Terrorist Murder In Jerusalem Synagogue

Why do you think your braying deserves an answer? you falsely accused Israel of attacking the Al Aqsa, and are trying to defend the indefensible. There is karma, you know.
I didn't falsely accuse.

I provided corroborative evidence to back up my claim.

All you do, is shoot your fuckin' mouth off!
 
Israel did not "attack" al-Aqsa mosque, it responded to violence. Muslims set fire to rugs in the mosque after throwing stones and molotov cocktails at tourists. When Israels respond, how is that an attack on the mosque? How is protecting and putting down rioters misbehaving an attack on the mosque? OMG! they did not take their shoes off to put out the fire burning the rugs set by the muslims rioters. Which is worse? trying to burn your own mosque or not taking off shoe to put out a fire? Who in their right mind takes their shoes off when rugs are burning on the floor?

I swear, I don't think people bother to think half the time before posting the garbage they spout.
Taking need action to threats on the mount is not the same as attacking the mosque. Put out fires and take custody of those who set them is not attacking the mosque. Should they are just stood by and watched the mosque burn? Should they have let the mischief makers kill someone first?

....................and how does any of this justify knifing and chopping at rabbis praying inside a synagogue? How is this cause to celebrate in the streets and had out candy or threaten to kill any politician in Israel? Where does it go from here?
You just keep talking and telling stories. I have no reason to believe you without any evidence to back up your claim. Pony up some proof, or shut the **** up!
 
Bill, I have looked for any evidence to prove or deny your 'globalresearch' article and there is none to be found. Usually, if something as significant as 30 incidents of Israeli forces attacking the al-Aqsa mosque you will find it on more than one web site. Therefore I call your article a lie.

As does Aris and most others here. As for the rest of my reply, perhaps you should just take a look at the map of the Temple Mount to see that there is a lot more there than just the one mosque.
 
Why do you think your braying deserves an answer? you falsely accused Israel of attacking the Al Aqsa, and are trying to defend the indefensible. There is karma, you know.
I didn't falsely accuse.

I provided corroborative evidence to back up my claim.

All you do, is shoot your fuckin' mouth off!

All you have is bullshit from anti American, anti Semitic sites. You haven't proven jackshit.

It is exactly these lies and incitements that lead to massacres such as the one in the synagogue.
 
Bill, I have looked for any evidence to prove or deny your 'globalresearch' article and there is none to be found. Usually, if something as significant as 30 incidents of Israeli forces attacking the al-Aqsa mosque you will find it on more than one web site. Therefore I call your article a lie.

As does Aris and most others here. As for the rest of my reply, perhaps you should just take a look at the map of the Temple Mount to see that there is a lot more there than just the one mosque.

Global research is like the National Enquirer magazine of the Internet. Perfect for small brained, ignorant morons like Billy The Bully. Here are some of the other "interesting" articles this site carries. You gotta laugh:

Hillary Inc. The Military-Industrial Candidate Global Research

Ukraine Secretive Neo-Nazi Military Organization Involved in Euromaidan Sniper Shootings Global Research

Obama Announces Right-wing Immigration Reform in National Address Global Research

CIA Behind Hip-Hop s Drug Fetish Says Former Cocaine Kingpin Rick Ross Global Research

The Pentagon 8217 s 8220 Non-Lethal Military Aid 8221 Will be Used to Kill Civilians in East Ukraine Nazemroaya Chossudovsky Global Research

Towards a New Joint Global Currency Putin Calls Upon Washington 8220 Not to Meddle in Russian Affairs 8221 Global Research
 
Last edited:
That is the point, the "article" is not factual.
You say that, but you haven't proven that.

Sharon was being filmed and never entered the mosque or dome, nor did he pray while on the mount during that visit. Sharon had visited the mount compound on a number of other occasion over the years. The visit requested was planned to be, and permitted by Arafat, as a meeting place between Sharon and Arafat to finally shake hands. Arafat had other ideas and rejected the peace offering by Sharon and the peace deal that would have given up half of jerusalem to the palestinian state. He even had bus loads of palestinians brought in to ensure a situation that would trigger the intafada. Rocks also were brought and placed around the mount area. It was not a spontaneous response but an orchestrated one, and witnessed by the world.
Israeli forces do more to keep jews from the mount that permit them. Rabble muslims that cause trouble are often limited as a means to prevent rock or fire attacks on the mount or down below at the Kotel. They were allowed to return for friday prayers. More often than not Israeli police do not permit tourism by jews on the mount, especially when emotions are hightened so as not to incite a confrontation.
>>Sharon was only permitted to enter the compound after the Israeli Interior Minister had received assurances from the Palestinian Authority's security chief that no problems would arise if he made the visit.[21] Sharon did not actually go into the Al-Aqsa Mosque, and went during normal tourist hours. Colin Shindler writes "Shlomo Ben-Ami, the Minister of Internal security, was told by Israeli intelligence that there was no concerted risk of violence. This was implicitly confirmed by Jibril Rajoub, the Palestinian head of Preventive Security on the West Bank, who told Ben-Shlomo that Sharon could visit the Haram, but not enter a mosque on security grounds."[22]<<
**** Sharon! His visit was not the point of the article.

