[/QUOTE]
A substantial percentage of contemporary American Negroes are affected by a kind of paranoia which causes them to see and to believe things which either are not there or are not quite what they want them to be.
Hugging the thugs and serving them hot tea is one extreme form of treatment. Assigning yourself the role of punisher and brutalizing the thugs is another extreme.
My experience was the same but I was in those neighborhoods ten years before you.
In a high drug area? Thats your privilege showing...pretending that your personal anecdote is the case for most people.
You actually drove frequently to a drug area and were waved at. Let that sink in for a second because people who LIVE in those areas get harassed....no, but not you tho.
I worked a high drug/high crime area. Mostly blacks and hispanics. I knew many people there and many were good folks. I waved at them. Chatted with them at the gas station getting my coffee. Granparents. Young adults who were trying to work for a better life. Simple blue collar workers who maybe had troubled pasts but now we're working honest and doing ok. Good people.
But the thugs and gang members who terrorized those folks, robbed them, raped them, and killed them? We busted their ******* heads. We fucked with them every time we saw them. We tried to make them HATE being in that neighborhood....and made them never want to come back. We knew who they were. We would follow them until they committed a minor offense so we could **** with them and try to find a jail able offense or scare them out of the community for the night.
And crime dropped. I know liberals will protest that. **** em. It was for all those good citizens to live in peace....not to please a ******* liberal. I don't regret it for a second. And most people who lived there would say they are thankful for it.
But that was 20 years ago.
Today's cops can't clean a neighborhood like that. They must hug the thugs. Serve them hot tea. Tolerate their crimes or be put on trial themselves. We can thank liberals for it.
In a high drug area? Thats your privilege showing...pretending that your personal anecdote is the case for most people.
You actually drove frequently to a drug area and were waved at. Let that sink in for a second because people who LIVE in those areas get harassed....no, but not you tho.
I worked a high drug/high crime area. Mostly blacks and hispanics. I knew many people there and many were good folks. I waved at them. Chatted with them at the gas station getting my coffee. Granparents. Young adults who were trying to work for a better life. Simple blue collar workers who maybe had troubled pasts but now we're working honest and doing ok. Good people.
But the thugs and gang members who terrorized those folks, robbed them, raped them, and killed them? We busted their ******* heads. We fucked with them every time we saw them. We tried to make them HATE being in that neighborhood....and made them never want to come back. We knew who they were. We would follow them until they committed a minor offense so we could **** with them and try to find a jail able offense or scare them out of the community for the night.
And crime dropped. I know liberals will protest that. **** em. It was for all those good citizens to live in peace....not to please a ******* liberal. I don't regret it for a second. And most people who lived there would say they are thankful for it.
But that was 20 years ago.
Today's cops can't clean a neighborhood like that. They must hug the thugs. Serve them hot tea. Tolerate their crimes or be put on trial themselves. We can thank liberals for it.
That's funny. Thirty years ago there weren't any East Indian call centers to do our reports for us.
Negro thugs know only one thing and care about one thing. That is power. Who has the most power wins.
but it includes black correct? So what did I post in error based on your comment?
The fact that you seem so accepting of being pulled over four times without having committed any specific offense suggests you are rather young. Because if you were older you would remember the time in America, not so long ago, when it would be an outrageous violation of your civil liberties for police to do that. Unless they had some specific reason (traffic or other offense) the police had no legal right to interfere with your freedom of movement within the public thoroughfare or to question where you had been or where you are going. This is something that commonly takes place in police states and it's become commonplace in the United States.
This was a good point of view, you should write about this scenario in general.
I can understand how a lit cigarette might be a burn hazard to a cop who is about to place a subject under arrest, which involves physical contact. But how does a cigarette being smoked by someone seated inside a car represent a hazard to a cop standing outside the car writing a summons? It doesn't. And if the cop simply doesn't like the smell of tobacco smoke he can take a step backward.
Even in an automobile, a cigarette could be used to burn a cop handing the driver a citation or warning. If an officer orders someone to put out their cigarette, they can be arrested (depending on the state) if they fail to comply.
How many times has that happened?
