Current and former officials who were with President Donald Trump on his 2018 trip to Paris denied, on the record, a story from the Atlantic.
www.breitbart.com
Current and former officials who were with President Donald Trump on his 2018 trip to Paris denied, on the record, a story published by the Atlantic, which cited anonymous sources that claim Trump described America’s fallen heroes as “suckers” and “losers.”
The Atlantic story cited anonymous sources who claimed that Trump did not want to visit the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery at the site of the Battle of Belleau Wood during his visit to Paris in 2018 and that he was worried about his hair in the rain. The sources also claimed that Trump said the cemetery was “filled with losers” and that the Marines who died at Belleau Wood were “suckers” for being killed.
Goldberg has a history of defending pedophiles as well.
View attachment 384691
A bunch of Trump sycophants denied it happened?
Golly. I’m convinced.
You have no proof it happened. Anonymous sources can make up anything they want. That's the fact of the matter.
This leftist screech is why you do not belong in the greatest country., but in a 3rd world far left garbage dump.
Sarah Sanders can make up anything she wants too. In fact, we know she has.
This is why credibility is so important and why lacking credibility (as Trump does), turns us into a third world country.
And you give credibility to.... anonymous sources.
You are a ******* moron. Incompatible with the first world society, as usual with far leftists.
I give a hell of a lot more credibility to Goldberg than the serial liars in the White House.
See why it’s so bad that Trump lies relentlessly?
The serial liars are all in the media. That's why we call it "fake news."
You don’t call it fake news because it’s fake. You call it fake news because you want to live in an alternative reality where Trump an incompetent, vile, petty asshole.
Nobody in their right mind can watch CNN, MSNBC, et. al. and
NOT see the bias.
Yep, but true with FOX as well, for the past 30 years....
But NOTE! Bias does not in any way mean Fake News....
The extreme left wing bias while claiming to be unbiased does mean fake news.
Take for example how they report on police on black violence every time it happens in a national fashion, without providing the actual statistics. This in itself is fake news in the form of painting a false narrative.
The facts regarding what they choose to report, and how they report it makes them fake news. And the fact that they are anti-American makes them anti-American fake news.
Imaging the frame of mind that one has to have to think that being opposed to institutional racism means being opposed to America itself.
" First off, it is important to clearly define what people mean when they say “institutional racism” or “systemic racism.” Institutional racism is best defined as racism perpetrated by government entities. However, since most people, including people on the left, acknowledge that there is no law or government entity explicitly discriminating minorities in modern America, the definition of “institutional” or “systemic” racism has shifted over time. When the left cries out about “institutional racism”, they are referring to people of power and influence who have an unconscious bias against minority groups, elongating the pathway to success for all minorities. This argument essentially shifts the focus away from personal choice and responsibility by spreading the idea that non-whites have a limited control over their lives and that the “system” is cheating them. It also accuses people of being racist without evidence, by calling people out on unconscious bias, which is an unprovable and unidentifiable concept."
Merion West is an online magazine that publishes articles and interviews from across the political spectrum.
merionwest.com
At least this is a good start at an academic discussion. Institutional racism and implicit bias manifest in different ways. It's quite simplistic and rather ignorant to say that unconscious acts of racism cannot be proven or identified. Take for instance studies that demonstrate that minorities are policed quite differently and that when they're found guilty of offenses, their sentences are substantially greater even when considering factors like prior offenses and severity of charges.
But let's go even more basic than this. This is just an example. In Australia, they did a study. They had people of various ethnicities walk onto a bus, and say they forgot their money and couldn't pay the fare. 70% of the time, white individuals were allowed onto the bus, the driver allowing them to ride for free. Black people got the same benefit at half that rate, about 36%. People of Asian or Indian descent were somewhere in the middle. Were those bus drivers racist? I doubt it. Black riders were still allowed on at a lower rate than white riders even if the driver was black! (Although the difference was not nearly as pronounced as with white drivers)
