excalibur
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2015
- 28,522
- 57,690
- 2,290
Deals like this are the future.
Will Blue States be slack though? They seem so stuck in the 1930s.
Will Blue States be slack though? They seem so stuck in the 1930s.
America’s power grid needs a massive infusion of capital to build billions of dollars’ worth of new critical infrastructure, and it needs to come fast if the U.S. is to be able to meet rapidly rising demand from AI data centers and other big energy users. That much has become undeniable over the past few years.
...
On Monday, a consortium led by Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP), a BlackRock subsidiary, and Swedish infrastructure firm EQT announced a $33.4 billion deal to take AES Corp. private. It is the kind of "Build, Baby, Build" move I have been writing about as the defining energy policy theme of this era, and it should be a welcomed event for those who desire to keep the lights on in this country.
Any time BlackRock’s name arises, the usual critics will line up to wring their hands about Wall Street and private equity. But the facts revolving around this specific deal agitate for more thoughtful consideration.
AES’ explanation of why it pursued the deal in the first place is telling. The company’s chairman, Jay Morse, laid it out in a release: AES has a significant need for capital to support growth beyond 2027, and without this transaction, the company would likely have had to slash or eliminate its dividend and issue large amounts of new equity just to fund necessary infrastructure investments. In this era of rapid demand growth, this is a reality currently being faced by management teams at many energy companies.
...
So, this is less about corporate talking points and more about hard financial math. AES operates regulated utilities in Indiana and Ohio serving 1.1 million customers and has signed agreements to supply nearly 12 gigawatts of power to major technology firms. Meeting that kind of demand requires billions of investment dollars in new generation, transmission and distribution infrastructure. The old model, in which a publicly traded utility tries to fund massive buildouts while managing quarterly earnings calls and dividend expectations, simply cannot keep pace with the scale of what is needed or the speed with which the capital must be deployed and turned into hard assets.
This is where the GIP-led consortium offers something genuinely different. GIP is one of the world's largest dedicated infrastructure investors, with roughly $190 billion in assets under management spanning energy, transportation, digital infrastructure and water systems globally. Its portfolio is built around 20- and 30-year time horizons, not on strip and flip fixer-uppers. Its business model is straightforward: acquire critical infrastructure, invest in it patiently and earn returns by making sure the asset performs well for customers over the long haul.
The deal's structure reinforces that reality. The consortium has committed that no acquisition costs, including transaction fees, advisory costs and any premium, will be passed through to ratepayers. It is funded with 100% equity, meaning no new debt is being loaded onto the company. AES maintains investment grade credit ratings from both S&P and Fitch, and the consortium says it is committed to preserving that profile.
...
One more point worth emphasizing here: When data centers and large commercial users drive new infrastructure investment and bear the cost of that investment, they spread fixed costs across a larger customer base. A recent Congressional Research Service analysis found exactly this dynamic at work, noting that increased demand from large users allowed fixed utility costs to be spread over a larger volume of sales, leading to lower rates. That means a lower per-megawatt-hour cost for residential and commercial ratepayers than a scenario where demand stays flat and existing customers shoulder the full burden of maintaining aging systems. That is basic utility math which must evolve if the various U.S. regional grids are to be able to meet future power demand and help sustain the country’s nascent industrial revitalization.
...
...
On Monday, a consortium led by Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP), a BlackRock subsidiary, and Swedish infrastructure firm EQT announced a $33.4 billion deal to take AES Corp. private. It is the kind of "Build, Baby, Build" move I have been writing about as the defining energy policy theme of this era, and it should be a welcomed event for those who desire to keep the lights on in this country.
Any time BlackRock’s name arises, the usual critics will line up to wring their hands about Wall Street and private equity. But the facts revolving around this specific deal agitate for more thoughtful consideration.
AES’ explanation of why it pursued the deal in the first place is telling. The company’s chairman, Jay Morse, laid it out in a release: AES has a significant need for capital to support growth beyond 2027, and without this transaction, the company would likely have had to slash or eliminate its dividend and issue large amounts of new equity just to fund necessary infrastructure investments. In this era of rapid demand growth, this is a reality currently being faced by management teams at many energy companies.
...
So, this is less about corporate talking points and more about hard financial math. AES operates regulated utilities in Indiana and Ohio serving 1.1 million customers and has signed agreements to supply nearly 12 gigawatts of power to major technology firms. Meeting that kind of demand requires billions of investment dollars in new generation, transmission and distribution infrastructure. The old model, in which a publicly traded utility tries to fund massive buildouts while managing quarterly earnings calls and dividend expectations, simply cannot keep pace with the scale of what is needed or the speed with which the capital must be deployed and turned into hard assets.
This is where the GIP-led consortium offers something genuinely different. GIP is one of the world's largest dedicated infrastructure investors, with roughly $190 billion in assets under management spanning energy, transportation, digital infrastructure and water systems globally. Its portfolio is built around 20- and 30-year time horizons, not on strip and flip fixer-uppers. Its business model is straightforward: acquire critical infrastructure, invest in it patiently and earn returns by making sure the asset performs well for customers over the long haul.
The deal's structure reinforces that reality. The consortium has committed that no acquisition costs, including transaction fees, advisory costs and any premium, will be passed through to ratepayers. It is funded with 100% equity, meaning no new debt is being loaded onto the company. AES maintains investment grade credit ratings from both S&P and Fitch, and the consortium says it is committed to preserving that profile.
...
One more point worth emphasizing here: When data centers and large commercial users drive new infrastructure investment and bear the cost of that investment, they spread fixed costs across a larger customer base. A recent Congressional Research Service analysis found exactly this dynamic at work, noting that increased demand from large users allowed fixed utility costs to be spread over a larger volume of sales, leading to lower rates. That means a lower per-megawatt-hour cost for residential and commercial ratepayers than a scenario where demand stays flat and existing customers shoulder the full burden of maintaining aging systems. That is basic utility math which must evolve if the various U.S. regional grids are to be able to meet future power demand and help sustain the country’s nascent industrial revitalization.
...
