your estimate of how many Republicans are something other than white.

And, if you don't mind, tell us what religions Republicans represent other than Christianity.

And I notice you didn't insist there are liberals in the GOP. At least you have the brains to already know that.

You stated 90% Christian and I asked you to provide a source which you can't. So you just made the numbers up in your head.

No I didn't. I've posted sources many times. If these ignorant right wingers are too lazy to ******* read, it's their problem.
But to me, what's hilarious is that you can't come up with a single link showing the GOP is less than 90% white. Who else do you think they represent? Give me something so you can laugh at it. Even you know the GOP is 90% white. Why do you think they talk about expanding their base. What the **** do you think they are talking about?

I never disagreed that Republican voters are mostly white, but it's not the GOP's fault. What was the last "white" initiative that the GOP put forward?

I don't know what your insinuation here is. Maybe that the GOP are racists?

View attachment 56891

White initiative. The GOP is racist as ****. The honest ones admit it.

House Republicans Want to Limit School Lunch Program to Rural White Kids Only

However, one specific provision in the House proposal should raise eyebrows. The House Republicans have scaled back a summer school lunch pilot program, so that it will be applied to rural areas only. The pilot program which was introduced with an initial expenditure of 85 million dollars, has been scaled back to a 27 million dollar expenditure going forward, with urban areas being completely cut out of the funding.

So while predominately white impoverished rural counties will benefit from the program, predominately black counties in the Mississippi Delta, majority Hispanic counties in the Rio Grande Valley, and Indian Reservations out West will not be included.

---------------------------------------

Have you ever noticed how Republicans either don't don't know anything about their party or they are lying and racist *****. Considering they sit in front of the Internet, they have the be the most determined to stay ignorant people on the face of the earth.

 

[Billo_Really]

What you said:

• Raise capital gains tax to 25%

• Raise tax on dividends to 25%

• Submit a bill to Congress for a Financial Transactions Tax for every share traded on Wall Street

• Cut the defense budget in half

• Close all the over 800 bases around the world

• End the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and all the countries in Africa

• End the drone program

• End all welfare payments to Israel

In one major way, this seems very GOP. Take a good look. What's missing?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Give up?
If you notice from posts by right wingers on the economy or bringing down the deficit, there is one thing missing again and again.
Building stuff.
Making stuff.
Creating stuff.
Again and again, right wingers try to "lure" business. But they rarely talk about starting a business.
For instance, Republicans love to say business is fleeing California and moving to states like Texas. The TRUTH is, companies with minimum wage jobs move to Texas. Because there are so many uneducated Texas who will work for piss wages.

Companies that rely on innovation, research and development, move to states like California and some Eastern states because they need to be near research and development facilities. I've posted facts on this many, many times. But anti education Republicans don't want to hear it.

What that has to do with what I said, I don't see the connection.

Now I'm not saying don't raise taxes. They have to be targeted. Raising taxes willy nilly can do more harm than good.

I didn't say raising taxes "willy nilly", I was very specific in the taxes I would raise.

And if you just pull all American bases everywhere and cut funding everywhere all at once, you just invite chaos.

I didn't say closing them "all at once". Of coarse there would be a phased reduction. And country's that still wanted our base there, we'd keep it there, as long as that country paid for all the operating costs.

As far as the defense budget, when you count all the defense related industries, the amount we pay is over $1 trillion a year. Yeah, I would cut that in half.

It has to be both targeted and phased and well planned out from the beginning. There has to be goals and it needs to be well managed.

Where do you get off saying my goals would not be "targeted, phased and well managed"?

Facts and data need to be constantly collected and analyzed. And that's another reason GOP economic policies always fail. They don't believe in study, research, education or making corrections.

Again, that has nothing to do with what I said.

So your plans come across as talking points and not serious policy, which would happen with more detail. Really well thought out plans with lost of detail based on study, research, data and analysis always have the greatest chance of success. And that's the "liberal" way.

Whatever you perceive to be (what I listed), is fine with me.

Where do you get off saying my goals would not be "targeted, phased and well managed"?

If don't say it or infer it, then who would know that's an assumption? You have to be more specific. You can't leave things out and just assume people will somehow know.

With the exception of the defense budget and closing the bases, everyone of those listed was specific.

 

[Kosh]

Yes, I do believe somebody other than a white guy could win the nomination, and it wouldn't be solely because of his or her race like with you guys.

And where is this evidence that the GOP voters are 90% Christian anyway?

Wait a second. You think Republicans aren't 90% white and mostly Christian? Forget that the facts have been linked to dozens of times here on this site.

Give us what you imagine the numbers to be.

Give us your estimate of how many Republicans are something other than white.

And, if you don't mind, tell us what religions Republicans represent other than Christianity.

And I notice you didn't insist there are liberals in the GOP. At least you have the brains to already know that.

You stated 90% Christian and I asked you to provide a source which you can't. So you just made the numbers up in your head.

No I didn't. I've posted sources many times. If these ignorant right wingers are too lazy to ******* read, it's their problem.
But to me, what's hilarious is that you can't come up with a single link showing the GOP is less than 90% white. Who else do you think they represent? Give me something so you can laugh at it. Even you know the GOP is 90% white. Why do you think they talk about expanding their base. What the **** do you think they are talking about?

I never disagreed that Republican voters are mostly white, but it's not the GOP's fault. What was the last "white" initiative that the GOP put forward?

I don't know what your insinuation here is. Maybe that the GOP are racists?

View attachment 56891

White initiative. The GOP is racist as ****. The honest ones admit it.

