Texas GOP officials agree: Legal same-sex marriage will cause incest and pedophilia

[PaintMyHouse]

The law should not accommodate same sex couples. Lets put this thread in the closet please.

A shame that most Americans now don't agree, for you that is...

 

[Dana7360]

Not cause it, because incest and pedophilia has existed for a long time, as have all other aberrations. What legalization of same sex marriage will do, is increase the acceptance of incest and pedophilia as just a incidence of aberration being socially acceptable and another form of normal.

Gay marriage has been legal in Massachusetts for around a decade.

I don't see anyone being more accepting to the crimes of incest and pedophilia.

Gay marriage has been legal for many years in Iowa.

I don't see anyone being more accepting to the crimes of incest and pedophilia.

Well I guess I'm not completely correct.

The republicans consider rape and incest just another form of conception. Many believe that women who are raped deserve what happened to them.

All we have to do is listen to republicans talk about "legitimate rape" and forcing women to give birth to a rapist's child to know that republicans are more accepting of incest and pedophilia.

Then there's that endless list of republicans who are guilty of incest and pedophilia.

Gay people getting married won't do anything to America except make it follow our constitution and laws instead of violate it by discriminating people.

 

[bodecea]

If you approach the issue from the premise of gay marriage, a perverted thought in and of itself, then why not expect more perversion after marriage ?

Because there's no such thing as 'gay marriage,' there is only marriage law capable of accommodating both opposite- and same-sex couples; the law remains the same, unchanged, unaltered, and not 'redefined.'

Because marriage law accommodates both opposite- and same-sex couples, there is no 'perversion,' nor is homosexuality 'perversion' (see: Lawrence v. Texas (2003)), and it's ridiculous to infer that allowing same-sex couples access to marriage law they're eligible to participate in will result in 'perversion.'

indeed, if any perversion exists, it exists in the desire to seek to deny gay Americans their comprehensive civil liberties.

The law should not accommodate same sex couples. Lets put this thread in the closet please.

Nope...not going back in the closet.

 

[Stephanie]

so, aren't there some studies out that say's that?

now according to you sensitive people, things need to be censored on how they speak on homosexuals now?

is all you do is whine?

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Because it will. Animal Sex Brothels are now legal in Denmark and the Germany, and the age of consent has been lowered in Eurotrash nations and even Argentina.

Here's a quandary for you:

What standard permits Homosexuality, but prohibits incest and polygamy?

 

[JakeStarkey]

I can see the social con is unhappy.

But none of the reasons they have given have in fact been fact before.

Let's move forward.

 

[Redfish]

Give us the name of one of these societies.

ancient Rome. just to name one.

Rome fell because of gay marriage? Wow. I must have missed that in the history books.

rome fell because it lost its moral compass. homosexuality was one of the perversions they allowed.

 

[bodecea]

ancient Rome. just to name one.

Rome fell because of gay marriage? Wow. I must have missed that in the history books.

rome fell because it lost its moral compass. homosexuality was one of the perversions they allowed.

Nope...Rome fell when the christians took over....the pagan tribes rolled over them like a bulldozer.

 

[PoliticalTorch]

If you approach the issue from the premise of gay marriage, a perverted thought in and of itself, then why not expect more perversion after marriage ?

Because there's no such thing as 'gay marriage,' there is only marriage law capable of accommodating both opposite- and same-sex couples; the law remains the same, unchanged, unaltered, and not 'redefined.'

Because marriage law accommodates both opposite- and same-sex couples, there is no 'perversion,' nor is homosexuality 'perversion' (see: Lawrence v. Texas (2003)), and it's ridiculous to infer that allowing same-sex couples access to marriage law they're eligible to participate in will result in 'perversion.'

indeed, if any perversion exists, it exists in the desire to seek to deny gay Americans their comprehensive civil liberties.

The law should not accommodate same sex couples. Lets put this thread in the closet please.

No wonder you mentioned the word "closet" because that's exactly where you're in.

 

[JakeStarkey]

ancient Rome. just to name one.

Rome fell because of gay marriage? Wow. I must have missed that in the history books.

rome fell because it lost its moral compass. homosexuality was one of the perversions they allowed.

So did Greece. Russia, Germany, Austro Hungary, Turkey, etc., all fail but weren't homosexual.

Do better, please.

 

[Inevitable]

No society has survived normalization of homosexuality. None. Those in Europe that have are already crumbling under the weight of Islam that hangs gays from lampposts. No culture that has normalized homosexuality has stopped there. They have all and always gone on the normalize every other form of perversion.

Give us the name of one of these societies.

ancient Rome. just to name one.

Ancient Rome fell only because of homosexuality? So the monetary problems, military problems, and imperial incompetence didn't have anything to do with it? They would have survived it had two dudes not gotten it on with one another?

 

[Inevitable]

If you approach the issue from the premise of gay marriage, a perverted thought in and of itself, then why not expect more perversion after marriage ?

Because there's no such thing as 'gay marriage,' there is only marriage law capable of accommodating both opposite- and same-sex couples; the law remains the same, unchanged, unaltered, and not 'redefined.'

Because marriage law accommodates both opposite- and same-sex couples, there is no 'perversion,' nor is homosexuality 'perversion' (see: Lawrence v. Texas (2003)), and it's ridiculous to infer that allowing same-sex couples access to marriage law they're eligible to participate in will result in 'perversion.'

indeed, if any perversion exists, it exists in the desire to seek to deny gay Americans their comprehensive civil liberties.

The law should not accommodate same sex couples. Lets put this thread in the closet please.

yes it should. If you want to put out away and nit talk about it than just getout if the way.

You complain a lot about gay themed threads. If they bother you so much then don't read them.

 

[WinterBorn]

Texas GOP officials agree: Legal same-sex marriage will cause incest and pedophilia

--------------------------------------
That's the mindset of the GOP that continues to marginalize otherwise great hard-working, tax-paying American citizens who happen to be GLBT. Never mind the real issues of the day facing the citizenry like jobs, education, cleaner water, etc. No. Let's just target Gays with these laughable, poorly thought out ideas that are very offensive and highly inaccurate, and gullible Texans will vote for their side! That's why Texas will never amount to any more than a second-rate state known for its bigotry and hate. And well, everybody is already seeing Red there aren't they, it's gotta be from all the hate. It's that penchant from the right to continue to throw these GLBT citizens under the bus and forget about them while trying to sell a rotten egg to their hungry followers who many times unknowingly go on to eat it voraciously.

Well, if anyone knows about pedophilia and incest, it would probably be the Texas GOP.