Most of the whites on this board believe there is no need for reparations. You should see the arguments against it. I was amazed at the ignorance even though there is a precedent already set for this.
Not really. As the Japanese Internment folks lost real property. Homes, businesses, land. And the reparations were as an explicit repayment for this real, measurable monetary loss.....and was granted to specific individuals who experienced this loss. And while some money was granted to the heirs of those harmed, it was the individuals who were harmed themselves that submitted the legal case for reparations to begin with.
Reparations for black folks is more an ethical and philosophical argument than an actual loss of real property or legal argument. And would apply to anyone of a particular race rather than to a specific individual. There's no precedent for that. None of the former slaves could sue because they're all dead....unlike the Japanese internship folks who were very much alive when they filed their court paperwork. And the dead have no rights.
Reparations weren't paid to anyone of Japanese ancestry. Or even to anyone who was interned in one of the camps. But only to those who could prove property loss as a result of internment. While 'reparations for black folks' is paid to anyone of a particular race. That's unprecedented.
And races in the US are so mixed that things start to get a little muddy. If you're 50% black and 50% white does that mean you only get a half payment? Or does anyone who self identifies as African American get a share? What if your ancestors weren't slaves? For example, Obama's dad was from Kenya. None of his ancestors were slaves to any more degree than your average white person. Does he or folks like him get reparations?
Its all muddy, nebulous and legally unprecedented. So who knows? The courts don't grant damages based on racial history. And they don't grant damages based on something that didn't happen to you personally. So we'd be rewriting the law.
Worse still....once we've opened that door, does that mean you can go back into the history books and look for any relative that might have been wronged by government....and try to get your payment? Once we've lifted real damage requirements, any statute of limitations for damages, and which person is affected requirements......you've got a litany of unintended consequences that will likely follow. As you've essentially rewritten civil law.
And finally, once we've paid reparations, does that mean that any societal imbalance is thus rectified? Do affirmative action programs go to the wayside? Does all racial preferences in our laws vanish as a consequence?
I don't know. Maybe.