The CO2 Problem in 6 Easy Steps

[CrusaderFrank]

Where the fuck do you get the idea that the real world data says there's no AGW?

Here's some real world data that says you need to think again (or perhaps for the first time):

You let off the chart of the Deep Pacific Ocean Warming

 

[SSDD]

You let off the chart of the Deep Pacific Ocean Warming

That would be the "the ocean ate my global warming" chart?

 

[Crick]

Like this one from NOAA/NCDC?

How is it you can look at these data and the numerous other datasets displaying the ocean's 10x10e22 joules added heat (btw, that's 1.136 BILLION times the energy of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima) just since 2000 and claim "no warming in the last 17 years?" Doesn't it ever bother you to be that dishonest?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Like this one from NOAA/NCDC?

How is it you can look at these data and the numerous other datasets displaying the ocean's added 10x10e22 joules just since 2000 added heat and claim "no warming in the last 17 years?" Doesn't it ever bother you to be that dishonest?

...and that's how atmospheric CO2 turned the ocean to warm gastric juice. And they lived carbon free and happily ever after

So, 120PPM of CO2, warmed the planet 2-8 degrees, turned the oceans acidic and warmed them in the process.

Uh huh.

Sure, it did. Sure

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Chart demonstrating the process by which atmospheric CO2 warmed the Deep Pacific Ocean

 

[Crick]

Like this one from NOAA/NCDC?

How is it you can look at these data and the numerous other datasets displaying the ocean's added 10x10e22 joules just since 2000 added heat and claim "no warming in the last 17 years?" Doesn't it ever bother you to be that dishonest?

...and that's how atmospheric CO2 turned the ocean to warm gastric juice. And they lived carbon free and happily ever after

So, 120PPM of CO2, warmed the planet 2-8 degrees, turned the oceans acidic and warmed them in the process.

Uh huh.

Sure, it did. Sure

Don't be such a fucking idiot Frank. If you think it didn't, SHOW US THE GODDAMNED DATA THAT SAYS IT DIDN'T.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Like this one from NOAA/NCDC?

How is it you can look at these data and the numerous other datasets displaying the ocean's added 10x10e22 joules just since 2000 added heat and claim "no warming in the last 17 years?" Doesn't it ever bother you to be that dishonest?

...and that's how atmospheric CO2 turned the ocean to warm gastric juice. And they lived carbon free and happily ever after

So, 120PPM of CO2, warmed the planet 2-8 degrees, turned the oceans acidic and warmed them in the process.

Uh huh.

Sure, it did. Sure

Don't be such a fucking idiot Frank. If you think it didn't, SHOW US THE GODDAMNED DATA THAT SAYS IT DIDN'T.

Prove there's no Bigfoot!

Bigfoot Denier!!

 

[Crick]

No, Frank. Show us ocean heat content data that does NOT display a 10x10e22 joules of heating since 2000.

 

[SSDD]

Like this one from NOAA/NCDC?

How is it you can look at these data and the numerous other datasets displaying the ocean's added 10x10e22 joules just since 2000 added heat and claim "no warming in the last 17 years?" Doesn't it ever bother you to be that dishonest?

...and that's how atmospheric CO2 turned the ocean to warm gastric juice. And they lived carbon free and happily ever after

So, 120PPM of CO2, warmed the planet 2-8 degrees, turned the oceans acidic and warmed them in the process.

Uh huh.

Sure, it did. Sure

Don't be such a fucking idiot Frank. If you think it didn't, SHOW US THE GODDAMNED DATA THAT SAYS IT DIDN'T.

That chart doesn't say that it did...that chart shows 0 to 700m which is not the deep ocean...and considering the amount of data tampering going on in government climate science what makes you think that chart is accurate?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

No, Frank. Show us ocean heat content data that does NOT display a 10x10e22 joules of heating since 2000.

