The Call To End The First Amendment

[HikerGuy83]

Ron Lauder, the President of World Jewish Congress, is calling for the end of free speech in America. He has several interests: He's a businessman and philanthropist and an outspoken activist for causes near and dear to his heart. The Constitution of the United States is NOT one of those interests. He's not interested in Christian causes or the needs, wants, or interests of the average American citizen. His number one cause is Zionism and the Jewish people, in general.

His newest cause is the dismantling of the 1st Amendment to the Constitution and the dismantling of free speech. He doesn't like to be criticized and is starting a campaign to squash anyone and everyone who stands in the way of his personal ideology.

Here's his plan to control what others say or think:




Own Shroyer has an answer to Ron's attack on our 1st Amendment:

Isreal Derangement Syndrome on full display.

 

[rosends]

How is the claim a lie? Demonstrate it.

It isn't true. Proven false. I showed the explanation. I linked to supporting material. The reading and thinking part is up to you.

 

[Oklahoma Journalist]

It isn't true. Proven false. I showed the explanation. I linked to supporting material. The reading and thinkin

It isn't true. Proven false. I showed the explanation. I linked to supporting material. The reading and thinking part is up to you.

LOL. A lie is intentionally conveying a falsehood. So this would not include mistakes, faulty reporting, misinformed people, different interpretations of events, etc.

Read your own material. The initial 500 casualty number is disputed, with estimates now from 100 to 471.

The entire incident details are also very contested.

The extremist in the OP’s vid wants to shut down what he does not like by calling it a “lie.”

 

[rosends]

LOL. A lie is intentionally conveying a falsehood. So this would not include mistakes, faulty reporting, misinformed people, different interpretations of events, etc.

Read your own material. The initial 500 casualty number is disputed, with estimates now from 100 to 471.

The entire incident details are also very contested.

The extremist in the OP’s vid wants to shut down what he does not like by calling it a “lie.”

Except that the story kept spreading even after it was proven wrong. The intentional dissemination of unsubstantiated claims is lying. His point (and had you watched the video, you would know this) was not that anyone should shut down those who lie. He argues that it is important to spread the truth with the same speed. You really didn't watch it, or if you did, you lack basic comprehension skills. Seek help.

 

[Oklahoma Journalist]

Except that the story kept spreading even after it was proven wrong. The intentional dissemination of unsubstantiated claims is lying. His point (and had you watched the video, you would know this) was not that anyone should shut down those who lie. He argues that it is important to spread the truth with the same speed. You really didn't watch it, or if you did, you lack basic comprehension skills. Seek help.

It was never “proven wrong.” The event details are disputed, including the casualties. That’s a common occurrence.

The extremist in the OP’s vid is a zealot and a danger to the US and freedom.

 

[Oklahoma Journalist]

. Seek help.

This is the response I get from an extremist. Typical.

 

[rosends]

It was never “proven wrong.” The event details are disputed, including the casualties. That’s a common occurrence.

The extremist in the OP’s vid is a zealot and a danger to the US and freedom.

So the conclusions of the world's investigators don't carry the weight of proof for you?

And, again, what in the video is a danger to the US and freedom? Using social media to present information to counter misinformation that is in social media? That is a threat to you?

Talk about snowflakes...

 

[rosends]

This is the response I get from an extremist. Typical.

Oh, do others tell you to get help? That's unsurprising.

 

[PeterPilot]

What does that have to do with the video and the claim about it? I mean, Yay you for having an opinion but it is irrelevant to what I said.

It provides perspective on the distorted Zionist authoritarian viewpoint. In all my life I have never seen so many cry-babies as today's Zionists. Authoritarian cry-babies.

 

[rosends]

It provides perspective on the distorted Zionist authoritarian viewpoint.

How is that viewpoint authoritarian? That viewpoint is trying to counter the propaganda which has been proven false. Why not say that the anti-Zionist viewpoint is distorted and authoritarian?

In all my life I have never seen so many cry-babies as today's Zionists. Authoritarian cry-babies.

I have not seen any and I work with over a thousand of them every day. What's your knowledge base?

 

[rosends]

Here is another example of how a lie gets half way around the world before the truth puts his shoes on.

It isn't new -- 2024, but it is another example of the decision to print lies and not back down at the same volume. Corrections never get as big a font as the original lies.

Al Jazeera, Hamas Admit Story Alleging IDF Rapes in Gaza Hospital Fake News – Total News

totalnews.com