- Banned
- #41
"I went to school before Google Scholaring and runaway sociology took over the education establishments, so yes, I would be more informed than you would be. The 'Founders' were largely middle and upper class bourgeois types, the usual demographic that start and win successful 'revolutions', as opposed to ranting idiots and egomaniacs who usually end up getting killed by their own followers in short order. Since you don't know squat about English history, you might want to readup on the politics of England from the 1660's onward for a couple of months and get some sort of clue about the whole thing and then get back to the topic."
Gosh, I went to school well before the personal computer was anything more than science fiction. So now we have evidence that you are prone to making assumptions based on pure fantasy.
Revolutions-by definition-are illegal uprisings that are fought by revolutionaries.The "founders" (which BTW, I did not mention) rarely have much involvement until the actual conflict is over. You obviously have little knowledge about American history.
So make us up a list of these 'wild eyed fanatics', because apparently only you know who they were. Or is that claim just your pure fantasy?