Text began coming in to Meadows on January 6th, begging trump to stop the Capitol attack

playtime said:
ummmm ... congress has to refer a criminal charge to the DOJ, who then decides whether to indict - which THEN goes in front of a judge/goes to trial; THEN it's a criminal matter. howverrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr..........if you lie under oath in a court of LAW - it AUTOMATICALLY becomes a bigley issue for jail time.

.
Click to expand...

If you lie under oath the judge has to refer that accusation to the DA, who then decides whether to indict, which then goes to trial in front of a jury. Then it becomes a criminal matter.

Pretty much the same process.
 
bripat9643 said:
If it's not a legal proceeding, whatever that nebulous term is supposed to mean, then why can witnesses go to jail if they lie?
Click to expand...
D’oh…:eusa_doh:
Because it’s a crime maybe?


“Federal crime

It is a federal crime to make a material false statement in a matter within the jurisdiction of a federal agency or department. 1 Perjury is also a federal crime. Perjury is a false statement made under oath before a federal tribunal or official.”
 
berg80 said:
It’s possible the Jan. 6 committee refers a criminal case against Trump, Liz Cheney says

It’s still possible that the Jan. 6 committee investigating the attack on the U.S. Capitol makes a criminal referral to the Justice Department against former President Donald Trump, Rep. Liz Cheney said.

“It’s a decision that we’ll make together as a committee,” the Wyoming Republican said in an interview with ABC News’ “This Week” that aired Sunday.

Committee members have appeared to be divided over whether it would potentially refer a case against Trump, who some believe is to blame for the 2021 attack. Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-MS, who chairs the committee, said last month that while if the DOJ examines the hearings and decides to review it further they would, but making a criminal referral is “not our job.”

Others on the committee, including Cheney, quickly shot back, saying that the committee has yet to vote on whether it would recommend criminal referrals to the department.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/03/che...ould-refer-a-criminal-case-against-trump.html

Whether they do or not the committee will be passing along to the DoJ more than enough information to sustain multiple indictments of Trump.
Click to expand...
I'm uncertain. I think they will bring charges against his co conspirators for certain, like all the president's men, of Nixon. But a former president??? The jury pool, only needs one Trumper on it out of the 12, for a hung jury....and no way is the DOJ gonna take that chance and be labeled a partisan Doj, that continued to divide the country, unless....unless it was a slam dunk indictment, where even a Trumper would have to convict.
 
Care4all said:
It took two years of Watergate hearings and investigation to bring the American people, around to the truth.
Click to expand...
They've been going after Trump, using the federal government and congress, for about six years.

Nothing yet . . .
 
bigrebnc1775 said:
Well stop being a bot. There is going to come a day that every democrat will be marked as an enemy if America hunted down like Hitler's Nazis tried and executed.
Click to expand...

LOL

Imbecile, I showed you a screen shot of robots crawling this site. You're a total moron thinking I was talking of myself.

www.usmessageboard.com

Current visitors

www.usmessageboard.com www.usmessageboard.com
 
scruffy said:
Perhaps you didn't hear me the first time

NO ONE CARES.

All summer long you fucktards were running around with Molotovs, and bricks, and bottles full of frozen piss.

Now you expect me to give a shit about a measly old gun?

I don't

Couldn't care less
Click to expand...

but_blm-png.449685
 
It took two years of Watergate hearings and investigation to bring the American people, around to the truth.[/qupte]

democrat truth. He shoulda stayed and fought it. Clinton did and he deserved impeachment.
Click to expand...

www.powerlineblog.com

Podcast: Everything You Know About Watergate Is Wrong, Part 1

Writing about the Watergate scandal in the 1980s, political scientist John Marini said “The passage of time has not resulted in greater clarity concerning what it is we should have learned from the event, perhaps because we still lack an authoritative account of it.” Having reached the 50th...
www.powerlineblog.com www.powerlineblog.com

it's taken 50 years to see what it REALLY was.
 
Calypso Jones said:
democrat truth. He shoulda stayed and fought it. Clinton did and he deserved impeachment.
Click to expand...

It wouldn't have been much of a fight. Had he not resigned, he would have been impeached by the House and thrown out of office by the Senate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

So Republicans don't cheat??

< Previous Thread

Could this be the next John Dean?

Next Thread >

Similar threads

odanny
Bureau of Land Management choice has to withdraw after found to have been critical of January 6th.
Replies
2
Views
67
Auld Phart
Auld Phart
John Edgar Slow Horses
Trump has to stop lying
8 9 10
Replies
189
Views
1K
HikerGuy83
HikerGuy83
0
Everything Is Blowing Up In Elon Musk's Face.
Replies
17
Views
281
MarcATL
MarcATL
C_Clayton_Jones
Pardoned January 6 rioter said 'I'm shooting myself' before Indiana deputy fatally shot him
Replies
7
Views
226
OhPleaseJustQuit
OhPleaseJustQuit
0
Trump Reportedly Is Set To Accept A Jet From Qatar’s Ruling Family For Possible Use As Air Force One
43 44 45
Replies
892
Views
6K
Delldude
Delldude

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom