The Court Gives One To The Democrats

[PoliticalChic]

1. The Supreme Court gave its decision that will allow the Democrats to continue to destroy America.
The Court is right, even though it allows the America-hating Democrats to do wrong.


2. "Supreme Court allows Biden to end Trump-era 'Remain in Mexico' policy
The policy required people seeking asylum at the southern border to wait in Mexico while their claims were decided.
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court handed President Joe Biden a victory Thursday, ruling that he can shut down a Trump administration program designed to restrict immigration at the southern border.

The court said in a 5-4 ruling that the Biden administration acted properly in seeking to end the "Remain in Mexico" policy, formally known as the Migrant Protection Protocols. It required people seeking asylum at the southern border, mainly from Central America, to wait in Mexico while their claims were decided."

Supreme Court allows Biden to end Trump-era 'Remain in Mexico' policy

The policy required people seeking asylum at the southern border to wait in Mexico while their claims were decided.

www.nbcnews.com

3. In short, it said a President did not have to maintain policies of a previous President. It is the right decison.


4. BUT......let's not forget that the aim of the Democrats, for a half century, has been to replace Americans with unskilled, uneducated third worlders who need welfare and government largesse, and will vote Democrat.



5. A reminder: Trump, who loves America, prevented the invasion that Democrats support.
Trump Administration Drastically Cuts Refugees Allowed To ...

Sep 26, 2019The new cap, which marks the third time the Trump administration has dwindled the refugee limit, would also be a more than 80% decline compared with the last year of the Obama administration, when...



Border chief: Wall cuts illegal crossings 80% - Washington ...
Border chief: Wall cuts illegal crossings 80%
Feb 27, 2020Democrats eye Trump censure as Senate acquittal all but assured "We've seen apprehensions and illegal entries and gotaways all being reduced by over 80% in that 20-mile stretch," Mr. Morgan told...



A Review Of Trump Immigration Policy - Forbes
A Review Of Trump Immigration Policy
Aug 26, 2020For FY 2020, the Trump administration established an annual ceiling for refugees 84% lower than the final year of the Obama administration (from 110,000 down to 18,000). As of July 17, 2020, only...



Illegal immigrant crossings fall 78% and once overcrowded ...
Illegal immigrant crossings fall 78% and once overcrowded cells are empty
First is daily apprehensions, a number that hit 4,600 at the height of the latest crisis in May. That has now dropped to 1,300. What's more, he said, the 21-daily average is below 1,000, a 78% cut....



Illegal immigration dropped 80 percent in El Paso due to ...
Illegal immigration dropped 80 percent in El Paso due to border wall, border chief says
Illegal immigration in one area of Texas has dropped more than 80 percent thanks to the new border wall system that includes multiple layers of fencing, roads, lights, and extra personnel, the acting commissioner of Customs and Border Protection Mark Morgan told Congress on Thursday.



Illegal crossings lowest in years as border wall expands ...
Illegal crossings lowest in years as border wall expands
Trump said the expanded border wall is helping slow illegal immigration into the United States. He noted that the last two months have seen the lowest number of illegal crossings in years, while illegal crossings from Central America are down 97 percent.



Trump Further Reduces Obama's Refugee Inflow to U.S. by 80 ...
Trump Further Reduces Obama's Refugee Inflow to U.S. by 80 Percent
Oct 1, 2020President Trump is further reducing the inflow of refugees to the United States, cutting their resettlement by 80 percent compared to former President Obama's last year in office.




There is no doubt about Trump being a great President for America.

 

[toobfreak]

Yeah, they might have won one there but I'm far more interested that they also took away the EPA and other alphabet agencies from enacting regulations whose powers really are supposed to reside within the Congress itself!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yeah, they might have won one there but I'm far more interested that they also took away the EPA and other alphabet agencies from enacting regulations whose powers really are supposed to reside within the Congress itself!

I wrote about it because of the irony.

I agree with it, but not with the Democrats.

There were several other decisions....and they will take up the reason the election was stolen....North Carolina.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yeah, they might have won one there but I'm far more interested that they also took away the EPA and other alphabet agencies from enacting regulations whose powers really are supposed to reside within the Congress itself!

I've been waiting a long time for the Court to deal with bureaucrats taking over.


In 1960, the Code of Federal Regulations had 22,877 pages. In 2012, there were 174,545 pages. Charles Murray, “By the People: Rebuilding Liberty Without Permission,” pg 6

1. 1. While the officials in these agencies are generally good people, they become focused on their particular portfolio of duties, that, often, they cannot see the consequences on other parts of society. Put this together with human nature, and one can see bullying, and misuse of power, especially when these individuals are immune to penalty, and supported by free and extensive legal representation: they have sovereign immunity in their positions.
   2. A remedy would be the ability of citizens to sue the federal government to protect their legitimate interests, for damages. While currently unconstitutional, the Congress can waive sovereign immunity,
   3. Such a congressional waiver would not only protect the citizenry, but would go far toward defining the limits of federal authority.
   4. While not unconstitutional, regulation may be considered extra-constitutional. There may be some point where it is considered to be an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority to an agency or bureau. Under Obamacare, or Dodd-Frank Reform we see legislation where regulators have not yet determined what the regulation should be…how can Congress allow a law without knowing what the impact will be?
2. [Yet, from the earliest of Progressive administrations, we find the belief that government bureaucrats, and technocrats, and agencies know better than those involved in the myriad voluntary transactions as to how much each should have.

