One Hurricane (That hasn't made landfall yet) and you pour on the insults,
Heat. Kitchens. Given how free with insults you are (they're pretty much all you have), you shouldn't squeal like a sissy when you get some back.
it is clear you can't make a case in explaining WHY there are FEWER than average Hurricanes at this time of the year.
Why would I, since AGW theory doesn't predict more hurricanes?
Given that you didn't know that, you look even more stupid now. I mean, you're actually congratulating yourself over supposedly disproving a claim that nobody made. And why is it that you fail so completely at the basics? Because you only know what you've read on conspiracy cult blogs.
Not only that it was YOU warmists who went crazy over the 2005 season that hasn't come close to being matched since (blaming it on CO2) , and there was a 12 year absence of major hurricanes making landfall. Too many times warmists have been wrong about Hurricanes, thus your simpering attacks without evidence, is proof you have no cogent argument to produce.
What else did the voices tell you?
There is also a drop in Tornadoes as well,
There was no predictions of more tornadoes either. Sweet jeebus, is there any topic you don't get completely wrong?
As usual you are wrong since climate models Does in fact project
INCREASED Hurricane and Tornado numbers and intensity in the future projected warming world:
"Human activities have contributed substantially to observed ocean–atmosphere variability in the Atlantic Ocean (
medium confidence),
and these changes have contributed to the observed upward trend in North Atlantic hurricane activity since the 1970s (
medium confidence)."
and,
"
Both theory and numerical modeling simulations generally indicate an increase in tropical cyclone (TC) intensity in a warmer world, and the models generally show an increase in the number of very intense TCs. For Atlantic and eastern North Pacific hurricanes and western North Pacific typhoons, increases are projected in precipitation rates (
high confidence) and intensity (
medium confidence).
The frequency of the most intense of these storms is projected to increase in the Atlantic and western North Pacific (
low confidence)
and in the eastern North Pacific (
medium confidence)."
and ,
"Tornado activity in the United States has become more variable, particularly over the 2000s, with a decrease in the number of days per year with tornadoes and an increase in the number of tornadoes on these days (
medium confidence). Confidence in past trends for hail and severe thunderstorm winds, however, is
low.
Climate models consistently project environmental changes that would putatively support an increase in the frequency and intensity of severe thunderstorms (a category that combines tornadoes, hail, and winds), especially over regions that are currently prone to these hazards, but confidence in the details of this projected increase is
low."
and this where they use their
patented climate models projecting an increase:
"Both theory and numerical modeling simulations (in general) indicate an increase in TC intensity in a warmer world, and the models generally show an increase in the number of very intense TCs.
In some cases, climate models can be used to make attribution statements about TCs without formal detection (see also
Ch. 3: Detection and Attribution). For example, there is evidence that, in addition to the effects of El Niño, anthropogenic forcing made the extremely active 2014 Hawaiian hurricane season substantially more likely, although no significant rising trend in TC frequency near Hawai‘i was detected."
bolding mine
LINK
==========================
Your typical ignorance on what projected climate models says, is once again exposed.
Meanwhile you IGNORED this question:
By the way what am I denying?
