The Bottom 40%

[Dad2three]

, got rid of the Articles of Confederation, that libertarian type document huh? lol

yes dumbto3, they got rid of Articles and replaced with Constitution and commerce clause to promote free trade as opposed to protectionism under Articles.

See why we say dumbto3???

Moron, read a history book..

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Can't refute the Founders DIDN'T use "free markets"

100% stupid!! Of course they used free markets. Was our Constitution really socialist and still govt then was 1% the size of todays on a per capita inflation adjusted basis?

See why we say stupid??

dumbto3= pictures colors and big letters as if to prove how stupid liberals are.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

, got rid of the Articles of Confederation, that libertarian type document huh? lol

yes dumbto3, they got rid of Articles and replaced with Constitution and commerce clause to promote free trade as opposed to protectionism under Articles.

See why we say dumbto3???

Moron, read a history book..

yes dumbto3, they got rid of Articles and replaced with Constitution and commerce clause to promote free trade as opposed to protectionism under Articles.

See why we say dumbto3???

 

[Dad2three]

Can't refute the Founders DIDN'T use "free markets"

100% stupid!! Of course they used free markets. Was our Constitution really socialist and still govt then was 1% the size of todays on a per capita inflation adjusted basis?

See why we say stupid??

dumbto3= pictures colors and big letters as if to prove how stupid liberals are.

Sorry Bubba, if giving you LOGICAL, HONEST ANSWERS BACKED UP WITH CREDIBLE LINKS IS TO MUCH FOR YOUR TINY BRAIN...

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Can't refute the Founders DIDN'T use "free markets"

100% stupid!! Of course they used free markets. Was our Constitution really socialist and still govt then was 1% the size of todays on a per capita inflation adjusted basis?

See why we say stupid??

dumbto3= pictures colors and big letters as if to prove how stupid liberals are.

Sorry Bubba, if giving you LOGICAL, HONEST ANSWERS BACKED UP WITH CREDIBLE LINKS IS TO MUCH FOR YOUR TINY BRAIN...

yes dumbto3, they got rid of Articles and replaced with Constitution and commerce clause to promote free trade as opposed to protectionism under Articles.

See why we say dumbto3???

 

[Dad2three]

Can't refute the Founders DIDN'T use "free markets"

100% stupid!! Of course they used free markets. Was our Constitution really socialist and still govt then was 1% the size of todays on a per capita inflation adjusted basis?

See why we say stupid??

dumbto3= pictures colors and big letters as if to prove how stupid liberals are.

Sorry Bubba, if giving you LOGICAL, HONEST ANSWERS BACKED UP WITH CREDIBLE LINKS IS TO MUCH FOR YOUR TINY BRAIN...

yes dumbto3, they got rid of Articles and replaced with Constitution and commerce clause to promote free trade as opposed to protectionism under Articles.

See why we say dumbto3???

Hint PROTECTIONIST POLICIES DIDN'T START UNTIL WAY AFTER THE CONservatives CONfederate Articles of CONfederation were thrown under the bus dummy!

 

[auditor0007]

If you had any clue you might actually be able to make a legitimate argument. Why is it every thing you ever post makes you look like a complete idiot? A typical classroom does not cost taxpayers $400,000. The cost is around $325,000. The teacher's salary is not the only salary necessary to cover a child's education. There are bus drivers, secretaries, special ed teachers, counselors, maintenance workers, and administrative workers, all whom are necessary to keep the school running efficiently. Secondly, there are costs for rent on the building itself, and there are also costs associated with extracurricular activities. Intelligent people understand that it's not "liberal bureaucracy wasting $350,000 per classroom; it's the cost of running a school.

Had you tried to make an argument that we are wasting money in certain areas, maybe you would have had an argument. Instead you are trying to convince us that we should be able to teach a group of 25 kids for $50,000 per year. Wake up for God's sake.