“Progressives looked to insulate administrators not only from the chief executive, but from politics altogether. It is the Progressives' desire to free bureaucratic agencies from the confines of politics and the law that allows us to trace the origins of the administrative state to their political thought. The idea of separating politics and administration--of grounding a significant portion of government not on the basis of popular consent but on expertise--was a fundamental aim of American Progressivism and explains the Progressives' fierce assault on the Founders' separation-of-powers constitutionalism.” The Birth of the Administrative State: Where It Came From and What It Means for Limited Government]

 

[PoliticalChic]

I've been waiting a long time for the Court to deal with bureaucrats taking over.


In 1960, the Code of Federal Regulations had 22,877 pages. In 2012, there were 174,545 pages. Charles Murray, “By the People: Rebuilding Liberty Without Permission,” pg 6

1. 1. While the officials in these agencies are generally good people, they become focused on their particular portfolio of duties, that, often, they cannot see the consequences on other parts of society. Put this together with human nature, and one can see bullying, and misuse of power, especially when these individuals are immune to penalty, and supported by free and extensive legal representation: they have sovereign immunity in their positions.
   2. A remedy would be the ability of citizens to sue the federal government to protect their legitimate interests, for damages. While currently unconstitutional, the Congress can waive sovereign immunity,
   3. Such a congressional waiver would not only protect the citizenry, but would go far toward defining the limits of federal authority.
   4. While not unconstitutional, regulation may be considered extra-constitutional. There may be some point where it is considered to be an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority to an agency or bureau. Under Obamacare, or Dodd-Frank Reform we see legislation where regulators have not yet determined what the regulation should be…how can Congress allow a law without knowing what the impact will be?
2. [Yet, from the earliest of Progressive administrations, we find the belief that government bureaucrats, and technocrats, and agencies know better than those involved in the myriad voluntary transactions as to how much each should have.

“Progressives looked to insulate administrators not only from the chief executive, but from politics altogether. It is the Progressives' desire to free bureaucratic agencies from the confines of politics and the law that allows us to trace the origins of the administrative state to their political thought. The idea of separating politics and administration--of grounding a significant portion of government not on the basis of popular consent but on expertise--was a fundamental aim of American Progressivism and explains the Progressives' fierce assault on the Founders' separation-of-powers constitutionalism.” The Birth of the Administrative State: Where It Came From and What It Means for Limited Government]

 

[Moonglow]

1. The Supreme Court gave its decision that will allow the Democrats to continue to destroy America.
The Court is right, even though it allows the America-hating Democrats to do wrong.


2. "Supreme Court allows Biden to end Trump-era 'Remain in Mexico' policy
The policy required people seeking asylum at the southern border to wait in Mexico while their claims were decided.
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court handed President Joe Biden a victory Thursday, ruling that he can shut down a Trump administration program designed to restrict immigration at the southern border.

The court said in a 5-4 ruling that the Biden administration acted properly in seeking to end the "Remain in Mexico" policy, formally known as the Migrant Protection Protocols. It required people seeking asylum at the southern border, mainly from Central America, to wait in Mexico while their claims were decided."

Supreme Court allows Biden to end Trump-era 'Remain in Mexico' policy

The policy required people seeking asylum at the southern border to wait in Mexico while their claims were decided.

www.nbcnews.com

3. In short, it said a President did not have to maintain policies of a previous President. It is the right decison.


4. BUT......let's not forget that the aim of the Democrats, for a half century, has been to replace Americans with unskilled, uneducated third worlders who need welfare and government largesse, and will vote Democrat.



5. A reminder: Trump, who loves America, prevented the invasion that Democrats support.
Trump Administration Drastically Cuts Refugees Allowed To ...

Sep 26, 2019The new cap, which marks the third time the Trump administration has dwindled the refugee limit, would also be a more than 80% decline compared with the last year of the Obama administration, when...



Border chief: Wall cuts illegal crossings 80% - Washington ...
Border chief: Wall cuts illegal crossings 80%
Feb 27, 2020Democrats eye Trump censure as Senate acquittal all but assured "We've seen apprehensions and illegal entries and gotaways all being reduced by over 80% in that 20-mile stretch," Mr. Morgan told...



A Review Of Trump Immigration Policy - Forbes
A Review Of Trump Immigration Policy
Aug 26, 2020For FY 2020, the Trump administration established an annual ceiling for refugees 84% lower than the final year of the Obama administration (from 110,000 down to 18,000). As of July 17, 2020, only...



Illegal immigrant crossings fall 78% and once overcrowded ...
Illegal immigrant crossings fall 78% and once overcrowded cells are empty
First is daily apprehensions, a number that hit 4,600 at the height of the latest crisis in May. That has now dropped to 1,300. What's more, he said, the 21-daily average is below 1,000, a 78% cut....



Illegal immigration dropped 80 percent in El Paso due to ...
Illegal immigration dropped 80 percent in El Paso due to border wall, border chief says
Illegal immigration in one area of Texas has dropped more than 80 percent thanks to the new border wall system that includes multiple layers of fencing, roads, lights, and extra personnel, the acting commissioner of Customs and Border Protection Mark Morgan told Congress on Thursday.



Illegal crossings lowest in years as border wall expands ...
Illegal crossings lowest in years as border wall expands
Trump said the expanded border wall is helping slow illegal immigration into the United States. He noted that the last two months have seen the lowest number of illegal crossings in years, while illegal crossings from Central America are down 97 percent.



Trump Further Reduces Obama's Refugee Inflow to U.S. by 80 ...
Trump Further Reduces Obama's Refugee Inflow to U.S. by 80 Percent
Oct 1, 2020President Trump is further reducing the inflow of refugees to the United States, cutting their resettlement by 80 percent compared to former President Obama's last year in office.




There is no doubt about Trump being a great President for America.

Even you and yours can be replaced, ain't life grand, you forgot to get a warranty from God.