The point of the article was the difference the media reports violence by Palestinian's and Israeli's. It makes a big deal about one Palestinian attack and basically ignores over 30 Israeli attacks on Palestinian's.

Omar....Caliph Omar ibn al Khattab

Amazing you know neither recent event or history about the mount. You would actually believe Sharon just walked into the al-Aqsa mosque with so many people in attendance?
Why should I believe you?

Well golly gee Billy , will ya be so kind as to tell us what caused these Israeli attacks on Palestinians? 'Atta boy!
 
That is the point, the "article" is not factual.
You say that, but you haven't proven that.

Sharon was being filmed and never entered the mosque or dome, nor did he pray while on the mount during that visit. Sharon had visited the mount compound on a number of other occasion over the years. The visit requested was planned to be, and permitted by Arafat, as a meeting place between Sharon and Arafat to finally shake hands. Arafat had other ideas and rejected the peace offering by Sharon and the peace deal that would have given up half of jerusalem to the palestinian state. He even had bus loads of palestinians brought in to ensure a situation that would trigger the intafada. Rocks also were brought and placed around the mount area. It was not a spontaneous response but an orchestrated one, and witnessed by the world.
Israeli forces do more to keep jews from the mount that permit them. Rabble muslims that cause trouble are often limited as a means to prevent rock or fire attacks on the mount or down below at the Kotel. They were allowed to return for friday prayers. More often than not Israeli police do not permit tourism by jews on the mount, especially when emotions are hightened so as not to incite a confrontation.
>>Sharon was only permitted to enter the compound after the Israeli Interior Minister had received assurances from the Palestinian Authority's security chief that no problems would arise if he made the visit.[21] Sharon did not actually go into the Al-Aqsa Mosque, and went during normal tourist hours. Colin Shindler writes "Shlomo Ben-Ami, the Minister of Internal security, was told by Israeli intelligence that there was no concerted risk of violence. This was implicitly confirmed by Jibril Rajoub, the Palestinian head of Preventive Security on the West Bank, who told Ben-Shlomo that Sharon could visit the Haram, but not enter a mosque on security grounds."[22]<<
**** Sharon! His visit was not the point of the article.

The point of the article was the difference the media reports violence by Palestinian's and Israeli's. It makes a big deal about one Palestinian attack and basically ignores over 30 Israeli attacks on Palestinian's.

Omar....Caliph Omar ibn al Khattab

Amazing you know neither recent event or history about the mount. You would actually believe Sharon just walked into the al-Aqsa mosque with so many people in attendance?
Why should I believe you?
Aris doesn't lie, heathen.
Heathen is uncalled for Hoss.................steve
Why not? He'll admit it himself.
 
...The only thing I care about is the truth and you haven't proven I am "propagandizing lies". But if you do prove it, I will acknowledge it and change my position.
The Accused is not allowed to serve as the Judge or Jury.
 
That is the point, the "article" is not factual.
You say that, but you haven't proven that.

Sharon was being filmed and never entered the mosque or dome, nor did he pray while on the mount during that visit. Sharon had visited the mount compound on a number of other occasion over the years. The visit requested was planned to be, and permitted by Arafat, as a meeting place between Sharon and Arafat to finally shake hands. Arafat had other ideas and rejected the peace offering by Sharon and the peace deal that would have given up half of jerusalem to the palestinian state. He even had bus loads of palestinians brought in to ensure a situation that would trigger the intafada. Rocks also were brought and placed around the mount area. It was not a spontaneous response but an orchestrated one, and witnessed by the world.
Israeli forces do more to keep jews from the mount that permit them. Rabble muslims that cause trouble are often limited as a means to prevent rock or fire attacks on the mount or down below at the Kotel. They were allowed to return for friday prayers. More often than not Israeli police do not permit tourism by jews on the mount, especially when emotions are hightened so as not to incite a confrontation.
>>Sharon was only permitted to enter the compound after the Israeli Interior Minister had received assurances from the Palestinian Authority's security chief that no problems would arise if he made the visit.[21] Sharon did not actually go into the Al-Aqsa Mosque, and went during normal tourist hours. Colin Shindler writes "Shlomo Ben-Ami, the Minister of Internal security, was told by Israeli intelligence that there was no concerted risk of violence. This was implicitly confirmed by Jibril Rajoub, the Palestinian head of Preventive Security on the West Bank, who told Ben-Shlomo that Sharon could visit the Haram, but not enter a mosque on security grounds."[22]<<
**** Sharon! His visit was not the point of the article.