Sounds like a system that's begging for competition

So they can take the best and brightest and leave the rest, including the handicapped? Great ANOTHER right wing failure

You'll have plenty of company with the other Left Behinds

Like the CONservatives "math" where gutting taxes increase revenues or "history" where the CONservatives stood with the US Founders, the most radically liberal of their day, NOT the Torries/Loyalists? lol

Obama's been the biggest creator of Poor people ever.

Funny, I thought it was Herbert Hoover, but I now stand corrected. It's definitely obvious that Obama has led us down the drain. We all want to go back to the end of 2008 when everything was smelling roses.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Sounds like a system that's begging for competition

So they can take the best and brightest and leave the rest, including the handicapped? Great ANOTHER right wing failure

You'll have plenty of company with the other Left Behinds

Like the CONservatives "math" where gutting taxes increase revenues or "history" where the CONservatives stood with the US Founders, the most radically liberal of their day, NOT the Torries/Loyalists? lol

Obama's been the biggest creator of Poor people ever.

Funny, I thought it was Herbert Hoover, but I now stand corrected. It's definitely obvious that Obama has led us down the drain. We all want to go back to the end of 2008 when everything was smelling roses.

Obama: The greatest, most powerless President EVAH! BOooooosh!!

You Progs are a ******* joke

 

[Dad2three]

So they can take the best and brightest and leave the rest, including the handicapped? Great ANOTHER right wing failure

You'll have plenty of company with the other Left Behinds

Like the CONservatives "math" where gutting taxes increase revenues or "history" where the CONservatives stood with the US Founders, the most radically liberal of their day, NOT the Torries/Loyalists? lol

Obama's been the biggest creator of Poor people ever.

Funny, I thought it was Herbert Hoover, but I now stand corrected. It's definitely obvious that Obama has led us down the drain. We all want to go back to the end of 2008 when everything was smelling roses.

Obama: The greatest, most powerless President EVAH! BOooooosh!!

You Progs are a ******* joke

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

You'll have plenty of company with the other Left Behinds

Like the CONservatives "math" where gutting taxes increase revenues or "history" where the CONservatives stood with the US Founders, the most radically liberal of their day, NOT the Torries/Loyalists? lol

Obama's been the biggest creator of Poor people ever.

Funny, I thought it was Herbert Hoover, but I now stand corrected. It's definitely obvious that Obama has led us down the drain. We all want to go back to the end of 2008 when everything was smelling roses.

Obama: The greatest, most powerless President EVAH! BOooooosh!!

You Progs are a ******* joke

dumbto 3 is a dad who uses colors pictures and big letters to win debates?? Sad and true but what would we expect from a liberal?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Funny, I thought it was Herbert Hoover,

total idiot illiterate liberal has no idea that Hoover and Bush were liberals!!

 

[Dad2three]

So they can take the best and brightest and leave the rest, including the handicapped? Great ANOTHER right wing failure

You'll have plenty of company with the other Left Behinds

Like the CONservatives "math" where gutting taxes increase revenues or "history" where the CONservatives stood with the US Founders, the most radically liberal of their day, NOT the Torries/Loyalists? lol

Obama's been the biggest creator of Poor people ever.

Funny, I thought it was Herbert Hoover, but I now stand corrected. It's definitely obvious that Obama has led us down the drain. We all want to go back to the end of 2008 when everything was smelling roses.

Obama: The greatest, most powerless President EVAH! BOooooosh!!

You Progs are a ******* joke

 

[Dad2three]

Funny, I thought it was Herbert Hoover,

total idiot illiterate liberal has no idea that Hoover and Bush were liberals!!

Yep, it WAS Harding/Cooldige who ramped up the 1920's, Hoover was only their less than 6 months before their bubble popped!

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

You'll have plenty of company with the other Left Behinds

Like the CONservatives "math" where gutting taxes increase revenues or "history" where the CONservatives stood with the US Founders, the most radically liberal of their day, NOT the Torries/Loyalists? lol

Obama's been the biggest creator of Poor people ever.