House Republicans Want to Limit School Lunch Program to Rural White Kids Only

However, one specific provision in the House proposal should raise eyebrows. The House Republicans have scaled back a summer school lunch pilot program, so that it will be applied to rural areas only. The pilot program which was introduced with an initial expenditure of 85 million dollars, has been scaled back to a 27 million dollar expenditure going forward, with urban areas being completely cut out of the funding.

So while predominately white impoverished rural counties will benefit from the program, predominately black counties in the Mississippi Delta, majority Hispanic counties in the Rio Grande Valley, and Indian Reservations out West will not be included.

---------------------------------------

Have you ever noticed how Republicans either don't don't know anything about their party or they are lying and racist *****. Considering they sit in front of the Internet, they have the be the most determined to stay ignorant people on the face of the earth.

This from a racist far left drone!

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Yes, I do believe somebody other than a white guy could win the nomination, and it wouldn't be solely because of his or her race like with you guys.

And where is this evidence that the GOP voters are 90% Christian anyway?

Wait a second. You think Republicans aren't 90% white and mostly Christian? Forget that the facts have been linked to dozens of times here on this site.

Give us what you imagine the numbers to be.

Give us your estimate of how many Republicans are something other than white.

And, if you don't mind, tell us what religions Republicans represent other than Christianity.

And I notice you didn't insist there are liberals in the GOP. At least you have the brains to already know that.

You stated 90% Christian and I asked you to provide a source which you can't. So you just made the numbers up in your head.

No I didn't. I've posted sources many times. If these ignorant right wingers are too lazy to ******* read, it's their problem.
But to me, what's hilarious is that you can't come up with a single link showing the GOP is less than 90% white. Who else do you think they represent? Give me something so you can laugh at it. Even you know the GOP is 90% white. Why do you think they talk about expanding their base. What the **** do you think they are talking about?

I never disagreed that Republican voters are mostly white, but it's not the GOP's fault. What was the last "white" initiative that the GOP put forward?

I don't know what your insinuation here is. Maybe that the GOP are racists?

View attachment 56891

White initiative. The GOP is racist as ****. The honest ones admit it.

House Republicans Want to Limit School Lunch Program to Rural White Kids Only

However, one specific provision in the House proposal should raise eyebrows. The House Republicans have scaled back a summer school lunch pilot program, so that it will be applied to rural areas only. The pilot program which was introduced with an initial expenditure of 85 million dollars, has been scaled back to a 27 million dollar expenditure going forward, with urban areas being completely cut out of the funding.

So while predominately white impoverished rural counties will benefit from the program, predominately black counties in the Mississippi Delta, majority Hispanic counties in the Rio Grande Valley, and Indian Reservations out West will not be included.

---------------------------------------

Have you ever noticed how Republicans either don't don't know anything about their party or they are lying and racist *****. Considering they sit in front of the Internet, they have the be the most determined to stay ignorant people on the face of the earth.

This is the problem with you liberals. You drag out some liberal rag piece and then we have to spend time to research the subject to get the truth. Well, I don't have the time to research each and every one (I will next week because I'm on vacation) because I work for a living. But I thought I would tap into this one this morning, and here is what I found:


About That Summer Lunch Program
Republicans want to target a pilot program to rural counties, but poor urban children will still eat.

I was all ready to jump on the GOP for cruelly cutting poor urban kids out of the summer lunch program, while maintaining it for impoverished rural ones, but it turns out that the full story isn’t nearly as obnoxious.

Politico’s David Rogers had a piece yesterday detailing the agriculture and food safety spending billpassed by the House Appropriations Committee’s Agriculture Subcommittee. One part of the piece caught the eyes of a number of progressive bloggers:

Liberal bloggers like Talking Points Memo’s Josh Marshall and others seized on the idea of Republicans slashing spending for city kids in favor of rural ones. But they missed a crucial piece of the puzzle – that this pilot program operated in addition to a larger ($492 million in the fiscal year 2015 bill) Summer Food Service Program, which goes to rural and urban kids alike. The $27 million for the pilot program in question is aimed at finding more efficient ways to deliver the summer lunches, but is not the sum total of summer nutritional assistance for poor children.

About That Summer Lunch Program

So, as we see, the liberals create more lies to try and make something that really isn't. It has nothing to do with the constituency base or race for that matter; more liberal lies. What it has to do with is EXTRA funding due to the delivery system needed to service kids that live miles and miles away from their schools instead of an urban setting where a kid can walk to the school, take a bus, or otherwise get a ride from an adult.

Furthermore it's a pilot program. For you liberals out there, a pilot program means a test program. It is also about school lunch when school is out of session which is something I'm totally against no matter who is involved. It's bad enough all the money we have to pump into these failed schools, but now we have to pay to keep them open to do the job liberal parents won't do.

 

[Geaux4it]

Good question and after 2 pages, still no answer

-Geaux

 

[Geaux4it]

Bend over America... well, for the ones in the 47% demographic

-Geaux
----------

The real reason Hillary Clinton isn't saying how she'll pay for her trillion-dollar spending increase is because she knows it means raising taxes on the middle class," said spokesman Michael Short.

Hillary Clinton Proposes $275 Billion In New Infrastructure Spending

 

[Care4all]

Bend over America... well, for the ones in the 47% demographic

-Geaux
----------

The real reason Hillary Clinton isn't saying how she'll pay for her trillion-dollar spending increase is because she knows it means raising taxes on the middle class," said spokesman Michael Short.

Hillary Clinton Proposes $275 Billion In New Infrastructure Spending

that's just a Republican operative mouthing off nonsense..... one thing Clintons don't do, is hurt the middle class.....
Never have and never will....