The point of the article was the difference the media reports violence by Palestinian's and Israeli's. It makes a big deal about one Palestinian attack and basically ignores over 30 Israeli attacks on Palestinian's.

Omar....Caliph Omar ibn al Khattab

Amazing you know neither recent event or history about the mount. You would actually believe Sharon just walked into the al-Aqsa mosque with so many people in attendance?
Why should I believe you?

Well golly gee Billy , will ya be so kind as to tell us what caused these Israeli attacks on Palestinians? 'Atta boy!

Hello! Is Billy home?
 
Bill, I have looked for any evidence to prove or deny your 'globalresearch' article and there is none to be found. Usually, if something as significant as 30 incidents of Israeli forces attacking the al-Aqsa mosque you will find it on more than one web site. Therefore I call your article a lie.
Tell that to the 181 Palestinian's that were injured in February from violent attacks by Israeli's

February 2014
Three Palestinian civilians (2 in Gaza; 1 in the West Bank) were shot dead by Israeli forces, while 221, of whom 219 were civilians and 53 children, were injured (40 in Gaza and 181 in the West Bank). In the same period, no Israelis were killed, and 6 were injured, of whom 5 were civilians. 23 incidents settler-related incidents, 6 involving injuries to a person, and 17 resulting in damage to Palestinian properties were registered.

Another 10 were hurt in August.

Israeli Police Attacks Worshipers In Al-Aqsa Mosque, Ten Injured
Palestinian medical sources in occupied Jerusalem have reported that at least ten Palestinian worshippers were injured, Monday, during clashes that took place after Israeli police officers stormed the yards of the al-Aqsa mosque.

Israeli fanatics frequently attempt to invade the mosque, and have frequently assaulted and beat local worshipers
.

This happens frequently? Here's a short list of attacks since 2009.

It should also be remembered that assaults on Masaajid and non-Jewish Places of Worship in ‘Israel’ by Zionists are a very common occurence.

2009
9 December 2009 – The Hasan Khadr Mosque at the village of Yasuf near Salfit was burnt, with ‘price tag’ slogan written on the wall.
2010
4 May 2010 – Settlers torched the main mosque of the al-Lubban al-Sharqiyya village, its extensive carpets and Korans, south of Nablus
3 October 2010 – Arsonists, suspected of coming from Gush Etzion, set fire to rugs, defaced a Koran, and scrawled ‘revenge’ on the walls of the mosque of Al Fajjar/Beit Fajar, near Bethlehem.

2011
6 June 2011 – A mosque was defaced and damaged in Al Mughayyir, near Ramallah
5 September 2011 – Settlers torched the mosque of Qusra, south of Nablus
8 September 2011 – Settler youths made an attempt to deface the mosque of the village of Yatma, near Rechelim and Kfar Tapuach, in the Nablus Governorate in a price tag assault
9 September 2011 – Graffiti slogans in Hebrew were sprayed on the Amir Hassan mosque in Birzeit and over a wall of the Birzeit University near Ramallah. The graffiti said:”Mohammad is a pig”(Naúthu Billah) and “death to Arabs.”
3 October 2011 – Burning of a mosque at the Bedouin town Tuba-Zangariyye in the North District of Israel.
7 December 2011 – Arsonists tried to set fire to the mosque of the Palestinian village of Burkina, near the settlement of Ariel, and also torched two Palestinian vehicles, in a suspected ‘price tag’ assault.
13–14 Dec 2011 – Arsonists torched the Nebi Ukasha Mosque in Jerusalem marking the burial site of Nabi Ukasha, in a suspected price tag action
14–15 Dec 2011 – Arsonists defaced and torched the mosque at the Palestinian village of Burqa near Nablus, The slogans “Mitzpe Yitzhar” and “War,” were scrawled on the mosque
18 December 2011 – Hate slogans and the signature ‘price tag’ defaced the walls of the mosque of Bnei Naim, east of Hebron

2012
11 January 2012 – A mosque at the West Bank Palestinian village of Dir Istiyya was defaced with graffiti, and three cars nearby were torched
19 June 2012 – The Jamiah Masjid in the West Bank village of Jab’a was set alight and sprayed with the graffiti, ‘The war has begun’

2013
7 April 2013. Vandals defaced two mosques, and slashed the tires of several cars in the Palestinian village of Tekoa,
13 May 2013. Three cars were torched near a mosque at the village of Umm al-Qutuf in Wadi Ara. The mosque wall was defaced with graffiti reading “price-tag” together with a Star of David and “Eviatar,”
10 October 2013. A mosque in the West Bank Palestinian village of Burqa was defaced with a slogan reading “Redemption of Zion loves Tomer Hazan,” and three cars were set on fire in what is suspected to be a “price tag” attack. Tomer Hazan referring an IDF soldier murdered in Qalqilyah in September.
8 December 2013. The mosque of Baqa al-Gharbiyye in Israel was defaced by graffiti reading “Mohammed is a pig,”(Nauthu Billah) “mutual responsibility,” “Terror stones”, and “regards from Boaz and David Chai”, while the windshields of 5 nearby cars were shattered.

