Sure you want investigations when you have democrat partisans in all the top echelons of the DOJ, FBI, NSA, and the intel agencies. What about after 8-years of Trump and he puts partisan conservatives in charge of those agencies and they overlook GOP crimes and investigate the crap out of democrats?
Then there is the Kavanaugh treatment where you democrats get bimbos to swear that they were sexually assaulted by the opposition candidates. Creeps like Avenatti love to find bimbos to split some cash with.
How do you square Hillary's illegal server, her destroying subpoenaed evidence, her mishandling classified info, and her pay-to-play Foundation?
(Hint: Yes you do have a double standard. She is very shady)
All this current discussion is a way to make obstruction of justice an honorable thing in your mind. It's not, it's an affront to the idea that we are a nation of laws. Congressional oversight of the executive is enshrined in the constitution as both a power and a responsibility.
There is a difference between real obstruction, and phony obstruction. Mueller was never obstructed, he had all the time and resources he needed.
Obstructing an illegal investigation is not obstruction, its protecting the presidency. The Mueller Investigation into Trump was Strzok's "insurance policy". As Dershowitz said, the Mueller Investigation should have been a Joint Committee looking only into Russian Meddling. Obama's spying on the Trump campaign with US and foreign intel assets was the biggest scandal in US history. The FISA warrants were illegally obtained. Carter Page was totally innocent, and never charged with anything, yet the FBI could spy on all of the Trump people using the 2-hop rule.
In summary, if you have obstruction, impeach, because if you miss your shot, Barr, Huber, Durham, and Horowitz surly won't miss their shots at taking down the deep state.
The very idea of a "deep state" is silly. If such a thing existed they would adore Trump for his plutocratic ways and willingness to let big business run wild. You keep defaulting back to a conspiracy theory that only exists to make it seem that those opposing this deeply compromised president are far worse than he can ever be.
1. The deep state exists and it is based on globalism, not nationalism Deep state in the United States - Wikipedia
2. Please provide a link proving that Trump is "deeply compromised". That makes no sense to me. You think Putin is dangling a Moscow Trump Tower deal? Is that your "deeply compromised"?
3. I support the loyal opposition, but not the deep state that Barr, Huber, Durham, and Horowitz will prosecute. The GOP opposed everything that Obama stood for, but they used their positions legally, the Obama admin apparently spied on the Trump campaign illegally, and that needs to be punished.
1. I read your link and my statement stands, if THEM exists they love Trump
2. Trump was deeply compromised by the megatons of baggage he has accumulated as an adulterer and shady businessman in addition to what the Russians have on him. Never doubt that Putin has career ending dirt on Trump and he knows it.
3. I have difficulty responding to a statement that is entirely based on the "deep state" theory that is itself based on a mass of misrepresentation and ignorance of how things work when someone is stupidly caught up in a counter-intelligence operation. Seriously, I am fully prepared to accept that Trump is too stupid to realize even talking to Russian spies might cause him and his cronies some trouble.