Pointing at things and Shrieking "MANMADE GLOBAL WARMING!!!!!" is not science, Dear

 

[Crick]

And you might try to get a better handle on that whole "prove a negative" issue. That's about the sixth time in the last week that idea's been badly abused.

 

[Crick]

...and that's how atmospheric CO2 turned the ocean to warm gastric juice. And they lived carbon free and happily ever after

So, 120PPM of CO2, warmed the planet 2-8 degrees, turned the oceans acidic and warmed them in the process.

Uh huh.

Sure, it did. Sure

Don't be such a fucking idiot Frank. If you think it didn't, SHOW US THE GODDAMNED DATA THAT SAYS IT DIDN'T.

That chart doesn't say that it did...that chart shows 0 to 700m which is not the deep ocean...and considering the amount of data tampering going on in government climate science what makes you think that chart is accurate?

Three different studies have found the same ocean heating. And since the dependent variable is heat content and not temperature, the fact that the full ocean depth isn't included indicates this is very likely an understatement of actual ocean heating, Mr Science-Whiz.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

A friend of mine swears she saw BigFoot in rural Washington State in 1974.

I want you BigFoot DENIERS!!! to prove she was wrong

 

[CrusaderFrank]

And you might try to get a better handle on that whole "prove a negative" issue. That's about the sixth time in the last week that idea's been badly abused.

Yet, you keep using it? I guess when the lab is so vicious and sadistic to your "theory" what else can you do?

 

[jc456]

Don't be such a fucking idiot Frank. If you think it didn't, SHOW US THE GODDAMNED DATA THAT SAYS IT DIDN'T.

That chart doesn't say that it did...that chart shows 0 to 700m which is not the deep ocean...and considering the amount of data tampering going on in government climate science what makes you think that chart is accurate?

Three different studies have found the same ocean heating. And since the dependent variable is heat content and not temperature, the fact that the full ocean depth isn't included indicates this is very likely an understatement of actual ocean heating, Mr Science-Whiz.

Coughing......bull....shit

 

[jc456]

And you might try to get a better handle on that whole "prove a negative" issue. That's about the sixth time in the last week that idea's been badly abused.

Umpteenth, umpteenth time prove CO2 drives climate.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Don't be such a fucking idiot Frank. If you think it didn't, SHOW US THE GODDAMNED DATA THAT SAYS IT DIDN'T.

That chart doesn't say that it did...that chart shows 0 to 700m which is not the deep ocean...and considering the amount of data tampering going on in government climate science what makes you think that chart is accurate?

Three different studies have found the same ocean heating. And since the dependent variable is heat content and not temperature, the fact that the full ocean depth isn't included indicates this is very likely an understatement of actual ocean heating, Mr Science-Whiz.

And since the dependent variable is heat content and not temperature

How do you measure heat content without measuring temperature?

 

[Crick]

That chart doesn't say that it did...that chart shows 0 to 700m which is not the deep ocean...and considering the amount of data tampering going on in government climate science what makes you think that chart is accurate?

Three different studies have found the same ocean heating. And since the dependent variable is heat content and not temperature, the fact that the full ocean depth isn't included indicates this is very likely an understatement of actual ocean heating, Mr Science-Whiz.

And since the dependent variable is heat content and not temperature

How do you measure heat content without measuring temperature?

You missed the point. Given the data shows heat content, the addition of the rest of the ocean depth would, if anything, ADD to the measured parameter.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Three different studies have found the same ocean heating. And since the dependent variable is heat content and not temperature, the fact that the full ocean depth isn't included indicates this is very likely an understatement of actual ocean heating, Mr Science-Whiz.

And since the dependent variable is heat content and not temperature

How do you measure heat content without measuring temperature?

You missed the point. Given the data shows heat content, the addition of the rest of the ocean depth would, if anything, ADD to the measured parameter.

How did they determine the increase in heat content?

 

[Crick]

The usual way.

Tell me Todd, have you seen some data that shows the ocean below 700 meters to be cooling?