Funny, I thought it was Herbert Hoover, but I now stand corrected. It's definitely obvious that Obama has led us down the drain. We all want to go back to the end of 2008 when everything was smelling roses.

Obama: The greatest, most powerless President EVAH! BOooooosh!!

You Progs are a ******* joke

dumto3 is dad who thinks he wins debate with pictures colors and big words. What would we expect from a liberal? Its as if he is trying to prove how stupid he is.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Funny, I thought it was Herbert Hoover,

total idiot illiterate liberal has no idea that Hoover and Bush were liberals!!

Yep, it WAS Harding/Cooldige who ramped up the 1920's, Hoover was only their less than 6 months before their bubble popped!

so does that make dumto3 a conservative now??

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Funny, I thought it was Herbert Hoover,

total idiot illiterate liberal has no idea that Hoover and Bush were liberals!!

Yep, it WAS Harding/Cooldige who ramped up the 1920's, Hoover was only their less than 6 months before their bubble popped!

yes and hoover and FDR then prove that liberalism did not work

 

[auditor0007]

Funny, I thought it was Herbert Hoover,

total idiot illiterate liberal has no idea that Hoover and Bush were liberals!!

Yep, it WAS Harding/Cooldige who ramped up the 1920's, Hoover was only their less than 6 months before their bubble popped!

yes and hoover and FDR then prove that liberalism did not work

Liberalism did not create the stock market crash of 1929 that led to The Great Depression. And Hoover wasn't a liberal. Good grief.

 

[auditor0007]

Funny, I thought it was Herbert Hoover,

total idiot illiterate liberal has no idea that Hoover and Bush were liberals!!

Hoover was no liberal. He did absolutely nothing after the crash other than to allow things to take their course. Had he pushed for strong government intervention, things would never have gotten as bad as they did. By the time FDR was elected, Hoover had allowed the US economy to be buried. From your point of view, we have never had a conservative president, because from my pov, Ronald Reagan was only a mild conservative. BTW, I'm not the one who thinks you can teach 25 kids and run a school for $50,000 per year. If you want to know who the idiot is here, take a look at some of your idiotic posts.

 

[auditor0007]

Funny, I thought it was Herbert Hoover,

total idiot illiterate liberal has no idea that Hoover and Bush were liberals!!

Yep, it WAS Harding/Cooldige who ramped up the 1920's, Hoover was only their less than 6 months before their bubble popped!

Hoover could have helped turn things around if he had started pumping money into the system rather than just allow the "market" to take its course. Had he started FDR's agenda, the Depression would not have been nearly as bad as it was. As for whom it was that was responsible for the Depression and market crash of 1929, it was the complete lack of regulations of the banking industry. As the economy was booming, so many people were getting rich in the stock market. Many people thought the ride would never end, so they borrowed as much money as they could, without any collateral as the banks would have it, and used that money to buy stocks. As more and more people purchased stocks, it drove the prices so high that the market was completely overvalued, all because of borrowed money. Then it all came crashing down. Here was the big problem; all that money that had been borrowed needed to be paid back, but nobody could pay it back. All was lost. Many who had invested borrowed money ended up taking their lives because they lost everything plus some. Over 23,000 committed suicide the year following the stock market crash which is a much higher percentage of the population than in any other year in our history that is recorded.

 

[kaz]

How does the right wing propose to improve education and reduce funding at the same time? Does this involve forcing everyone to become a member of a specific religion, by any chance? Because religious people aren't necessarily that intelligent.

First of all, education is local, not Federal.

And throwing money at the problem is no solution, we spend way more than our peers on education and get so much less in return. The answer to that is not to throw more money

What data do you have that less money results in a better education?

That isn't what I said, now that's funny. You can't comprehend a sentence on education

You claim the answer is not to throw more money. What data do you have to support that?

Already told you that, big guy. And I gave you a freebie on this one. I don't answer questions from you and won't until you start answering questions. In fact, you admitted you are lying because you don't answer questions when you are lying