Texas bill would require warning label on some popular snack foods....Not Recommended for Human Consumption

1srelluc

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2021
Messages
60,135
Reaction score
89,141
Points
3,488
Location
Shenandoah Valley of Virginia

The bill targets 44 ingredients including food dyes, bleached flour, and certain oils and preservatives.

A Texas bill would require manufacturers to add warning labels to snack foods that include certain ingredients. It could affect popular candies, chips and drinks. (Scripps News)


The bill targets 44 ingredients including food dyes, bleached flour, and certain oils and preservatives.


If it's signed into law, it could impact the labeling on candies like Skittles and M&Ms, chips including Doritos and Ruffles, and drinks like Gatorade and Mountain Dew.


The bill is in line with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his "Make America Health Again" initiative, which is pushing for more transparency.

So, like CA's Prop 65 warning.....See what happens when half of CA moves to TX. ;)

Truth be told most of that stuff really isn't fit for human consumption.
 

The bill targets 44 ingredients including food dyes, bleached flour, and certain oils and preservatives.

A Texas bill would require manufacturers to add warning labels to snack foods that include certain ingredients. It could affect popular candies, chips and drinks. (Scripps News)


The bill targets 44 ingredients including food dyes, bleached flour, and certain oils and preservatives.


If it's signed into law, it could impact the labeling on candies like Skittles and M&Ms, chips including Doritos and Ruffles, and drinks like Gatorade and Mountain Dew.


The bill is in line with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his "Make America Health Again" initiative, which is pushing for more transparency.

So, like CA's Prop 65 warning.....See what happens when half of CA moves to TX. ;)

Truth be told most of that stuff really isn't fit for human consumption.

80% of manufactured foods in this country aren't safe for human consumption, and haven't been since the 60's.
 
it did nothing to add the labels to cigarettes.
if you have not figured out that tobacco is bad for you by now you are a total idiot
the government has had warning labels on it for ages
been under a rock? or are you just crying for no reason?
 
if you have not figured out that tobacco is bad for you by now you are a total idiot
the government has had warning labels on it for ages
been under a rock? or are you just crying for no reason?

when responding to me, please actually have something of relevance to say.
 
when responding to me, please actually have something of relevance to say.
I did, tobacco products have had warning labels on them for decades, what part of that don't you comprehend?
Texas does not need to add another label.........it's already there! open your eyes

what should they say? smoking is bad, it kills you........don't do it?
 
I did, tobacco products have had warning labels on them for decades, what part of that don't you comprehend?
Texas does not need to add another label.........it's already there! open your eyes

what should they say? smoking is bad, it kills you........don't do it?

wow, I think you 100 percent misread my post. I clearly said the labels would change nothing just like labels on cigarettes.
 
wow, I think you 100 percent misread my post. I clearly said the labels would change nothing just like labels on cigarettes.
that is not the drift I read but I will agree with you, if you want to munch of junk food most are not going to read any label at all, they open, eat and move on to their next junk snack food
Even if they can read fat chance they put it down and ponder their diet
 
Back
Top Bottom