2014
15 January 2014. A mosque in the village of Deir Istiya near Ariel was set fire to, and the slogans “Arabs Out”,”Hi from Qusra’ and “Revenge for spilled blood in Qusra” sprayed on its walls.[
18 April 2014. The door of the Abu-Bakr Al-Siddiq mosque at Umm al-Fahm was set alight and a slogan reading ‘Arabs out’ scrawled on its wall.
28 April 2014. The tires of several local cars were slashed, and the Star of David, and an exhortation to ‘Close mosques, not yeshivas’ were sprayed on a mosque in the Israeli Arab town of Fureidis. It was, according to the head of Tag Meir (Spreading the Light) Gadi Gvaryahu, the 31st case of a house of worship in either Israel or the West Bank being subject to desecration since 2009.
14 October 2014.The mosque of Aqraba, near the settlement of Itamar was torched by a firebomb and the graffiti “price tag Tapuach” was sprayed on a wall nearby.
12 November 2014. Settlers reportedly torched the mosque at al-Mughayyir and spraypainted racist slogans at the site
Over 6000 Israeli's stormed the mosque in this year alone.

In recent months, groups of extremist Jewish settlers, often accompanied by Israeli security forces, have repeatedly forced their way into the Al-Aqsa complex. The frequent violations anger Palestinian Muslims and occasionally lead to violent confrontations.

A total of 6311 Israelis stormed the Al-Aqsa compound from the beginning of 2014 until June 2, the Al-Aqsa Foundation for Endowment and Heritage, a Palestinian NGO, said
.

BTW, the point of the GR article was that these attacks always go un-reported or under-reported. Maybe that's why you weren't finding anything.

As does Aris and most others here. As for the rest of my reply, perhaps you should just take a look at the map of the Temple Mount to see that there is a lot more there than just the one mosque.
What does the layout of the buildings on the site have to do with the number of attacks?
 
All you have is bullshit from anti American, anti Semitic sites. You haven't proven jackshit.

It is exactly these lies and incitements that lead to massacres such as the one in the synagogue.
You ain't no Mother Theresa yourself.
 
All you have is bullshit from anti American, anti Semitic sites. You haven't proven jackshit.

It is exactly these lies and incitements that lead to massacres such as the one in the synagogue.
You ain't no Mother Theresa yourself.

Your source, the equivalent of an Internet National Enquirer, made claims of "attacks" on the Al Aqsa mosque, where there was absolutely no evidence for it, not even enough to call it a speculation. And the rest of it is your braying.
 
15th post
All you have is bullshit from anti American, anti Semitic sites. You haven't proven jackshit.

It is exactly these lies and incitements that lead to massacres such as the one in the synagogue.
You ain't no Mother Theresa yourself.
Awwww did we hurt your feelings by questioning your stupid accusations? Ha ha ha.
 
Your source, the equivalent of an Internet National Enquirer, made claims of "attacks" on the Al Aqsa mosque, where there was absolutely no evidence for it, not even enough to call it a speculation. And the rest of it is your braying.
If there was no evidence, why did Jordan recall its Ambassador?

Jordan Accuses Israel of Attacking, Desecrating Al Aqsa Mosque



Jordan accused Israel of attacking and desecrating a revered mosque and withdrew its ambassador, stoking the growing tensions surrounding the city’s most sensitive holy site
.

The only "no evidence" around here, is coming from you. You've shown absolutely no evidence showing these attacks didn't occur. The only evidence you've provided, is your big, dumbass, racist, hate-mongering mouth.
 
Your source, the equivalent of an Internet National Enquirer, made claims of "attacks" on the Al Aqsa mosque, where there was absolutely no evidence for it, not even enough to call it a speculation. And the rest of it is your braying.
If there was no evidence, why did Jordan recall its Ambassador?

Jordan Accuses Israel of Attacking, Desecrating Al Aqsa Mosque



Jordan accused Israel of attacking and desecrating a revered mosque and withdrew its ambassador, stoking the growing tensions surrounding the city’s most sensitive holy site
.

The only "no evidence" around here, is coming from you. You've shown absolutely no evidence showing these attacks didn't occur. The only evidence you've provided, is your big, dumbass, racist, hate-mongering mouth.

What's the evidence of the attack, you fuckwad? What attack took place? False accusations by Arabs are a dime a dozen.
 
Back
Top Bottom